MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How would he be better? Hillary is just a continuation of Obama's policies. He's more "likeable" but that's irrelevant.
Everyone knows she's pure politics and keeps any actual deeply held philosophies far away from view. If every utterance of hers might be a lie, the only way to make predictions as to what her policies will actually be like is to look at Bill's presidency. And there's the problem. Most of my fellow democrats like to romanticize Bill's tenure and chalk up the economy during that period to his brilliance, rather than simply riding the .com bubble. They forget how fucking Greenspan kept lowering the interest rate every three to six months, trying to keep that high going and inadvertently encouraging (along with Bush's help and that cocksucker Greenspan) the eventual housing crisis.

But what really raises my hackles about Bill was his gleeful cooperation in welfare reform. A democrat willingly assisted congress in fucking over poor people. Why the republicans wanted to impeach the guy is beyond me. He was their best friend, aiding them in accomplishing something they were unable to do for decades. Forever after, my memories of Bill Clinton will be, "Poor people? Lol."

So, basing Hillary on Bill's results, I'm expecting a president that would work with congress to fuck over her constituency as long as she gets what she wants. In this regard, Trump is potentially better, as I doubt congress will want to actually work with him.
 
I look forward to the spin of the news that Trump declares Obama a US Born citizen.

Indeed, the original birther was, you guessed it, HRC, and the Trump merely "finished her business." Thats how effective Trump is. Even Hillary can't finish her work on time and Trump effectively did it for her.
 
Everyone knows she's pure politics and keeps any actual deeply held philosophies far away from view. If every utterance of hers might be a lie, the only way to make predictions as to what her policies will actually be like is to look at Bill's presidency. And there's the problem. Most of my fellow democrats like to romanticize Bill's tenure and chalk up the economy during that period to his brilliance, rather than simply riding the .com bubble. They forget how fucking Greenspan kept lowering the interest rate every three to six months, trying to keep that high going and inadvertently encouraging (along with Bush's help and that cocksucker Greenspan) the eventual housing crisis.

But what really raises my hackles about Bill was his gleeful cooperation in welfare reform. A democrat willingly assisted congress in fucking over poor people. Why the republicans wanted to impeach the guy is beyond me. He was their best friend, aiding them in accomplishing something they were unable to do for decades. Forever after, my memories of Bill Clinton will be, "Poor people? Lol."

So, basing Hillary on Bill's results, I'm expecting a president that would work with congress to fuck over her constituency as long as she gets what she wants. In this regard, Trump is potentially better, as I doubt congress will want to actually work with him.

The right wins either way. I guarantee despite courting sjw morons and black lives matter speds if elected Hillary will govern to the right of center like her husband.
 
Do you realize how insane you have to be to think it'd be better for Obama to become a dictator than four years of Trump then voting in someone else?
 
I look forward to the spin of the news that Trump declares Obama a US Born citizen.

Indeed, the original birther was, you guessed it, HRC, and the Trump merely "finished her business." Thats how effective Trump is. Even Hillary can't finish her work on time and Trump effectively did it for her.

Thankfully fact checkers exist and found that Trump's statements are false.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ump/hillary-clinton-obama-birther-fact-check/

The birther movement refers to the long-running myth that Obama was not born in the United States and thus, under the Constitution, could not be president. Trump promoted this beliefavidly for several years with anyone who would listen. This week, Trump told Late Show host Stephen Colbert that he doesn’t "talk about it anymore."

Did Clinton not just start the birther movement but back it wholeheartedly by being "all in"?

The paper trail

The allegation about Obama’s birthplace tracks back to the bruising 2008 Democratic primary between Obama and Clinton. According to a Telegraph article, as early as April 2008, a Clinton supporter passed around an email that questioned where Obama was born.

"Barack Obama’s mother was living in Kenya with his Arab-African father late in her pregnancy," it said. "She was not allowed to travel by plane then, so Barack Obama was born there and his mother then took him to Hawaii to register his birth."

The cry that Obama was not a legitimate candidate grew much louder in June 2008.

On June 7, 2008, Clinton conceded and called for all Democrats to rally behind Obama. Some in her party did not care to listen. By June 10, 2008, opponents to Obama were posting on a website called Pumaparty.com. PUMA stood for Party Unity My Ass. The website encouraged frustrated Clinton supporters to back the Republican nominee.

John Avlon, editor-in-chief of the Daily Beast, explored the roots of the birther movement in his book Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe Is Hijacking America. Avlon described a posting on the PUMA website with the heading "Obama May Be Illegal to Be Elected President!" He wrote that a Clinton volunteer in Texas, Linda Starr, played a key role in spreading the rumor.

Starr connected with Pennsylvania attorney Philip Berg in August and Berg followed up by suing in federal court to block Obama’s nomination. The suit was thrown out repeatedly on the grounds that Berg lacked standing and the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately refused to hear his appeal.

There is no record that Clinton herself or anyone within her campaign ever advanced the charge that Obama was not born in the United States. A review by our fellow fact-checkers at Factcheck.org reported that no journalist who investigated this ever found a connection to anyone in the Clinton organization.

Clinton, herself, answered this very accusation after Trump's tweet during an interview with CNN’s Don Lemon. Lemon asked Clinton if she started smear campaigns that Obama was born outside the United States.

"That is – no. That is so ludicrous, Don. You know, honestly, I just believe that, first of all, it’s totally untrue, and secondly, you know, the president and I have never had any kind of confrontation like that," Clinton said. "You know, I have been blamed for nearly everything, that was a new one to me."

We should note that the birther rumor is distinct from the myth about Obama’s religion, which is what got the ball rolling at the Trump event in New Hampshire.

Our ruling

Trump said that Clinton started the birther movement and "was all in."

It’s an interesting bit of history that the birther movement appears to have begun with Democrats supporting Clinton and opposing Obama. But Trump, and others who have made this claim, neglect to mention that there is no direct tie to Clinton or her 2008 campaign.

The story appears to have started with supporters of Clinton, an important distinction.

Trump goes on to completely distort the chain of events by claiming Clinton "was all in" on the birther movement. Most of the talk started after Clinton suspended her presidential campaign. And the only thing she officially has ever done is deny any accusation of starting a whisper campaign.

We rate this claim False.
 
Do you realize how insane you have to be to think it'd be better for Obama to become a dictator than four years of Trump then voting in someone else?

Nope Trumpster is the leastest evil (unless you count Cthulhu) but 4 more years of Obama may be a lesser evil than 4 years of Hillary. Just marginally... but when you are mouth deep in shit, do you really want it to reach your nose? Or do you want it Trumped down to your neck?
 
Four years of a terrible new president is millions of times better than a suspension of the constitution and it's absolutely reeetarded to say otherwise
 
Four years of a terrible new president is millions of times better than a suspension of the constitution and it's absolutely reeetarded to say otherwise

I'd have to agree here, for the most part either Trump or Hillary would be severely limited in how much they can do if either gets elected, it's not the end of the world but its also not something to take lightly.

Hillary would just be Obama, Trump would just be Bush.
 
Do you realize how insane you have to be to think it'd be better for Obama to become a dictator than four years of Trump then voting in someone else?
Do you realize how autistic you have to be to take everything you read on the farms literally?

Given the choice, most people would rather have another Obama term (4 years) than a Clinton or Trump one, but no one honest to god wants the constitution to be thrown out and for him to be a dictator.
 
It's a dumb thing to say ID RATHER HAVE PIKACHU THAN TRUMP/HILLARY LOL

And the whole thing about Obama staying president I've heard tons of people muse about here and elsewhere
 
Four years of a terrible new president is millions of times better than a suspension of the constitution and it's absolutely reeetarded to say otherwise
Unless we're talking democratically elected left-wing politicians, amirite?

I'd have to agree here, for the most part either Trump or Hillary would be severely limited in how much they can do if either gets elected, it's not the end of the world but its also not something to take lightly.

Hillary would just be Obama, Trump would just be Bush.
Trump is an open sympathiser of Ba'athism, and Hillary Clinton's the cruelest Nixonian the DNC's ever backed.

They're not fit to shoe-shine James Buchannan.
 
The right wins either way. I guarantee despite courting sjw morons and black lives matter speds if elected Hillary will govern to the right of center like her husband.

Courting morons and the worst of your base is pretty much a given if you want to be president. The problem with that is they might someday realize you've been using them and take over like the Teabaggers did with the Republicans.
 
You know you fucked up when you make Trump look sane and reasonable by comparison.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom