- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
It integrates a lot of new tech such as the gun tube, keeps commonality with the Abrams, meaning the crew from one tank can work in the other with minimal training time.Autoloaders are not new technology as the French figured them out in the 1950s and the Soviets mastered them in the 1960s. It's just lazy at this point not use mature technology as even the M8 AGS had one as well. Plus no active protection system just means this thing will get clapped by a random FPV drone in the field. For $13ish million dollars a pop, it is a rip off.
And because of the FAILURE of the M8 AGS autoloader, the US Army wanted something no frills that would "just work" like Todd Howard. You can't fuck up a guy shoving a tried and tested 105mm round into the chamber, just can't.
Also it has room for expansion. There are plans for engine and APS upgrades. The Army just wanted the tanks now, because it's been well over 20 years since they had a light tank, or in this case, an "assault gun".
They just wanted something they could load with cheap HE and HESH/HEP rounds and blow up structures and bunkers without having to fill up a entire ass C-17 with a partially disassembled M1 Abrams. Can it be used as a tank? Sure. They want it to blow up shit first and foremost, armor second.
On cost, it's being built in America by Americans. Chinks have the slave labor perk and also don't give a fuck about protection. Weighing as much as a base T-72 at 42-46 short tons probably means it has similar if not greater protection due to composites. That is also not counting the better computers and optics than a Chink tank.
TL;DR the M10 Booker is kino.
