Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.

www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari



Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant's political criteria.

www.breitbart.com

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.

www.projectveritas.com

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230


(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:



The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.



“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”

Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.



Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.



The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”

The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”

Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.



Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:

“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.

 

[Autocrat]

I'm not saying the argument isn't a vaild one. But I argue against it for two reasons; one is the Google and co have a ridiculous monopoly over the internet. What Google and credit card companies like Mastercard says goes. My second reason why I hate this argument is that these are the same fucks who butched about a tiny bakery refusing to make gay wedding cakes due to their religious beliefs.

The credit card processor situation is ridiculous.
One cool thing about that is, Peter Thiel (first investor into Facebook, writer of The Diversity Myth in the 90's, literal faggot, was behind Gawker going bankrupt, billionaire, all around badass) is actually pretty against stifling these ideas. Which goes there is at least some silicon valley power players on the side of genuine freedom and meritocracy (most would just call this equality, but 'equality' is now a euphemistic dogwhistle). So a competing company can be founded, however hard it is.

Particularly when you look at the rise of crypto — which is to say 'a massive amount of money with a culture of privacy and libertarian values' — I think the just side has a good chance of winning out in the end. At least, I'd rather see how it plays out a little more before I agree that we should have the government telling us more of what we can and cannot do.

Regulation for social media is basically saying you can't have an intentional / specific online community, because it has to cater to everyone. Or, if regulation only applies to social media with a lot of users, then it's saying that an intentional community that gets sufficiently large based on its values, it now has to give up those values and let everyone in because free speech.
It essentially ensures Facebook will be around forever. It's the death of innovation.

Sooooo when is 4chan going to find a way to redpill this AI like they did with Tay? Google are basically asking for it at this point.

They're designing these parts by hand. Basically, social justice is becoming a rule in the algorithms.
There's no changing that.

Anyone else finds ironic that they call their shit project "veritas" (truth in latin) when it does the exact same opposite of that

Project Veritas are the people doing the investigative journalism. It's not an effort within Google.

 

[CatParty]

@crocodilian the original thread for this story is literally next to the duplicate you posted lol

 

[Absolutego]

I'll reiterate that search results alone don't prove manipulation; only with the knowledge of how fucked up google is I am comfortable enough to make a claim that they are engaging in some sort algorithm fiddling. With that being said, I asked few friends to do the same search and yt inventors always turned up at least 50/50 black/white split. Personally I logged out of google services and used a vpn with same results. There is a possibility they identified me based on some other information, but at this point I don't feel an obligation to give them a benefit of doubt.

Like I said, "white" is a very poor filter because no one actually uses the term "white" as a racial descriptor in the biography pages of American inventors, they instead refer to specific European heritage, if race is referenced at all. The reason you're getting 50/50 black/white is because "African-American" is a very common term, which means any page for a black inventor has a higher frequency of the term "American" in it, putting it higher in the results. If you filter by excluding results with African, you get a page full of sites referencing the meme about the search results, because the amount of spergs who don't understand how search engines work is apparently much larger than the number of people writing pages about "white American inventors" organically.

I don't even deny that Google's biasing search results for more popular terms that people actually search for, just that "white American inventors" is such a niche subject easily explained by thinking about how a search engine functions that it's a stupid as fuck hill to die on.

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QDVVo14A_fo

Comments from Jen Gennai's Medium victimhood manifesto before they were pruned:
View attachment 814574

I like the comment that says "who needs to worry about Russia when the enemy trying to manipulate the election is right here in America?" No fucking shit. What room do any of these people have to complain about Russia after this?

 

[Malagor the dank omen]

who needs to worry about Russia when the enemy trying to manipulate the election is right here in America

This is the saddest part. We all know the enemy is in America and they do everything in broad daylight as if nobody thinks they are there. It's so cartoony that it hurts and nobody gives a fuck because what can we do aside giving up all our social media and email accounts? Too high of a price for many

 

[Feline Supremacist]

LOL oh thats funny.

"Dude I voted for Trump"

"Tell the local Nazi girl, maybe she'll like you!"

"Okay!"

"Hey I voted for Trump, wanna come over and smoke a blunt? I like Hitler too!""

The thought crossed my mind.

 

[TowinKarz]

It essentially ensures Facebook will be around forever. It's the death of innovation.

I disagree, there's a big difference between inventing the phone, developing the telephone network, and then trying to somehow make it so those with the wrong kind of political opinions can't use it.

Alexander Bell never took that final step, but the modern-day equivalents are absolutely in love with the idea that they can make it so "mean people" can't play with "their" toys. Even if they BOUGHT them fair and square.

If people want to whine about stifling innovation, the tech giants brought it on themselves by taking that one last step of "Oh, and only the RIGHT kind of people get to use it"

Facebook/Google/etc's big mistake was not respecting the idea of free speech, media firms used to, or at least were held back by the fact that technological limitations meant you couldn't vet everyone who wanted to buy your newspaper or make a phone call on your network for political alignment and deny it to them realtime.

You can now, and the leaders gave in to the temptation and are now paying the price of becoming as despised as they are rich just like the Robber Barons of old.

At this point, if they refuse to self-correct, a breakup is inevitable, and the funny thing is it's solely down to their greed. They could've been happy with billions and some grumpy comments, instead, they wanted TRILLIONS and NO DISSENT AT ALL.

 

[Autocrat]

Facebook = telephone network

You can't launch a telephone network from your dorm room. If you're putting Facebook on the level of mobile carriers, then you're social media should have a high barrier to entry due to regulations, with very little differentiation. Yes, that's the death of a lot of innovation.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Mysteriously, Reddit has responded by banning Project Veritas' official reddit account, while Youtube has struck with privacy complaints to ensure the video can't be re-uploaded to their site.

They're too late for that. They created a Streisand effect and it's also uploaded on Bitchute who got 70k views and still rising.

 

[Quijibo69]

Looks like Google really wants Trump to win again do to their own stupidity this time.

 

[SilkGnut]

Anyone else finds ironic that they call their shit project "veritas" (truth in latin) when it does the exact same opposite of that

We shall call him.... MINI ME.... err... MINITRUE.

 

[Unog]

Yes, that's the death of a lot of innovation.

What fucking innovation? Anything that comes anywhere near competing with these sites that has a free speech policy gets fucked from behind by the banks and payment processors.

 

[Autocrat]

What fucking innovation? Anything that comes anywhere near competing with these sites that has a free speech policy gets fucked from behind by the banks and payment processors.

I haven't even see people try d.tube, which tokenizes video likes.
Yeah, the payment processing thing is terrible. But a) those were a couple early battles in a new war, and b) that has nothing to do with Twitter or Patreon. Payment processors can rightly be compared to mobile carriers. Stripe may have been launched by teenagers / guys in their early 20's, but they were forced to stop by actual payment processors. I wouldn't argue against more regulation for mastercard et al.

 

[JohnLenin]

Here's a live stream from 2 hrs ago on Jen Jannai LMAO it's ends right around when Cruz starts asking her questions

 

[Sīn the Moon Daddy]

Just because you make something invisible doesn't mean it isn't still there. And on top of that, you just gave your enemy the power of invisibility and will now have trouble tracking it. The creators of these tech platforms seem to be displaying the same behavior as their userbase.

Invisibility is a severely underrated superpower. It's all about them sneak attack criticals son

 

[Nacho Man Randy Salsa]

Google can't put the internet genie back in the bottle, no one can.

 

[casE sensiTive]

Did Kojima do it again?

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

Sooooo when is 4chan going to find a way to redpill this AI like they did with Tay? Google are basically asking for it at this point.

I think the only way to modify it in any meaningful way from outside of Google facilities is via an SSH session or some shit, requiring proper credentialskey and password, at least.

They're too late for that. They created a Streisand effect and it's also uploaded on Bitchute who got 70k views and still rising.

Veritas Visuals

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent "Trump situation" in 2020 on Hidden Cam

www.bitchute.com

Wow, another 40k views in the last 4 hours.

BREAKING: New Google Document Leaked Describing Shapiro, Prager, as ‘nazis using the dogwhistles’ – Project Veritas

www.projectveritas.com

BREAKING: New Google Document Leaked Describing Shapiro, Prager, as ‘nazis using the dogwhistles’

(New York) – Project Veritas has obtained a newly leaked document from Google that appears to show a Google employee and member of Google “transparency-and-ethics” group calling conservative and libertarian commentators, including Dennis Prager and Ben Shapiro, “nazis.” Project Veritas received this document after the release of its investigation into Google through the “Be Brave” campaign at VeritasTips@protonmail.com.
Other big tech insiders can contact Project Veritas HERE.
The email apparently was sent as part of the Google “transparency-and-ethics” group internal communications and suggests that content from PragerU, Jordan Peterson, and Ben Shapiro should be disabled from the “suggestion feature.”
“…if we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles…”



“I don’t think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities. But if it is, why not go with Meredith’s suggestion of disabling the suggestion feature?”
After the release of our Google investigation, Google Senior Executive Jen Gennai posted on Medium saying:

“Google has repeatedly been clear that it works to be a trustworthy source of information, without regard to political viewpoint. In fact, Google has no notion of political ideology in its rankings.” – Jen Gennai, Head of Responsible Innovation at Google

The leaked document appears to contradict Jen Gennai’s claim that Google has “no notions of political ideology in its search rankings.”

The video was pulled down by YouTube yesterday citing “privacy violations.” Viewers can still watch the video in the following places:

• Bitchute
• Vimeo

PragerU and Ben Shapiro are about as Jewish as jew can be. Must be some of those self-hating jews.

I love how snippy she is in the beginning. "I have a day job." She claims she's not familiar with the Project Veritas report, yet she's peeved about it nonetheless.

 

[TowinKarz]

It's uproariously funny how the supposed masters of the internet still think online universities and bloggers operating from private studios in spare home bedrooms are practically prayed to every night by millions of Nazis, like, do they even go out in the street for 5 seconds a day and notice that your average person isn't wearing PragerU shirts? much less armbands? I'll bet 1 in 3 people wouldn't even KNOW what "Prager" is.

They're trying to hit mice with mallets, and are smashing everyone else's toes.

 

[Dick Justice]

It's a shame, because so many of their services are good. I might take you up on that. A How-To thread would be awesome.

I don't know if I'm ready for that, what I was referring to was consultation on a case-by-case basis. If you want a guide for quick reference, Restore Privacy and Privacy Tools io are good places to start.

Part of why I supported Trump, was because of the backlash. (Which I now officially consider too strong for my liking). One step closer to getting more people politically aware. More real life demonstrations (Though I've only gone to one rally so far and didn't meet anyone there).
The one bright side of this thought policing is the dialectic backlash. We'll see how large it grows.

I generally vote minority parties in elections for the same reason. From my perspective it seems like the best thing that can happen in the next US election cycle is for as many people to vote third party as possible in the next election. I can't think of a single American I've heard who says they voted for someone because they really like that person and think they're the best for the job, it's always the lesser of two evils shit.