💰 Grifter Hasan Piker / HasanAbi - Young Turk, Twitch Streamer, Stunlocked Brogressive, Cenk's Nephew, only a socialist for the money, abuses his dog by shocking it, Rutgers sex pest

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I want to start by saying that whether those that liked the video want to admit or not, this video was made to pander to Hasan's side (as of right now is titled "The Weasely Little Liar Awards") and it frames every detractor of Hasan on the same level.
And then the video creator makes excuses for Hasan lying about shocking his dog. The story changes every time he opens his mouth, also from his friends. And now he's trying to gaslight every as crazy if they believe it. Hasan deserves a bunch of liar awards just from that.

Also it's quite revealing that the video creator only showed that one clip. Yes, many are upset with Hasan just from using a shock collar, but the worst part was how all these clips showed how little he seemed to care about his dogs feeling bad, and seemingly prioritized using her as a prop on his stream. Especially the clip of him manically laughing at Kaya getting thoroughly put in place by the other dog where Hasan came off as a proper psychopath.
 
Do we need more proof that Hasan only use this dog as a prop and to get some poonthang?
No, mainly because EVERYTHING Hasan does is an act. He might be the most disingenuous fake human I have ever seen. Even the most blatant of lizard person career politicians seem more genuine and honest than him.
 
Didn't watch the video. Not watching through yet. Hours of Hassan , ball washers, autistic Right. being a mentally retarded dumb ass. Sweeping for a little Turkish ultra nationalist, violent psychopathic anti American who should be deported to Turkey so he can get his ass beat for being a closeted homosexual gay boy.
It was too much of a pussy trust fund, fat boy. Little Witch kid to serve his country in the military. Even though every other person has to do it. But not Fat Boy Turkish homosexual Hassan. He's gonna say how great Turkey is in the 3rd world is from his LA mansion where he abuses animals.
Animal abusers are right up there. In my mind with child molesters. Anyone who can hit or abuse a dog for political gain is subhuman.
Dogs, humans. Oldest companions behind horses. Same reason you shouldn't eat horse meat or dog meat.
'cause that is not why humans domesticated either animal. We did not domesticate them for meat, we domesticated them as companions.

The worst type of people are the type of people who abuse mammals, who are capable of understanding human empathy like dogs. Mccall's and other animals who? Have deep emotional attachments to their owners.
All dog abusers and animal abuse. So it should be publicly executed. Same thing with people wear socks with sandals.
 
"I am white. I say that I am white. I am white. I say I'm white all the time. I love white. I am white myself. I am not offended by cracker, I am white. You say I really hate white people? I am white."
I know that Schrodinger's white goes for Jews and East Asians but that's for how Americans perceive them. True Schrodinger's whites (that consider themselves white) are Turks and Mexicans. You will never meet two groups of people that defend with such passion their whiteness while becoming POCs the moment is convenient. Hasan really is the Turkish Fuentes.

This is worse than I thought. That cot has nothing, is like having her sleep on a bed frame regularly. That shit looks out of Amazon Basics. From what Chinese dungeon did you get that lil bro?

And the fucking light. Fucking roach, just get indirect lighting if you want to record her that badly for God's sake. If she is the Tibetan Mastiff kind that sleeps during the day, there's no way she is getting quality sleep.

I take it back, now I'm fully backing animal welfare on this. What are the fucking odds Kaya does have joint issues because of the bed, the collar and bad sleep?
 
The video should be timestamped at 3:43:23. Pro-tip: If you want people to watch a video you're shilling that TOTALLY WILL CHANGE HOW YOU SEE DRAMA, maybe you should provide real timestamps instead of vague descriptors of the time.

This prompted one of the most frenzied online news cycles ever about Hasan, where for weeks #Collargate was all everyone talked about. Hasan denied using the collar. People analysed every frame of the incident and still gets brought up to this day. Now, I will say as far as whether Hasan used the shock collar on Kaya or not, based on all available evidence, it's probably true :agree:. But... here's the thing. Kaya is obviously a well cared animal. She goes on multiple walks a day. She has a regular playtime with other dogs and everyone attests to how loved and spoiled she is.
Wait, isn’t that abuser behavior? The “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?” It’s a common tactic of abusers to spoil someone only to start abusing them? That’s his best argument? Doesn’t entertain the thought that maybe Hasan and his whores buddies aren’t covering their asses? He’s not even a janny and he must sweep.
 
Especially the clip of him manically laughing at Kaya getting thoroughly put in place by the other dog where Hasan came off as a proper psychopath.
Bear in mind, Kaya was simply a puppy and the other dog was a fully grown female Shitbull. That was the thing that really tipped me off on how he views animals. They're just playthings for him, objects to be used and abused to fulfill whatever image he desires at the given moment. But because he is a brownoid, his instinctual hatred towards innocent life shines through and we get moments of Hasan mindlessly abusing animals, or at least laughing at their misery and terror. He stated before, "A dog is just a dog. I don't give a fuck about them."
 
This image from shoeonheads video got a good laugh :story:

hassanshoe.jpg
 
Here’s some criticism of Hasan from the left.


IMG_1931.jpeg

Text

“Piker has also said that China comes closest to embodying his vision of socialism.

These views don’t merely raise the hackles of centrist Democrats. They are anathema to Chinese leftists like Kevin Lin, a labor activist and researcher from China, co-author of “China in Global Capitalism: Building International Solidarity Against Imperial Rivalry” (2024) and the managing editor of Asian Labour Review, a publication about workers’ struggles across Asia.

When Americans like Piker praise Beijing as a counterweight to U.S. hegemony, “this is often done in the name of anti-imperialism and countering U.S. state propaganda on China,” Lin told New Lines. Piker “explains away capitalist exploitation and repression in China using arguments that wouldn’t hold up if used to explain away the same exploitation and repression in the U.S.,” Lin said.

Lin finds Piker’s reverence for China as a model of socialism problematic. “At the heart of the Chinese system,” he said, “is labor exploitation by foreign capital, Chinese domestic private capital and state capital via state-owned enterprises, where independent trade unions and workers’ organizations are banned and where workers have next to no say in the management of their workplaces, just like in any capitalist economy.”
For Brian Hioe, one of the founding editors of New Bloom, a magazine covering progressive activism and youth politics in Taiwan and the Asia Pacific, Piker’s pronouncements on China marshal “the cliches of Western leftist Orientalism” and reflect “the narrow horizons and parochialism of western leftists,” as he wrote in December 2025.

Actual Chinese people, Hioe wrote, “are merely shadow puppets through which to construct a grandiose fantasy that is juxtaposed with Western contexts.”
 
“Piker has also said that China comes closest to embodying his vision of socialism.

These views don’t merely raise the hackles of centrist Democrats. They are anathema to Chinese leftists like Kevin Lin, a labor activist and researcher from China, co-author of “China in Global Capitalism: Building International Solidarity Against Imperial Rivalry” (2024) and the managing editor of Asian Labour Review, a publication about workers’ struggles across Asia.
I remember him specifically praising Mao's land redistribution. Now, despite my own family's history with the Communists, I am willing to admit that they did some things right... but land redistribution really wasn't one of them. The Chinese Communists largely just blindly aped western communist thought that had been developed for a western economic framework. So-called Chinese landlords were mostly just wealthy peasants. Not outrageously wealthy peasants, but peasants with farms that were comparable in size to a poor American farmer. They might be able to make it through a bad harvest without starving, but they still needed to work their own land and maybe pay some neighbors to work some of it. The Chinese economy simply wasn't developed enough in most places (especially the places with the most Communists) to have a large capitalist class but also had developed socially in a different way where we just didn't have the same structures where one family owned all the land and everyone else worked it for a fraction of the profits while the owner sat on his ass.

Here (a) is a contemporaneous article from a western communist explaining this.

But Mao and his buddies had to find someone to blame for all the problems, and then kill so that the problems would be solved. So what did they do? They claimed that the richest person in a village was a landlord, executed him, then gave his land to everyone else. Obviously that had some positive effect in that itinerant farmers gained some land, but long term this does little (other than reducing the number of people) to prevent starvation for the country as a whole.
 
Hey guys, did you watch this video? It makes this totally compelling argument about Hasan...
(song by cornball "champagne socialist")
 
View attachment 9015827
(L)

Glass houses, nigga. Glass houses.
This tweet makes no internal sense. The cost of his fame is that some people look better than him? Huh? And what is the "Greek tragedy" of this?

