I'm curious what you guys think of the ending to Fulci's City of the Living Dead:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UdGWmPCPkHU
I just talked about this in another thread about bad endings to movies/tv and probably games. Even for Eyetalian horror this is a bizarre ending. Like I said in the other thread there's two rumors: either something happened during the edit of the movie and chemicals were spilled on the negative and they improvised an ending. Or, Fulci changed his mind and wanted a dark ending.
After thinking about it I'm going to lean towards the later theory because it makes sense. Carlo DeMejo stabs the priest, the zombies go up in flames and disintegrate into nothingness, the movie could have just ended there, we got to 90 minutes, go to credits, we're done. Even if the last few minutes of footage to establish this happy ending were damaged the movie could have very easily just ended right there and everyone goes home happy. I think Fulci wanted a darker ending but didn't have the money for reshoots so they improvised this which kind of fits into his motif:
It's like that bit in Don't Torture a Duckling where Florinda Bolkan enters the church and steps out and the footage is replayed to the audience and then it's revealed we're watching surveillance footage. Same thing happens in The Beyond when Emily touches the painting and has blood on her hands (invoking Stigmata) and she runs out of there without making a sound and the film repeats the footage to establish that this is supernatural.
I don't think the ending to City truly works but I get what he was going for: most likely a meta-commentary implying the movie itself is cursed which fits the feeling of decay and death present in the film.