- Joined
- Jan 5, 2021
Null i think you need to check in chyat. They don't sound OK right now.
💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2021
Yeah sounds like a good deal to me. Read primary sources and papers from the comfort of my own home for slightly less money? Sign me up.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2022
Yeah, they pulled that card with Louis CK when it came out that he asked all the ladies before pulling his dick out.
But you know what's way easier than all this consent autism? Since the wahmen and their allies have been giving men unsolicited advice, here's an equal-value exchange:
Ladies, do not, I repeat, DO NOT enter a man's home, hotel room, car, or any other private location alone unless you want to fuck them!
Seriously, it's as simple as that. If you follow this one simple rule you will cut out 99.9% of post-coital "friends?" handshakes. Brony influencers HATE this one simple trick.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Counterpoint: Chris Chan
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2024
I've been watching libtard seethe videos ever since the election and I've noticed a couple things.
Almost every single person making these videos aren't American and they have literally no idea why they lost.
Take this spergs video for instance, he comes back from over 2 years of can't be bothered to upload fucking anything, to this, which is one of the worse ones I've seen, with such wonderful platitudes as "It's not illegal to be in MS-13".
This man is nigger cattle and I would Jesse Plemmons this faggot in a heartbeat.
Almost every single person making these videos aren't American and they have literally no idea why they lost.
Take this spergs video for instance, he comes back from over 2 years of can't be bothered to upload fucking anything, to this, which is one of the worse ones I've seen, with such wonderful platitudes as "It's not illegal to be in MS-13".
This man is nigger cattle and I would Jesse Plemmons this faggot in a heartbeat.
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2022
Attachments
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2021
Null said once that the senator who said "don't be alone with a female and you won't get your shit wrecked" (paraphrasing) has never had a rape accusation. He's right .
A few men have tried to initiate with me, one even took me to his house, but I being a fucking autist-retard only said eh I need to make dinner and if you won't take me home I'll walk. He took me home, and my vow has never been broken. So I agree, never be alone with a man especially if you can't take him down (with a butter knife, a dog, a gun, a car... Mother fucking take him down or out).
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2023
Luis Rossmann, right to repair advocate and cat enjoyer, has phone booked the owner of Better Way Electronics after scummy practices regarding refunds, spying on people using his software with DRM, banning people from using his software over petty reasons and striking Louis's channel. Turns out, the owner is a convicted sex offender who blackmailed underaged girls into committing sexual acts after hacking their devices.
Edit: BWE filed a privacy complaint on the video. According to Louis, he timestamped the phone booking as the privacy complaint violation, confirming that it was accurate
Clip of the phone booking in 360p. Skip to [2:20] in the clip or [14:20] in the video if you want to listen to his criminal charges, its vile.
Edit: BWE filed a privacy complaint on the video. According to Louis, he timestamped the phone booking as the privacy complaint violation, confirming that it was accurate
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 28, 2024
Link
Nick, you fucktard, YOU did this to your family. YOU brought the Imholtes into your family, YOU invited them other, YOU brought cocaine into YOUR house, YOUR daughter tested positive for YOUR cocaine (that YOU probably intentionally gave her). This is all YOUR fault, not Aaron's. It's un-fucking-believable that he cannot take ANY accountability for any of the consequences of his own actions. All of his "mistakes" were a lot of fun.
The good news from this is that his few fans are sick of the Aaron Imholte goo talk. I think the few scragglers will start fucking...
Reactions:
x 45 x 12 x 14 x 3
x 45 x 12 x 14 x 3
Todd Peterson is Aaron’s lawyer.
Todd Peterson is a criminal defense attorney. This isn't at all like Ty Beard who was an experienced civil litigator, but not so much in the specific area of defamation.
In Aaron's previous legal issues, including what his past criminal case he pleaded guilty to last year and both his divorces, he was represented by Casey Kolb, who's a generalist, and apparently a friend of Aaron's. The owner of Aaron's...
Reactions: x 20 x 31 x 10 x 4 x 1 x 1 x 1
x 20 x 31 x 10 x 4 x 1 x 1 x 1
Nick's seething hard on Twitter
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Yeah he's baiting people to post "racism" as their political leanings to be funny but he gets the money regardless.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
Does anybody remember which MATI and when the original clip of Null making fun of Ralph saying "I'm just so fucking stupid, your honor" is from?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I'm not ok! I'm very upset!
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Looks like it might be here:
At 19:18
or maybe
at 01:04:23
You too can use the MATI search tool.
or
And yes, I am working on catching up on the last few months plus some new-old streams that have show up in various archives.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Ralph was false DMCA'ing MATI on YouTube and I was complaining that the actual malice clause of 512(f) that made counter-suing for knowingly false DMCA complaints could easily be defeated in court by just going "I'm just fucking stupid"
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2024
Otherwise known as the "so you... wanna come up for some coffee?" "No, it's getting pretty late." defense.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2023
It's definitely this one, I remember it for sure. Here it is on Youtube, timestamped at the beginning of the context for the rant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8W4LWK5ivI&t=1051s
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
It was pretty crazy to hear Jewsh repeat the "b-b-but you need AFFIRMATIVE VERBAL CONSENT OR YOURE LITERALLY A RAPIST" line of thought, kind of a reddit take. The women in these e-celeb "rape/sexual assault stories" are usually dumb and don't know any other way to express the dirty feelings they have after being pump and dumped and conflate "allowing casual sex to happen and feeling bad after" with real, actual rape.
I don't feel bad for the niggas who get exposed btw, they reap what they've sewn. It's just not applicable to most normal people's situations, if you're not a complete autist than you can read body language and the fact that your previous escalations were not shot down without robotically asking "beep boop bop, ma'am can you sign this consent waiver so I may engage in intercourse with you beep bop" lmao
I don't feel bad for the niggas who get exposed btw, they reap what they've sewn. It's just not applicable to most normal people's situations, if you're not a complete autist than you can read body language and the fact that your previous escalations were not shot down without robotically asking "beep boop bop, ma'am can you sign this consent waiver so I may engage in intercourse with you beep bop" lmao
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2024
i thought i read bladee im so glad i misread"Heil Hitler" emo cover by "Baldee," artist on xitter:
https://x.com/georgefloydhigh/status/1921522916191023466
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2023
I miss @She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.
The cutesy rape apologia is also making me miss the week I was banned for tomboy posting.
Josh, did you know that tomboys were always a creepy fetish as a far back as the Beverly Hillbillies?
The cutesy rape apologia is also making me miss the week I was banned for tomboy posting.
Josh, did you know that tomboys were always a creepy fetish as a far back as the Beverly Hillbillies?
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
The go-to line of people angry at this just lie about what I've said. I did not say you need a literal contract. There is no false conflation of violent sexual assault and sexually predatory behavior, you are the one saying that. By the way: an identical point is made by lolicons, who say that calling lolicon 'drawn child pornography' harms the victims of real child pornography, though nobody actually conflates the two except the person making that argument.
I'll remind you that what this person did is: (1) invite an 18-year-old he's never met before into his hotel room, (2) showed her a video of a My Little Pony review, (3) immediately shoved her back onto the bed and had sex with her, (4) shook her hand and said "friends?" after the fact.
I genuinely believe this is predatory behavior. He took a woman younger than him who trusted him, brought her into a private space to treat her with gifts, brought her guard down with those gifts, suddenly proceeded to sex without any caution or foreplay or discussion, then immediately tried to distance himself from her.
To fault her for this, you would have to first accept that any woman walking into any hotel room of their own volition is consenting to spontaneous sex with whoever is there, or you would have to insist that for it to be nonconsensual that she must fight back in some way - which, if compared to any other offense, is nonsense. It's not theft if you don't explicitly say "please don't take my stuff" or violently assault the thief stealing your belongings.
For the second time, perhaps the instinct of a 20-year-old man is that it's her fault because she knows how he is, or that her meeting him again would retroactively make the first time consensual. However, as a man in his thirties, I know people well enough to say that this is poor decision making as a result of trauma from the first incident. What she wanted was to have a relationship with someone she had an online friendship/admiration for. When he took advantage of her and then immediately brushed her off, this causes an injury. Meeting with him a second time was her way of trying to regain control of her bodily autonomy. If she managed to loop him into a relationship then, it would retroactively make the first incident acceptable and she could get over it easier.
However, after the second incident, she could no longer cope with what had happened and she wrote a call-out post. This is again a way of trying to regain control of your life after being ejaculated on by a sperg in two separate bouts of spontaneous nonconsensual sex (there's another word for that).
Let's say that the person is autistic and doesn't understand that you can't re-enact your hentai porn in real life because real women don't like being subjected to spontaneous sex with strangers. What could Autsmo McClop done to avoid being credibly accused of rape? Let's see.
1. Asked "Do you want to have sex?"
2. Attempted foreplay.
If you say that 1 is unreasonable, you are a retard. If you are having casual sex with strangers you do not know, you should not rely entirely on body language, because this person is a stranger you do not know and you do not know their body language. Think of it like a dog. There's a strange dog. Do you pet it? Do you try to fuck it? No, because that's a strange dog and you don't know how it reacts to you yet. It might bite your cock off.
And there is nothing, absolutely nothing more awkward about asking "do you want to have sex?" in this situation in particular, considering this is a heavily autistic brony who just showed the woman he's trying to have sex with a My Little Pony review. Being able to demonstrate understanding of basic human concepts like consent might actually help him look less retarded and more attractive. Trying to say that asking "do you want to have sex?" is somehow a fucking mood killer when the proceeding 15 minutes to that question was a YouTube review of a fucking children's cartoon is the most absurd shit ever.
Second, you should basically always attempt foreplay. I don't think there's any sexual encounter that does not benefit from foreplay. Even spontaneous sex with a familiar person benefits from foreplay. It would have benefited Autismo McClop a lot to slowly heat up the encounter, and it would have allowed the woman more opportunity to more easily say she doesn't want to continue.
Lets say that she's a dumb, evil woman and goes along with 15 minutes of foreplay into sex with a brony. That would actually hurt her credibility a lot. If someone's leaning into a kiss and you go along with it for however long as it progresses to sex, that is implied consent and it's her fault if she suddenly regrets it. I would not blame the brony if he had brought the woman to his hotel room, he leaned in for a kiss, and then was rejected. I think even if the kiss landed and then she left and wrote a callout post, there's very little harm done and I could understand him thinking she would have romantic interests in him. But that's not what happened. There was no cuddling, no kissing, no intimacy of any kind. He physically shoved a woman half his size onto a bed and undressed her to have sex.
Do you know what the complete absense of verbal consent and foreplay indicates to me? Autismo McClop did not care if she consented, and he did not care if she enjoyed the sex. What does that sound like to you?
I'll remind you that what this person did is: (1) invite an 18-year-old he's never met before into his hotel room, (2) showed her a video of a My Little Pony review, (3) immediately shoved her back onto the bed and had sex with her, (4) shook her hand and said "friends?" after the fact.
I genuinely believe this is predatory behavior. He took a woman younger than him who trusted him, brought her into a private space to treat her with gifts, brought her guard down with those gifts, suddenly proceeded to sex without any caution or foreplay or discussion, then immediately tried to distance himself from her.
To fault her for this, you would have to first accept that any woman walking into any hotel room of their own volition is consenting to spontaneous sex with whoever is there, or you would have to insist that for it to be nonconsensual that she must fight back in some way - which, if compared to any other offense, is nonsense. It's not theft if you don't explicitly say "please don't take my stuff" or violently assault the thief stealing your belongings.
For the second time, perhaps the instinct of a 20-year-old man is that it's her fault because she knows how he is, or that her meeting him again would retroactively make the first time consensual. However, as a man in his thirties, I know people well enough to say that this is poor decision making as a result of trauma from the first incident. What she wanted was to have a relationship with someone she had an online friendship/admiration for. When he took advantage of her and then immediately brushed her off, this causes an injury. Meeting with him a second time was her way of trying to regain control of her bodily autonomy. If she managed to loop him into a relationship then, it would retroactively make the first incident acceptable and she could get over it easier.
However, after the second incident, she could no longer cope with what had happened and she wrote a call-out post. This is again a way of trying to regain control of your life after being ejaculated on by a sperg in two separate bouts of spontaneous nonconsensual sex (there's another word for that).
Let's say that the person is autistic and doesn't understand that you can't re-enact your hentai porn in real life because real women don't like being subjected to spontaneous sex with strangers. What could Autsmo McClop done to avoid being credibly accused of rape? Let's see.
1. Asked "Do you want to have sex?"
2. Attempted foreplay.
If you say that 1 is unreasonable, you are a retard. If you are having casual sex with strangers you do not know, you should not rely entirely on body language, because this person is a stranger you do not know and you do not know their body language. Think of it like a dog. There's a strange dog. Do you pet it? Do you try to fuck it? No, because that's a strange dog and you don't know how it reacts to you yet. It might bite your cock off.
And there is nothing, absolutely nothing more awkward about asking "do you want to have sex?" in this situation in particular, considering this is a heavily autistic brony who just showed the woman he's trying to have sex with a My Little Pony review. Being able to demonstrate understanding of basic human concepts like consent might actually help him look less retarded and more attractive. Trying to say that asking "do you want to have sex?" is somehow a fucking mood killer when the proceeding 15 minutes to that question was a YouTube review of a fucking children's cartoon is the most absurd shit ever.
Second, you should basically always attempt foreplay. I don't think there's any sexual encounter that does not benefit from foreplay. Even spontaneous sex with a familiar person benefits from foreplay. It would have benefited Autismo McClop a lot to slowly heat up the encounter, and it would have allowed the woman more opportunity to more easily say she doesn't want to continue.
Lets say that she's a dumb, evil woman and goes along with 15 minutes of foreplay into sex with a brony. That would actually hurt her credibility a lot. If someone's leaning into a kiss and you go along with it for however long as it progresses to sex, that is implied consent and it's her fault if she suddenly regrets it. I would not blame the brony if he had brought the woman to his hotel room, he leaned in for a kiss, and then was rejected. I think even if the kiss landed and then she left and wrote a callout post, there's very little harm done and I could understand him thinking she would have romantic interests in him. But that's not what happened. There was no cuddling, no kissing, no intimacy of any kind. He physically shoved a woman half his size onto a bed and undressed her to have sex.
Do you know what the complete absense of verbal consent and foreplay indicates to me? Autismo McClop did not care if she consented, and he did not care if she enjoyed the sex. What does that sound like to you?
Last edited: