Lancelout
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
1: Gendered phrasing in the law is a product of the time it was created,. Can you think of a single example of a judge allowing a crime to go unpunished due to said gendered phrasing ?Eh, what Chris's done was so uncharacteristic for that land, that their system didn't even have the "mother-son" option, only "child-grandchild", but I am sure you knew this.
"Plausible" evidence is not evidence. Really, I am getting tired of this.
- They found something to arrest Chris.
- Well, he broke EPO.
- Eh. no, his charges say it's incest and there was enough time to determine that.
- No, there wasn't! There was not enough time.
- Ok, so Chris was charged with EPO violation?
- No, they removed him to determine if he did it.
- Ok, so they DID find something on Barb?
- No, they couldn't, here is teenheathcare link.
- Ok, so why did they arrest him then?
- Because they found additional evidence!
- But you said they couldn't at that time frame! What Barb said something?
- She couldn't, because she would've said her family!
- But they hate her to the point of leaving her on Chris!
- Doesn't matter, still family!
- I don't think you understand...
- All your claims are baseless!
Right.
Oh, now you are a psychiatrist as well.
Criminal code of Virginia : B. Any (((((person))))) who engages in sexual intercourse with his daughter or granddaughter, son or grandson, or father or ((((mother))))) is guilty of a Class 5 felony.
Clearly illegal
2: its fucking unreal how stupid you are lol
Plausible : : superficially fair, reasonable, or valuable
: appearing worthy of belief
So you are saying evidence worthy of belief isnt evidence ? Are you a fucking retard ?
3: Thats not how the argument progressed
- They arrested chris and therefore that proves they found physical evidence on barb- You
- It really doesnt , particularly considering they arrested him shortly after null reported he violated EPO, -me
- BUT HIS CHARGES DONT SAY EPO and there was 2.5 days to examine - You
- Rape kit takes atleast a week and thats assuming barb was competent to consent and consented. Also i didnt say he was charged with violating epo -me
- THEN THEY FOUND PHYSICAL EVIDENCE ON EXAMINATION OF SEX -You
- Gynos are not able to determine if someone simply had sex , here is source - Me
- Ok, so Chris was charged with EPO violation? -you
- No, they moved to arrest and charge with incest partially because of EPO violation -me
Im not going through fixing the rest of your bullshit to match reality; as it breaks down into utter nonsense that was never once claimed after that. They didnt remove him " to determine if he did it ". They removed him because there was a safety concern for a potential victim. That is addressed by serving an EPO . They didnt feel need to charge him yet and simply continued their investigation .This isnt complicated.
4: So wait, in a forum for discussing lolcows you are mad .. .about me discussing a lolcows potential mental state now.
Seethe harder phew