Feminism discussion thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Who is/are your favorite feminist author(s) and why?
Sheila Jeffreys, it's been a while since I read her work so I can't give a good answer but I enjoyed all her books that I read so far. Anticlimax: A Feminist Perspective on the Sexual Revolution is a good one to start with.

 
But topics on pooners seems more scarce than their more violent male counterparts. While a lot of the "bois" in the book don't seem to have actually committed to the pooning, they act like the modern ones we know. Taking on the worse aspects of the lowly male species: DUDE SEX LMAO, deriding other women, proving just what doods they are. They were typically found in "queer" (read: tranny) spaces. Some indulged in polyamory. And above all, they just seemed like women who were desperate to escape the hatred and sexualization women and girls constantly face in every aspect of our lives. They're annoying, sad, self-loathing, and kind of pitiful. This book was published in 2005 and this chapter feels more relevant than ever.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I had the misfortune of living with a couple polyamorous pooners in my life and I thought of that chapter nearly every day while living with them. Some women hate being stepped on by the patriarchy so much that they want to wear the boot themselves. Nearly every TIF I've ever had the displeasure of knowing has fallen into that authoritarian category. They take the "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" attitude and try turning it up to 11 to prove how Actual Troon ScotsMAN they are.

Also, if men want women to be less burned out at work, they could scroll on their phones a bit less and help mom around the house a bit more so she's not too tired to make your chicken nuggies. Just a thought.
1753223037689.webp
 
While a lot of the "bois" in the book don't seem to have actually committed to the pooning, they act like the modern ones we know. Taking on the worse aspects of the lowly male species: DUDE SEX LMAO, deriding other women, proving just what doods they are. They were typically found in "queer" (read: tranny) spaces. Some indulged in polyamory. And above all, they just seemed like women who were desperate to escape the hatred and sexualization women and girls constantly face in every aspect of our lives. They're annoying, sad, self-loathing, and kind of pitiful. This book was published in 2005 and this chapter feels more relevant than ever.

The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Lol, so in other words, they act like 99% of feminist women be they straight or gay, and its merely your ideological blinders that stop you from see it.
 
can anyone explain why men think a woman complaining (and oftentimes joking) about a shitty job means they were bamboozled and should actually be tradwifes? also who the hell hops on linkedin for fun?
I hate that shit so much, if we go with this idiotic logic they have then men are too emotional and shouldn't be in the working field given how much movies there was in the 90s to 2000s which can be basically summarized as " I HAVE AN OFFICE JOB AND I FUCKING HATE IT AAAHHHHH" (Office Space, Falling Down, Fight Club, and American Beauty) and how many men resonated with these movies. Anyone who has more than one braincell can come to the conclusion that maybe its not normal for humans whether they are a man or a woman to work for 8 and sometimes even 12 hours, especially jobs that isolate them from rest of the people since we are very socially dependent creatures. There were studies shown that people today work more than the average medival serf and that in tribe societies people would work 4 hours maximum with rest of the day having it for themselves, but no why come to a decent conclusion when you can just instead violently spew shit out of your mouth because that shit pushes a certain narrative you agree with?

Also don't forget the other Holy Reddit talking point men love to parrot nonstop when it comes to this topic which is "Women would rather be wagecucks and submit to a boss that hates them and yells at them than be wives and mothers that submit to a man that loves them". Somehow being wageless slave for a wage cuck who can just screw not only you but also your children (if you have them) on a whim is a better choice because..?

That whole statement is very retarded because
1) You are way more likely to be yelled at by your own husband than a boss and usually bosses that act like that usually get reprimanded or fired for acting like this because working spaces are regulated, where as homes don't tend to be.

2) If you have a shitty boss, you can always quit your job and go find another one, whereas if you're stuck with an abusive controlling husband and if you try to leave chances are you'll get murdered.

3) For every shitty boss a woman had, another woman can tell you multiple stories about herself or women in her own life that submitted themselves to a husband like they were told to and followed every instruction provided to them to a T on how to be a good housewife that would allegedly make their husbands really happy, only for that husband to basically decide to destroy everything whether it's him completely decimating the marriage with Rekieta style hedonism or trooning out.
 
Last edited:
There were studies shown that people today work more than the average medival serf and that in tribe societies people would work 4 hours maximum with rest of the day having it for themselves,
Only people who believe this have never tried to grow their own food by manual labor before.
 
The men that Feminism needs to reach are the exact men who will ignore anything women have to say. Accordingly, I think the solution is to disguise feminist talking points in moidslop self-improvement podcasts. My apologies for the cringe, but just imagine an Andrew Tate type saying the following:

Welcome back, legends, to another episode of IRON TOWN! Last episode, we talked about getting hard on the OUTSIDE, but today, we're gonna talk about getting hard on the INSIDE.

Listen, women say they want a sensitive man with feelings and shit, but the LAST thing they REALLY want is a whiny faggot they have to clean up after. And it's not just whinging: If you let your temper overpower you, she's either gonna see you as a toddler having a tantrum - NO PUSSY - or as a nigger from a hostile tribe - NO PUSSY. The only exception is standing up on her behalf when she's too scared to do it herself - WET PUSSY.

(Ad break: Now he shills for a whitelabel 5-in-1 bodywash that he's selling for a 3x markup. During the ad break, he argues that cleanliness is the supreme male virtue, and thus that failing to wash your ass is an abandonment of your "inherent masculine spirit", and that you need to just "suck it up" and "stop being a bitch". After shilling, he continues.)

But then, why do bitches say this shit about "sensitive" men? It's because hiding your feelings is BITCH SHIT! A real man doesn't hide shit. He's in control DESPITE his feelings. That internal mastery is what bitches crave, but they don't know how to ask for it, so they ask for "sensitive" men... And then they regret getting what they asked for.

Anyway, it's been your boy BigDickBoss, keep it 100, and I'll catch you on the next one.
Three feminist demands conveyed to men who would never care what a woman had to say:
  • Getting angry counts as "being emotional".
  • Don't be a softboi faggot who uses your girlfriend as an emotional tampon machine.
  • Wash your ass.
 
I lost at least three brain cells reading that thread. Thanks.

Edit: Thread tax I guess... gay men complaining about being fetishized because of porn and expecting female sympathy for it is so tone deaf. Fujos are annoying losers but they are such a non-issue compared to straight men who watch porn. Most gay men will never encounter a fujoshi irl, but women are completely surrounded by male porn users. Yaoi is a bigger problem for the women who consume it than it is for any man.
Gay men can complain all they like but they know full well that if they get angry enough fujoshis can shut up. Male rage is male rage and nothing makes a fujo cry harder than a faggot calling her an ugly fat ass with roast beef curtains. They are often shocked at gay men's misogyny because they simply think it's non-existent with their yaoi.

I mentioned Anne Rice earlier. Turns out she was a pedo defender herself.
Screenshot_2025-07-25-19-42-18-366.webp
 
Last edited:
Gay men can complain all they like but they know full well that if they get angry enough fujoshis can shut up. Male rage is male rage and nothing makes a fujo cry harder than a faggot calling her an ugly fat ass with roast beef curtains. They are often shocked at gay men's misogyny because they simply think it's non-existent with their yaoi.

I mentioned Anne Rice earlier. Turns out she was a pedo defender herself.
View attachment 7692543
Incidentally, that's why I don't appreciate Josh's defense of Richard Stallman.
 
Gay men complaining about being "fetishized" is the same old tired ass males whining about women enjoying things, and is a terminally online thing in my experience. I don't think I've ever known a gay man to whine about this in real life. It is the "What about MALE circumcision?" of goid problems. Maybe they should sort of out their rampant goonerism in their own community, or how they worship, and yes, fetishize, certain body types among themselves. But they won't, because they are men.

I say, keep making the fags seethe, fujos. They hate you, so it's the least you can do in return.
 
MRW they're legalizing bussy or whatever as a form of reproductive reality
Fujoshis giving phul sapport to IRL faggots because they think they're like their BL novels is uwu wholesome and not hurting anyone, when guys goon too much to femboy and say bussy unironically it's an insult to wimminz.

Make it make sense.
 
Only people who believe this have never tried to grow their own food by manual labor before.
She's not technically wrong. Serfs probably did work less hours overall because their work was seasonal and they had a lot of religious holidays. That said, you're right that it shouldn't be taken to mean they worked 'less' than some 9 to 5 computer touching wagecuck. Being a medieval serf was brutal and backbreaking.

But I do agree with everything else in her post except the implication that we've somehow ended up worse off than malnourished liceridden dirt-farmers with no human rights.
 
She's not technically wrong. Serfs probably did work less hours overall because their work was seasonal and they had a lot of religious holidays. That said, you're right that it shouldn't be taken to mean they worked 'less' than some 9 to 5 computer touching wagecuck. Being a medieval serf was brutal and backbreaking.

But I do agree with everything else in her post except the implication that we've somehow ended up worse off than malnourished liceridden dirt-farmers with no human rights.

Exactly, search the etymology of the word "robot".
The people forced to corvée had some time for holy pilgrimages and such, but for the events like harvest they had to work very hard both on their landlords and their own piece of land and make it in sometimes very small time window. Apart from other duties for the landlord throughout the year.
 
Fujoshis giving phul sapport to IRL faggots because they think they're like their BL novels is uwu wholesome and not hurting anyone
The thing I don't understand about fujoshis is are they actually attracted to gay men? I was speaking to one the other day and she was talking about this guy she had a crush on and he's one of the most camp men I've came across in my life
 
The thing I don't understand about fujoshis is are they actually attracted to gay men? I was speaking to one the other day and she was talking about this guy she had a crush on and he's one of the most camp men I've came across in my life
My theory is fujoshit is a combination of penis envy and self insert eroticism.
So they can self insert as a male, but since they're still females their character is effeminate and attracted to males.
 
The thing I don't understand about fujoshis is are they actually attracted to gay men? I was speaking to one the other day and she was talking about this guy she had a crush on and he's one of the most camp men I've came across in my life

My theory is fujoshit is a combination of penis envy and self insert eroticism.
So they can self insert as a male, but since they're still females their character is effeminate and attracted to males.

I think fujos or really any type of woman can crush on a gay guy. I've known quite a few women who were genuinely attracted or aroused by gay men before they knew they were gay men and women who, even knowing a man's sexuality, find him attractive. I myself experienced crushes on gay men before I knew they were gay. It depends on pretty much anyone's preferences and another's performance. I've known sensitive, kind, quiet gay guys who are "my type" of men in terms of preference combo who were in the closet for a while and even dated women before coming out. "We always just thought you were bi" is a common saying in a lot of circles, as is "I'd date you if you/I were straight!"

In terms of specifically fujo attraction to gay men, I think @Ajkaceratops is correct in the theory that it's penis envy and a self-absorbed type of arousal. But I think a lot of fujo/TIFs will also SOCIALLY/CULTURALLY envy gay men because they're considering them in that stereotypical way that heterosexual people tend to view gay people as sexual, gendered analogues that conflate with more conventional understandings of social gender. "Whaaat?! An ~effeminate~ gay man!? How fun!! I'm jealous he gets to act and 'wear whatever' he wants!" Even though most people know gay men can't really do, say, act, wear whatever they want all the time, we also know that fujos are not going to do the mental work to see past stereotypes, since their very identities are founded in them.

This same type of thinking leads people to have those narrow views of ~*~gender~*~, which leads the worst of them to transition. I lived with a TIF who read out her teenage diary where she lamented that because she wasn't a girly-girl, boys didn't like her; she took a typical childish stereotypical view that life would be "easier" if she was a gay man. They really do see other people's material existence as costumes, as consumable goods. So when a fujo is "crushing" on a gay guy, I think some arousal and attraction are there, but I also think she's objectifying gay men as this product she can incorporate into her life or a lifestyle she can emulate.

It's even more disturbing to me when said fujos are trying to emulate being little boys, like this fat creep.
 
The thing I don't understand about fujoshis is are they actually attracted to gay men? I was speaking to one the other day and she was talking about this guy she had a crush on and he's one of the most camp men I've came across in my life
I think fujo girls are attracted to men but do not like the dynamic of a heterosexual relationship, so they imagine a world where they can be an equal to the person they're dating.
 
I think fujo girls are attracted to men but do not like the dynamic of a heterosexual relationship, so they imagine a world where they can be an equal to the person they're dating.
I was friends with a bunch of girls like that in highschool and I think you're at least partially right. As far as I can tell there's a few factors that can also apply at the same time:
1) They're into men. Two men being together is hot to them.
2) They don't want to have sex / a relationship so they don't want a woman involved that represents them as a reader.
3) They don't see women as equal to men so a relationship between two guys seems more meaningful to them.
4) They see women as competition and it's less threatening to see their fave tumblr sexyman be with a guy rather than another woman (that's hotter than them).
 
Back
Top Bottom