- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
If you didn't know, the Kitty Genovese rape case was a Jewish media hoax. I'm not even tinfoiling/meming: the accepted mainstream view is that it didn't happen as originally reported, even though it has long been the literal textbook example of the bystander effect.New York is really like that, and it hasn't actually changed despite Times Square no longer being a mini ghetto. Look up Genovese Syndrome.
Something about A Quiet Place prompts viewers to try and out-think the movie. I didn't love the movie to death but it's probably not more absurd than any random zombie apocalypse movie.It is well made and there is effort put into it, but the problem is when a film wants to be taken seriously, the plot inconsistencies become even more glaring. Asking the audience to accept that not a single government or military was able to figure out that creatures with extremely sensitive hearing could be disabled with sonic weapons is a bit of a stretch. I think it would have worked better if they'd set it in a different time period, where the isolation and lack of a technological solution would be easier to believe.
Just re-watched Rob Zombie's Halloween. People give Rob way too much flack for the remakes (moreso the second) but really I can appreciate what he did especially with the first. He didn't just rehash the original frame for frame the way gus van sandt did with psycho 98. He hit the right story beats and added in just enough of his own touch to make something unique.
Even when it retells the Carpenter movie events and story beats are shifted around or even omitted. Like Linda and Bob getting killed in the Myers house as opposed to the Wallace house before Annie is attacked and she survives too
Also While nobody can ever truly replace Donald Pleasance as Loomis Malcom McDowell did a decent enough job. Not mention Michael is fucking brutal in this one. You can hear the knife as it stabs and cuts people and I swear I can hear bones snapping a few times I swear Blumhouse must have taken some inspiration from this Michael given how in the last two new movies he's crushed a guys face in with his foot, thrown people around and gone fucking savage on them. Tyler mane did such a great job as Michael that i personally think he really should play Jason if they ever get around to making a new movie soon.
Sorry for the room temperature take but I think Rob Zombie's Halloween is every bit as not-good as it's made out to be. I've never seen a bad Malcolm McDowell performance in anything, and he's been in some real garbage (including this) so it's got that going for it at least. Danielle Harris getting sliced up for what felt like 45 minutes transcends your run-of-the-mill slasher movie "misogyny" and comes across as blatant magical realming on Rob Zombie's part. It might be the only horror movie that's ever actually offended me, and I've seen some shit, so maybe there really is something special there. But I am a fuddy-duddy who thinks Halloween was doing just fine with hardly any blood at all.I kind of agree with boomerfan69. The Rob Zombie movies were at least unique and unapologetically nasty. They had that going for them and didn't rely too heavily on memberberries (aside from the "Was that the Boogieman?" line which was pure cringe). I don't know where I'd rank them in the pantheon of Halloween movies (soon to be 13 in total when Halloween Ends comes out).
I think the Evil Dead remake had a real stroke of genius by having completely different characters than the original (probably because they eventually managed to read the room re: recasting Ash). Not that it ultimately matters too much, but they might as well have called e.g. Malcolm McDowell's character something other than "Dr. Loomis".