I've spilled a lot of ink on the psionics and internal consistency discussion. I don't require people to agree with me, I only care that they understand me. I feel I've articulated my own position well enough that agree or disagree, it's at least not due to misunderstanding my argument. So I personally am moving on from that specific area. I don't think
@Krokodil Overdose is wrong in his facts so much as how much weight he places on them. As
@Oilspill Battery points out, there are in-universe references to psychics before that point so we know it's a real thing in-universe. I'm fine with the government not having figured out how to weaponise it in a way that demands on-screen covering of that. Who even knows that a "trauma bomb" would be a good weapon compared to tank, nukes and rayguns or whatever else they work on. Anyway, not being drawn into this futher. I'll comment on the below, though.
That doesn't count. I do love the fact that people with magic powers were just such a given to people that they didn't need an explanation. Moses and his snake staff trick being easily replicated by someone else like it was very low level magic was pretty odd too.
I've always taken that to indicate that it was a magic trick in the modern sense of the term. He turns a stick into a snake - sounds like standard suggestion and misdirection and sleight of hand. He turns water to blood - adding dye? He summons frogs? Several ways to do that. They sound like conjuring more than they do miracles. Moses, if he existed, was a Hebrew raised in the royal court and presumably knew the tricks and magic of the priesthood. The whole thing sounds more like someone initiated into some Mystery Cult going rogue and trying to split off from the rest. So much of the Old Testament is just a book of dirty tricks and parables about getting ahead by being sneaky or untrustworthy. Like David vs. Goliath - many ancient cultures had a tradition of settling things via appointed champions. And for good reason: actual combat in an age without antibiotics, hospitals, surgery or the ability to care for disabled people (or disabled to be able to contribute) was a disaster. You couldn't have dozens of your menfolk crippled, brained and maimed. So two brave champions would battle to decide it for all. This also worked because wars weren't usually existential back then. Who has rights to the fish in this river, who gets to live in this valley, etc. So the champion system was proportionate. What do we get in David and Goliath? The Israelites repeatedly refusing to accept the results of the fight and demanding do-overs culminating in some little shit who kills the enemy champion from afar with a sucker punch missile. Most of the "miracles" in the Old Testament read as tricks, not miracles. March around Jericho for seven days blowing trumpets and banging drums and then God brings the walls tumbling down? Or just masking the sound of sappers undermining them?
So when it comes to stories of magic in the Old Testament most of it sounds more like a Mystery Cult and its initiates bamboozling the masses and the kings with "magic".
The reason I said that is because you can enjoy watchmen without liking superhero comics, or without ever even having read one. Its a deconstruction that works even without people being intimately or even vaguely familiar with the thing its deconstructing. I have older relatives who've never even touched a comic who like watchmen.
This feels tautological to me. If you like Watchmen then you
do like a superhero comic by definition. Your older relatives have touched a superhero comic - Watchmen is a superhero comic. And I would imagine if they liked it there are other comic works out there that they would like but the barrier to entry due to so much of it depending on knowledge outside that specific story is the issue. Which was your earlier point I
did agree with, it's very hard to find a superhero epic that is standalone, in the West. But I don't think you can use the argument above to suggest that Watchmen isn't or doesn't need to be a superhero comic. I think that has to be argued by reference to the text. I laid out my reasons earlier why I think the superhero elements (costumes, names, etc.) are an intrinsic part of the themes and story.