What is it about what I said that confused you? I agree that women have every reason to oppose the Republican party as long as it continues to pander to the religious right. I already said as much twice you dumb cunt. I also said, twice, that I think the people responsible for those comments should be kicked out of office.
The reason I constructed that hypothetical is because I thought, apparently in vain, that it would be a simple enough scenario for even a pant wetting windowlicker to grasp that the religious right view abortion as literal baby murder. And they are opposed to baby murder. They don't hate women, they hate baby murder. Do you get it yet champ? They think abortion is baby murder. I don't think that, the religious right does. That's why they said those things. Stop me if I'm going to fast for you.
And I don't know why evangelicals would care, I'm not a Republican.
The 'evangelicals' we keep hearing are a section of the movement.
A number of churches considered evangelical are left leaning. The reason we take notice of them is 1) their size and density in the US and 2) activism is a core segment of evanglicalism. Any evanglical Christian (or any religion that is spread mostly by evangelism) worth their salt should be easy to spot, because it is their version of the pronoun obsession. Hell, Trump had decided to ignore the Catholic vote until mid-September, and that population is supposed to be pro-life (and pro-worker, pro-environment, pro-family, and option to the poor).
The GOP's abortion stance has been othing more than proverbial seasoning for their main course of militarism, supply side economics, and the extraction industry. Look at how they happily nominated a man who's position on abortion changed several times in 1 interview. Remember, Trump only got involved on two big parts of the GOP platform: the Wall, and trade. Pence was his concession to draw the social conservatives, which he had pandered to with weak promises and
lack of substance. Fucking Pence is the sort of asshole that would make those comments, he headed a publication that printed an article lamenting the inclusion of AIDS victims at the GOP convention, says condoms are ineffective, and thinks creationism
the explaination for the very origins of life.
How the fuck is the GOP going to play victim of 'the media' when they keep defending the sort of assholes who seem to lack an understanding of biology and compassion for unexpected mothers-to-be?
A nice jab at Clinton, though it was a fucking retarded stratagy to bring up something that had already been tried once in the 1990's and hope that Hillary would be pulled down with Bill. I just hope they don't...
Oh boy...
The only thing to make it worse would be somebody thinking this push to ensure full consent was a liberal idea...
A retard said:
I would say I feel bad for Trump, but since he was onboard with holding a conference with Bill's accusers, and tried to have them intercept Bill before the debate...fuck him and everyone who said "yeah, do that".
Jeff Sessions, who sits on the
Senate Judiciary Commitee originally said he wouldn't call Trump's "grab em by the pussy" statements “sexual assault. I think that’s a stretch.”
Ben Carson thinks everyone is so shocked about the tape because maybe "you know, people have not heard this".
I can kinda understand the concepts of what they were saying, but right now I'm just in awe of the worst damage control in my lifetime. What the fuck happened?