What he meant to express is that it's ironic that a looksmaxxer is getting mogged by random people. But he had to try and make it sound erudite, and in the process he completely mangled his point.

The total lack of capitalization and punctuation doesn't help him look smarter, either. If you actually make good points, you can more or less do whatever you want with the writing style, but if your brain overheats coming up with any insult besides "suck my dick," then you shouldn't be trying anything avant garde, sorry.
 
I remember him specifically praising Mao's land redistribution. Now, despite my own family's history with the Communists, I am willing to admit that they did some things right... but land redistribution really wasn't one of them. The Chinese Communists largely just blindly aped western communist thought that had been developed for a western economic framework. So-called Chinese landlords were mostly just wealthy peasants. Not outrageously wealthy peasants, but peasants with farms that were comparable in size to a poor American farmer. They might be able to make it through a bad harvest without starving, but they still needed to work their own land and maybe pay some neighbors to work some of it. The Chinese economy simply wasn't developed enough in most places (especially the places with the most Communists) to have a large capitalist class but also had developed socially in a different way where we just didn't have the same structures where one family owned all the land and everyone else worked it for a fraction of the profits while the owner sat on his ass.

Here (a) is a contemporaneous article from a western communist explaining this.

But Mao and his buddies had to find someone to blame for all the problems, and then kill so that the problems would be solved. So what did they do? They claimed that the richest person in a village was a landlord, executed him, then gave his land to everyone else. Obviously that had some positive effect in that itinerant farmers gained some land, but long term this does little (other than reducing the number of people) to prevent starvation for the country as a whole.
It is worth mentioning that Communism is antithetical with most Chinese customs. For example, they really like owning land. Once that became impossible, something snapped.

I have this theory: 100 years of Communism.

What that theory entails is that no country can survive more than 100 years with a Communist system of government. Once that century is up, the country will either collapse, adopt other systems of government and/or be so weakened that they will be basically a 3rd world state. China is about 20 years away from that.
 
he was doing fine until he got to shocktober 7th. I'm sorry but when you dedicated an entire segment (rightfully) calling nick a disgusting sweeping snake only to say "yeah, he shocked his dog and I disagree with it BUT... kaya is better off in a mansion anyway and people were calling the authorities on him for this so checkmate" it feels like you put on the maid outfit and went to the TommyC school of "Big Sweep 101".
You can extrapolate that “logic” to the spouse, partner, or children who live in a mansion but are still being abused.
 
I remember him specifically praising Mao's land redistribution. Now, despite my own family's history with the Communists, I am willing to admit that they did some things right... but land redistribution really wasn't one of them. The Chinese Communists largely just blindly aped western communist thought that had been developed for a western economic framework. So-called Chinese landlords were mostly just wealthy peasants. Not outrageously wealthy peasants, but peasants with farms that were comparable in size to a poor American farmer. They might be able to make it through a bad harvest without starving, but they still needed to work their own land and maybe pay some neighbors to work some of it. The Chinese economy simply wasn't developed enough in most places (especially the places with the most Communists) to have a large capitalist class but also had developed socially in a different way where we just didn't have the same structures where one family owned all the land and everyone else worked it for a fraction of the profits while the owner sat on his ass.
So basically Mao took what Stalin did with the kulaks and went "I can beat his high score".
I have this theory: 100 years of Communism.

What that theory entails is that no country can survive more than 100 years with a Communist system of government. Once that century is up, the country will either collapse, adopt other systems of government and/or be so weakened that they will be basically a 3rd world state. China is about 20 years away from that.
TBF, they've already moved away from "real communism" to a system that is more akin to Nazism but with chinks than huwites.

Which...well, Hasan supporting them says more about him than anything.
 
So basically Mao took what Stalin did with the kulaks and went "I can beat his high score".
And he did.

TBF, they've already moved away from "real communism" to a system that is more akin to Nazism but with chinks than huwites.
Nazism is Socialism with Nationalism. It is Communism but racist. The point is, the closest a system is to Communism, the faster it bleeds a state. Switching to a somewhat Capitalistic coat of paint merely made it so they had more money to burn. They still are being bled out by Communism though. They have almost 25 years left in power at the very best case scenario. After that, the Party is over.
 
Back
Top Bottom