Google Says It Will Delete Location Data When Users Visit Abortion Clinics - Under pressure from employees and supporters of reproductive rights, the company announced privacy changes for the post-Roe era.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Nico Grant
July 1, 2022, 6:03 p.m. ET
SAN FRANCISCO — Google said on Friday that it would delete abortion clinic visits from the location history of its users, in the company’s first effort to address how it will handle sensitive data in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.
The location data change will take place in the coming weeks, Jen Fitzpatrick, a Google senior vice president, wrote in a blog post. The policy will also apply to trips to fertility clinics, domestic violence shelters, addiction treatment facilities and other sensitive locations.
Google, which holds reams of intimate information about its billions of users, has come under scrutiny since the Supreme Court’s decision last week to strike down Roe v. Wade, eliminating the constitutional right to an abortion after almost 50 years. Some supporters of reproductive rights have pushed people to delete apps that track their menstrual cycles online, while experts saidsearch and location data from companies like Google are more likely to be used as evidence.
The overturning of Roe has more broadly renewed questions about how much data and digital trails people have produced, which could be used to surveil or target those who try and get an abortion. In states that allow bans or other limits on abortion, law enforcement is expected to be focused on taking action against medical providers, but information about individuals — including location data, payments data and more — is not hard to obtain through data brokers and other sources.

The Alphabet Workers Union, a group representing more than 800 people who work for Google’s parent company, Alphabet, demanded on Tuesday that the search giant delete any personal data that law enforcement could try to use to prosecute those who are getting abortions.
With Friday’s announcement, while Google will delete some location data, it did not commit to automatically deleting search records about abortions, which may also become sought after. Users must individually opt to delete their search history.

Google has been sued by the state of Texas, accused of continuing to track users even when they use the Chrome web browsers’ supposedly private Incognito Mode — which may further erode confidence that the company will purge all data when people try to browse privately.
Google also made no commitments about changing the way it handles government data requests.
“We remain committed to protecting our users against improper government demands for data, and we will continue to oppose demands that are overly broad or otherwise legally objectionable,” Ms. Fitzpatrick wrote.
The company also said that users will soon be able to more quickly delete multiple menstruation logs stored on Fitbit, a health-tracking company owned by Google, rather than one at a time. The company also reminded users to employ existing settings options on Google to improve their online privacy.

 
Wow, seems like that would only be a concern if Google is selling all of the data it collects to the government.
 
Google isn't actually doing anything real, here. Companies very rarely delete data they collect, they just don't publish it anywhere.
I guarantee you if someone got an abortion then walked out and murdered someone and part of the investigation involved their location data from Google then the full trip would be on the data Google handed over.

It's free goodwill for Google among crazy people and their retarded employees. They lose nothing.
 
When will liberals realize they’re just being played by big mega corporations? Mega corporations are also offering women money to travel places to get an abortion so they can go right back to work. They like that you can’t have a family because having time for family means less money for them.

Wait, are you telling me that selfless entities such as Google and Starbucks aren't doing this out of the kindness of their hearts?!
 
Cavanaugh specifically mentions that going out of state is A-OK and legal in the opinion so I don't see how they would hold up in court.

Granted it could take years for such a law to wind its ay through the courts and get stuck down.

It is odd that crossing state lines for this is OK.
Remember Jared from Subway?
He isn't in jail becase he banged an underaged chick.
He is in federal prison becase he crossed state lines to have sex with a girl who was of the age of consent in the state that they had sex but under 18 and he took pictures of it. (Holy run on sentence Batman!)

There are many sates with age of consents under 18.
However the FBI may get involved if you cross state lines to have sex with some one under 18 in them.
FWIW Jared is gross and I don't feel bad for him.
I just don't like the precedent.

If you cross state line to buy Marijuana can the feds make you Jared's cell mate?
It is still just as illegal as heroin as far as the feds are concerned.

Fireworks are banned in my state but legal in most if not all surrounding states.
As it is unless you set someone else's property on fire or are a real jackass about it the cops just ignore it becase they have bigger fish to fry.

Sadly it sounds like the FBI could set up "Operation: Freedom Fighter" (they would be the ones fighting against freedom as usual) and start busting people for crossing state lines to buy somthing that was illegal in their state. They way they prosecute sex crime they could arrest you even if you set the fireworks off in a state where they were legal.
It’s a federal law, specifically 18 USC § 2423, part b, which makes it illegal to “Travel With Intent To Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct.“, where illicit sexual conduct is basically sex with someone under the age of 18, or making CP. In this case, there is no law stating it is illegal to “travel with intent to abort a child”, and there probably never will be. So it’s not quite as simple as “fed think thing bad, arrest if you cross state lines”, you still need to have broken a specific federal law, but given how many of them there are, its actually quite hard not to do so, especially since lying to a federal officer, even unintentionally can get you in trouble.
 
Mega corporations are also offering women money to travel places to get an abortion so they can go right back to work. They like that you can’t have a family because having time for family means less money for them.
This line of thought is bizarre. These corporations aren't forcing these women to get abortions. The woman chooses to, and the company pays for it.

I didn't know my employer was "playing" me the whole time by giving me dental insurance and healthcare coverage! Helping me pay my medical bills? Those insidious bastards! I'll go into debt instead, thank you very much! Hell, maybe I'll keep that broken limb just to stick it to the man! After all, anything that benefits a company is bad, even if it literally directly benefits you in specific!
 
It’s a federal law, specifically 18 USC § 2423, part b, which makes it illegal to “Travel With Intent To Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct.“, where illicit sexual conduct is basically sex with someone under the age of 18, or making CP.

For more information on this, see: Onision
 
This line of thought is bizarre. These corporations aren't forcing these women to get abortions. The woman chooses to, and the company pays for it.

I didn't know my employer was "playing" me the whole time by giving me dental insurance and healthcare coverage! Helping me pay my medical bills? Those insidious bastards! I'll go into debt instead, thank you very much! Hell, maybe I'll keep that broken limb just to stick it to the man! After all, anything that benefits a company is bad, even if it literally directly benefits you in specific!
If mega corporations actually cared about families, they would be raising wages and allowing for not just women, but men to be granted paternity leave. Also, the track record some companies have with healthcare makes me believe they don’t actually want people to have families. They make it way more of a pain to get a family healthcare plan than they would an individual one. Yes, women can choose to get an abortion if they want, but let’s be real here, they want a cheap workforce first and foremost, so not putting in incentives to have families works in their favor.
 
I mean, if you can outlaw sex tourism, you should be able to outlaw abortion tourism.

Also google is lying. "Whoopie-doopsie, we did a fucky-wucky and didn't delete all that confidential data after all." -Them as soon as they get caught
I dunno but they asked Kavanaugh about it and he basically said ‘no that would violate the interstate commerce clause’ so if he thinks it would be unconstitutional I tend to agree.



One big reason is that the key vote in Dobbs was Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who ruled out travel bans in a concurring opinion. Kavanaugh wrote that such a ban would fail “based on the constitutional right to interstate travel” and described the question as “not especially difficult as a constitutional matter.” That view was echoed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in a post-Dobbs statement: “under bedrock constitutional principles, women who reside in states that have banned access to comprehensive reproductive care must remain free to seek that care in states where it is legal.”
 
Lol just leave your phone at home you dumb whore.
Gotta be able to post the updates minute by minute

1656740151251.png
 
If mega corporations actually cared about families, they would be raising wages and allowing for not just women, but men to be granted paternity leave. Also, the track record some companies have with healthcare makes me believe they don’t actually want people to have families. They make it way more of a pain to get a family healthcare plan than they would an individual one. Yes, women can choose to get an abortion if they want, but let’s be real here, they want a cheap workforce first and foremost, so not putting in incentives to have families works in their favor.
hoh its defintively something motivated by money for company. Cost of travel and abortion vs paying out maternity leave? Finding a replacement, retraining cost, etc.
 
Yes, women can choose to get an abortion if they want, but let’s be real here, they want a cheap workforce first and foremost, so not putting in incentives to have families works in their favor.
The issue of family healthcare costs and wages expands to the broader shitty systems in the US at large. Many companies offer paid male paternity leave and 5 states mandate it.

At the end of the day, paying for the abortion of a potential child that a worker doesn't want is a net bonus to the worker, it benefitting the employer as well doesn't matter. People come and go from companies all the time, Your employment at a company can last a few years, a child lasts a literal lifetime.

Baby delivery isn't free either (especially if it's a fucking C-section), the company's healthcare coverage helps with that as well. They aren't nudging the employee either way by giving them a choice.

Why the hell should a company even have a say in you having a family or not? Your decisions are your own and they should only care as far as it affects work. They're a company. Women get their abortions paid for if they ask and it's on company insurance, simple as. Women get their delivery paid for if it's covered by company insurance, simple as.
 
Last edited:
Just seems like a weird change. A really fucking weird change. I actually don't understand the logic behind it. Oh no I went to the *checks notes* weight loss clinic what if google knows, I sure hope this very specific piece of data isn't tracked!

They're just going to automatically delete some of your location history? No toggle, no reminder asking if you want to keep it, just outright going to delete some of your shit that is supposed to be tracked to help you?

I can't tell if this is some misguided virtue signalling or if they're basically just admitting that they share all this data fucking wholesale and it can be traced back to you. Or is it a case of bitches getting one abortion at planned parenhood and suddenly the algorith keeps advertising baby clothes to them.
 
Back
Top Bottom