Scott even contacted big name fnaf YouTubers to take down their videos about the fanmade fnaf + aswell.
At least Im glad he didnt abuse the report system and just contacted the youtubers personally and asked them to take it down.
People enjoy this sort of "grounded" aspect of Scott, he doesnt act like a "holier than thou" celeb.
Phisnom always came across as a retard in all honesty. He tries way too hard to be "edgy" it's honestly kind of ironic that he clearly enjoys spiting people despite having paper thin skin himself.
Something something, those in glass houses.
The paradoxical thing about "edgy" V-tubers is that you cant be actually edgy and a V-tuber. You can be a fucking PEDO and a V-tuber but not edgy. The reason is because to be edgy and a tough skinned attitude would require knowing when let things go or when to go absolutely nuclear and, unfortunately, thats not the "V-Tuber" thing to do because its ultimately a very "PC alligned" position. Sure, you can be "safe edgy" but thats not true edgy now, is it?
The beginning is confusing. Are they trying to incorporate elements from FNAF 4 as well with the nightmares and inside the house thing?
Considering FNAF 2 was really a prequel, it's odd they would try to make it a true sequel in movie-form.
The "prequel" twist worked in FNAF 2 given how vague and mysterious everything was (and lets face it, it wasnt hard to buy that the FNAF universe has more tech more akin to 2020's back in the 80's...tho only for animatronics, as FNAF 1 already had them being unrealistically advanced by being able to move around).
Nevermind that its not uncommon for sequels, even horror sequels, to eventually have an entry thats a prequel (twist or otherwise), usually exploring further some event mentioned in the original. So it didnt feel out of left field having a prequel.
It doesnt work much in movie form because of the very different framing devices. I have some some suggesting how a prequel to the movies could work but still, seems like they'll play safe.