- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
At one point you have to admit a problem has crossed the line of just a rare anomaly to become systemic. I've mentioned "Whatever" before which is a novel and movie from the 90's. Back when that was made there were incels but they were very rare so they weren't taken seriously, even themselves had a more "aw shucks, well there's always next time!" attitude than the blackpill of today.
But those were genXs, as a millennial even before the incel thing went mainstream I was noticing that things were getting worse. The whole "college is a 24/7 sex party" movies told back then was a total lie to sell movie tickets. Even in frat houses not everybody was getting laid, I got laid more in highschool that in college, nuff said.
But the real inflection point were dating apps, not online dating which goes back all the way to the 90's, that one actually sort of worked and I did get lucky with okc back when it was a website and not yet another tinder clone owned by the match group. But tinder changed everything, it made even the mid girls who made the bulk of "approachable women" put on airs because now even the kind of hot men who wouldn't give them the time of day in public would DM them for a quicky.
Now consider if 5/10 below-average dudes were suddenly getting DMs from really hot women for a quicky, how many of them would settle with a 5/10 girl? or even a 7/10 above-average girl when they can get laid with a 10/10 almost on demand?
That's the situation with women now. Social media only compounds the problem by basically telling all confirmed spinsters that they are great the way they are. Its only when they get too old (mid 40s and up) when the veneer starts fading out and even corpos drop them because its bad optics for the brand to show haggard cat ladies with their products. But in the meantime they get nothing but praise, if they don't actively look for criticism in the bowels of the internet they wont ever see it, corpos will never make an empty egg carton joke but they have made many equivalent hurtful comments about men with no consequences.
Basically mass media reinforces a femcel-lite behavior, they don't go all the way but they are almost there, just have to openly call for most men to be killed.
While that article its nothing but basement-level misandry she does make a point here:
"With advances in women’s rights, women gained the ability to take care of themselves"
Except I'll argue that the big difference is that single women are no longer humilliated and peer-pressured to find a man. Its not just economics, you had women living alone and working for themselves 200 years ago, and there were always convents. But back then society shunned you for doing that while today single women are practically leonized by the state, the corpos and media.
However single men are still being humiliated, probably even more than before. Its asinine to believe this social asymmetry has no consequences.
You're FAMOUS now!
Do you have to ask? feminism has always from the start been the me!me!me! movement, it was literally started by rich western white women who thought their right to vote was more important than those of poorer mostly non-white men. They always try to latch themselves to any trendy movement to leech support and prestige, often being told by people like marx to fuck off back to bougie town (probably one of the few coherent thoughts hungry santa had). They hated the gays at first for not wanting to fuck them then learned to co-opt them, rinse & repeat.
If this woman wants the village to raise her child she could move to a kibbutz where that's how things worked, oh but you have to do actual work there! tilling the fields, repairing a tractor, they don't want some useless latte sipping blogger, and she wouldn't be caught death doing manual labor anyway.
This part: "If this were a town square, a hundred years ago, my neighbour would no doubt get off his arse and help carry my bags or watch my child while I do the return trip to get the second load."
How out of touch can she be? 100 years ago she would be called a whore with a little bastard and told to leave town.
So yeah she wants a free babysitter, would probably ask the state to force men to help her with her little hellspawn just like incels want state-provided gfs, the irony...
They expect that because that has always being the status quo. Even in war women became war brides, slaves or maybe raped, but they were rarely killed unlike men, and if so it wasn't the kind of grisly deaths men and even boys suffered like being skinned alive and such.
If I see a woman who's about to be run over by a truck I wont do shit, and if you think I'm going to far consider that the guy who grabbed a girl who was about to get hit by a car because she was jaywalking got accused and sentenced for sexual assault for touching her arm.
Not taking the risk...
The term was invented by a woman, do some basic research before ranting...
They aren't, trust me.
Last edited:
