💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Timestamp: 55:20

People like this retard are why everything in this country gets fucking ruined.

I found this because of Louis Rossmans recent video. Idk who this guy is, but I can not stand people like him, I can say that much knowing nothing else about him. This straight up white nigger, only thinking about what he wants high time preference retard. In fact he's worse than a normal nigger because they would probably just shoot someone and get locked up. Instead of using the dmca amd trying to set legal precedence.

Nigger no one cares about your permission to use your piece of shit video.

To give the rest of the context.


Rossman has a problem with it because of the 1201 claims. Rightfully so.

Obviously the guy is a clown, 1st Amendment auditor. So he's probably already a lolcow to some people.


Then the linked/showed this live stream. From the context hes the guys lawyer? Ill have to go through and actually listen to all of this to make sure thats correct.


Timestamp: 58:30

Going through the rest of this livestream there is a lot here outside of just this piece of shit copywrite lawyer lol. The autism is strong with this one.

A "retard alert" even got dropped in this stream. A kino casino viewer?

Holy shit lmao. "Im definitely a more of a Nick Fuentes kind of guy" lmao bro.

Ok thats enough editing in comments on this stream. This is something i think is worth diving into a bit more, thats the last thing I'll add.

I lied one last edit, just to say. I think DMCA lawyers might be the only scum worst that shitty ambulance chaser scam lawyers that file bullshit frivolous lawsuits.
 
Last edited:
I cut a perfect loop of "Mad at the Internet - FederalAmericanGovernment" and after listening to it for a few days I wanted to share it here. If you play it foobar or a similar player that can perfectly loop, it's completely seamless.

 
Fuck you Josh, now i cant stop listening to Francis E. Deck in the background while i work. Is oddly soothing as background noise, at this rate i will start speaking like him.
 
Also, if you end up talking about British News next MATI, please show this image, my friend drew it and wants it to be printed in a history book in a few decades.

StarmerL.png
 
A mayor in Grand Rapids Michigan by the name of David Lagrand has been going viral recently for 2 very shit takes
He thinks that gun owners should be ashamed of themselves (Link)

And he also gave a spiritually Muhammadeen take by demanding K-9 units be put down after a shooting investigation (link)
 
So this is funny for the anisa/ian segment of mati (thanks to @Bulgarian Lives Matter for the clips)
Remember when I mentioned that hunter went full shitlib and said fuck ice (both as an animated video and the small bit in the buc-ee's video)
So meatcanyon shittalked another podcast because he didn't like their review of the wolf of wall street: so the people on this podcast are talking about how the wolf of wall street is long (as is ususal with scorsese movies) they say that the first hours good but when you pause the film you realize you have 2 more hours to the film, and meatcanyon then compares wolf of wall street to marvel capeshit avengers endgame and says "isnt that movie 4 hours long?" Tldr meatcanyon's just calling these people on the other podcast nerds.

So some black guy on tiktok talked about what happened

This isn't really important as its in the background of idubbbz stream.
So idubbbz calls meatcanyon apolitical (and compares him to charlie moistcritical)

 
Haven’t seen a single mention of it on this site yet, but there’s a company called Fridababy that sells tech for babies (thermometers etc)

Lately there’s been some controversy because of some wildly pedophilic marketing they’ve been doing.

View attachment 8555532View attachment 8555533View attachment 8555534View attachment 8555535View attachment 8555537View attachment 8555538View attachment 8555542
The CEO's surname is (((Hirschhorn))). We shouldn't be surprised.
 
:null: Please believe me... I was a feeder...


 
Last edited:
I saw this on my timeline now I’m going to make you suffer through these retards (Link)
I have no clue what I'm intended to feel from this besides discomfort. This is like those videos of news stations saying the exact thing overlayed, identical in every single way. Makes me think they're bug people that were fed a script and haven't had a single individual thought since the womb.
Am I supposed to feel inspired? Is the autotuned niggerbeat in the back supposed to get my heart pumping? Is this what the average zoomie responds to?
 
Is this what the average zoomie responds to?
as someone who's technically one, this shit's fucking vertical slop and anti-ice crap. knowing the usual tiktok audience however..... they're the type that enjoys shitlib propaganda, being that they'll yell about ice agents, netanyahu, israel, and trump being bad all the time, that and it's got all their favorite creator's that they watch. tldr look its a bunch of people saying buzzword must stare at the colors and cuts to different people
light-cubes-sped.gif
 
same stick & 2 days left till friday
1772068204588.png
1772069110813.png

Punished GABE vs NewYork court
CSGO LOOTBOX IS THE BATTLEGROUND
note: yes, this is waaaaay late after issue
1772068392990.png

1772068529650.png 1772068550546.png 1772069048179.png

Attorney General James Sues Game Developer for Promoting Illegal Gambling Through Video Games
Valve’s Counter-Strike, Team Fortress, and Dota Games Have Slot Machine-Like Features That Entice Users to Pay for the Chance to Win Rare Prizes That Can Be Exchanged for Money
Lawsuit Alleges Valve’s In-Game “Loot Box” Feature Violates New York’s Gambling Laws and Can Lead to Serious Harms, Especially for Young People
February 25, 2026
NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James today sued Valve Corporation (Valve), a video game developer, for illegally promoting gambling through video games popular with children and teenagers. An investigation by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) found that Valve’s video games, including Counter-Strike 2, Team Fortress 2, and Dota 2, enable gambling by enticing users to pay for the chance to win a rare virtual item of significant monetary value. In Valve’s most popular game, the process resembles a slot machine, with an animated spinning wheel that eventually rests on a selected item. The randomly selected virtual items have no in-game functionality but can be sold online for money, with one item reportedly being sold for more than $1 million. The lawsuit alleges that Valve has made billions of dollars luring its users, many of whom are teenagers or younger, to engage in gambling in the hopes of winning expensive virtual items that they can cash in on. With this lawsuit, Attorney General James seeks to permanently stop Valve from continuing to promote illegal gambling in its games and to pay disgorgement and fines.

“Illegal gambling can be harmful and lead to serious addiction problems, especially for our young people,” said Attorney General James. “Valve has made billions of dollars by letting children and adults alike illegally gamble for the chance to win valuable virtual prizes. These features are addictive, harmful, and illegal, and my office is suing to stop Valve’s illegal conduct and protect New Yorkers.”

Valve is a developer, publisher, and distributor of video games and the operator of a platform called Steam, which allows users to directly download its games, including Counter-Strike 2, Team Fortress 2, and Dota 2. The lawsuit alleges that Valve enables gambling through these games by charging users for the chance to win a rare virtual item by paying to open a virtual container known as a “loot box.”

The virtual items awarded when a user opens a “loot box” are cosmetic, like a hat for a player’s character or artistic skins for a player’s weapons. Like slot machines, the prizes won from loot boxes are determined randomly in accordance with odds set by the casino, which in this case is Valve. Valve intentionally makes some items far harder to win than others, making the rare items more valuable. Despite having no in-game functionality, these virtual items can be extremely valuable, with the rarest items selling for thousands of dollars online.

The value of Counter-Strike’s skins rose significantly in recent years, attracting speculators and investors who viewed these virtual items as potentially lucrative digital assets. In March 2025, it was reported that the market for Counter-Strike skins had surpassed $4.3 billion.

Valve allows users to cash in on the virtual items they have won in two ways. Users can sell the items they won through Valve’s own virtual marketplace, the Steam Community Market, where they can use the proceeds to buy other video games, video game hardware, and other virtual items. Users can also connect their Valve accounts to third-party marketplaces where the virtual items can be sold directly for cash. The OAG’s investigation found that Valve facilitates and even assists these third-party marketplaces in their operations.

The high value of Counter-Strike’s rare skins and the ease of liquidating items through third-party marketplaces have made Valve’s virtual items an attractive target for thieves. Valve has received hundreds of thousands of support requests from users reporting that their Steam accounts had been hacked, or that they had been tricked into transferring items to a bad actor.

Valve’s loot box model can be especially harmful to children. Attorney General James asserts that young users with limited funds can be enticed to start gambling through loot boxes in the hopes of obtaining a virtual item that they believe will enhance their status in the games’ virtual worlds. Research has shown that children who are introduced to gambling are four times more likely to develop a gambling problem later in life than those who are not. In addition, although this case is about illegal gambling, it is important to note that Valve’s promotion of games that glorify violence and guns helps fuel the dangerous epidemic of gun violence, particularly among young gamers who can become numbed to grave violence before their brains are fully developed.

In the lawsuit filed today, Attorney General James seeks to permanently stop Valve from promoting gambling features in its games, disgorge all ill-gotten gains, and pay fines for violating New York’s laws.

This lawsuit is the latest effort by Attorney General James to protect children online and prevent illegal gambling in New York. Earlier this month, Attorney General James warned New Yorkers of the risks posed by sports betting and prediction markets ahead of the Super Bowl. In February, Attorney General James and a bipartisan coalition of 39 attorneys general called on Congress to pass the Senate version of the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) to protect children and their data. In 2024, Attorney General James championed New York’s SAFE for Kids Act to restrict addictive social media feeds for users under 18. Attorney James is currently leading bipartisan coalitions in separate lawsuits against Meta and TikTok addressing the harms to young people’s mental health caused by those platforms. Last year, Attorney James stopped 26 online casinos masquerading as legal sweepstakes from illegally operating in New York.

This matter is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Marc Montgomery and Alexandra Hiatt and Senior Enforcement Counsel Jordan Adler under the supervision of Bureau Chief Kim Berger and Deputy Bureau Chief Clark Russell, of the Bureau of Internet and Technology. The Bureau of Internet and Technology is a part of the Division of Economic Justice, which is led by Chief Deputy Attorney General Chris D’Angelo and overseen by First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.
1772068755690.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
So idubbbz calls meatcanyon apolitical (and compares him to charlie moistcritical)
(Barely related canned rant) Well, he is. I've been watching Hunter for years (his actual appearances, not his shitty cartoons). He's always the second most (insert ideology) in the room. His takes are abrasive, only if the other person makes a more abrasive take. On a podcast he ran with Tom (and vaguely haunted by Don) from Flashgitz, "Cream Crew", he would always mirror Tom's extreme views. If Tom were to say "I want every brown person crucified in London Town square", Hunter would bounce off that as easily and passionately as if one of his new, progressive friends said "ICE are murderers and need to be skinned in the streets".
He's not this outspoken political pundit that the farms thinks he is, hes just a sponge. A loud one, and a funny one if you put him around the right person.
Anyway I recommend Cream Crew, on YouTube/other podcast sites, wholeheartedly, Tom may be the most chudly man to exist on this Earth. Shame he's a brit.
 
I have noticed that in American culture now there is zero expectation that anyone shows up on time and showing up on time basically ensures you will have a 10+ minute wait.
Thought it was normal for any appointment to check in at least 15 minutes (that is ass in seat not getting out of the car) before the schedules time? Everything from haircuts to a doctor's appointment. That way they can work around those whose needs go either shorter or longer than the scheduled appointment. Which is why if possible always choose the earlier appointments. Also always book earlier in the week to get people when they are more energetic rather then Friday at 4 pm when people are tired and ready for the weekend thus likelier to give poor quality service. There should be a Freakenomics chapter or blog about which quantifies and describes this in more detail but I cannot find it off hand.
 
For whatever reason, nobody ever pays attention to state-level legislation and nobody ever bothers to intervene by writing their local representatives to not pass retard bills.

Governor Gavin Newsom, subhuman retard that he is, just gave his stamp of approval for a bill by the name of AB-1043, which forces all operating systems to implement ID verification to prove the end user is 18 or over. If you live in California, congratulations, you no longer own your own hardware and you must do the goy shuffle to use your computer like you're buying alcohol at a liquor store.

California's websites are all so shit that I can't even get the proper page for the bill to load, and had to resort to using the Wayback Machine to get the text of the bill so I could relay it to you here.


Assembly Bill No. 1043
CHAPTER 675
An act to add Title 1.81.9 (commencing with Section 1798.500) to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, relating to consumer protection.
[ Approved by Governor October 13, 2025. Filed with Secretary of State October 13, 2025. ]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST​

AB 1043, Wicks. Age verification signals: software applications and online services.
Existing law generally provides protections for minors on the internet, including the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act that, among other things, requires a business that provides an online service, product, or feature likely to be accessed by children to do certain things, including estimate the age of child users with a reasonable level of certainty appropriate to the risks that arise from the data management practices of the business or apply the privacy and data protections afforded to children to all consumers and prohibits an online service, product, or feature from, among other things, using dark patterns to lead or encourage children to provide personal information beyond what is reasonably expected to provide that online service, product, or feature or to forego privacy protections.
This bill, beginning January 1, 2027, would require, among other things related to age verification with respect to software applications, an operating system provider, as defined, to provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder, as defined, to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store and to provide a developer, as defined, who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface regarding whether a user is in any of several age brackets, as prescribed. The bill would require a developer to request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.
This bill would prohibit an operating system provider or a covered application store from using data collected from a third party in an anticompetitive manner, as specified.
This bill would punish noncompliance with a civil penalty to be enforced by the Attorney General, as prescribed.
This bill would declare its provisions to be severable.

Digest Key​

Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO


Bill Text​


The people of the State of California do enact as follows:​

SECTION 1.​

Title 1.81.9 (commencing with Section 1798.500) is added to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:

TITLE 1.81.9. Digital Age Assurance Act​



1798.500.​

For the purposes of this title:
(a) (1) “Account holder” means an individual who is at least 18 years of age or a parent or legal guardian of a user who is under 18 years of age in the state.
(2) “Account holder” does not include a parent of an emancipated minor or a parent or legal guardian who is not associated with a user’s device.
(b) “Age bracket data” means nonpersonally identifiable data derived from a user’s birth date or age for the purpose of sharing with developers of applications that indicates the user’s age range, including, at a minimum, the following:
(1) Whether a user is under 13 years of age.
(2) Whether the user is at least 13 years of age and under 16 years of age.
(3) Whether the user is at least 16 years of age and under 18 years of age.
(4) Whether the user is at least 18 years of age.
(c) “Application” means a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application.
(d) “Child” means a natural person who is under 18 years of age.
(e) (1) “Covered application store” means a publicly available internet website, software application, online service, or platform that distributes and facilitates the download of applications from third-party developers to users of a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing that can access a covered application store or can download an application.
(2) “Covered application store” does not mean an online service or platform that distributes extensions, plug-ins, add-ons, or other software applications that run exclusively within a separate host application.
(f) “Developer” means a person that owns, maintains, or controls an application.
(g) “Operating system provider” means a person or entity that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system software on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device.
(h) “Signal” means age bracket data sent by a real-time secure application programming interface or operating system to an application.
(i) “User” means a child that is the primary user of the device.



1798.501.​

(a) An operating system provider shall do all of the following:
(1) Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store.
(2) Provide a developer who has requested a signal with respect to a particular user with a digital signal via a reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface that identifies, at a minimum, which of the following categories pertains to the user:
(A) Under 13 years of age.
(B) At least 13 years of age and under 16 years of age.
(C) At least 16 years of age and under 18 years of age.
(D) At least 18 years of age.
(3) Send only the minimum amount of information necessary to comply with this title and shall not share the digital signal information with a third party for a purpose not required by this title.
(b) (1) A developer shall request a signal with respect to a particular user from an operating system provider or a covered application store when the application is downloaded and launched.
(2) (A) A developer that receives a signal pursuant to this title shall be deemed to have actual knowledge of the age range of the user to whom that signal pertains across all platforms of the application and points of access of the application even if the developer willfully disregards the signal.
(B) A developer shall not willfully disregard internal clear and convincing information otherwise available to the developer that indicates that a user’s age is different than the age bracket data indicated by a signal provided by an operating system provider or a covered application store.
(3) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a developer shall treat a signal received pursuant to this title as the primary indicator of a user’s age range for purposes of determining the user’s age.
(B) If a developer has internal clear and convincing information that a user’s age is different than the age indicated by a signal received pursuant to this title, the developer shall use that information as the primary indicator of the user’s age.
(4) A developer that receives a signal pursuant to this title shall use that signal to comply with applicable law but shall not do either of the following:
(A) Request more information from an operating system provider or a covered application store than the minimum amount of information necessary to comply with this title.
(B) Share the signal with a third party for a purpose not required by this title.



1798.502.​

(a) With respect to a device for which account setup was completed before January 1, 2027, an operating system provider shall, before July 1, 2027, provide an accessible interface that allows an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or both, of the user of that device for the purpose of providing a signal regarding the user’s age bracket to applications available in a covered application store.
(b) If an application last updated with updates on or after January 1, 2026, was downloaded to a device before January 1, 2027, and the developer has not requested a signal with respect to the user of the device on which the application was downloaded, the developer shall request a signal from a covered application store with respect to that user before July 1, 2027.



1798.503.​

(a) A person that violates this title shall be subject to an injunction and liable for a civil penalty of not more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) per affected child for each negligent violation or not more than seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) per affected child for each intentional violation, which shall be assessed and recovered only in a civil action brought in the name of the people of the State of California by the Attorney General.
(b) An operating system provider or a covered application store that makes a good faith effort to comply with this title, taking into consideration available technology and any reasonable technical limitations or outages, shall not be liable for an erroneous signal indicating a user’s age range or any conduct by a developer that receives a signal indicating a user’s age range.



1798.504.​

(a) This title does not modify, impair, or supersede the operation of any antitrust law.
(b) This title does not require the collection of additional personal information from device owners or device users other than that which is necessary to comply with Section 1798.501.
(c) An operating system provider or a covered application store shall comply with this title in a nondiscriminatory manner, including, but not limited to, by complying with both of the following:
(1) An operating system provider or a covered application store shall impose at least the same restrictions and obligations on its own applications and application distribution as it does on those from third-party applications or application distributors.
(2) An operating system provider or a covered application store shall not use data collected from a third party in the course of compliance with this title to compete against that third party, give the covered application store’s services preference relative to those of a third party, or to otherwise use this data or consent mechanism in an anticompetitive manner.
(d) The protections provided by this title are in addition to those provided by any other applicable law, including, but not limited to, the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (Title 1.81.47 (commencing with Section 1798.99.28)).
(e) If any provision of this title, or application thereof, to any person or circumstance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this title that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this title are declared to be severable.
(f) This title does not apply to any of the following:
(1) A broadband internet access service, as defined in Section 3100.
(2) A telecommunications service, as defined in Section 153 of Title 47 of the United States Code.
(3) The delivery or use of a physical product.
(g) This title does not impose liability on an operating system provider, a covered application store, or a developer that arises from the use of a device or application by a person who is not the user to whom a signal pertains.



1798.505.​

This title shall become operative on January 1, 2027.

Similar legislation is being presented in Colorado, that means this is a coordinated Democrat maneuver to strip anonymity of political dissenters at the operating system level. You can expect this sort of horseshit to occur at the Federal level once Democrats seize a majority in Congress under a Democrat president sometime in the future. You can also expect this to begin happening in other blue states, if it isn't underway already.


To the retards out there who are smugly saying "suffa California, suffa" this shit will impact you and will spread like a plague. Microshit, Apple and a majority of Linux distros are not pulling out of blue states just so they don't have to obey retard laws, they'll instead obey and simply force red state users to choke down the ID verification shit too.

Websites will likely start complying by denying access to computers running operating systems without ID check bullshit as well.

This is not about le children, it's about stripping you of your privacy, your anonymity and eventually your ability to dissent against the government entirely.

This is a nightmare scenario and you're all asleep at the wheel.
 
I'm happy to report I have finally found a use for the giant screen in my car.
2026-02-25_18-44.png
Sadly, it only works while parked. Luckily, since it's electric that means that for every hour I drive I can watch an hour of MATI while I charge.
 
Back
Top Bottom