- Joined
- Dec 11, 2024
I'm pretty sure the friend he is talking about is Stocking, so you might not be too far off.
💰 Grifter "Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2021
In solidarity with Null I threw up a bad chili dog I had last night
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2024
Oh wow. Would you look at that.
Looks like that famous, gook, insect like respect for human life worked out really well for him.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2024
They like to push the idea that incest is practiced by poor people in rural, undeveloped areas. But incest is a result of hedonism. In reality, incest is predominate in well-developed or well-established areas.
They also like to project onto White Southerners because it's an easy target.
Bummer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2022
This argument over "women invading mens spaces" really shows how much people desire simple schemas to navigate massively complex and dynamic societal situations with exceptions out the ass and it is very depressing.
First of all, the obsession with corporate careers as a status marker is a fairly new phenomenon. Most status in the past was conveyed by din of birth and people would fill rolls fit to their station. The idea that everyone in a society should go to university and pretend to be aspiring aristocrats jostling for status is a fucking retarded boomerism and kind of makes the foundation of this debate broken to begin with. Like for real, what are we arguing here, whether everyone in society should be living in a deeply psychologically unhealthy way or if it should only be men?
Second the entire argument should really be one of incentives and choice. I think if everyone just stopped pressuring women in one direction or the other and the economy wasn't fucking broken the percentages would probably break down like this. About 70% of women would find fulfillment in a domestic life, about 20% would girl boss and the remaining 10% would be loose or lesbians. Those are obviously out my ass numbers but it doesn't matter for my argument, the point is that right now we live in a society where powerful people are trying to engineer those numbers to bring the girlboss and slut percentages way up through social programming. This meddling is to the determent of women who find themselves in unfulfilling careers or unable to find a committed partner because of the pictures of their assholes on OF as well as the rest of society because we kind of need psychologically healthy women who aren't riddled with anxiety and depression. I see the retardrights disproportionate response to Mace as an understandable backlash against the current societal incentives but unfortunately it's a reaction that just seeks to push the pendulum all the way in the other direction.
The solution to all of this both economic and social. We need an economy that allows women and men who want to form single earner families that possibility and we need to accept women in the workforce without turning it into a pathological quest for equal percentages of women.
First of all, the obsession with corporate careers as a status marker is a fairly new phenomenon. Most status in the past was conveyed by din of birth and people would fill rolls fit to their station. The idea that everyone in a society should go to university and pretend to be aspiring aristocrats jostling for status is a fucking retarded boomerism and kind of makes the foundation of this debate broken to begin with. Like for real, what are we arguing here, whether everyone in society should be living in a deeply psychologically unhealthy way or if it should only be men?
Second the entire argument should really be one of incentives and choice. I think if everyone just stopped pressuring women in one direction or the other and the economy wasn't fucking broken the percentages would probably break down like this. About 70% of women would find fulfillment in a domestic life, about 20% would girl boss and the remaining 10% would be loose or lesbians. Those are obviously out my ass numbers but it doesn't matter for my argument, the point is that right now we live in a society where powerful people are trying to engineer those numbers to bring the girlboss and slut percentages way up through social programming. This meddling is to the determent of women who find themselves in unfulfilling careers or unable to find a committed partner because of the pictures of their assholes on OF as well as the rest of society because we kind of need psychologically healthy women who aren't riddled with anxiety and depression. I see the retardrights disproportionate response to Mace as an understandable backlash against the current societal incentives but unfortunately it's a reaction that just seeks to push the pendulum all the way in the other direction.
The solution to all of this both economic and social. We need an economy that allows women and men who want to form single earner families that possibility and we need to accept women in the workforce without turning it into a pathological quest for equal percentages of women.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
Amazon delivery driver berates a customer's doorbell cam over how much stuff they order.
Who was in the right here?
Who was in the right here?
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2023
NOOOOOOOOOOO I GOT HIRED FOR THIS JOB AND NOW I HAVE TO WORRRRRK NOOOOOOOO.
Classic nigga moment.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
I think @Bummer is more or less right. We keep echoing the argument about "women in the work place" but it was never really about that. Women have always had jobs, but certain fields were closed to them as a way to socially gatekeep dual-income families as being only a poor people thing (or a upper middle class thing. The UMC woman with a job-ie has also been around forever). The real flash point here seems to be desirable white collar jobs (stuff on a development track as opposed to secretarial work) opening that up to women without continuing to also socially enforce the "dual income households are for poors" taboo.
More-or-less instantly that doubled the pool of skilled/professional labor and caused a cascade on the labor market where now the majority of families feel they need two incomes to get by, but they don't make enough to hire domestic help and are basically slowly drowning from the combination of domestic and work tasks.
It doesn't particularly matter who stays home with the kids and who works, but the two full time wagie income family thing is just a huge trap that I firmly believe is responsible for most of the novel problems in society. I think it's the primary driver in the total collapse of civic and community organizations over the last 30 or 40 years because nobody feels like they have time with how much shit they need to do at home after work. Now on top of feeling pressed for time and broke nobody has a support system either.
At time goes on most things that started out feeling like women problems are becoming apparent as actually Jew/finance problems if you think about it for a minute. If you talk to people who are obsessed with gender relations it quickly becomes apparent they believe in some fantasy version of history that never happened - and are attempting to return to, or flee from, a past that never even existed.
More-or-less instantly that doubled the pool of skilled/professional labor and caused a cascade on the labor market where now the majority of families feel they need two incomes to get by, but they don't make enough to hire domestic help and are basically slowly drowning from the combination of domestic and work tasks.
It doesn't particularly matter who stays home with the kids and who works, but the two full time wagie income family thing is just a huge trap that I firmly believe is responsible for most of the novel problems in society. I think it's the primary driver in the total collapse of civic and community organizations over the last 30 or 40 years because nobody feels like they have time with how much shit they need to do at home after work. Now on top of feeling pressed for time and broke nobody has a support system either.
At time goes on most things that started out feeling like women problems are becoming apparent as actually Jew/finance problems if you think about it for a minute. If you talk to people who are obsessed with gender relations it quickly becomes apparent they believe in some fantasy version of history that never happened - and are attempting to return to, or flee from, a past that never even existed.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
Something I realized watching the video was, it's a black woman, and I cannot recall a single black woman coworker I've had in my entire adult life who was actually a good employee, not one. A few were mediocre, most were bad, and the worst coworker I've ever had was a black woman, she was so bad I quit the job (and upgraded my career, coincidentally, so I suppose I should be thanking her) over it. Every white woman I've ever worked with has been good to great. Every Hispanic woman I've ever worked has met the minimum standards of competence and many were great. But I've never ever in my entire life worked with a black woman who I would call good at her job. And it's not like I'm comparing apples to oranges here, these white and Hispanic women to black women comparisons are within the same fields, doing the exact same work. Non-black women just get it done and black women don't. Black women also loudly complain more than every other demographic, male and female, put together.
But I'm sure it's just a coincidence. After all, black women are the most educated group in America, right???
Watching that video, and reflecting on it for a little while, has made me realize there's more to it than JUST race, JUST sex, etc. You should take all visible factors into account before judging somebody you haven't yet interacted with, then you can interact with them if you so choose and adjust that judgement (or not) based on the content of their character.
I can't imagine a white woman, or a woman of any other race for that matter chimping out like that. I can see a man chimping out over that but he'd be more violent (probably smashing the boxes
), and a black man would be more likely to do so than other races. It's funny that a simple video of a delivery driver having a meltdown gave me so much to think about but I guess that's just the way it goes sometimes.
- Joined
- May 6, 2020
when you get a physical job and start complaining about breaking nails
I would assume this is a racist meme intended to make me dislike blacks if I didnt know better
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
Wasn't the claim a few years back that women were less likely to quit their job at Amazon then men? I remember more than a few poosters claiming men are just lazy and don't want to work, but here we have a female-gendered Amazon employee complaining that they be breaking they nails because too many boxes? What?
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2021
The nigger is in the right, actually. Did you know that 20% of their customer base makes 60% of the purchases. And it's always dumb gay trinkets that they'll throw away in a week or things they could have bought at the grocery store a few blocks away. The Amazon app is structured to make you addicted to daily purchases. If you quantified the amount of wasted gas, jet fuel, man hours and technology to deliver a toothbrush to a guys front door, you would be sickened. We should shame everyone who makes any and especially daily purchases from Amazon. Now the nigger is going about it in a stupid way. Smart Amazon drivers smash repeate customers packages in the truck and deliver them broken shit. If that happens three times in a week, Amazon has lost an addicted customer. Don't be upset with the nigger, you don't realize how many times a week they have to go to the same house to deliver a single small box, it would break you too.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Really? "Female" is the first word you jump to for this?
I wish, so badly, that 100 IQ people in general weren't the most disingenuous and intellectually dishonest people to ever fucking live.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
>Be hired to deliver boxes
>Get mad that you have to deliver boxes
Like, I get you want to make a broader pointy about how we live in a society, but you end your post with the implied argument that delivery drivers shouldn't be making deliveries.
I was actually being a bit sarcastic with my comment -- does the phrase 'female-gendered' get used in normal conversation? Do I need to be more obvious and/or crass to not get insulted by The Joshua Conner Moon? I can edit the post to "vagina-haver" if you so prefer.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
yes?
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2021
They shouldn't be. It's an unnecessary and dehumanizing job. Amazon should be abolished and would have been by now if our markets weren't speculative and based off growth rather than revenue. We invent fake service jobs that provide nothing and wonder why no one does their job right. It's retarded, and the peon handling the boxes is not to blame.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Postal delivery is literally so important that after WW2 the first thing we did in the occupation was set up postal service and we were in such a hurry to do so that we kept 3rd Reich stamps (all of which featured Hitler) to remain in circulation with monetary value.
Getting things from Point A to Point B is probably up there with prostitution and farming as the first jobs mankind created.
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
I guess this is my fault for not keeping up with modern high-society parlance. Outside of medical, where you note your 'sex' as 'male' or 'female', in every other real world conversation it's 'man' or 'women', with 'male' and 'female' being used for specific cases. I personally have never heard or uttered the phrase 'female-gendered' in my entire life. It seems a silly tautology.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2025
Delivering pieces of paper and maybe a small parcel or two are one thing.
Whoever this is orders the exact same thing by the cartload. If I understand that nigger it’s fucking water.
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2021
Well we already have UPS, USPS and FedEX. Why do we need Amazon too? It's a lot worse than a delivery company. Amazon can't even ship government documents so they're only good for buying gay plastic trinkets.