🦊 Furry Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Jonathan Boudalycaon said:
Superb Pedro was banned from Further Confusion by cowardly Neckbeards, Troons and a Habeeb Girl.
View attachment 8432048View attachment 8432049View attachment 8432051View attachment 8432052View attachment 8432053

Meanwhile at ANE ...
View attachment 8432659View attachment 8432657

Then back at FurCon ...
View attachment 8434677View attachment 8434676

The FurCon Lewd Pool Party Event
View attachment 8434681View attachment 8434678View attachment 8434679View attachment 8434680

FurCon attendees are trolling the Hotel Managements' Policies.
View attachment 8434684View attachment 8434685

The Tech -y Adventure

View attachment 8434689View attachment 8434690View attachment 8434692


The FurCon Arcade
View attachment 8434711View attachment 8434712
Click to expand...
Yep, meant Pedro. Dude's awesome and it's sad that he got banned. How you gonna ban bomb voyage?
 
This is the first depiction of furry con type activity in any media. It was in a horror movie about a haunted hotel with such a sordid history of murder, suicide and depravity that the ghosts of it causes the caretaker to murder their families. The act of a guy in a fursuit giving a BJ was considered a horrific crime against the natural order enough to haunt a room forever just like a suicide in a bathtub. This scene was considered shocking and disturbing in the 1970's.

Little did 1970's Stephen King know that 30+ years later real life hotels would have a floor dedicated to diaperfurs with shit fetishes and a special room on the convention floor for dog and horse cock dildo vendors.

furrycon.webp
 
mr_negativity said:
This is the first depiction of furry con type activity in any media. It was in a horror movie about a haunted hotel with such a sordid history of murder, suicide and depravity that the ghosts of it causes the caretaker to murder their families. The act of a guy in a fursuit giving a BJ was considered a horrific crime against the natural order enough to haunt a room forever just like a suicide in a bathtub. This scene was considered shocking and disturbing in the 1970's.

Little did 1970's Stephen King know that 30+ years later real life hotels would have a floor dedicated to diaperfurs with shit fetishes and a special room on the convention floor for dog and horse cock dildo vendors.

View attachment 8444637
Click to expand...
I know you’re just shitposting, but this moment is actually far more insidious and says a lot more about furry conventions if you’re familiar with the original novel.

DISCLAIMER: I’m gonna sperg a bit, so if none of you want to see an incredibly autistic analysis about how this scene in The Shining still holds (but not in the way you’re expecting), consider this your warning to bail out.

Anyways: in the original novelization of The Shining, it’s not just a random “lol furry” scene. It’s a very specific part of the Overlook Hotel’s fucked up social history that Jack uncovers through the hotel’s old papers and later “sees” in supernatural visions.

To summarize it: the man in the suit is supposed to be the hotel’s former owner, Horace (Harry) Derwent. He’s depicted as rich, powerful, and cruel. The man in the animal costume is Roger, someone who was interested in Horace romantically. Horace doesn’t feel the same way, so he manipulates Roger into doing increasingly humiliating things to feed his ego.

At one of the Overlook’s lavish costume parties, Derwent essentially forces Roger to show up as a “cute doggy,” then treats him like an actual dog in front of other guests, hinting that maybe he’ll reconsider their relationship if Roger goes along with it. The point isn’t “kink” or “identity.” It’s dominance, degradation, and entertainment for the people with power.

So the “costume” isn’t presented as cosplay or identifying as an animal. It’s presented as a humiliation ritual where a rich man uses his influence to turn another person into a prop. The novel doesn’t make it clear whether Roger is secretly into dressing up as a dog or enjoys being dominated, but it very clearly paints the dynamic as Derwent using money and status to make someone submit and be publicly humiliated.

As for why the movie uses a bear costume and not a dog: Kubrick never explicitly said why he changed it, but it’s very clearly a reference to the dog scene in the novel, compressed into a single, nasty visual shock. Roger being reduced to an animal isn’t just symbolic; it’s control through role and situation.

-------------------------

Now, as interesting as that all is, you might be wondering what the hell any of this has to do with Furry Conventions in 2026. Well, think about it for a minute. The closest modern furry convention analog isn’t "bear suit equals sex thing." It’s the power imbalance and public humiliation while dressed up, where the costume turns a person into a prop, and the social setting of a crowded convention makes it harder to say no.

You see echoes of this in handler and pet play dynamics that encourage similar roleplay (albeit usually way more consensual), but you also see parallels to Derwent’s abuse of power. That includes staff blatantly abusing their positions of authority, or on a smaller scale, a room host forcing their own rules on the friends they're rooming with. And this isn’t even touching the fact that if you’re a fursuiter, it can be hard to set boundaries when strangers get grabby, especially when you can’t easily speak or react.

To the furries who lurk this thread: are you seriously saying you’ve never seen a wealthy or popular room host pressure a friend into doing something weird or degrading while everyone cheers? And when you think about it, that friend was probably uncomfortable but went along with it anyway, smiling through it because they didn’t want to lose the room, their social circle, or their ride home.

Have you seen something like that? Then congrats: you basically saw this exact moment from the novel in real life. Status plus audience plus costume equals degradation that reads "consensual" from the outside, but isn’t freely chosen. A future "consent accident", if you will.

TL;DR: Stephen King didn’t predict degeneracy at future furry conventions. He predicted the abuse of power and the kind of rot that can perforate scenes like that for decades. The dog or bear costume is just a bonus on top of it.
 
Last edited:
Pinball 2000 said:
To the furries who lurk this thread: are you seriously saying you’ve never seen a wealthy or popular room host pressure a friend into doing something weird or degrading while everyone cheers? And when you think about it, that friend was probably uncomfortable but went along with it anyway, smiling through it because they didn’t want to lose the room, their social circle, or their ride home.
Click to expand...
What made me realize there are "haves" and "credits" in the furry fandom (because what furry have you seen "have not" that also go to conventions without racking up a credit card bill?) are room parties.

Some don't even let you in unless you have a certain model of car, and exclusivity breeds "Okay, what would you do for a Klondike bar?"

The good news is they slip up at times and our roving band of journalKiwis are always on the case :)
 
Next up before Furry Fiesta in Texas is this growing little disaster of a Fur Con called "Formal Equinox" held up in Canada during March. This is the kind of Furfaggotry you can expect to see there. The dancer in the video was also discovered to be a ABDL Pup fetishist.
 
Last edited:
Pinball 2000 said:
To the furries who lurk this thread: are you seriously saying you’ve never seen a wealthy or popular room host pressure a friend into doing something weird or degrading while everyone cheers? And when you think about it, that friend was probably uncomfortable but went along with it anyway, smiling through it because they didn’t want to lose the room, their social circle, or their ride home.
Click to expand...

I know exactly what you are talking about. I have seen room parties just be having rituals because someone in the group slighted who is ever hosted it.

It would be so sad but the culture of room parties at cons have gotten way out of hand at this point.
 
Otis Boi said:
I know exactly what you are talking about. I have seen room parties just be having rituals because someone in the group slighted who is ever hosted it.

It would be so sad but the culture of room parties at cons have gotten way out of hand at this point.
Click to expand...
What's the most depraved thing you've had the misfortune of witnessing at these furry room parties?
 
Pinball 2000 said:
As for why the movie uses a bear costume and not a dog: Kubrick never explicitly said why he changed it, but it’s very clearly a reference to the dog scene in the novel, compressed into a single, nasty visual shock. Roger being reduced to an animal isn’t just symbolic; it’s control through role and situation.
Click to expand...
Kubrick's movie had a bear motif all through it, including Danny's teddy bears, which some claim is a veiled reference to sexual abuse, possibly by Jack himself. I'm not sure I buy this, but they show up a lot in the film, so he probably changed the dog to a bear to go along with the motif, for whatever reason it's in the movie.
 
Pinball 2000 said:
As for why the movie uses a bear costume and not a dog: Kubrick never explicitly said why he changed it, but it’s very clearly a reference to the dog scene in the novel, compressed into a single, nasty visual shock
Click to expand...
In all fairness, the dog costume wasn't described as being scary, but rather silly, if i remember right.

I always thought it was still a dog, just uglier...
 
Jonathan Boudalycaon said:
What's the most depraved thing you've had the misfortune of witnessing at these furry room parties?
Click to expand...
That is hard to say, I think the revenge shitter, or the diaper taco party where the two worst. I have seen a lot of stuff I regret see and being a part of and it all starts with "Hey, Otis Boi come with me really quick I need to say 'Hi' really quickly". It goes with out saying the orgies are just fatties rubbing their bellies together.
 
Otis Boi said:
That is hard to say, I think the revenge shitter, or the diaper taco party where the two worst. I have seen a lot of stuff I regret see and being a part of and it all starts with "Hey, Otis Boi come with me really quick I need to say 'Hi' really quickly". It goes with out saying the orgies are just fatties rubbing their bellies together.
Click to expand...
Diaper Taco Party seems self explanatory but what was the Revenge Shitter?
 
Otis Boi said:
That is hard to say, I think the revenge shitter, or the diaper taco party where the two worst. I have seen a lot of stuff I regret see and being a part of and it all starts with "Hey, Otis Boi come with me really quick I need to say 'Hi' really quickly". It goes with out saying the orgies are just fatties rubbing their bellies together.
Click to expand...
It's clear that you've already experienced going to Hell and back at these furry room parties. You have my sympathies. Not even eye bleach could help you unsee those horrors that you've spoken of.

On another note, how much of a freak out would ANE Staff have had if curries went dressed as this guy did?
1000002351.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom