Science Healing Ozone Layer Could Trigger 40% More Global Warming - Ozone Layer Bad

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

As the ozone layer recovers, it’s also intensifying global warming. Researchers predict that by 2050, ozone will rank just behind carbon dioxide as a driver of heating, offsetting many of the benefits from banning CFCs.

The planet is now expected to heat up more than scientists once predicted, and a major reason lies in the future behavior of ozone. This gas shields life on Earth from dangerous ultraviolet radiation, yet it also acts as a greenhouse gas by trapping heat in the atmosphere.

The ban on ozone-depleting chemicals such as CFCs has allowed the protective layer to steadily recover. But researchers warn that when this rebound is combined with rising levels of air pollution, ozone could drive 40% more warming than earlier estimates suggested.

Research led by the University of Reading shows that between 2015 and 2050, ozone will be responsible for an additional 0.27 watts per square meter (Wm⁻²) of trapped energy. This measurement refers to the amount of extra heat retained per square meter of the Earth’s surface. By mid-century, this would make ozone the second most important cause of warming, behind only carbon dioxide (1.75 W m⁻² of extra warming).

Professor Bill Collins, who led the study, explained: “Countries are doing the right thing by continuing to ban chemicals called CFCs and HCFCs that damage the ozone layer above Earth. However, while this helps repair the protective ozone layer, we have found that this recovery in ozone will warm the planet more than we originally thought.

“Air pollution from vehicles, factories, and power plants also creates ozone near the ground, causing health problems and warming the planet.”

The research, published on August 21 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, used computer models to simulate how the atmosphere will change by the middle of the century. The models followed a scenario with low implementation of air pollution controls, but with CFCs and HCFCs being phased out as mandated by the Montreal Protocol (1987).

The findings show that stopping CFC and HCFC production – done mainly to protect the ozone layer – provides less climate benefit than previously calculated. CFCs and HCFCs are greenhouse gases that warm the planet. Countries banned them to save the ozone layer, expecting this would also help fight climate change. But as the ozone layer heals, it creates more warming that cancels out most of the climate benefits from removing CFCs and HCFCs.

Countries that reduce air pollution will limit some ozone formation near the ground. However, the ozone layer will continue repairing itself for decades regardless of air quality policies, creating unavoidable warming.

Protecting the ozone layer remains crucial for human health and preventing skin cancer. The ozone layer shields Earth from dangerous ultraviolet radiation that can harm people, animals and plants. However, the research suggests climate policies need updating to account for ozone’s larger warming effect.
 
After the shit fit they threw about acid rain, holes in the ozone layer, and all that shit, and THIS is the fucking thanks we get?

Fuck it, bring back lead paint, asbestos, and everything else.

FUCK THE PLANET!

PS: China puts out more of those banned chemicals in one month than the entire USA during the entire 1980's.
 
Oh Lordy.... we're finally at the "End of WWII could harm anti-Nazi sentiment!" stage of social movement insanity...

Activism forever!

Never give up the revolution!

EVEN IF YOU WON!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Wait... I thought they wanted the ozone layer to heal? What the actual fuck? So now they're saying destroying it is a good thing? I don't get it.
GHG theory is based on false assumptions about how heat transfer in the atmosphere works. The modelled behaviour is that all energy transfer from the surface to the top of the atmosphere is radiative and conductive, while ignoring convective overturning that pumps huge amounts of heat towards the upper atmosphere and the poles, where it is more easily radiated to space. With this as the base assumption, any gas that has a "greenhouse effect" - ie anything that absorbs energy within the specific infrared bands associated with the so-called greenhouse effect and re-emits it at a longer wavelength - is said to trap heat, and so induce warming.

Also, everything humans do is bad and evil.
 
It's research from the University of Reading.

Untiggtled.webp
If they can't work out the difference between men and women, I don't see how they can possibly expect us to believe their ozone story.

Wonder if this "research" is being sponsored by a company who have a shitload of CFCs their trying to sell off?
 
Oxygen plays a pivotal role in forest fires, which release CO2 stored in the trees. This, in turn, accelerates climate change. Therefore, we should reduce the oxygen content in the atmosphere to zero, starting with these scientists' offices.
 
Here's the deal: you defund these frauds, and we promise not to mention you've been throwing money at bullshit for half a century. Let's all just draw an embarrassed little line and move on now.
 
Whoops, globul whorming will happen regardless of what you do. Looks like it's time for more restrictions while you slurp your synthesized bug shake through the recycable shit straw!
 
This is to excuse China and India for blowing huge holes in the ozone layer.

ALl this is is just ballwashing China and India.

"No, no, see, actually they're helping fight global warning by getting rid of that pesky ozone layer!"
 
Guess we'll all boil to death then, I don't really give a shit. Nothing I can do for the environment when countries like India and China exist so I really cannot muster a single fuck to give.
 
After the shit fit they threw about acid rain, holes in the ozone layer, and all that shit, and THIS is the fucking thanks we get?

Fuck it, bring back lead paint, asbestos, and everything else.

FUCK THE PLANET!

PS: China puts out more of those banned chemicals in one month than the entire USA during the entire 1980's.
And cue to the following excuse: "It's ok when China do it".
 
At this point, just shut the fuck up, you haven't had a clue for at least 50 years.
 
And cue to the following excuse: "It's ok when China do it".
it's because poor little India and poor little China are developing countries, they need all the help they can get to get to where Europe and the US are. And damnit, it's their RIGHT as developing countries to completely obliterate any carbon reduction the rest of us have taken steps towards.
/sneed
 
Back
Top Bottom