Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Basic e*f*u* (IcRcAc)

This is the most tension-producing adjustment of the primitive IRA orientation since it is, in effect, a reaction formation. In spite of this, it is the most common adjustment of the primitive cluster and an is a generally satisfactory and an efficient solution.

Among those with high intelligence, this is the pattern of the true intellectual. At average and and lower levels, the e*f*u* tends to be a cautious sensitive person who places great importance on his ability to be feeling and relating. To a large extent, the e*f*u* tries to be a selfless person who dedicates his life to learning how to understand and help others. He feels very guilty and disturbed by any tendency on his part to be self-centered, selfish, and self-seeking. He avidly learns techniques for observing and remembering the things that go on around him; he learns and tries to apply all possible methods of developing insight and understanding. He is particularly interested in the improvement of mankind, in general. The e*f*u*, obviously, is an idealist, but his effectiveness ranges all the way from total unrealism to highly complex theoretical productivity. The philosophical idealist usually comes from this cluster and, as such, he is very wary of the empiricist and the naturalist and is very careful not to be inductive in his reasoning.

While the i*f*u* [EcRcAc] is often similar, he is much more intensely intellectualized. He, too, is threatened by his tendency to be tempted by empirical-naturalistic data and becomes negativistic to this sort of stimuli. The e*f*u*, in contrast, is much less negativistic because denial is not necessary for him. Empirical-naturalistic stimuli simply do not exist for him; therefore, anyone who claims that it does exist is either a charlatan, or a hypocrite. Self-weakness, the tendency toward idle thoughts, mind wandering, and purposeless existence is much more threatening for the e*f*u*. He tries to be an active, independent person who disciplines his body and his mind in order to be socially productive. Learning, study, planned experience, and theoretical evaluation are, for him, the means to creative living. Life is the search for truth, and truth can be obtained only by rational, objective, and scientific study. The pragmatist is likely to be influenced by his own needs; his ideas and beliefs distorted by his own objectivity. Essentially, this is also true for the e*ra, [IcRuAu] a response pattern the e*f*u* actively avoids. It is less true for the i*fu [EcFuUu] or i*f*u* [EcRcAc] who, we believe, have a sensitivity and an perceptivity to external events that is lacking in the e*f*u* and the i*fu. [EcFuUu] However, the e*f*u* is indifferent to the i*fu [EcFuUu] - because he "knows" that the latter is wrong. The i*f*u*, [EcRcAc] on the other hand, is extremely hostile toward the i*fu, [EcFuUu] because he threatens to subvert the i*f*u* [EcRcAc] adjustment.

The e*f*u* does not take the active social role of the e*f*a. [IcRcAu] Indeed, he is opposed to the social effectiveness of the e*f*a [IcRcAu] because he believes him to be too much influenced by the needs and desires of the group. The e*f*u* has much more need to change society than to conform to it. As a result, he is much concerned with how things should be, and less concerned with learning how to adjust to life as it is. Missionaries, political scientists, organization and management specialists, economists, jurists, and psychotherapists are fairly common in this cluster. Conventionality, in the sense that they learn and apply the traditional, the tried, and the authority-based solutions, is characteristic of the e*f*u*, but this does not include conformity. The e*f*u* is usually an active reformer who wants to do what is right, proper, and just.

The e*f*u* is considerably more intense than the e*f*a*, [IcRcUc] although both tend to drive themselves in order to avoid lassitude and passivity. The e*f*a [IcRcAu] can get considerable satisfaction from his social activity and becomes fatigued and discouraged when he fails to live up to his responsibilities on the job or to his family. The e*f*u* is much more prone to disillusionment, discouragement, and an depression. His sense of responsibility is much wider for it includes all mankind. His failure to have the influence he feels he should have, the failure of people to live up to his expectations, or his own loss of energy and drive tend to disturb and, often, disable him. Fatigue states and tension disorders of all kinds are common in this pattern. Because of his reliance on ideas, concepts, and abstractions as a means of explaining life, paranoid delusions of a megalomaniacal nature may occur in some e*f*u* individuals. Since, at best, he is an intense, dedicated person who feels the need for change or correction, it is not unusual for the e*f*u* to be forthright and even combative in expressing his feelings and attitudes.

Most of the discussion above applies to e*f*u* in the upper ranges of intellectual capacity. In the middle and an below average ranges, there is a tendency for the e*f*u* to become very involved with movements for social change and social benefit. Many e*f*u* will be very active in religious and an fraternal organizations that have social welfare and humanitarian aims. These people are also very active in taking courses that provide training in leadership, supervision, personality development, public speaking, and other forms of intellectual discipline. Mystical and philosophical groups also attract many from this cluster, although they do not have the same fascination for this group as for the i*f*a*. [EcRcUc] Generally speaking, the middle level e*f*u* is humanitarian, sentimental, and conventional. He takes his religion, patriotism, and family responsibilities very seriously.
 
the description says its one of the rarest types and near impossible to test, but its clearly the most common type for this thread.

its because they were so rare, this personality was a glitch in the system, the bug they never bothered fixing. The results so rarely happened that they don't bother elaborating.

thats actually very weird, normies need validation. they go on gameshows and win because they love money, you play games because you want to win.

if you won the lottery it wouldn't feel exciting the way it does to normies because you didn't do anything. but if you did some dumb task like throw a shoe into a garbage can, you'd love it more because you accomplished a goal you yourself set. Normies aren't like that
Well..I guess I'm really not a normie. Never felt like one. You are quite accurate on the goal thing, but I would be very happy if I won the lottery because I could retire now.:lol:
At least I didn't get instructions on murder or disposal of a body, haha.
I wanted to mention that the test questions don't really fit my experience, when I was younger I had very balanced grades where I usually have something like 2 As, 2Bs, and 3-4 C and Ds, where the subjects that I got As in are subjects that I was interested in, so my grades are on this weird scale where the grades are inversely correlated with the amount of effort I spent studying. The questions instead mention something like all As or poor grades, which is a rather strange qualifier, to me at least.

When I first saw this quiz on /x/ everyone was getting IuFcUu, myself included. I'm not surprised a board where everyone's favorite pastime is trying to have sex with Japanese fox spirits would get that kind of result but it being this prevalent on here too makes me think that despite what the notes say it's actually pretty common in today's world outside of normie concentration camps like YouTube and Facebook.
I think if someone is on kiwifarms or 4chan, they are probably already, for a lack of a better word, neurodivergent(?), as they say, so we are going to get more people from the ends of the scale, so more crazies,more stranger/rarer personalities and more fiercely intelligent people(not me though, I'm painfully average), while you'll see the more basic, standard personalities in the normie concentration camps. This test seems to roast every single personality type it has stated though, so I guess we are all dysfunctional in some way.
 
I know it's kind of gauche to retake these sorts of tests, but when I took it yesterday I had been up for like 18 hours and was tired as shit. The last post I wrote in this thread had so many typos it was barely understandable until I fixed it after waking up, so please forgive me. I'm kind of unsatisfied with my last result because not only is it short, but it spends a lot of words on having temper tantrums and being overtly aggressive, which doesn't describe me at all.

I was curious why the Fc personality trait seemed to be such a negative (seems like it's because F is associated with being emotional, and so trying to act more R suggests a harsh repression of one's own emotions to get control over one's situation, which can lead to aggression when the control breaks or they're feeling defensive - which doesn't sound particularly like me) and I've been trying to read into more how this assessment specifically defines things.

I decided to retake the test in a more alert state of mind and see if I'd answer some of the questions differently (I think I actually did misread one the first time). Obviously there's lots of questions where you can feel trapped between two bad choices ("in what context?" "why isn't there a sometimes options!?" etc.), but the biggest change in how I looked at things were the questions in the Primitive test (which is mainly about how you acted in childhood, from what I gather) related to social interactions. They're pretty much all giving you two extreme choices between "I was a social butterfly" and "I was an anxious social outcast". I mostly chose the latter answers the first time because I never attempted to make friends much as a kid, but I never really was that anxious about socializing if I needed to or ever had much friction or social rejection if I did interact with other kids, and I do understand the concept, even younger, of acting slightly different between different social groups, so I decided to mostly pick the former answers when appropriate.

Overall profile:IFA

Intellectual Dimension: Internalizer (I) with relative strength (1-20) of 14
Procedural Dimension: Flexible (F) with relative strength (1-20) of 4
Social Dimension: Role Adaptive (A) with relative strength (1-20) of 2
High Activity Level
I got IFA this time instead of IFU, with a much weaker strength on both the R/F and A/U scales. From what I'm reading, a weak A sounds more appropriate for my childhood experience than a U. So this gave me a different input to the start the Basic test with. I found out that this test actually gives you a lot of different questions based on which Primitive personality you entered to start with. So this time I got IuFuAc.

Overall profile: Iu Fu Ac

Intellectual Dimension: Introduction to E/I basic level Details of Iu The basic level has relative strength (1-20) of 8
Procedural Dimension: Introduction to R/F basic level Details of Fu The basic level has relative strength (1-20) of 2
Social Dimension: Introduction to A/U basic level Details of Ac The basic level has relative strength (1-20) of 6
Basic ifu* (IuFuAc)

The ifu* is very similar to the if*u, [IuRcUu] whom we will discuss below, except that he is potentially more capable of genuine creativity and imagination. A primary problem of the primitive IFA is that he is an object of considerable interest to others and, unlike the IRA, very sensitive to these involving attempts. If he desires his intimacy and auto-sensuality, he must defend strongly against social-interpersonal distraction. Thus, the negativism and social defensiveness of the ifu* is consistently greater than that of the if*u*. [IuRcAc] This insulation against social distraction is the primary characteristic of the ifu* adjustment. The ifa [IuFuAu] is aware of his vulnerability to distraction or, at least, to his suggestibility and tendency to follow social stimulation. When he desires to isolate himself, he must ensure against the possibility of distraction by becoming seclusive and withdrawn. The ifu*, however, manages to develop built-in defenses and, in effect, can exist as a contemplative, thought-involved person even in an environment that is rich in social distraction. It is this ability that causes this adjustment to be insulated.

The schizoid character of the adjustment is obvious. The ifu* tends to be a preoccupied person who finds psychological satisfaction in his own mental activity. He lacks the precision and discipline of the e*fu, [IcFuUu] for he is mentally spontaneous and imaginative; he has considerable range and versatility in his mental activity. Religious and philosophical attitudes, often with a mystical or abstract quality, and artistic creativity of all sorts are common in individuals from this cluster. Visions, intuitive judgments of an abstract nature, and psychic phenomena of all kinds are possible and occur frequently. This cluster may include people who range from being highly abstract religious and moral philosophers to self-involved and insulated schizophrenics.

The primary difference between the ifu* and ir*u* [IuFcAc] adjustments lies in the conscience, or emotional control, of the ifu*. The ir*u* [IuFcAc] is primitive and individualized, while the ifu* will sublimate or displace his primitive autistic tendencies into socially appropriate channels. The symbolism of the ifu* is usually interpretable because it has social meaning, although this meaning may be extremely devious and highly esoteric. Phobias, compulsions, and fetishes are more likely in the ifu* than in the ir*u*. [IuFcAc] Incantations, rituals, and superstitions are not only of great interest to the ifu*, but the originators of most of these are also ifu*. The soothsayers, oracles, and prophets of the past, and the primitive witch doctors of the present, probably come from this cluster.

The ifu* and ifu [IuFuUu] patterns are also very similar; the primary difference is the extreme social negativism of the ifu*. The ifu [IuFuUu] has little need to defend against social involvement and interaction for, in most cases, he is left alone to develop as he pleases. The ifu*, in contrast, must deny interaction, often by becoming deliberately unconventional and even uninviting. The need to wear sackcloth and ashes, to affect strange ways, to flout convention, is more likely to occur in the ifu* than in the ifu. [IuFuUu] Some religious orders that prescribe vows of silence and a truly cloistered existence has been developed by ifu* individuals as a means of maintaining their intimacy and mental freedom. The average successful member of such groups is likely to be an ifu, [IuFuUu] while the leaders are more apt to be ifu*.

Material and worldly things have little value or attraction for the ifu*. Spiritual values, for them, have real meaning and substance. Obviously, this is not necessarily a psychotic, or even abnormal adjustment. There are those who are attracted to a cloistered life for abnormal or psychotic reasons, but they can rarely adapt in a satisfactory way. The interest of the ifu*, in Zen, existentialism, transcendentalism, or transmigration of souls is real and mature. Intellectual level, life experience, and opportunity for training are all important in determining the effectiveness of this adjustment; the ifu*, with average or below average intelligence, tends to become confused, frustrated, and tense. Drug addiction is not uncommon among spiritual satisfaction in drug effects. Tile Confessions of an Opium Eater and, to some extent, Tile Doors of Perception are products of the ifu* adjustment. Many religious rites involving the use of mescaline or mushrooms find their origin in the need of the ifu* for mental activity. The Ic finds this very threatening; the Ec may find it intellectually interesting, but experientially unpleasant.
tl;dr I have the potential to be a genius artist, religious schizo, cult leader, esoteric hermit, or psychedelic drug addict. Yeah, this one sounds more like me.

