Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Am I extra retarded? I got IuRcAc, but when I go to the page for that there's no part of it that applies specifically to IuRcAc. Maybe I did something wrong.
 
Okay, there was some shit that was so accurate it actually hurt my feelings, but there was other shit that was so completely wrong I laughed.
 
I got EFU and it mostly describes me what the fuck. Some things will obviously be wrong but it's definitely more fascinating than an IQ Test and whatnot.
The [EFU] child is rarely in danger of losing touch with external reality, even when under extreme pressure. With his withdrawal, he does not retreat from reality; he merely withdraws at a distance and watches. The [EFU], then, is likely to become an early non-participant observer and much of his early experience is in placing himself in events about him, but only in his mind. Identification, rather than projection, is a primary psychological mechanism of the [EFU].
Click to expand...

I have never felt a "literally me" until this stuff. I wonder how many autists they tortured this info out of.
1000004646.jpg
However, in spite of these vulnerabilities, real artistic, intellectual and cultural creativity is possible and relatively common in this group.
Click to expand...
Thanks glowie. Might not run you over.
 
Last edited:
1768089503762.jpeg

IM IMMUNE TO PROPAGANDA

IM IMMUNE TO CRITICISM

MY VOCABULARY IS MILDLY RETARDED, EVEN FOLLOWING EXTENSIVE PRACTICE
 
How is this less accurate than social media personality tests? I answered honestly and yet all the descriptions were the opposite of what my childhood was like and my temperament. Fuck you CIA man for wasting my time.
 
x14-Murder-All-Kikes-88x said:
I got ifu (IuFuUu). The description is mostly accurate except I am not that overly obsessed with my interests as it makes it out to be.
Click to expand...
I got IFU too (albeit IcFuUu) and I AM that overly obsessed with my interests. It also pegged my early interest in studying linguistics, though I switched to other information studies fields eventually. Pretty accurate, but vague enough at times. Some of the other types have traits that describe me too. Which leads into my feelings about personality tests. They're fun little things, not because they give you a label that 100% describes you, but because they help you to reflect more about yourself and how you really think.

Other thoughts: I normally get INTJ on the Myers-Briggs, I wonder what the overlap is for others. Also, like others have pointed out some of the types really don't hold back from describing them negatively. While I saw one or two that mentioned women of that type for a paragraph, most descriptions use "he". It could be just convenience but I wonder if there's a higher sex-correlation for some like in the MBTI. Some types mention how they are at different intellectual levels, which is interesting.
 
I was IuRcUu for this one and an INTJ last time I took the Myers Briggs test which seems to track. I'd like to retake this one but that always feels like cheating in a way.
 
Did the whole thing because I love these kind of shit, got IuRuUu, and honestly yeah, it got me fairly well, except some specifics (chronic masturbator kek, fuck that shit) but overall yeah, I am an schizoid dependent retard, but for it to be so eloquently said by a fed is fun and interesting.

Overall quite pleased, and I would argue very accurate, I love how it doesn't hold it's punches and just says shit straight, which is a breath of fresh air when compared to all the other shitty questionnaires.
 
parsnip said:
Am I extra retarded? I got IuRcAc, but when I go to the page for that there's no part of it that applies specifically to IuRcAc. Maybe I did something wrong.
Click to expand...
Hey, I got the same result as you ("if*u* (IuRcAc)"). This whole thing is written poorly. The author always starts with the other type, then bring about another type, only THEN they finally make a comparison with our group ("if*u*"). I don't know why the author wrote this way. Autism? It's written weirdly and lacks proper coherence.

If you want to read it, exclude ALL comparative talk at the beginning. They don't usually directly address this specific subtype ("if*u* (IuRcAc)"), they only mention how the whole group is ("if*u*"), so skim over the text until you reach that part of the paragraph.

@Urbicide in this post has actually made a good "summary" of some sort by removing the comparative talk.

Though, one thing that I'd like to correct Urbicide is that the "IRA" part we get is actually the "primitive" personality pattern. It's different from the convergent cluster group for the "basic" personality pattern. The proper description text for IRA should be here.

Here's the differences between the three personality patterns:
1768109394841.png

It can be read here, which I think should be properly read first before you dive deep into the description of each subtypes.

I also recommend this pdf doc from the CIA site, for some extra information. For example, for my IRA primitive personality pattern, it descibes it as:
1768109577074.png
There's also this "Simple overview of PAS primtives with cartoons". Makes it very easy to understand the differences if you don't want to read long wall of text.

Also, remember to read the preface first! There's also the interpretative note.

Overall, I would rate my own result as missing some marks. Maybe I made some mistakes during the test. Or maybe it's because the whole thing is old.
 
Last edited:
1768113280088.png
>The ir*a (IuFcAu) individual then, is an actively autistic or schizoid person who is highly self-centered and narcissistic, yet still maintains his social awareness and versatility.
>Thus, bizarre behavior is quite common in the ir*a since his autistic inventions have a completely individual quality that have no meaning except to himself. In spite of his social skills, he lives in a personal world that has meaning and reality for him, alone.
>Drug addiction of all types, and fetishes of all descriptions, will occur in this adjustment pattern. Because of the lack of perseveration or ritualization of ideas, neurotic adjustments of a schizoid nature are more common that clear cut schizophrenic illness. When psychosis occurs, the individual is usually untestable.
:lossmanjack:
 
Alright I have returned with some film representations of what spooky fed personality testing might possibly look like. Mostly because I'm bored and because I observed remarkable similarities in the methodology at least alluded to in the films.

A Scanner Darkly (2006)


Blade Runner obviously (1982)

Call me gay or whatever I just think the topic is fun.
 
Coffee Druid said:
Other thoughts: I normally get INTJ on the Myers-Briggs, I wonder what the overlap is for others. Also, like others have pointed out some of the types really don't hold back from describing them negatively. While I saw one or two that mentioned women of that type for a paragraph, most descriptions use "he". It could be just convenience but I wonder if there's a higher sex-correlation for some like in the MBTI. Some types mention how they are at different intellectual levels, which is interesting.
Click to expand...
I am a fruitcake who consistently gets INFP on Myers-Briggs, though, I am still surprised by IuFuUu being more common with women according to the writer. I would have assumed the more socially stunted schizoid personality types would be over-represented by men but apparently there is a lot of women with dead personalities living under rocks too. But to be fair, a lot of this stuff strikes me as being based off of ancient, and probably inaccurate, research.
 
Shaneequa said:
I haven't seen anyone else post my result so @ me if you're also autistic, schizoid, self-centered and narcissistic all at the same time.

ir*a (IuFcAu)
Click to expand...
Accounting for the antiquated language, it describes us as extremely insular and introspective, yet socially conscious and affable; i.e. a sociable autist. That's pretty spot on for me despite how low my individual scores were. I've consistently tested as ENFP with Myers Briggs so I guess that also tracks. The propensity for drug abuse, sexual deviancy and untraceable psychosis is a bit concerning though, not gonna lie. I'm honestly surprised that this isn't a more common type on a site like this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom