MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do all these people who blab on and on about belonging to the 'master race' always look like SHIT?

Because if they had any personally positive characteristics of their own, they would not have to cling so desperately to race or nationality or some other group they belong to.

Racists of all races are usually a disgrace to their own race, one of the more amusing ironies of the phenomenon.
 
Because if they had any personally positive characteristics of their own, they would not have to cling so desperately to race or nationality or some other group they belong to.

Racists of all races are usually a disgrace to their own race, one of the more amusing ironies of the phenomenon.
Basically. It's a big reason why MRAs are generally worthless slobs, and the two groups overlap so much. They don't actually have any positive characteristics on their own so they cling desperately to whatever elite group they happen to belong to through sheer luck so that can feel superior to someone.
 
Debate time.

Apparently rubio is throwing the kitchen sink at trump in a desperate attempt to look less robotic.

Little late for that now.

 
If she had better positions to my taste I wouldn't care so much about her being an unscrupulous monster.

Pretty much anyone who supported the catastrophic failure of the Iraq War is on my permanent shitlist.

Clinton also presided over the savage asfucking of the American middle class that was NAFTA and, along with Hillary, continues to pimp the abbatoir that is the for-profit prison industry in the name of "tough on crime." This is not only a vast human rights atrocity, it is also an exorbitant waste of enormous amounts of money.

I don't think we can look forward to much but the continued evisceration of the middle class under Hillary.

And just as an example of the reprehensible utter bullshit this woman will say with a straight face:

“On Defense of Marriage [Act], I think what my husband believed — and there was certainly evidence to support it — is that there was enough political momentum to amend the Constitution of the United States of America, and that there had to be some way to stop that. And there wasn’t any rational argument — because I was in on some of those discussions, on both ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ and on DOMA, where both the president, his advisers and occasionally I would — you know, chime in and talk about, ‘You can’t be serious. You can’t be serious.’ But they were. And so, in a lot of ways, DOMA was a line that was drawn that was to prevent going further. It was a defensive action.”

–Former secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton, interview on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show,” Oct. 23, 2015

Now that's just bullshit of the deepest dye. No Constitutional amendment of this sort would ever, ever have passed, much less been ratified by 75% of the states. This is just crazy talk.

And this is what this woman will say to someone like Rachel Maddow who couldn't possibly believe it. As I pointed out, with a straight face. A very, very, straight face.

If it helps, I've read a number of biographies by former Secret Service agents and books about the Secret Service in general that paint Hillary Clinton as an extremely nasty, two-faced individual who positively took delight in tormenting agents assigned to her detail. The sheer number of recorded incidents in these publications paints her as a highly vindictive, calculating persona with very few personal scruples. I'm not American, but evidence like that would immediately turn me off voting for a person like this.
 
If it helps, I've read a number of biographies by former Secret Service agents and books about the Secret Service in general that paint Hillary Clinton as an extremely nasty, two-faced individual who positively took delight in tormenting agents assigned to her detail. The sheer number of recorded incidents in these publications paints her as a highly vindictive, calculating persona with very few personal scruples. I'm not American, but evidence like that would immediately turn me off voting for a person like this.
So she has a few personal scruples? That's doing well for a politician
 
Trump took good few hits last night from rubio. I'm not sure whether that'll affect super tuesday as there's little time for data gathering.

I'd still say the donald is hard to beat at this point, even with the successful attack on trumps university fraud.


Rubio has abandoned his 3-2-1 strategy and is now trying to manipulate a potential brokered convention.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/rubio-prepares-to-take-trump-to-contested-convention/
Attendees at a Manhattan meeting on Wednesday told CNN that Terry Sullivan gave a presentation involving two paths to victory. The individuals, who asked to remain anonymous, said they were given two scenarios that are likely to unfold before July’s Republican convention:

  • Anti-Trump factions coalesce around Rubio and he uses that momentum to win the nomination.
  • Rubio fights for the nomination at a brokered convention when none of the candidates receive a simple majority.
Wednesday’s meeting came one day that Donald Trump handily came in first place in Nevada’s caucus. The billionaire, who also won in New Hampshire and South Carolina, secured 45.9 percent of the vote.

Someone should remind Rubio that the GOP cant just hand the nomination to the 2nd or 3rd place loser.
 
Trump took good few hits last night from rubio. I'm not sure whether that'll affect super tuesday as there's little time for data gathering.

I think Trump is past the point where he can be hurt by bad debate performances. He took some pretty bad hits from Jeb prior to New Hampshire, and he still rampaged home.

Someone should remind Rubio that the GOP cant just hand the nomination to the 2nd or 3rd place loser.

Can't they? If it's a brokered convention (unlikely, I know, but theoretically possible) then they can hand the nomination to anybody, including somebody who wasn't in the primaries.
 
Can't they? If it's a brokered convention (unlikely, I know, but theoretically possible) then they can hand the nomination to anybody, including somebody who wasn't in the primaries.

Well they can do it but-
  • It'll look very, very bad
  • Trump could run third party
  • The base are past the point of no return and might stage a political revolt
Theoretically they can but politically it's out of the question.
 
Well they can do it but-
  • It'll look very, very bad
  • Trump could run third party
  • The base are past the point of no return and might stage a political revolt
Theoretically they can but politically it's out of the question.

I think if the final delegate count was close enough and the gap between first, second and third was narrow enough the optics wouldn't be so awful. Remember, a lot of Republican voters really dislike Trump and would be unlikely to revolt.

Also, Trump has already promised he won't do a third party run. Which yes, in theory he could break, but then he'd have the same problems you just outlined.
 
Also, Trump has already promised he won't do a third party run. Which yes, in theory he could break, but then he'd have the same problems you just outlined.

True, but your assuming trump is rational and cares about consistency or honesty.

He's completely driven by ego and cant allow himself to lose.

Or maybe he can. I'm not sure.

I still think he'll be the nominee. If rubio is the supposed 2nd place candidate then he cant lose his home state (currently down 16 points). Cruz is also wining almost nowhere except Texas and recent polling is calling that into question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump winning all contests in huge landslides except first one - Doubters still go on about a "Third Party Run."
 
If a brokered convention betrays him, which they very well may do as the Hail Mary pass to stop him from becoming the nominee, he will futilely run solely to punish the GOP.

If Trump can get a certain amount of delegates, a brokered convention will not happen, and if Trump keeps getting landslides, he will just win more and more delegates.
 
Someone should remind Rubio that the GOP cant just hand the nomination to the 2nd or 3rd place loser.

That's true. The Democrats can do that, which is what they'll do to hand Hillary the nomination no matter how the voting goes.

Ironically, though, the GOP nomination process is more "democratic."
 
A poll released today show rubio losing by 16 points in his home state

http://www.vox.com/2016/2/25/11112928/rubio-trump-poll-florida
trump rubio poll.png


This has made Rubio desperate. He's now insisting trump wet himself during the debate.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...02/marco-rubio-donald-trump-con-artist-219843
Marco Rubio relentlessly mocked Donald Trump on Friday, escalating the attacks he unleashed during Thursday night’s debate and even suggesting the Republican frontrunner may have wet his pants on the stage.

“He called me Mr. Meltdown. Let me tell you something, last night in the debate during one of the breaks, two of the breaks, he went backstage and he was having a meltdown,” Rubio claimed. ”First he had one of those makeup things applying around his mustache because he had one of those sweat mustaches. Then, then he asked for a full length mirror, I don’t know why because the podium goes up to here (gestures to chest). I don’t know why maybe to make sure his pants weren’t wet.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-...-donald-trump-con-artist-219843#ixzz41IyxIqXi

"lol u wet urself "

:story:



Excuse the double post but there's been another crucial development.

There's a leaked memo circulating that confirms what we were thinking. The GOP doners themselves think Rubio is not a viable candidate and are exploring launching an independent bid.

independantbit.png


A memo prepared for the group zeroes in on ballot access as a looming obstacle for any independent candidate, along with actually identifying a viable, widely known contender and coalescing financial support for that person. The two states with the earliest deadlines for independent candidates, Texas and North Carolina, also have some of the highest hurdles for independents to get on the ballot, according to the research.

“All this research has to happen before March 16, when inevitably Trump is the nominee, so that we have a plan in place," a source familiar with the discussions said. March 16 is the day after the GOP primary in Florida, a winner-take-all contest that Marco Rubio supporters have identified as a must-win to stop Trump's early momentum.

“It’s critical some serious attention is given to this,” the source said.

The document, stamped “confidential,” was authored by staff at Data Targeting, a Republican firm based in Gainesville, Fla. The memo notes that “it is possible to mount an independent candidacy but [it] will require immediate action on the part of this core of key funding and strategic players.”

Data Targeting did not respond to a request for comment on the memo.

The research points to Texas and North Carolina as early tests for running an independent, conservative candidate against Trump and the Democratic nominee. The candidate would need to gather over 79,900 valid petition signatures in Texas by May 9 and over 89,000 in North Carolina by June 9.

Only two other states have thresholds that high, and gathering petitions can be an expensive and time-consuming process. What’s more, the Texas signatures would have to come entirely from voters who did not vote in this year’s Democratic and Republican primaries.

But “with 38 electoral votes in play in Texas and North Carolina’s true swing state status, failing to qualify in either or both states would render any independent candidate non-viable,” the report's authors wrote. “This is logistically possible but will require immediate action.”

By July 15, the independent candidate would need more than 460,000 voter signatures to make the ballot in 11 states. Assuming an April 1 start date, the campaign would have to gather 4,345 valid signatures per day to maintain a steady pace.

This is how Micheal Bloomberg enters the race
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Every presidential election seems to always manage to be more batshit than the last.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom