Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.

www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari



Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant's political criteria.

www.breitbart.com

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.

www.projectveritas.com

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230


(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:



The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.



“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”

Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.



Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.



The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”

The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”

Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.



Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:

“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.

 

[Autocrat]

I don't know if I'm ready for that, what I was referring to was consultation on a case-by-case basis. If you want a guide for quick reference, Restore Privacy and Privacy Tools io are good places to start.

I haven't started working on privacy because I haven't made the jump back into linux (and is Ubuntu even private? It comes with an Amazon desktop app last I checked). I'm positive microsoft is spying. Would wiping my hard drive even get rid of the botnet, that I'm positive is inside my actual computer at this point? Are store bought computers even safe? I'm sure they're not, and I'd have to build my own machine. And who's to say there isn't some kind of zero day in the hardware. If China managed to do it, can't the US?
And, don't big tech companies essentially always know what I'm doing with their network of cookies? Would I have Brave wipe it every time I close the browser? Can they even wipe it sufficiently?

It's questions like these that make me feel like privacy is a lost effort. I'm sure attempting, and failing, at securing your data would only red flag you and make their algorithms pay closer attention to what you're doing.

 

[CIA Nigger]

I haven't started working on privacy because I haven't made the jump back into linux (and is Ubuntu even private? It comes with an Amazon desktop app last I checked). I'm positive microsoft is spying. Would wiping my hard drive even get rid of the botnet, that I'm positive is inside my actual computer at this point? Are store bought computers even safe? I'm sure they're not, and I'd have to build my own machine. And who's to say there isn't some kind of zero day in the hardware. If China managed to do it, can't the US?
And, don't big tech companies essentially always know what I'm doing with their network of cookies? Would I have Brave wipe it every time I close the browser? Can they even wipe it sufficiently?

It's questions like these that make me feel like privacy is a lost effort. I'm sure attempting, and failing, at securing your data would only red flag you and make their algorithms pay closer attention to what you're doing.

Taking no precautions regarding privacy based on the idea of "meh the government knows everything anyway" is worse than taking some even if the government has a phone book sized file on you already. It's never too late to change your habits online.

 

[X Prime]

They can take a combination of your OS, your browser, your installed extensions, resolution, and various other info to fingerprit your session.

 

[MAPK phosphatase]

I have been trying, slowly but surely, to reduce Alphabets presence in my life as much as I can. My biggest hurtle is gmail. Changing to a different search engine is easy. Changing to a new email is more difficult because it's tied to so many other accounts. I already have a proton mail account, but that's tied to some things I don't want tied to my identity, such as this Kiwifarms account. It's not that it's impossible. It's just that I'm lazy. It took me this long to get a system where I could subscribe to and watch youtube videos without an account and without ever visiting youtube.

 

[kadoink]

.I already have a proton mail account, but that's tied to some things I don't want tied to my identity, such as this Kiwifarms account.

Dude, we all already know who you are anyways.

Oh, hi Mapk.

 

[LU 010]

I'm a privacy nigger so I've been not-a-fan of Google for a while now, but somehow I was still enough to be shocked at them just blatantly talking about deciding the outcome of the election. Like I don't even get the sense they're just self-interested sociopaths, they're insane ideologues who actually believe that their views are So Correct™ that they should be able and allowed to decide the outcome of a presidential election. It's like they actually believe that their 46 genders and constantly-shifting kaleidoscope of pronouns are more important than the fundamental principle of democracy. A megacorp using their power to control the outcome of an election isn't even in line with leftist principles. It's a dystopian cyberpunk novel come to life.

Trump derangement syndrome has really done a number on these lads.

 

[Niggernerd]

Everyone's thinking about Trump's re-election attempt, but I can't imagine how fucked this country will be 4 years after, no matter whether he is re-elected or not.

All of these people and companies are going to drastic measures to fight one man and his supporters/anyone who isn't on their side, yet, when the smoke clears, everyone will see them as the corrupt fucks they are. Then, where does this country go from there?

We join the United States of Japan and declare war on B̶r̶i̶t̶a̶n̶n̶i̶a̶ google.

 

[MAPK phosphatase]

Dude, we all already know who you are anyways.

You do not know me. That's not true. That's bullshit. You do not know me. You do naaaaaht.

 

[Corbin Dallas Multipass]

I don't know if I'm ready for that, what I was referring to was consultation on a case-by-case basis. If you want a guide for quick reference, Restore Privacy and Privacy Tools io are good places to start.

I generally vote minority parties in elections for the same reason. From my perspective it seems like the best thing that can happen in the next US election cycle is for as many people to vote third party as possible in the next election. I can't think of a single American I've heard who says they voted for someone because they really like that person and think they're the best for the job, it's always the lesser of two evils shit.

While I take your point, consider whet would be right now if 10 percent of trump voters went third party. Hillary would be president, and your third party candidate would still be politically irrelevant.

We need conditional or tiered voting for third parties to matter nationally.

 

[MAPK phosphatase]

While I take your point, consider whet would be right now if 10 percent of trump voters went third party. Hillary would be president, and your third party candidate would still be politically irrelevant.

We need conditional or tiered voting for third parties to matter nationally.

I'm a proponent of the Schulze voting method, but I also understand that people want a voting method that can be explained without breaking out the weighted directed graphs and matrices. Instant runoff is the next best option I think.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

James O'Keefe on Twitter

“Blue check mark "journalists" can run from the truth but they can't hide from it. Google insider story has been broadcast on evening news channels across the country. @nytimes @CNN @abcnews where are you? Why are you ignoring a story that has dominated half of the internet? https://t.co/aRGcIU6OvE”

twitter.com

Blue check mark "journalists" can run from the truth but they can't hide from it. Google insider story has been broadcast on evening news channels across the country. @nytimes @CNN @abcnews where are you? Why are you ignoring a story that has dominated half of the internet?

Your grandparents could be being served "red pills" at this very moment. It's almost time for Wheel of Fortune, do you know where your meemaw is?

 

[Coldgrip]

James O'Keefe on Twitter

“Blue check mark "journalists" can run from the truth but they can't hide from it. Google insider story has been broadcast on evening news channels across the country. @nytimes @CNN @abcnews where are you? Why are you ignoring a story that has dominated half of the internet? https://t.co/aRGcIU6OvE”

twitter.com

Your grandparents could be being served "red pills" at this very moment. It's almost time for Wheel of Fortune, do you know where your meemaw is?

5YX0EDdDZwIQOyoz.mp4

Nah, all my grandparents vote democrat, they're dead after all.

 

[Dick Justice]

We need conditional or tiered voting for third parties to matter nationally.

The notable thing is that in my limited awareness, Trump's the first anti-establishment candidate to appear on a major party ticket in decades. Wasn't the last guy that came even close Ross Perot? But that's not even the point, the point is to highlight the failures of establishment parties and thereby increase the fighting chance of other parties in future elections. Beyond that your, logic is flawed insofar as 3rd party voting doesn't sap votes from one party exclusively, which means that if people vote for minority parties it'll almost always hurt the major establishment parties equally. The only exception I'm aware of is when major establishment party figures leave their own party in a tizzy and thereby split the votes from their party, but that's a whole different matter.

I haven't started working on privacy because I haven't made the jump back into linux (and is Ubuntu even private? It comes with an Amazon desktop app last I checked). I'm positive microsoft is spying. Would wiping my hard drive even get rid of the botnet, that I'm positive is inside my actual computer at this point? Are store bought computers even safe? I'm sure they're not, and I'd have to build my own machine. And who's to say there isn't some kind of zero day in the hardware. If China managed to do it, can't the US?
And, don't big tech companies essentially always know what I'm doing with their network of cookies? Would I have Brave wipe it every time I close the browser? Can they even wipe it sufficiently?

It's questions like these that make me feel like privacy is a lost effort. I'm sure attempting, and failing, at securing your data would only red flag you and make their algorithms pay closer attention to what you're doing.

It's easier than you think, the most important thing is to think about it as a spectrum of exposure. You can radically reduce yours for little effort. As for Big Brother watching you, the current model is dragnet surveillance which means you're already being watched to the greatest degree. Unless you (and millions of others) are so dangerous for running linux and avoiding facebook that they have to dispatch field agents to manually spy on you you're fine. If we were already at such a worrying point do you think the farms would have to go to the trouble to manually dox and snitch on all the paedo lolcows?

 

[CamelCursive]

Maybe I'm not as keen on my US accents as I'd like to think, but the bitch in the video sounds like one of those Maple-Slurpers from that country up north with all the Tim Hortons and that faggot king that plays dress-up.

I'd say that's "foreign influence on US elections". Catapult the bitch over the fuckin' border. I don't even care which one, deport her into the goddamned Atlantic for all I care.

 

[CheezzyMach]

I'm going to laugh my ass off if people are sending evidence of Google's fuckery straight to the DOJ while they are getting grilled.

 

[V0dka]

I think the only way to modify it in any meaningful way from outside of Google facilities is via an SSH session or some shit, requiring proper credentialskey and password, at least.

Veritas Visuals

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent "Trump situation" in 2020 on Hidden Cam

www.bitchute.com

Wow, another 40k views in the last 4 hours.

BREAKING: New Google Document Leaked Describing Shapiro, Prager, as ‘nazis using the dogwhistles’ – Project Veritas

www.projectveritas.com

View attachment 814983

PragerU and Ben Shapiro are about as Jewish as jew can be. Must be some of those self-hating jews.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=q1YENAvOveE
I love how snippy she is in the beginning. "I have a day job." She claims she's not familiar with the Project Veritas report, yet she's peeved about it nonetheless.

Sending the empty headed "Digital Wellbeing at Google" representative to congress is basically Google saying "Fuck off we don't answer to the government", they don't even hold you in enough respect to send someone other than the janitor to represent them.

Cruz should've punked her and organized Trump to come up to her and try and and give her a hug and she'd blow her cover.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

I suspect google's actions, including the deletion of the Project Veritas video will now push the US government to make these online media people publishers instead. Meaning they have to respect the First Amendment come what may.

They did very obviously begin banning conservative voices such as Black Pigeon etc off of Youtube a few weeks back and this likely prompted Project Veritas to take a closer look. The end result is an obvious showing of their vile hubris.

 

[Flexo]

I'm just going to throw more fuel on the fire here...

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

Sending the empty headed "Digital Wellbeing at Google" representative to congress is basically Google saying "Fuck off we don't answer to the government", they don't even hold you in enough respect to send someone other than the janitor to represent them.

Cruz should've punked her and organized Trump to come up to her and try and and give her a hug and she'd blow her cover.

And on top of that she was pissy as fuck. Like how dare they question her? how dare they!

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

I suspect google's actions, including the deletion of the Project Veritas video will now push the US government to make these online media people publishers instead. Meaning they have to respect the First Amendment come what may.

The question is, what mechanism is there for actually doing that? If the FCC can just wave it's magic wand and say "it is so," then there's a lot of copyright lawyers who should be licking their chops right now. If something needs to go all the way through congress, not gonna happen.