For extra funzies, since my F score was pretty weak, so I decided to see what result I got doing the IRA test, using the same answers to any questions shared with the IFA test. I got IuRuAc, which so far from what I've seen is the personality with the shortest and most bare-bones description. They pretty much just shrug and say "you're an asshole and your shits all retarded idk"
Basic iru* (IuRuAc)

This is a relatively uncommon pattern because so many people with this adjustment are untestable. In the extreme, it is a classic, catatonic schizophrenic adjustment. The iru* is an immature primitive IRA who has reacted against his surface social adjustment. He is negativistic, resistant to, and an defiant of; attempts to relate to him. This negativism usually takes the form of personal isolation and autistic withdrawal. In most cases, the iru* will have shown signs of childhood schizophrenia, and will have been considered abnormal for some time. Severe temper tantrums, followed by withdrawal, are characteristics of extreme forms of this adjustment. Hallucinations rarely occur in this pattern, but frustration and thwarting often lead to combative and assaultive reactions.
 
To explain a little. The descriptions for the types are for people on the deep end. When you get 1, 2, 6 out of 20 you're not gonna fit those descriptions fully because they are meant to match the extremes and just show you tendencies.
 
It was developed by a CIA psychologist who was directly involved with MKULTRA.
It does not pretend every personality type is heckin' wholesome and valid. If you're a piece of shit, it will say so.
OP you missed the point. The insults arent some redpill truth. Its frustration. It is a handler mad he cant find a leash to put on you. Think about who wrote it. They wanted assets. It finds who bends and gives them "good" scores.
If you get a good score, good for you. You are a sheep. The agency loves you. You can be shamed and bribed. You will march when told. If you get a bad score, it means you are useless to them.

Look at mine. IuFcUu. The profile says primitive. It says schizoid.

He is completely succor dependent and needs constant care and attention
But what it really means is they cant use me. I live in my head. I dont play the social games. They have no lever to pull. So they call me helpless. It's not calling you shit because you are bad. It's calling you shit because you are aren't a tool they can use efficiently. It is a script for finding pawns. Its fed trash OP. dont glamorize it. Fuck you for wasting everyones time.
 
e*f*u / IcRcUu, low score.

Since no one linked the primitive types' descriptions, here.

This is interesting.

pasc3-01-3
Continuation of Primitive full profiles

EFU (continued)
do a lot of different things in the way of achievement
highly creative in sense of finding novel ways of dealing with the world
emotionally labile - explore the world differently than any other child

---------------------------------------------------
I series

I series internal landscape is preferred to external. We don't have
access to that so we make inferences.

IRA
Like ERA, imitative learners, social, learn social skills from modeling,
lack insight into what social skills mean. When environment shifts
can have a hard time (R)
Interior landscape is place I series prefers to be.
IA is not as happy as EA - I's want to be left alone except to be taken
care of. EU learns to achieve.
IA may: do what they want and hope they go away. Conform to get them
to pay less attention. Chameleons without emotional investment.
"Makes up better friends than find in real world"
People important not for emotional needs, but need people to tell
be about world I don't understand and take care of me.
IR fits into school well - learns/remembers, memorizes, rote learner
Unlike E, don't have intellectual inferiority issues.
IRA does well in school and socially - problem is keeping people at
distance. Develop compartmentalized world - my internal one and
the one everyone else is in.
Can look like ERA, but "drifty" learn the "moves" but do with "eyes closed"
Program themselves to do appropriate things but you don't get inside
my head.
for first 10 years or so IRA "good child" - conforming, learn in school,
socially attractive. A kind of self-sufficiently cause don't over-relate.
Can be perceived as leaders.
Then adolescents - tough on IRA. R is not emotionally sensitive and then get
emotional upheaval. (True of all R's to an extent).
Up to now, "Tell me what you want and I'll do it intellectually (I) or
socially (A)". In adolescence can't keep the distance.
New needs, IA conflict want to be involved but have learned to be
uninvolved. So lots of experimental learning.
Everything has been compartmentalized and figured out so this is
difficult.
e.g. I individual who compensates learns E and "shows it off" because he
he wants you to know. Most obvious extroverts are Ic.
(basic level adds, does not replace primitive).
IRA does not show through well at the basic level.
IRA child lives up to everyone's expectation but is not involved in
doing it. (14 yr old Eagle scout who kills his parents - no one knew the
internal). Everyone perceives the RA and the I world is hidden. e.g.
can't tell them how angry I am. R not insightful don't know how
to tell them.

I individuals are not "lonely" like E. Need a few friends and are loyal
which people like because you can count on them.
John speculates many prostitutes are uncompensated IRA - body is professional
tool - while it goes on, they are somewhere else. Push button and tape
runs.
(Me same concept for pastors)
IRA not negative.
IRA very unusual to not have a lot of pressure to adjust.
IA compensates by compensates I or A.

(stopped at 19:16)

IRU
Lacks the social imitativeness of the IRA
The IRA may have academic achievement in IRA because it is easy, not
because it is needed to get attention - IRA does what everyone expects.
Intellectual and social imitation.
With IRU - focus on IR and IU
Often allowed to just sit in the internal landscape up to a point
Few needs as long as taken care of.
But when move around, "U" children asked sooner to "earn their keep"
than A.
So use the IR to become student because that will get me noticed.
Learns by imitation - school, in family (take care of siblings) - not
motivated by wanting to help (e.g. EFU) but because can reproduce what
is around me.
Achievement of the IR is to absorb and transmit it - IRUs are
transmitters of culture.
ERU use physical skills, IRU may also perseverate but not by hitting a
ball, but thinking, computer, chess.
IR has computer linear process to achieving in the world.
e.g. Many doctors an IRU - needed to get through medical school.
Concert pianists (more intellectual than physical skill) - memorize
pieces, dependent on coach. Reproduce where they come from.
Easy for IRU to be scholar - don't want a LOT of attention.
Needs taken care of.
IRA interacts in emotional unattached way.
IRU tough adolescence due to U
"Intellectual exploiter"
IRA good student in elementary but may fall off in middle school
IRU better in high school
Vulnerability of IRU: IU can be ignored - does not make waves

Learns by imitation - school, in family (take care of siblings) - not
motivated by wanting to help (e.g. EFU) but because can reproduce what
is around me.
Achievement of the IR is to absorb and transmit it - IRUs are
transmitters of culture.

IRUs are useful assets for retard war? Seems like it.

Link to the seminars.
 
They wanted assets. It finds who bends and gives them "good" scores.
That doesn't seem to be entirely true. Look at e*f*a, it is a generally positive description that also explicitly says the guy has few to no levers and and is basically entirely set in his ways. They are obviously trying to see who they can brain blast the easiest but I don't think the level of salt is there. Old school psychological talk just sounds super harsh because the euphemism treadmill has been brutal.
 
Last edited:
The e*f*a has learned to manage his autistic susceptibilities
German.
The e*f*a cluster produces individuals who are conventional and well-behaved, who are, to a large extent, the backbone of an efficient society. Such persons study, and understand, the religious and moral ethics of their milieu. They then conscientiously attempt to live up to the expectations of their credo. They do not question the rituals and catechisms of their society, for they have firmly established ideas of right and wrong, ranging all the way from the proper tie to wear, to the moral obligations of motherhood.
Loyal Party member.

It is the e*f*a who can be dedicated to his country and community, an efficient and productive public servant, who denies even basic rights to minority groups because, by definition, they are not entitled to them.
True bureaucrat.

Well, that explains a lot.
 
The primitive test is shit, too many questions where i'd rather would've chosen "I did/am nothing of the above". I don't think that either/or shit does work for vast swathes of the population. No wonder some spook came up with this, these niggers usually don't take anything outside of the niggercattle norm into consideration. Just look at this:
Glownigger assesment.png
You are either an autist or a psychopath if you answer this, where's the nuance? Virtually all questions are like this.

Same for this one on the Basic Test:
Glownigger assesment 3.png
Neither of these choices even remotely reflects on how i would act. Can't even chose on a "i tend more to A than to B" answer in this scenario because both are not anywhere near close to how i would act IRL.

Anyways, i am IFU (or I Fuck You, which would have been an adequate descriptor for me in my 20's) on the primitive test:
Glownigger assesment 2.png

After going through Basic (ooh-rah) i am IuFuUc:
Glownigger assesment 4.png
Not gonna bother with cutting and cropping the IuFuUc "analysis" because many others already have put it up ITT.

Edit:
Glownigger assesment 5.png
"Guilt-free"? Oh Lord, i fucking wish for nothing more than that.
 
Last edited:
I do enjoy how I_U and especially IFU is so dominant here and that everyone has a similar personality score,
it is a generally positive description that also explicitly says the guy has few to no levers and and is basically entirely set in his ways.
or a useful idiot, but said in a nice way. like an NPC you can expertly run circles around because of how they are
 
I like these sorts of things as a pass time.

My Primitive type is IFU with a Basic type of e*r*a* (IcFcUc). I await the completion of the third portion.

I generally think the assessment is accurate though. I did my best to answer impulsively. A few questions would leave me considering both equally but I otherwise think it pegged me more accurately than the Myers-Briggs would. A secondary test you might consider to round yourself out is an Eneagram test.

One thing to consider to people getting perceptibly negative results would be that you're too busy resisting the test. View it like a Voight-Kampff test from bladerunner. It is intended to be given in a controlled environment with an impulsive subject. Ideally multiple choice wouldn't be a factor at all and it would be done under months of observation. I think it is remarkable that it can deliver insightful results merely by breaking the stages of the test down.

Bug me about other shit if you like I have an excess of free time.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen anyone bring it up, but if you look through the website pages you'll find one explaining how they test for this in reality. Apparently, this questionnaire was totally invented for the website and isn't how they would actually try to test for your personality. Instead, they give you a bunch of mental exercises and judge you based on your ability to complete them. It seems this is considered a feature of the PAS because it lacks any of the obvious problems with a questionnaire like unclear questions and answers, or anyway to "cheat" it by not answering truthfully.

They don't seem to explain exactly how the tests work, but there's one apparently involving working with numbers where doing well indicates you're a primitive Internalizer and doing poorly indicates your a primitive Externalizer, with particularly high or low scores indicating you're an extreme. The theory is that it's an entirely internal process involving abstract thinking which doesn't involve the environment at all, so an internalizer is more readily able to handle it than an externilizer. Then they give you some kind of arithmetic test where doing better than expected indicates you've compensated for weaknesses in your primitive nature, while doing less than expected indicates you haven't compensated, with extreme scores indicating an extreme compensation or lack of it again. Theory being that an externalizer doing well indicates they've compensated for their inherit weakness with math, while an internalizer doing poorly indicates they haven't compensated for their inherit weakness in the practical, real-world application of it vs. purely as abstract numbers. Then they give you some kind of test in remember information about the environment, where doing well indicates you've modified this aspect of your personality, while doing poorly indicates you haven't (modification is the other change your personality that the third website test they haven't made yet is supposed to test for).

Similarly, they give you some kind of test involving organizing blocks into a shape where doing well indicates you're Rigid (because you autistically examine the blocks' details to rotely figure out how to fit them together), while doing poorly indicates you're Flexible (because you would have a harder time focusing on details, get disctracted easier with this type of task in general, and be trying to feel out how the blocks fit together when finished). Then you get a test to find similarities and relationships between things, where doing relatively well as a rigid thinker indicates you've compensated for your primitive personality's inherit weakness, and doing relatively poorly means you haven't (because the test requires too much abstract thinking from you unless you've learned to think more flexibly). Doing well as a flexible thinker means you're unchanged, and doing relatively poorly indicates you've compensated by thinking learning to think more controlled and rigidly to the point it harms you're ability to do this abstract exercise. And then there's some kind of comprehension test where doing well either way indicates modification, and doing poorly indicates otherwise.

You finally you get some kind of autistm test where it sounds like you have to arrange pictures to form a natural social interaction. If you do average or better on the test then that indicates you're socially Acceptable (doing well means you're extrememly so), while doing poorly means you're socially Unaccpetable. Then you get some kind of test to recognize and respond to things, where doing relatively well as an A means you're still that way, while if you do average or worse than you've compensated to be less socially aware than you naturally are, and if you're U to start then it's the opposite. And then finally some kind of test to measure your anxiety of your own personality, where doing poorly indicates you feel anxiety over how you interact with others, indicating a modified personality, while doing well indicates you lack such stress and so are unmodified.
 
I do enjoy how I_U and especially IFU is so dominant here and that everyone has a similar personality score,
There are some IRA brothers like myself!

or a useful idiot, but said in a nice way. like an NPC you can expertly run circles around because of how they are
I might be useful, but I'm no idiot. Just a true believer.
 
Back
Top Bottom