Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think it probably has some accuracy or at least value but its also antiquated, much like psychology is, in that it doesn't understand the modern world/internet.

One of the questions was about barricading yourself in your room after experiencing I guess "social burnout" and it proposed that you'd just listen to music alone or daydream... the entire concept of sitting alone and being social on the internet never existed when this was conceived.

Similarly there are other questions about school and some other things that aren't case specific enough or place a huge emphasis on "studying" at school for papers etc. There is no option for "I just didn't study, child".

I think that one of the core changes the internet has brought about, and can specifically be seen in recent mass shooters/insane people is atomized beliefs/politics/hobbies that are indiscernible to anyone who hasn't spent their entire life in the same schism interacting with the same people. I don't think "psychology" nor a test like this can really deal with that level of societal change.

edit: and it should of course be mentioned that this is just a multiple (or rather binary) choice test with like 100 questions or some shit. It can never be anything more than extremely broad.
You might be right in some aspects, but like other users stated before me, there are just not enough questions. Especially with only two answers available where you're supposed to choose the best one, even if neither of them fits. There's a question about favorite school subjects, where my two favorite subjects were split between the different answers and I was completely indifferent about the other ones that were listed. I could have agreed with both answers of like 50% of the questions. This might just be a me problem, but I think the test would be a lot better, if the questions were imbedded in a concrete scenario. The primitive test should also be more specifically about childhood.
It was still fun to take it, but I really wish for a better test like this.
 
frig.png
Sounds nothing like me at all. Fuck this gay ass test
 
Guys I think I failed the test

Basic ir*u (IuFcUu)

Back to Table of Contents
Preface to the 64 Basic Types What this page is a part of.
Interpretative Notes to the 64 Basic Types Read these before reading any of the types!


This is the most primitive of the IRU patterns and an tends to be relatively rare. In general, the ir*u has made little adaptation or modification of his primitive tendencies; he is a non-involving schizoid person with limited emotional control and little awareness of any need to develop social-interpersonal competence. At best, he is a self-centered, highly autistic person who is individualistic and self-seeking; at worst, he is the classic childhood schizophrenic who never develops beyond his autistic personalized world.

Like the ir*u*, [IuFcAc] discussed below, this is a narcissistic adjustment, but it lacks the negativism and social-interpersonal defensiveness of the ir*u adjustment. Instead, the ir*u is much more socially passive and insulated. The ir*a* [IuFcUc] has learned some form of social adaptation in his development that maintains him fairly effectively, but the ir*u remains socially and interpersonally insulated from the beginning without developing superficial maturity. He is completely succor dependent and needs constant care and attention, not because he demands it in an overt way, but because he is essentially helpless without it. Obviously, it is very difficult for the ir*u to achieve any sort of productive, adult adjustment. The extreme ir*u is very difficult, if not impossible, to test, so part of the rarity of this pattern stems from this. Some ir*u records will occur in individuals with organic conditions, but usually the pattern is a result of the impairment and masks the pre-organic personality pattern. The ir*u is often a management problem because he is abusive, overactive, and assaultive. There are definite childish temper tantrums that are unrelated to external events.
 
Io Ru Ac meathead chad here who's athletic and could have been a good pilot or engineer or something. The test also called me out on my tendency to have very little tolerance for incompetence at work such which likely stems from ego. fair play, that's a pretty good shout!
Nothing about rape or necrophilia though, thank god they don't know about any of that :^)
Guys I think I failed the test
Did you respond to the questionnaire by trying to hit your computer with a wooden club?
 
Narcissistic with primitive emotional control and a charming facade? Yeah I can see it.

IMG_7882.jpeg

I think the tests can show you your “worst case self” if you let yourself become complacent and don’t correct obviously bad behavior. The enneagram test has a positive and negative side of each type and I like to think of it that way.
 
Same! Got it too, and aside from the "he is rarely an imaginative person, because he guards against autistic tendencies" ( :optimistic:) it actually described me well. No real slam-downs, I guess I just gotta work at avoiding a Nick Rekieta mid-life crisis...
You left out the best part:

“The appropriateness of his interests, then, is an important ingredient in his ultimate adjustment.
If his interest is inappropriate or unrealistic, he is inclined to persevere in spite of setbacks, obvious incompetence, or failure. The Greenwich Village poet, painter, musician, actor, or author who persists in the face of continuous failure and a lack of talent is an example.

Damn right, bitch. Make art or die trying. Let no bish human empathy or outside input hold you back 💪😎
 
Man I love that even the fucking glow niggers can't do data collection, am I in the 18-25 or the 25-35 age group? I'm glad I'm not 25 I guess. And another one of these things that has no pass/neither option, idk fucking neither of these options even remotely describe me and the end result is like not even fucking close because of it. Which tbf is the same result as all the other ones. That or I am simply too much of a fudged up cyclepath even for the cia?
 
The test feels a bit unclear if you had a traumatic experience during early schooling and overcame it.
Got myself caught up on too many questions thinking "was this how I acted before, or after, or just how I think I did in retrospect?"
Maybe I'm just retarded.
 
The website has a ton of PDFs going over various aspects of the whole thing, including an attempt to visualize the various elements of the letters used in the results. Link.

Some very Chris-chan ass drawings in this one
brave_08012026_193807.png

Another page goes into the results in relation to felons/nonfelons and their results. Link. Shows your primitive and the proportion of felons to nonfelons in that result, from their study.

There's some other pages that go into studies on using the PAS for determining treatment for alcoholics, etc. Lots of reading to be had.

The test feels a bit unclear if you had a traumatic experience during early schooling and overcame it.
Got myself caught up on too many questions thinking "was this how I acted before, or after, or just how I think I did in retrospect?"
Maybe I'm just retarded.
The test deliberately says to avoid thinking on your response and instead go with the first thing you come up with. Obviously that doesn't exactly help in the case of trauma, but it does appear it wants more spontaneous answers than thoughtful ones.
 
I got the schizo one, IuRcUu. It seems like it's a pretty common one in this thread.
The if*u will obey, without question, the commands of the "good voices". In the same way, while the iru [IuRuUu] will take what he wants without guilt or explanation, the if*u needs some rationalization; this permission can range from the concurrence of his "voices" to a delusional belief that something is his or that he is entitled to it by position or right. In this later case, he can believe that he is the true natural son of the president. Or the reincarnation of the Holy Ghost. His sense of responsibility, or conscience, still operates, but in a bizarre or ludicrous manner. Nonetheless, it serves as a method to relieve him of guilt.
Maybe we should get together and start a cult.
 
Another page goes into the results in relation to felons/nonfelons and their results. Link. Shows your primitive and the proportion of felons to nonfelons in that result, from their study.
1767920276451.png

IFU chads rise up
ironic that the acronym most similar to Fucking has done the least amount of Raping
 
The e*f*a has learned to manage his autistic susceptibilities and succor dependency needs and has developed a strong sense of values or conscience. Unlike the e*ra [IcRuAu] who is, essentially, a self-seeking and self-involved person, the e*f*a has learned the need to control his self-involvement and self-interest and, in most instances, has learned the appropriate techniques. Moral concepts, principles of behavior, and ideas of social responsibility are the rules and regulations by which the e*f*a forms his life pattern.

The primary psychological problem of the e*f*a* [IcRcUc] is his susceptibility to internal, or highly personal, events and his tendencies toward self-sufficiency and insulation from intimacy. His control is directed toward the disciplining of these tendencies so that he may be a rational, productive person. In contrast, the primary problem of the i*f*a [EcRcAu] is his susceptibility to external events and his tendency toward involvement and emotional reciprocity. He must learn to discipline these. The i*f*a [EcRcAu] uses his mental processes as a buffer against his over-reactivity and uses moral concepts and principles to structure his life. In doing so, he becomes somewhat contemplative and ideational in order to slow his activity and control his temptation to give in to sensory and sensual stimulation. The e*f*a uses his mental processes as a buffer against the chaos of his inner ideational experience; in doing so, he speeds his responsiveness to external stimuli and increases his activity. He uses his "mind" to sharpen his extremal perceptions; the i*f*a [EcRcAu] uses his "mind" to slow his external perceptions so that he can give them meaning and form.

The e*f*a is an active, alert individual who is eager to discover more ways to be responsive and reality oriented. Since, as a primitive R, he is an imitative person, he is very dependent upon external guidance and support of his behavior, reactions, and responses. As a primitive A, he learns the conventional social behavior of his environment quickly, without pressure or practice. As a primitive I, he is passive and internalized; it is here that the most external pressure for change is likely to occur. Given extremal pressure and punishment for internalizing, the e*f*a learns to repress or overcome his primitive I tendencies. The if*a [IuRcAu] has more difficulty repressing, so usually has more conscious guilt about his autism; he will often become extremely involved in externalized activities in order to control his internalizing. The if*a [IuRcAu] adjustment, then, is a function of the extent to which the environment provides firm discipline. The e*f*a adjustment, on the other hand, has the quality of self-discipline since the individual, himself, provides the control of his internalizing tendencies. For the primitive IRA, the means by which this is accomplished is very much a function of the training and guidance he has received. In this sense, the e*f*a is a faithful and loyal "carbon copy" of the milieu from which he emerges. He does not have the external distractibility and seductivity of the externalized; he can be very effective socially and interpersonally, because his primary psychological energy is directed toward defending against his own inner pressures. Both the i*f*a [EcRcAu] and e*f*a are characterized by their marked self-concern, but the qualitative aspects of this concern are almost opposite: One is concerned that he will over withdraw, while the other is concerned that he will over-relate.

Generally speaking, the e*f*a is a humanitarian, compassionate person with a strong sense of social responsibility. However, these traits are somewhat mitigated by being more abstract than concrete. This can result in some logic-tight compartments that may appear to be paradoxical. The e*f*a, for example, can be an excellent minister, dedicated to the needs of his parish and tireless in his exercise of social responsibilities and, at the same time, emotionally distant and lacking in understanding of his own children. It is the e*f*a who can be dedicated to his country and community, an efficient and productive public servant, who denies even basic rights to minority groups because, by definition, they are not entitled to them. The i*f*a [EcRcAu] will often be unduly cruel to that which tempts him in order to control his tendencies; the e*f*a, not affected in this way, will be more objective and consistent in his behavior. The e*f*a cluster produces individuals who are conventional and well-behaved, who are, to a large extent, the backbone of an efficient society. Such persons study, and understand, the religious and moral ethics of their milieu. They then conscientiously attempt to live up to the expectations of their credo. They do not question the rituals and catechisms of their society, for they have firmly established ideas of right and wrong, ranging all the way from the proper tie to wear, to the moral obligations of motherhood. Traditions, convention, and precedent are their bell, book, and candle. A primary problem of the e*f*a is that he frequently is the victim of others expectations. His initial role-playing skill, plus the effective way he learns to be active and apparently relating, lead others to overestimate and over-value him. In childhood and adolescence, he has little experience with rejection and is constantly included in the activities of his peer group. At the same time, he has little experience with intimate relationships with anyone other than members of his immediate family. At adolescence, then, intimate relationships are likely to be immature and idealistic. Early marriage, thus, is a real possibility, but there is almost no chance for maintaining such a relationship. The pseudo maturity of the e*f*a can result in failure experiences adolescence that may be very damaging. Guilt about his own inadequacy, and his bewilderment about the intensity of the expectations others have for him, can result in maladjustment. This is a particularly difficult adjustment for women; marriage and childbirth can be very traumatic. Apathies, which is really internalized depression, and inhibited behavior are the characteristic maladjustments of this pattern.
It is the e*f*a who can be dedicated to his country and community, an efficient and productive public servant, who denies even basic rights to minority groups because, by definition, they are not entitled to them.
WOOHOO
 
The test deliberately says to avoid thinking on your response and instead go with the first thing you come up with. Obviously that doesn't exactly help in the case of trauma, but it does appear it wants more spontaneous answers than thoughtful ones.
Took it again, impulsively answered, and now I feel personally attacked.
This is probably the most efficient of the Iu adjustments of the primitive IFA orientation. Although it is essentially a schizoid adjustment, the ifa pattern represents both emotional control or conscience and social awareness and responsiveness. The ifa tends to exploit his mental skills, but in most instances, this is socially productive. At higher levels of intelligence, the ifa can be quite creative and imaginative. He has a sense of responsibility and, although his interests are highly personal, individualistic, and even narcissistic, he recognizes the need to be productive, creative, and reality oriented. This is the pattern that produces many writers, artists, musicians, and liberal arts intellectuals. Aesthetic appreciation in its more abstract forms and subtle cultural appreciation are common manifestations.

The ifa is sensitive and discriminating; he gains great satisfaction from the exploitation of his intellectual skills. Since this is done in a sublimated manner, he does not have the individualistic and autistic quality of the ir*a. [IuFcAu] He is an intuitive person who has little use for the regimens or discipline of formalized mental activity. He is inclined to be an intellectually curious person who desires the freedom to range unfettered through the infinite varieties of mental experience. He is not only a non-involving person, but is adamant in maintaining his intimacy and individuality. Reading, thinking, and controlled mental activity are more important to him than physical activity, interaction, or gross sensual stimulation. He is dependent on others to take care of him so that he has time for his creative, imaginative pursuits. There is a very definite air of hauteur in this adjustment; failure to receive obeisance may result in petulance, temperament, and pique. The ifa is very sensitive to lack of respect or appreciation for his interests and accomplishments and is prone to become cynical and sardonic in the face of rejection or misunderstanding.

Obviously, the effectiveness of this adjustment is very much a function of the true worth of the activity. The elite, who are skillful and productive enough to warrant respect, not only get away with this adjustment, but are productive because of it. On the other hand, the less successful are prone to become discouraged and an apathetic because they are very sensitive to lack of appreciation, unlike the if* a, and are also quite insightful about their own lack of success. Disabling inferiority reactions manifested by morbid depression, pathological bitterness, and severe cynicism are not uncommon. Even the most successful ifa may sometimes have similar reactions because the high standards he sets for himself are often unattainable. Suicide, particularly in later years, is a common phenomenon.

There are many similarities between ifa and ifa*. [IuFuUc] The primary difference is that the ifa is often overestimated and overprotected during his early years. In many ways, thus, he is relatively show in maturing and becomes overly dependent on care and protection. When he is rejected, he is less prepared to adapt, and, thus, more prone to withdrawal and apathy, than the ifa*, [IuFuUc] who has had to fight, in one way or another, for example, may be petted and pampered during the years when she is attractive and, thus, be totally unable to adapt psychologically when she has reached, or is about to reach a time when her behavior is inappropriate. In contrast, the if*a [IuRcAu] may tend to persevere her behavior, even when it is inappropriate, because she does not have the same sensitivity of insightfulness characteristic of the primitive F.

In general, the ifa is a sensitive, but self-centered person who is artistic or "cultivated" in one form or another. He develops and exploits his mental skills in intellectual and creative ways. He often has highly mystical and spiritual values, usually places great store on his ability to be intuitive, but is very vulnerable to discouragement and disillusionment.
 
Last edited:
Any other [Eu Rc Uu] in here?

1767923185245.png


This is not an uncommon adjustment that is more frequently found in women than in men. Although the ef*u has many characteristics in common with the ef*a*, [EuRcUc] there is a fundamental difference in that the ef*u has failed to recognize or learn the need to modify his social interpersonal behavior. The ef*u may be quite negativistic and introverted, or he may be satisfied to be whatever he considers "himself' and make little effort to change or adapt his social . personality. The ultimate adjustment of the ef*u is a function of his ability to learn and perform some useful mechanical-procedural function and his ability to find a milieu in which his social characteristics are accepted.

The primary characteristics of the ef*a* [EuFcUc] are conventionality and his need to please. It should be pointed out, however, that the ef*a*is conventional only because he has made a definite attempt to fit into the pattern of the environment in which he finds himself. The ef*u, on the other hand, tends to be both unconventional and negativistic. It is almost characteristic of the ef*u to revolt against, or escape from, the environmental pattern of his early years and to seek a new group that will take him as he is. Rebellion, passive negativism, and behavior difficulties are features of the ef*u individual's history, but if he can escape his initial group and find psychological satisfaction with a new group, and adamantly hostile toward the old. This adjustment, of course, is very similar to that of the i*f*u. [EcRcUu] However, the i*f*u [EcRcUu] is intellectually oriented and aggressively argumentative; the ef*u has more of an emotional dependency quality in his adjustment and usually is more bewildered and anxious because he is unable to achieve the intellectual rationalization of the i*f*u. [EcRcUu] Thus, the ef*u is more passive and more socially introverted.

The ef*u with average intelligence can usually find some active manual-manipulation activity that he can learn well; he finds his total psychological satisfaction with people that have the same skills and interests, and feels uncomfortable, embarrassed, and out of place with any other group. The stereo-typical airplane pilot, baseball player, and skilled artisan frequently come from this cluster. The ef*u with higher intellectual levels tends to have little intellectual versatility. He does poorly in subjects he does not like, and very well in those subjects he does like. He tends to concentrate in highly specialized fields such as art or music, or goes into fields like social work, industrial arts, physical education, and the like where he can either concentrate on people who have similar skills and interests or identify with and help underprivileged, out-of-pattern, or misunderstood people. That is, he wants to help those who, like himself, have a need to escape from the milieu in which they are. Suspicion about the motives and attitudes of others is a prominent feature of the ef*u. His life adjustment has been achieved by considerable rebellion, but he has also been subject to a great deal of forced conformity. His failure to conform has often resulted in strong attempts to force him to adapt. Once he has achieved some success, he is, probably quite unconsciously, always on guard against those who threaten his freedom or pattern of activities and interests. He is possessive, jealous, and secretive about his own material possessions, emotional attitudes, and intimate personal relationships.
 
Last edited:
Or maybe you'll strike gold and end up just like me.
Huh, I did!

He has little interest in authority or prestige positions, but he is quite threatened by any change of pattern, whether this be a move to a new apartment, or a requirement to change or modify his work habits.
This is just everybody, though...
Among women, this pattern will produce many highly effective nuns, nurses, and office managers. However, it is a characteristic of the e*f*u women to be more effective in the rituals, procedures, and techniques of her calling than in the nuances of compassion and human understanding. She has a strong sense of responsibility, but is often cold, detached, and overly rational. This form of adjustment, however, does not have the defensive cruelty or dogmatic authoritarianism of the i*f* patterns.
CIA witchcraft.
 
"Initially, he is in danger of becoming so autistic"


Lmao.PNG
 
Last edited:
Paying the glow nigger tax despite, like most of these assessments, feeling very unimpressed by the questionnaire, am pleasantly surprised by how accurate the initial "primitive" type has been.

Perhaps the most striking difference between the [R] adjustments and the [F] adjustments lies in the spontaneous curiosity of the [F]. The [EF] is very aware of and very involved with the external events in his experience. His responsiveness to a wide range of external stimuli is both his greatest liability and his greatest asset. The multitude of things to which he can respond and his inherent interest in responding can easily create confusion and chaos. On the other hand, if he learns to order or control this perceptivity, he may become extremely creative and productive. The [IF] has similar responsiveness but he is very aware of and very involved with the internal events in his experience. He, also, is in danger of becoming chaotic and confused because of the multiplicity of subtle stimuli that attract and interest him. However, if he learns control, he is capable of marked imaginativeness and creativity. The direction of spontaneous interest for the [EF] is external and unless he is checked or disciplined he will develop in a very one-sided manner. He will develop his environmental relationships in a fickle, intense way at the expense of his ideational activity. Likewise, the direction of interest of the [IF] is ideational, and if unchecked, he will become extremely over-ideational at the expense of his environmental relationships. Since [EF] activity is obvious and involving, there is much more chance that restraint will be brought to bear and, in general, the [EF] individual has a long period to learn some control. The [IF], on the other hand, is externally passive and the extent of his ideational activity is far from obvious. The fact that he is a "good" baby in the sense that he demands little attention, entertains himself and is fairly invulnerable to discomfort and isolation, causes him to be taken for granted, and the pressure for control is apt to come fairly late. To some extent, then, the sensory-motor or behavioral maturation of the [IF] child is likely to occur quite late.

Of the two [IF] adjustments the [IFA] baby is likely to attract the most initial attention. There is a kind of "doll baby" quality to the [IFA] infant. He demands little attention, yet is responsive to care and attention due to his social adaptability. When left alone, he is capable of amusing himself. He is very curious about himself, and most parents find this initial curiosity "cute" and tend to encourage it without recognizing the essentially narcissistic quality of the curiosity. In general, it is fun to take care of an [IFA] baby, so this type of child rarely lacks either attention or succor dependent care. Generally speaking, the qualities associated with the [IFA] as he matures are much more appropriate and acceptable in the maturing female than in the male. Under ordinary circumstances, therefore, the Primitive [IFA] male is under more pressure to modify his behavior than is the [IFA] female. The elfin-like qualities, coyness, helplessness and social facility of the true [IFA] can be very pleasing to many when they appear in a female. On the other hand, this very same trait is particularly unacceptable in the male. Thus, after the "golden" years of babyhood, the [IFA] male is placed under terrific pressure to modify or change his pattern. It is not too strange, then, that many of the most actively masculine and self-sufficient individuals in all the patterns will occur in the [IFA] male group.

As the individual is placed under pressure to modify or change, there is bound to be some resistance. The [IFA]'s revolt or resistance is internalized and thus not very obvious. His role adaptability and succor dependency needs are such that he is much more openly conforming, and he is much more likely to symbolize or ideationalize his negativism and hostility. For example, the [IFA] child is most likely to displace his hostility to his mother or to a doll or to some other inanimate object. He is also the type most likely to have imaginary playmates, not because he is lonely, but because they offer no resistance to the free rein of his imagination. Fantasy in all of its forms is easily provoked and easily maintained in the [IFA] individual. Nightmares and terror of the unknown are the bugaboos of the [IF] adjustments (sleep walking and talking in sleep are typical of [EF] patterns.) As the [IFA] makes some modification, he has considerable inner stress (as opposed to the muscular tension states of the [E]). Stuttering, asthma and allergies are the most usual early manifestations of this stress.

Oddly enough, as the [IFA] individual develops an external orientation, he experiences what is best described as a sense of discovery. His curiosity, which has been going through a state of containment, finds a new outlet. He becomes an active, eager taster of life in adulthood and may achieve extremely productive social effectiveness. He learns how to respond to subtleties and nuances of external behavior extremely well and can become an especially effective observer of the details of his external environment. Even so, he is able to remain relatively detached and non-involved.

The [IFA], because of his role sensitivity, may become an extremely misleading person. His sensitivity, capacity for empathy and apparent social-interpersonal warmth may be highly effective. However, beneath this facade, he may be an egocentric and narcissistic individual. On the other hand, given firm training and guidance, he also may become the most creative, imaginative and socially effective of any of the Primitive Types. [IFA] s are particularly effective working in programs where the aim is to benefit the greatest number. It is not unusual for the [IFA] to become extremely interested and creative in mass endeavors like socialism, communism, economic theory, social welfare and political action. However, they are particularly prone to look for ways to elevate or improve the common good or common competence. They are inclined to become very disillusioned at lack of drive, lack of enthusiasm, or lack of competence in individuals. Since, as individuals, they often lack real compassion, they can be extremely unfeeling or objective in the way they punish and destroy what they see as bad or non-productive. Certain types of militant zealots and fanatics may appear in this group.

The [IFA] is not so much a reformer as he is an implementer. He usually identifies strongly with and is very loyal to the aims, methods, principles and practices with which he identifies. He is more inclined to want to do things better than to want to do them differently. In this sense, he is more a dedicated evolutionist than a revolutionist. However, his tendency to be critical, to seek innovations, and to place proficiency above tradition or compassion is likely to make him the object of considerable distrust, dislike and concern on the part of more conventional, imitative and authority-bound individuals.


Overall profile: Iu Fc Ac

Intellectual Dimension: Introduction to E/I basic level Details of Iu The basic level has relative strength (1-20) of 4
Procedural Dimension: Introduction to R/F basic level Details of Fc The basic level has relative strength (1-20) of 8
Social Dimension: Introduction to A/U basic level Details of Ac The basic level has relative strength (1-20) of 2

This is a relatively rare basic pattern, partly because of low incidence among normals and an partly because persons with extreme patterns are usually not testable. In the extreme, this is a schizophrenic adjustment in which the individual is highly self-involved, autistic, and socially isolated or defensive. Like the ir*u, [IuFcUu] this is a childhood schizophrenic or an immature schizoid adjustment. At best, people with this pattern are very narcissistic. Fantasy, auto sensuality, and introspective versatility are more marked in the ir*u* than in either the iru* [IuRuAc] or the iru. [IuRuUu] Although he can be imaginative and creative, the productivity of the ir*u* is so individualized or personalized that it has only minimal social usefulness.

Unlike the ir*u, [IuFcUu] the ir*u* must manifest some active social hostility in order to protect his intimacy and self-involvement. There is much more tendency for attempts at involvement with the ir*u* because he is a primitive A, making it necessary for him to develop some kind of insulation from social interaction. Extreme negativism, manifested early in his life, is usually characteristic of this adjustment. Tantrums, "fits," and similar behavior not only characterize his early life, but are usually very much a part of his adjustment all through life.


Lol conclusion was a little disappointing since I was too abnormal for the glowies to pin point. I underlined the bits that I felt were personally relevant. This is still the closest personality quiz I've taken to giving specifics and not just cold reading with extremely vague commonalities that most people can warp their personal image around.
 
When I first saw this quiz on /x/ everyone was getting IuFcUu, myself included. I'm not surprised a board where everyone's favorite pastime is trying to have sex with Japanese fox spirits would get that kind of result but it being this prevalent on here too makes me think that despite what the notes say it's actually pretty common in today's world outside of normie concentration camps like YouTube and Facebook.
 
Back
Top Bottom