Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
IuFcUu

This is the most primitive of the IRU patterns and an tends to be relatively rare. In general, the ir*u has made little adaptation or modification of his primitive tendencies; he is a non-involving schizoid person with limited emotional control and little awareness of any need to develop social-interpersonal competence. At best, he is a self-centered, highly autistic person who is individualistic and self-seeking; at worst, he is the classic childhood schizophrenic who never develops beyond his autistic personalized world.

Like the ir*u*, [IuFcAc] discussed below, this is a narcissistic adjustment, but it lacks the negativism and social-interpersonal defensiveness of the ir*u adjustment. Instead, the ir*u is much more socially passive and insulated. The ir*a* [IuFcUc] has learned some form of social adaptation in his development that maintains him fairly effectively, but the ir*u remains socially and interpersonally insulated from the beginning without developing superficial maturity. He is completely succor dependent and needs constant care and attention, not because he demands it in an overt way, but because he is essentially helpless without it. Obviously, it is very difficult for the ir*u to achieve any sort of productive, adult adjustment. The extreme ir*u is very difficult, if not impossible, to test, so part of the rarity of this pattern stems from this. Some ir*u records will occur in individuals with organic conditions, but usually the pattern is a result of the impairment and masks the pre-organic personality pattern. The ir*u is often a management problem because he is abusive, overactive, and assaultive. There are definite childish temper tantrums that are unrelated to external events.
 
I got: IRA and Io Ru Ac
1767892181515.png It is I who has the psychotic paranoid delusions child, Enjoy prison stalker
 
Has anyone got one saying they're normal fucking human being? Or is this a wrong site to ask?
 
Last edited:
"This is perhaps the least loyal of all basic adjustments "
"When rejected or denied, he becomes groveling and sniveling, but he is also capable of vindictive and malicious action in order to gain curry favor elsewhere."
"He can, and will, do almost anything to keep from being abandoned. This behavior should not be confused with the acceptance anxiety of the era, [EuFcAu] who will do almost anything in order to be liked or appreciated. The ira [IuFcAu] does not need to be liked; he does need someone to take care of him."
"At average and an below intellectual levels, this adjustment is a clear cut sociopathic one and can produce some of the most dangerous members of society."

I can't get over how mental I apparently am.
 
Got IRA in the first test but IuRcAc in the second. So from autistic to schizo?

the if*u* has learned to be non-responsive to, or to defend against the social-interpersonal demands of his environment. As a result, he is a seclusive, self-sufficient, and mentally preoccupied person who is behaviorally inactive. In the extreme, this can be a schizophrenic adjustment in which the individual will not only have lost reality contact, but will have hallucinatory experiences. However, it is not necessarily a schizophrenic solution, for many if*u*, with average or high intellectual levels will make effective, contemplative, intellectualized, or mystical adjustments.
I can pretend to be normal at least ig

The if*u* is quite comfortable in his withdrawal and, thus, has little tension...The if*u* is relatively impervious to external distraction and can exist
with relatively little stress.
I'll take it.

The if*u*, because he is f*, has a conscience related to external learning. For example, in the American culture, masturbation is very common for the if*u*, arising from his conscious recognition of the discrepancy between the self-satisfaction derived from the act and its social-cultural inappropriateness. The if*u* makes his total commitment to internalized activity and becomes negativistic or defensive to even superficial social activity.
The CIA has labeled me a gooner Im gonna kms

The if*u* is seclusive, non-relating, and much more non-conforming and unconventional than the if*a. [IuRcAu] While he may be imaginative, he is not necessarily as creative as the ifu*. [IuFuAc]
Not creative enough to be a fun schizoid and not self aware enough to be a functioning one

At average and below average intellectual levels, the if*u* tends to be superstitious and fantasy prone. Witches, fairies, and demons can be accepted as real...It is often exceptionally difficult for the externalized individual to understand or accept the abstract experience of the if*u*, and usually the if*u* has little need or desire to explain.
...

Some genuinely creative abstract writers and painters come from this cluster, but this type of productivity is not as common...The literalness and imitativeness of the primitive R orientation limits the breadth of creativity for the if*u*; thus, though imaginative, there is a mundaneness that results in prosaic products. Drug addiction is common among members of this cluster because the if*u* needs artificial help to expand his fantasy productivity.
"Your art sucks and you're a drug addict" So I'm Steven King. Great.

