Life after prison - What happens if Chris is One Day released from prison

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Since most apartments run a criminal background and credit check on applicants prior to a lease offer (ironically enough it's easier to get a 99-year lease on a house in China than a 1-year lease on an apartment in the US these days) I think Chris might have to either live in a vehicle or use orbiter pity-bux to rent out motel rooms (which is not uncommon for sex offenders- to the best of my knowledge). I don't think Chris is self-aware enough to try to go to a shelter of any kind.

Quite frankly I think if he tries to stay in Ruckersville he might be in serious physical danger from pissed-off locals not wanting a pariah around. I can see him going somewhere like rural Appalachia because it's not too far away.
There are plenty of Section 8 shitholes and 1960s motels that have been converted into crappy apartments that will gladly take Chris's tugboat.
 
People vastly overestimate Chris’s importance and relevance.
 
Chris has yet to be charged with rape and he might not be. The courts want to deal with this quickly. I bet he gets court mandated psychological services and probation, a no contact order with Barb and will be forced to move to some shitty one room apt in a converted hotel for half his tugboat a month.
 
Since most apartments run a criminal background and credit check on applicants prior to a lease offer (ironically enough it's easier to get a 99-year lease on a house in China than a 1-year lease on an apartment in the US these days) I think Chris might have to either live in a vehicle or use orbiter pity-bux to rent out motel rooms (which is not uncommon for sex offenders- to the best of my knowledge). I don't think Chris is self-aware enough to try to go to a shelter of any kind.
On the off chance Chris isn't registered as a S.O. is there a pervert park (sex offender community) that could accept him?
 
Chris has yet to be charged with rape and he might not be.
Do we know that Chris hasn't gotten charged with rape? They always look for more evidence when someone is put in jail for a crime like this. If they have found evidence of rape after Chris was booked, do they need to publicly say Chris is now charged with rape? Or can they keep that quiet at least until the first hearing?

Especially since everyone knows who Chris did this too so the victim doesn't feel shamed more?
 
Do we know that Chris hasn't gotten charged with rape? They always look for more evidence when someone is put in jail for a crime like this. If they have found evidence of rape after Chris was booked, do they need to publicly say Chris is now charged with rape? Or can they keep that quiet at least until the first hearing?

Especially since everyone knows who Chris did this too so the victim doesn't feel shamed more?

From what I've read he can be charged with anything before the trial begins and will likely keep some really heavy weight charges in reserve to leverage a plea, I think they will likely add it to the list at some point it just doesnt have to be now as there is no way in hell Barb consented.
 
Barb writing to him in jail (as per one of the letters) makes me think.
 
Chris has yet to be charged with rape and he might not be. The courts want to deal with this quickly. I bet he gets court mandated psychological services and probation, a no contact order with Barb and will be forced to move to some shitty one room apt in a converted hotel for half his tugboat a month.
About this - if in 9 days Chris will have another continuance, there can be no mistake, charges are VERY serious, even beyond incest. No defender would've wasted so much time on something that could result in a slap on the wrist.

Do we know that Chris hasn't gotten charged with rape?
They could add more charges, but the case got a continuance. There is also a problem that if it wasn't rape, then Barb was a consensual participant, therefore could be charged with incest too. Yes, Barb is too old to serve time in jail, but that doesn't mean she can't be charged and she wasn't after 3 months.

Barb writing to him in jail (as per one of the letters) makes me think.
There can be two explanations - firstly, don't forget their relationships are terribly codependent, so she probably asked him for money, that's why he asked "to bring gifts to the temple" or some shit. That also opens disgusting possibility, that Barb was indeed a consenting participant, but the second she felt that authorities could take her away from her hoard, quickly threw Chris under the bus. Secondly, are we sure it was Barb who sent that letter and not some other islamic tranny?
 
About this - if in 9 days Chris will have another continuance, there can be no mistake, charges are VERY serious, even beyond incest. No defender would've wasted so much time on something that could result in a slap on the wrist.


They could add more charges, but the case got a continuance. There is also a problem that if it wasn't rape, then Barb was a consensual participant, therefore could be charged with incest too. Yes, Barb is too old to serve time in jail, but that doesn't mean she can't be charged and she wasn't after 3 months.


There can be two explanations - firstly, don't forget their relationships are terribly codependent, so she probably asked him for money, that's why he asked "to bring gifts to the temple" or some shit. That also opens disgusting possibility, that Barb was indeed a consenting participant, but the second she felt that authorities could take her away from her hoard, quickly threw Chris under the bus. Secondly, are we sure it was Barb who sent that letter and not some other islamic tranny?
I’m repeating myself, but it’s yet to be addressed really. Why does everyone insist that Barb absolutely must be charged if it was consensual? I’m not a lawyer, but I’m fairly confident that is simply not true. For a hypothetical comparison, what if this was a case of consensual incest between a middle aged father and a very young but legal age daughter? Even in the absence of evidence of statutory rape, I can’t imagine any prosecutor would ever charge the daughter in that case. Why is this case so different? There are many other potential scenarios where they just don’t have the evidence to meet the standard for a rape conviction but wouldn’t want to charge both
 
Why does everyone insist that Barb absolutely must be charged if it was consensual? I’m not a lawyer, but I’m fairly confident that is simply not true.
Well, for starters, because in a case that Chris defended and which was a sign of things to come the size of a little aircraft carrier, mother and son were both arrested, since they both were willing participants of something illegal.
Also, how do you even imagine that? Incest is having sexual relationship with a close relative i.e. mother, father, son, daughter, etc. Chris can be charged as someone who had sex with his own mother and Barb can be charged as someone who had sex with her own son. It can affect only one participant only if other one was doing that unwillingly.
 
