- Joined
- Mar 27, 2021
In short: there are still very good chances of them succeeding, despite the recent setbacks.What are the chances of rebels succeeding, as it was in Syria? I'm not a burmasperg, all I know it has been a failed state since at least WW2.
While the Tatmadaw still controls the major urban areas, the population within them seems mostly hostile to the military rule, and a large majority of the territory, especially in rural areas, is wholly or partly beyond the army's control, whose convoys struggle to move around without falling into deadly ambushes. The case of the flotilla travelling up the Irrawaddy illustrates this once again.
On the other hand, unlike Syria, where the situation was a little more ‘simple’, given that there were ‘only’ — IIRC —, before Assad's fall, the loyalist clan composed of the Syrian army, Hezbollah and local militias, facing the HTS pocket around Idlib; pro-Turkish troops on the northern border alongside its FSA proxy; the Kurds, under a united banner; and the remnants of Daesh in the desert areas. More or less.
In Burma, while there are certainly only two sides to the main barricade — pro- or anti-regime — which is currently preventing opponents of the SAC from squabbling too much, there are a myriad of ethnic groups with their own aspirations (for autonomy or even independence, I admit I haven't checked each case individually), and, within these groups, militias and dissident groups, either rallying to the other side or choosing neutrality, therefore sometimes outright infighting, creating a civil war within the civil war.
All this with a Chinese regional heavyweight that, while it certainly does not have military bases in Myanmar as Russia did in Syria, nevertheless has much more significant long-term economic interests, and above all, immediate proximity to its eastern border. Russia is also quite heavily involved in Myanmar, despite the distance. Somewhat like in the case of North Korea, to draw a tenuous parallel, this allows a pariah regime (in the eyes of the West, at least) to diversify its supplies, as relations between China and the Burmese army have not always been smooth, and the latter still struggles to acknowledge the crucial aid provided by China in recent months. It would be shameful for the proud Tatmadaw to depend on foreign countries for its survival.
Despite this aid, and the territorial gains that followed, the rebels are advancing on multiple other fronts. The country's economic situation remains precarious, again despite Chinese bailouts, and the earthquake a few weeks ago did nothing to help matters. Within the army, the massive and often forced conscription that has been in place for several months is providing some breathing space for decimated troops, but motivation is sometimes lacking, and defections are frequent. Both sides are becoming increasingly well armed.
To conclude, and so as not to launch into yet another lengthy discourse on my part and repeat myself once more (or is it already too late?), if the rebels closest to the country's major cities, namely the PDF, formed in 2021 and composed largely of Bamars (or Burmans, the ethnic group forming the core of Burma, which gave the country its [former] name — although it seems that Myanma[r] is also a synonym for Bamars or Burmans — read more sperging about names here), were to sweep into Mandalay or Naypyitaw before being welcomed with open arms in the former capital city Yangon, they would still not control large parts of the country, whose future would then be impossible to predict. An amicable federation, new conflicts, total implosion with the proclamation of independent states, or direct Chinese intervention place its pawns or prevent the army from collapsing?
We are not there yet. And honestly, if it was possible at the beginning of 2024, and that was the rebels' stated objective, to bring down the junta in 2025, I think that is now an illusory goal. It would really take a total debacle towards Mandalay to perhaps trigger it. Yet there are so many fronts for the Tatmadaw to manage at the same time, and it has lost so many men and weapons that one wonders how it is still holding on. And yet it is holding on. We will see what happens next, particularly in Kyaukphyu and Bhamo.
Some fresh news at last, the flotilla appeared to be stuck in Shwegu, having been forced to turn back and moor there following multiple attacks from the shore.
Even more interestingly, the MDNAA, which has been in a ceasefire with the Tatmadaw since Chinese pressure and the handover of Lashio to the junta, is said to have threatened retaliation following bombings (see above) on the town of Kutkai, which is jointly occupied by the TNLA and the MNDAA. According to The Irrawaddy, the junta carried out no fewer than five air raids in the region within 24 hours, killing 37 people and also injuring a Chinese national in Kutkai. It also bombed other places, as usual. Honestly, having followed the conflict for some time now, the military's airstrikes are sometimes quite crazy — in the choice of locations, I mean. One sometimes wonders what motivates them, given the sheer number of targets available. It uses Russian or Chinese aircrafts, drones, but also paramotors.
Generally speaking, Myanmar is a nice testing ground for weapons, even 3D-printed guns.
Oh yes, and I forgot, to expand the comparison with Syria — the environment is completely different. No desert expanses and straight lines, but mountainous areas, hills and dense jungles with chaotic climates. This would complicate the possibility of a lightning assault, I believe.
EDIT
Some other news:
Also:
And:
US Lifting Sanctions on Myanmar Junta Allies ‘Unconscionable’: UN Expert
GENEVA—The UN’s Myanmar expert on Wednesday criticized the US decision to lift sanctions imposed on the ruling generals’ allies and their military-linked firms, branding it “unconscionable”.
Washington lifted the sanctions after the junta chief sent a glowing letter of praise to US President Donald Trump earlier this month.
Tom Andrews, the special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, said removing sanctions from individuals and companies that have provided weapons, supplies and other material support was a “shocking” turn in US policy that risked emboldening the junta and its enablers.
“This is a major step backward for international efforts to save lives by restricting the murderous junta’s access to weapons,” he said in a statement.
“It is unconscionable to undermine these efforts by rolling back sanctions on Myanmar arms dealers and junta cronies.”
(…) Andrews, a Democrat former US congressman, urged Republican Trump’s administration to reconsider.
“It is literally a matter of life and death,” he said. (…)
Last edited: