From what I can tell, there weren't any female writers on this and Scott wrote it solo, which I think really shows in how it's just a bunch of tropes stacked on top of each other and ends with robo-WrestleMania.
It was co-written and produced by Emma Tammi. Go look at her other works or listen to her talks with MatPat, I can almost guarantee she's the reason behind Vanessa and her 'trauma' being pushed to the forefront.
Isn't the movie set in 2002? I went to elementary school in the 2000s and I was in a robotics competition in like 2008 and 2009 as a kid, so it does kind of track with the era.
WTF that sounds badass as fuck.
I remebered having robotics class once a week per where we put together Lego Mindstorms robots like these then go to a competition every year.
The ending was sequel bait. Unless you're referring to the WWE animatronic all enter none leave brawl sponsored by "the power of friendship". I have no excuse for that, it's not very on brand for Scott and it's going to ruin the movie for some fans.
Yeah, I remember the Lego Mindstorms competition stuff in the 2000s.
And here I was thinking Scott finally dropped his "required non-canon reading" trope when Secret of the Mimic came out.
Secret of the Mimic didn't drop the requirement entirely. It's just that instead of being necessary, reading the books before hand makes the story more enjoyable. Which is still kinda unacceptable.
He has a retarded producer glued to his hip, a producer who's trying to make her name in Hollywood using his creation. Let's be honest though, Scott was never very good at telling stories. He was good at world building. It was the community theories that basically built his story for him with their 'predictions' that Scott would add in later as if it was always intended.
Toy "271K" Chica
And that's a bad thing? That scene was ass.
Of course. Tale as old as time and Scott will be too nice to tell her to fuck off.
The tree fort scene was there to build up character. No different than the scenes in IT where the kids are just hanging out. FNAF isn't terrifier or Halloween.
I caught the Mr.Burg moment too. Fucking sent me hard.
If you watch them for free, maybe, definitely won't be as enjoyable. For campy mascot horror/so bad it's good you could try Willie's wonderland. No FNAF knowledge needed.
I don't know how constrained he is by Blum house but he definitely needs to push for her removal. But she's only damaging herself. FNAF fan base aside she's not really building a career by making critic flops.
Answering your question, in the games they are kinda showed to be morally grey or tragic characters who did bad deeds out of circunstance, meanwhile in the movie both are just straight up evil. I actually like how they are portrayed in the movie but it rubbed some people the wrong way.