IRA
1767892561348.png
IuRcAc (if* u*)
1767892469318.png
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen anyone else post my result so @ me if you're also autistic, schizoid, self-centered and narcissistic all at the same time.

ir*a (IuFcAu)

Fundamental Nature:
  • Actively autistic or schizoid personality
  • Highly self-centered and narcissistic
  • Maintains social awareness and versatility despite internal focus
  • Iu: Spontaneous, diverse mental activity ranging from autistic withdrawal to creative intellectual work
  • Fc: Individual-centered, primitive, self-focused emotionality
  • IuF pattern: Extreme self-centeredness and immature emotionality
  • IuFc combination: Suggests explosiveness and personalized emotions
  • Ac: Social distance with introspective role uniformity

Behavioral Profile​

Social Functioning:
  • Succor-dependent (seeks support from others)
  • Exploits relationships for personal, individualistic interests
  • Possesses social skills but lives in a private, personal reality
  • Incapable of reciprocal emotional involvement with others
  • Fascinated by own sensuality and fantasy
  • Displays bizarre behavior due to highly individualized autistic inventions

Clinical Manifestations​

Common Presentations:
  • Ambulatory or socialized schizoid in extreme cases
  • Superficial assumption of responsibility at best
  • Drug addiction and fetishes of various types
  • Schizoid neurotic adjustments more common than schizophrenia
  • When psychosis occurs, individual typically becomes untestable
 
Basic e*r*a (IcFcAu)

This shit freaks me out because it shows how non-unique people really are, we like to think we are the way we are because of life experiences and our logical thinking but it’s basically just all pre-written in your fucking zodiac and personality type.

I got the Nazi concentration camp commander one, how the fuck did this test know I have a tendency to radical politics and mass prejudices when none of the questions even touched on that stuff.
 
This shit freaks me out because it shows how non-unique people really are, we like to think we are the way we are because of life experiences and our logical thinking but it’s basically just all pre-written in your fucking zodiac and personality type.
I've felt that way for a long time and my hyperbolic theory have been that there's really only ~70 individuals cloned into being the 8 billion people populating the earth.
 
I don't want to take it. I don't want them to know me.
 
I took the test. It seems to be implying that i'm a lonely person that settles down with certain people and where rules are clear. New environments are nervewracking and can cause trauma. I cling to reliable people.

My page broke while submitting so it's possible this is incorrect. I use Tor.

20260108_131910.jpg
 
I must be a retard and overthinking my answers to these questions, because it said I was a passive child who goes with the flow, shit his pants, and will do whatever society asks of him. None of that is me, and this didn't validate me as special so I spit on the glownigger who made this not thinking of niche weirdos like me answering his questions.
 
I'm gonna be honest, I don't think this is better than any other pseudoscience personality test, it's just more willing to say "your answers tell us you're retarded".
In the first two sections, I found that somewhere between 50 and 70% of all questions either had answers that were both wildly inaccurate, had answers that were both equally correct without further context, or just simply lacked a "I don't actually care about this at all" option. For example, something along the lines of:
  • When you're asked to go into a situation where you need to follow different social rules than normal...
had two answers that boiled down to
  • ...you retreat inwards and start daydreaming while refusing to engage with anyone.
  • ...you immediately become suspicious of and hostile to everyone.
Like, are you joking? What about "I just do it because it's not hard even if it's annoying"? Same issue for things were it asks you about how you feel when an injustice happens, you can't just go "I think it's wrong, obviously, but I'm not going to stress about it if I can't do anything", you HAVE to either be totally insensitive/lack understanding or have your heart break to pieces at the sight of it. It's clearly working from the assumption that everyone being assessed is already totally mentally fucked, which is just the inverse of something like MBTI where the assumption is that everyone is awesome because it's a horoscope in science clothing.

If anything, this just furthers my opinion that any sort of multiple-choice questionnaire assessment is utterly useless in psychology. Half the shit you need to know about someone comes not from their primary impulse answers to questions, but in the elaboration (or inability to elaborate) about those answers to explore the reasoning behind them. Shit like this is what's keeping psychology in the stone ages.
 
Back
Top Bottom