I don't understand one thing. Those are supposed to be the bad guys. Why would 'media literacy' people want characters meant to be evil for the sake of it as their little hecking gay icons?
It's because the woke want everything to be a hugbox; EVERYTHING must be about them and their fetishistic/hedonistic worldviews, and the only people that're truly evil, in their eyes, are the "straight white Christian male" stereotypes that they brainwash themselves to hate. It's a cult mentality, plain and simple.
It's another thing I genuinely do not understand in media in general. You want to be disabled in D&D and have a normal ass wheelchair? Why not just cure your handicap with magic or a potion.
I think the only fantasy game that I remember, off the top of my head, that actually handled the topic of a disabled character well was AdventureQuest. Sage Uldor, one of the major characters, is a man that was born blind; the game and story actually bring up that there were potential treatments for his blindness in lore. Thing is, his disability was explicitly supernatural in nature, and implied to be tied to his (somewhat limited) future sight abilities; friends and family tried countless times to fix his vision, but nothing would ever last, and his body is too old and frail nowadays to keep up with the treatments anymore regardless. Nonetheless, he does his best to support you and the rest of the cast, albeit strictly in a non-combatant role most of the time, and the game goes at lengths to discuss issues that he faces.
In sci-fi games, meanwhile, we have Hugh Darrow, from Deus Ex: Human Revolution. The main creator and progenitor of mechanical augmentation, Darrow himself is noted to not have any augs installed, instead still making use of a leg brace and cane whilst also missing an arm. There's two main reasons for this, and both of which tie heavily into his motives; the main reason is that he has an extremely rare genetic condition that makes his body violently reject any and all attempts at modification, meaning he can't benefit from any of his own creations. The other, is that he
wants to stop a conspiracy to control the human race through augmentation, via sending out a specific signal that drives every augmented individual insane; trying to warn the world of the dangers of excessive augmentation, essentially.
I think the main issue with how the woke handle disabilities is that... there's never any attempts at justification, worldbuilding, anything, that would justify why a character is still disabled when treatments are available. Both examples I mentioned above address why the characters are still crippled in a world where treatments are a thing, and the disabilities both help shape the characters and motivations, rather than simply being a trait that's tacked on. By contrast, the woke shove disabled characters in a setting for the sole purpose of their fetish fantasies; it's not representation, it's hedonism.