Pedophilia Debate Thread - What are your thoughts on people who masturbate to neko shotas?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

What's your opinion?

  • Send them all to the gas chamber!

    Votes: 269 73.7%

  • If they don't fuck real children, they're alright in my book.

    Votes: 81 22.2%

  • There is nothing wrong with pedophilia and kids can consent to sex.

    Votes: 15 4.1%
  • Total voters
    365
Pedos do not reform, pedos almost always reoffend. Whether it is their fault that they are the way they are or not is irrelevent, they are a persistent threat to public safety and should be removed. I take this stance not emotionally, but from a practical perspective: As a unit, our societies are stronger without pedophiliacs.
 
Doctor Placebo said:
Being "paedophobic" is good, natural, and important to preserving basic civilized life and human decency. It's like being cannibalphobic, animal-rapistphobic, or taking-a-power-drill-to-your-genitalsphobic.
Click to expand...

natural
Pedophilia is actually natural. They existed for who knows how long.

cannibalphobic
?
Can you eat corpses without burying them? Some people donate their bodies.

animal-rapistphobic
Pff. Animals rape each other all the time. Shark babies eat their siblings while they are in their moms belly.
Also whats the age of consent for animals? there has to be pedo animals in every species.

taking-a-power-drill-to-your-genitalsphobic.
Well a pedo would be that. I doubt pedos would power drill their own genitalia.
 
here are my thoughts
I dont think that drawing sexy cartoon kids should be illegal, I feel like something like that could be abused by the government and lead to further abuse of free speech. It is gross and creepy but I dont think its illegal or "CP" since there is no real human child victim. But people that draw that are fucked up in the head; theyre pedos. Ive seen groups of people on twitter who are apparently trauma victims, and they draw "agegap" porn art and everybody encourages it and RTs and commisions for it... Like I cannot imagine that to be healthy at all. Go to therapy instead of fetishizing your trauma online, its just miserable to see
 
Autumnal Equinox said:
@Senior Lexmechanic your thoughts? I'm sure they'd be quite illuminating.
Click to expand...
In a perfect world, we'd catch them before they touched a kid and put them all in exile in Malta or somewhere (after sterilization to prevent them from trying to make their own victims).
If we could guarantee we got the right person every time, shoot or chemically castrate them if they diddled a kid. Put them on a watchlist and prevent them from being alone with kids if not.
In our imperfect world, we should come down hard on child sex offenses regardless, and if a nonce that planned to hurt a kid gets vented, I'm not going to loose sleep over it. Vigilante justice isn't something I usually condone, but if it's a motherfucker who's clearly gearing up for re-offense... better to kill him and take the murder rap than let a kid get hurt.
 
TruthSeekingDaimon said:
We dont have the technology and resources to accomplish anything that surpasses modern liberalism.
Click to expand...
We're just about set to flip the technocracy switch.

To address the argument that they can't help it:
All animal behavior is determined by the genetic composition and variance of that organism.

Whenever a black person steals something, that's just something their genes made them do. In this sense, morality isn't real.

Given this information, what ought we do with criminals? There are a few ways to go about it.

1. Have an aristocrat class of people who decide the direction of society based on their thoughts and then kill the criminals to go in that direction.

2. Figure out what traits weren't around when your society was at its best and kill the people who have those traits.

3. Hold criminals in jails and let them out after a few months and hope they "learned their lesson"

There are more than just these 3 but I don't wanna be even more spergy than this post already is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guntleman said:
Here's a slightly warm take: Within a Liberal worldview, there is no legitimate argument against pedophillia.

Another good reason to reject Liberalism.
Click to expand...

I guess that depends on your definintion of Liberalism. If you take the definition outlined in Mills book On Liberty (seen as classic Liberalism) pedophilia would be condemned because it doesn't bring about Utility or overall good and it produces harm that outweighs the good.

What's defined as Liberalism today seems to be a mix of "do what thou wilt" but also censoring everything deemed capable of melting snow for "safety sake"
 
TruthSeekingDaimon said:
natural
Pedophilia is actually natural. They existed for who knows how long.
Click to expand...
Pedophilia is natural. So is male lions killing the children of female lions they want to shag.

A disgusted and violent reaction against pedos from both parents and people capable of basic empathy towards children is also natural, and unlike the first two, is far more beneficial to building a functional, healthy society that isn't overrun with of PTSD addled, suicidal otherkin who can't function properly because Creepy Steve was playing the Pop Up Pirate Game with them when they were ten.

That's my point.

The rest of your comment is so autistic it's not worth responding to.
 
TruthSeekingDaimon said:
What about gays?
What would you do with gays?
What other race do you want to sterilize so that there is an ethnic cleansing?
Click to expand...
Gay people who have sex with consenting adults aren't hurting anyone (except possibly themselves if they follow unsafe sexual practices, but w/e). Active pedophiles ruin the lives of children, and non-active pedophiles are still contributing to the ruination of children by providing a market for child porn. At this point I'd like to clarify that I don't think loli is CP: just a sign you're probably fucked in the head some way, and I still wouldn't let you near any child just in case, but it's not over the Rubicon like CP is.
Trying to say "pedophiles are a race" is evidence you're either a shitty troll or on crack.
 
The Pink Panther said:
why is fucking kids wrong now when it wasn't wrong back then
Click to expand...
I can't think of one culture where fucking prepubescent kids isn't considered wrong. It's usually ephebophilia that's accepted.

Why is ephebophilia wrong in the west when getting married young used to be normal and teenage marriages are still common in some third world societies? Because western society is not what it used to be. Getting married at twelve would make a modern western kid a pitied misfit with emotional baggage almost none of their peers could relate to.

Child marriage serves no purpose in the modern world and should be phased out globally.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom