Science Healing Ozone Layer Could Trigger 40% More Global Warming - Ozone Layer Bad

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

As the ozone layer recovers, it’s also intensifying global warming. Researchers predict that by 2050, ozone will rank just behind carbon dioxide as a driver of heating, offsetting many of the benefits from banning CFCs.

The planet is now expected to heat up more than scientists once predicted, and a major reason lies in the future behavior of ozone. This gas shields life on Earth from dangerous ultraviolet radiation, yet it also acts as a greenhouse gas by trapping heat in the atmosphere.

The ban on ozone-depleting chemicals such as CFCs has allowed the protective layer to steadily recover. But researchers warn that when this rebound is combined with rising levels of air pollution, ozone could drive 40% more warming than earlier estimates suggested.

Research led by the University of Reading shows that between 2015 and 2050, ozone will be responsible for an additional 0.27 watts per square meter (Wm⁻²) of trapped energy. This measurement refers to the amount of extra heat retained per square meter of the Earth’s surface. By mid-century, this would make ozone the second most important cause of warming, behind only carbon dioxide (1.75 W m⁻² of extra warming).

Professor Bill Collins, who led the study, explained: “Countries are doing the right thing by continuing to ban chemicals called CFCs and HCFCs that damage the ozone layer above Earth. However, while this helps repair the protective ozone layer, we have found that this recovery in ozone will warm the planet more than we originally thought.

“Air pollution from vehicles, factories, and power plants also creates ozone near the ground, causing health problems and warming the planet.”

The research, published on August 21 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, used computer models to simulate how the atmosphere will change by the middle of the century. The models followed a scenario with low implementation of air pollution controls, but with CFCs and HCFCs being phased out as mandated by the Montreal Protocol (1987).

The findings show that stopping CFC and HCFC production – done mainly to protect the ozone layer – provides less climate benefit than previously calculated. CFCs and HCFCs are greenhouse gases that warm the planet. Countries banned them to save the ozone layer, expecting this would also help fight climate change. But as the ozone layer heals, it creates more warming that cancels out most of the climate benefits from removing CFCs and HCFCs.

Countries that reduce air pollution will limit some ozone formation near the ground. However, the ozone layer will continue repairing itself for decades regardless of air quality policies, creating unavoidable warming.

Protecting the ozone layer remains crucial for human health and preventing skin cancer. The ozone layer shields Earth from dangerous ultraviolet radiation that can harm people, animals and plants. However, the research suggests climate policies need updating to account for ozone’s larger warming effect.
 
Hole in the Ozone leads into Acid Rain in the 90's
Thought Ozone Hole and Acid Rain were somewhat unrelated. Acid rain was caused by sulfur dioxide emitted from coal power plants and other bad combustions, ozone layer damage was caused by certain gasses in fridges and shit.
Funny enough, reducing the sulfur dioxide emissions by enforcing filtering in coal plants in the 90s led to a reduction aerosols over a few years, leading to increased insolation and reduction in cloud formation, and thus warming. Then a few years ago they restricted sulfur contents in ship bunker fuels, and once all those aerosols were gone over the oceans, the oceans started to warm up dramatically as well.
Acid rain was stopped, air quality was improved, but (under the assumption of human-caused climate change) the sulfur emissions also reduced the impact of CO2-caused warming by creating aerosols and thus blocking the sun a bit.
Now the ozone layer also causes green house effect. Wasn't the hole mainly over, like, the south pole and the southern hemisphere? Is the ozone layer thickening everywhere all of a sudden?
 
The soyentist grift keeps on grifting.

Ackhysually, UV is good for you! Here is an ad for Big Pharma anti-skincancer cream, it will save you 5% of the time and it is made from pure abortions!

What new wonder will science find out:
-Lead is good for you.
-Asbestos is a harmless food additive.
-Mercury does give immortality.
-Ozone layers bad, now magnetic field is bad!
-Cigarettes improve health.

Smoke your Tarlytons today.
 
Wait.. when I was a kid and this climate change bullshit was starting. I was told in school that the ozone layer never heals and it'll just constantly break down and get hotter till it kills us all?

Was I just not paying attention properly/misremembering? NOW the ozone layer heals and its bad??
 
One way or another, we have to learn how to live with a warmer climate, regardless of who's to blame.

The vast majority of Earth's history did not have ice at the poles, and only a very small proportion of Earth's history involves both poles being substantially iced over all year long (20% of the last 500 million years had even one pole covered, and an even smaller percentage of the time prior to that (though a couple of those early ones in the Proterozoic were thought to be 'snowball Earth' level total ice coverage).

Our planet is significantly colder than its median, and reversion to a more typical climate state is to be expected, whether in 50 years or 500 or 50,000. But all these people want is short-term thinking about "how do we stop it?" Fundamentally that thinking is "how do we, via vast human artificial action, induce the Earth to continue having a climate that is highly unusual in its geological history on a permanent basis?"

We should be thinking about how to make our cities capable of thriving in a "last 65 million years median" temperature. However, that temperature is around 5C higher than the 1850-1900 average temperature.

1757011308235.webp

So many of these people claim we're going to see massive warming, but then have no answer to it except "try to prevent it, even though that's an obvious fool's errand with a planet with a history like ours." No one wants to actually solve the problem, they just want to cry about it and raise funds to pretend they can make it never happen.
 
Back
Top Bottom