Does Barb know about the protective order? If Barb is willingly contacting Chris and is found to be sane, in the right mind, can that void the protective order?
The odds that Barb sent the letter are as likely as Cole sent the flowers: None whatsoever.

The only flaw in that theory is a ween would have uploaded the reply to Reddit or some other shithole by now, so maybe there is no letter, just Chris lying again.
 
The only flaw in that theory is a ween would have uploaded the reply to Reddit or some other shithole by now
Well, maybe he looked at this and changed his mind. But yeah, I've kinda skipped the possibility of it being a lie, just like when he claimed that he indeed met Miyamoto.
 
Meeting the legal definition does not mean the DA’s office is guaranteed to put forth charges. That’s exactly my point. Even if she said she was an enthusiastic participant to the police, I can’t imagine them pursuing the case against a nearly home bound 80 year old woman. I bring up the hypothetical of a father and 18-19 year old daughter just to say it’s absurd to think both would always be charged. Even if this hypothetical daughter “consented,” no one in their right mind would view her as anything other than the victim of her father although it wouldn’t meet the standard for rape. Between Chris and Barb, there’s a potential for a similar thing.

The ultimate point, as I keep reiterating, is that there are many other possible outcomes besides the strict dichotomy between Barb going to jail and Chris facing a rape charge. Barb not being charged tells us almost nothing about what happened.
 
Even if she said she was an enthusiastic participant to the police, I can’t imagine them pursuing the case against a nearly home bound 80 year old woman.
"I can't imagine" isn't a legal term. No one cares how old she is as long as she breaks the law. They wouldn't put her behind bars, but they would prosecute her regardless and put her into some shitty nursing home instead.

I bring up the hypothetical of a father and 18-19 year old daughter just to say it’s absurd to think both would always be charged.
I've showed you the case where mother and son were prosecuted for having consensual incest. If in your hypothetical case she would be a willing participant, she would be prosecuted too, since she is of legal age i.e. can consent. Just because you "can't imagine" doesn't mean it wouldn't be the case.
 
From what I've read he can be charged with anything before the trial begins and will likely keep some really heavy weight charges in reserve to leverage a plea, I think they will likely add it to the list at some point it just doesnt have to be now as there is no way in hell Barb consented.

The original arrest was brought on because Chris broke the EPO against Barb which leads to the admission of Incest, hence the charge for Incest. There's no doubt that Chris broke the EPO by transferring the $750.00 from Barb's PayPal - and in Chris's letter to Kenzie, one could successfully argue Chris is breaking the EPO again by encouraging people to send donations and make contact.

There's likely a backlog on Barb's rape kit. If I had to make a guess, I'll say that Chris' coming court case November 18th will be given another continuance and held in a legal limbo until they process the rape kit. Besides which, Consolvo has an ACTUAL murder case that he's trying to get done first, so Chris may have to wait in jail for a few more months.
 
Well, for starters, because in a case that Chris defended and which was a sign of things to come the size of a little aircraft carrier, mother and son were both arrested, since they both were willing participants of something illegal.
Also, how do you even imagine that? Incest is having sexual relationship with a close relative i.e. mother, father, son, daughter, etc. Chris can be charged as someone who had sex with his own mother and Barb can be charged as someone who had sex with her own son. It can affect only one participant only if other one was doing that unwillingly.
From the authorities standpoint, they have Chris saying that it was consensual and being adamant about it, then there's Barb's interview and we have no idea how that went yet. There's obviously an incentive for Barb to try to get Chris off now vs the Snyder Ramming since now, there's no Bob. Chris is the last man Barb will have contact with in a meaningful way, so there's probably a "Kin before Strangers" thing going on. I think Barb has a clear mistrust of "the authorities" and might have played the feeb with them or was unwilling to say, give a statement that Chris forced himself on her thinking she can put one over on Johnny Law and get the Golden Tard back into 14 Branchland.

I think Barb did indeed write to Chris, because not having his tugboat around means less stuff for her. Even though neighbors help, I bet they aren't helping with money, and Chris glomming onto the "donations" for her is exactly like when she was wrangling his begging scams.

Barb will probably not be charged simply because they aren't going to handcuff and book a near 80 year old woman, however they can keep Chris away from her, which would be just punishment enough.
 
Well, for starters, because in a case that Chris defended and which was a sign of things to come the size of a little aircraft carrier, mother and son were both arrested, since they both were willing participants of something illegal.
Also, how do you even imagine that? Incest is having sexual relationship with a close relative i.e. mother, father, son, daughter, etc. Chris can be charged as someone who had sex with his own mother and Barb can be charged as someone who had sex with her own son. It can affect only one participant only if other one was doing that unwillingly.
Bro, idk why you're acting like the criminal justice system has any sense of consistency or logic to it, but wherever you got that idea it's definitely poorly founded.

I legitimately have no idea why people can't accept that Barb was as into this as Chris was. Like, shit, go ahead and ask Josh: he's had a way closer relationship with Chris than most and has already echoed the same beliefs that I have, that these two had a really weird relationship going back years, on both Barb's and Chris' part.

The authorities got involved because they suspected there might be some kind of actual elderly abuse going on, due exclusively to the reports of outside observers. I'd be willing to guess that at this point they've realized they've gotten themselves involved in some insane shit they didn't bargain for and just want out.
I'll say the same thing I have before: if Barb is competent enough to live alone, which Chris' letter confirms she is, she'd be competent enough to consent and testify, and she will not testify that Chris raped her. That's all there is to it. Case closed.

So what will happen after prison? Nothing, cause he won't go to prison. After jail though Chris will get time served plus probation and mandatory counseling, which he'll whine about and it remains to be seen if he'll comply. Unless he's legally barred from going back to Branchland, that's what he's going to do. A-logs will seethe, white knights will cope, everything will go on as it has.
 
Back
Top Bottom