Science Healing Ozone Layer Could Trigger 40% More Global Warming - Ozone Layer Bad

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

As the ozone layer recovers, it’s also intensifying global warming. Researchers predict that by 2050, ozone will rank just behind carbon dioxide as a driver of heating, offsetting many of the benefits from banning CFCs.

The planet is now expected to heat up more than scientists once predicted, and a major reason lies in the future behavior of ozone. This gas shields life on Earth from dangerous ultraviolet radiation, yet it also acts as a greenhouse gas by trapping heat in the atmosphere.

The ban on ozone-depleting chemicals such as CFCs has allowed the protective layer to steadily recover. But researchers warn that when this rebound is combined with rising levels of air pollution, ozone could drive 40% more warming than earlier estimates suggested.

Research led by the University of Reading shows that between 2015 and 2050, ozone will be responsible for an additional 0.27 watts per square meter (Wm⁻²) of trapped energy. This measurement refers to the amount of extra heat retained per square meter of the Earth’s surface. By mid-century, this would make ozone the second most important cause of warming, behind only carbon dioxide (1.75 W m⁻² of extra warming).

Professor Bill Collins, who led the study, explained: “Countries are doing the right thing by continuing to ban chemicals called CFCs and HCFCs that damage the ozone layer above Earth. However, while this helps repair the protective ozone layer, we have found that this recovery in ozone will warm the planet more than we originally thought.

“Air pollution from vehicles, factories, and power plants also creates ozone near the ground, causing health problems and warming the planet.”

The research, published on August 21 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, used computer models to simulate how the atmosphere will change by the middle of the century. The models followed a scenario with low implementation of air pollution controls, but with CFCs and HCFCs being phased out as mandated by the Montreal Protocol (1987).

The findings show that stopping CFC and HCFC production – done mainly to protect the ozone layer – provides less climate benefit than previously calculated. CFCs and HCFCs are greenhouse gases that warm the planet. Countries banned them to save the ozone layer, expecting this would also help fight climate change. But as the ozone layer heals, it creates more warming that cancels out most of the climate benefits from removing CFCs and HCFCs.

Countries that reduce air pollution will limit some ozone formation near the ground. However, the ozone layer will continue repairing itself for decades regardless of air quality policies, creating unavoidable warming.

Protecting the ozone layer remains crucial for human health and preventing skin cancer. The ozone layer shields Earth from dangerous ultraviolet radiation that can harm people, animals and plants. However, the research suggests climate policies need updating to account for ozone’s larger warming effect.
 
Wait a minute, so you're telling me the ceremonial tire I've been burning every weekend out of spite is actually GOOD for the planet now??

Well then fuck you, I'm gonna stop doing it!
 
I'm tired boss...
  1. Hole in the Ozone leads into Acid Rain in the 90's
  2. Global Warming in early 2000's leads into Inconvenient Truth in 06
  3. Major Hurricanes destroys New Orleans due to incompetence from both the Dem Mayor & Dem Gov
  4. The Great Blizzard(s) of 2010 + Ice Storm of Feb 2011 leads into Global Warming name change to Climate Change
  5. The advent of Polar Vortex
  6. Now Healed Ozone layer leads to future Global Warming

Btw from Wikipedia:
1756747784782.webp
1756748130065.webp
 
Holy shit, a 40% more multiplier? My global warming fossil fuel greenhouse gas stacking homo sapiens civilisation build would kill for that kind of DoT increase, but from the looks of things they're just a PoB warrior with a "+50% base fearmongering accuracy" modifier tacked on with no way to actually proc it.
 
The people who love climate dooming will absolutely not question why this complete inversion of everything they were previously told is now true and how anyone who points out how utterly inconsistent climate (((science))) as presented is a drooling death cult nitwit.
 
The ozone layer fearmongering from 20 years ago turned out to be false? OY VEY, how do we keep the grift going? Oh I know, the ozone layer is actually le bad!
 
After the shit fit they threw about acid rain, holes in the ozone layer, and all that shit, and THIS is the fucking thanks we get?

Fuck it, bring back lead paint, asbestos, and everything else.

FUCK THE PLANET!

PS: China puts out more of those banned chemicals in one month than the entire USA during the entire 1980's.
Typical burger take: fuck us! Let corpos shit the plabet! Let US be India 2.0 (I mean it's already headed that way...)
 
You need to stop using paper and use plastic because you're destroying the rainforests
you need to pay a tax on plastic because it's destroying the environment, you can use paper in only specific situations where paper is totally useless like straws, because it's too small to put a tax on bt anything we can put a tax on, you have to use plastic but pay us to save the environment
it's all the same bullshit, the perfect mix of "we hate you but give us money" that's what they're passionate about
 
I remember the Ozone Hole being such a big deal back in the 90s they were worried about the greenhouse effect and thus heating the world.

Now these morons are declaring the opposite. Once again, 'muh climate' is a complete and total meme whose real purpose is to re-introduce sumption laws and reduce the average man into a complete and total serf. Eat the bugs and own nothing for the lower classes while the elites get to enjoy owning everything and eating steaks.
 

"Healing Ozone Layer Could Trigger 40% More Global Warming"​


Yeah, I suppose it could. It could, in the same way that I could be typing this from a spacecraft orbiting Sagittarius A*. Incidentally, 40% of zero is zero.
 
Back
Top Bottom