Everyday Feminism - aka Everyday Autism

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Better yet, the next person accused of it should just laugh it off.... I'd LOVE to see the SJW's mass-implode when their magic words no longer have any effect. People ARE getting sick of it internally, but are still just a bit too afraid of looking bad to publically say "stuff it" just yet.

Well, I don't think the silly celebrity spat is an example of defamation, as such, but calling Tim Hunt a sexist based on basically nothing certainly was, and clearly caused him damage. It's hard to ignore getting thrown out of a job and having your reputation destroyed based on lies.
 
One thing I've noticed is that when it comes to rap and hip-hop, they all have this set idea as it always being an ultra-serious, life on the streets type of music. They'll blame whites for appropriating it and watering it down. Granted I'm not a music expert, but what about the Fat Boys or DJ Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince who were around rap's earlier days and provided lighter stuff because they wanted to?
 
One thing I've noticed is that when it comes to rap and hip-hop, they all have this set idea as it always being an ultra-serious, life on the streets type of music. They'll blame whites for appropriating it and watering it down. Granted I'm not a music expert, but what about the Fat Boys or DJ Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince who were around rap's earlier days and provided lighter stuff because they wanted to?

They're honorary whites in the eyes of SJWs.

But it's nothing new with music. For years, people have been blaming whites for appropriating and watering down jazz and rock - and even ragtime, to an extent. It's been going on even before SJWs were a gleam in the eye of history. Mention the names of Nick LaRocca and Paul Whiteman (and, in some circles, Elvis Presley) to these people and rage would flow forth unlike any other.

On matters like this, I quote Louis Armstrong, who once said to Jack Teagarden: "You're an ofay, I'm a spade, let's blow!"
 
Are all of their articles these days just a few a sentences followed by a crappy comic? They might as well just become a webcomic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even the stuff you don't know about....


ESPECIALLY the stuff you don't know about......
 
But it's nothing new with music. For years, people have been blaming whites for appropriating and watering down jazz and rock - and even ragtime, to an extent. It's been going on even before SJWs were a gleam in the eye of history. Mention the names of Nick LaRocca and Paul Whiteman (and, in some circles, Elvis Presley) to these people and rage would flow forth unlike any other.

On matters like this, I quote Louis Armstrong, who once said to Jack Teagarden: "You're an ofay, I'm a spade, let's blow!"
The really fucked up part to me is just how badly SJW's misinterpret why white people playing black music screwed black people over for so long. It wasn't because white folks couldn't play, or even because they watered down the music for white consumption. Whiteman and LaRocca and Presley could all play really well, even though I feel guys like Armstrong and Otis Redding were better, and don't deserve to be compared to the likes of Pat Boone or Vanilla Ice.

The problem was the institution of segregation, which guaranteed mandatory underexposure and less pay no matter how popular black music or performers were. The theaters, radio and TV stations that refused to allow records by colored folks to play. The parents that refused to let their kids by records with darkies on the cover. The crooked execs who screwed their employees of less beneficial race over their payments and exposure. Under almost no circumstances could this be surmounted. The Duke Ellingtons were very much the exception.

Things are different now. At any given time at least half the nation's pop chart is filled with black music played by black artists who make the same amount of money as their equally famous white counterparts. In terms of commercial success, many of the examples of appropriators are utterly destroyed commercially by their black counterparts. Drake's sold far more records than Macklemore. Nicki Minaj repurposed Iggy Azalea's ass as a janitor's mop. Jay-Z and Kanye are both contemporaries of and far wealthier than Eminem, and even subtracting the money from the latter's marriage he's still in the same ballpark.

This is ten to fifteen percent of the nation's population, and they overrepresent in the music industry like Jews overrepresent the programming industry or Catholics overrepresent modern Supreme Court Justices. SJWs have missed the point on this so much the arrows they fire land in separate parallel universes from the target.
 
The really fucked up part to me is just how badly SJW's misinterpret why white people playing black music screwed black people over for so long. It wasn't because white folks couldn't play, or even because they watered down the music for white consumption. Whiteman and LaRocca and Presley could all play really well, even though I feel guys like Armstrong and Otis Redding were better, and don't deserve to be compared to the likes of Pat Boone or Vanilla Ice.

The problem was the institution of segregation, which guaranteed mandatory underexposure and less pay no matter how popular black music or performers were. The theaters, radio and TV stations that refused to allow records by colored folks to play. The parents that refused to let their kids by records with darkies on the cover. The crooked execs who screwed their employees of less beneficial race over their payments and exposure. Under almost no circumstances could this be surmounted. The Duke Ellingtons were very much the exception.

Things are different now. At any given time at least half the nation's pop chart is filled with black music played by black artists who make the same amount of money as their equally famous white counterparts. In terms of commercial success, many of the examples of appropriators are utterly destroyed commercially by their black counterparts. Drake's sold far more records than Macklemore. Nicki Minaj repurposed Iggy Azalea's ass as a janitor's mop. Jay-Z and Kanye are both contemporaries of and far wealthier than Eminem, and even subtracting the money from the latter's marriage he's still in the same ballpark.

This is ten to fifteen percent of the nation's population, and they overrepresent in the music industry like Jews overrepresent the programming industry or Catholics overrepresent modern Supreme Court Justices. SJWs have missed the point on this so much the arrows they fire land in separate parallel universes from the target.

The whole story is significantly more complicated and confusing than I can sum up in a forum post, but the conclusion is generally right.

In any case, I don't see what's wrong with a white person wanting to go into a supposedly-black music. They play that kind of music because they like it, after all, not because they want to keep the blacks down. You think Elvis was gleefully sneering about how black artists would be less successful than him because he ripped off their music and sold it to the white man?
 
Well ladies it turns out if we fuck a white guy we have to fuck a black guy too because racism.

http://everydayfeminism.com/2013/11/racial-preferences-are-racist/

Affirmative action in my vagina? It's more likely than you think.
They really do like to police other people's sexuality, don't they?

Three Ways to Fight Diet Culture

In the US, we care a lot about weight loss. We talk about it. Obsess about it. Glorify it. Because we’ve all heard at least one (read: hundreds of) news story about the obesity epidemic. We’ve all at least seen the trailer for Wall-E, and we know the dystopian future that awaits us if we stop being diligent about our bodies for even a second.

In nature, all “health” means is proper metabolic function, and all “fitness” means is the capacity to survive to reproductive age and pass on our genes. In the media, however, health and fitness have a different connotation – which hinges on being below a certain body mass, eating a certain number of calories, and not ever, ever hitting the dreaded plus-size clothing rack.

I speak with people all the time who are struggling to ditch diet culture and are scared to death of gaining weight because of the very limited range of body shapes, sizes, and types that the media portrays as acceptably healthy.

Because we all know being overweight doesn't have any effect on your proper metabolic function, does it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Five Reasons We Need Black Only Spaces:
A personal appeal from Senator Strom Thurmond

Oh, wait. It was written by this cunt:
VdTbnW9E.jpg


I didn't know Thurmond had another bastard. You do your daddy proud, Michal "MJ" Jones.

I highly recommend everyone read her article. It's the dumbest, most racist, least coherent idea I've seen expressed by anyone since I watched Davis "The Other Retard MJ" Aurini's "The Jewish Question" video.

Here's her links:
- http://www.michal-jones.com/
- https://www.facebook.com/michal.tc.jones
- https://twitter.com/justsaymj
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaljones
- https://michaljones.wordpress.com/author/michaljones/
- https://www.tumblr.com/search/michal jones
- https://www.pinterest.com/justsaymj/
- http://queerofgender.com/post/112143622163/profile-interview-michal-mj-jones

Those seeking milk will be rewarded with this one.
 
Five Reasons We Need Black Only Spaces:
A personal appeal from Senator Strom Thurmond

Oh, wait. It was written by this cunt:
VdTbnW9E.jpg


I didn't know Thurmond had another bastard. You do your daddy proud, Michal "MJ" Jones.

I highly recommend everyone read her article. It's the dumbest, most racist, least coherent idea I've seen expressed by anyone since I watched Davis "The Other exceptional individual MJ" Aurini's "The Jewish Question" video.

Here's her links:
- http://www.michal-jones.com/
- https://www.facebook.com/michal.tc.jones
- https://twitter.com/justsaymj
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaljones
- https://michaljones.wordpress.com/author/michaljones/
- https://www.tumblr.com/search/michal jones
- https://www.pinterest.com/justsaymj/
- http://queerofgender.com/post/112143622163/profile-interview-michal-mj-jones

Those seeking milk will be rewarded with this one.
*Looks at links* I knew this person would be a genderqueer or something like that. I all had to do was just take one look at her. BTW, does anyone else think those glasses make him/her look like an SJW Steve Urkel?
 
EDF seems to be taking a play from the Assigned Male handbook in that you don't need thinking things through, use your head and looking into things medically when it comes to gender idenity. It's just pretty much an accessory to these guys.

Honestly, this article seems pretty damn irresponsible, especially since it's targeted at people who are in a very vulnerable position in their life (being confused about their gender identity).

"Trying something out – like a new name (or nickname), a new pronoun, a new shirt or a new hat, even low dose hormones – can be the nudge that pushes you in the right direction. It can turn an abstract experience of discomfort into concrete validation of “this feels right.”"

Don't get me wrong, hormones can be a God-send to those who legitimately have gender dysphoria, but there's a very good reason that any doctor worth their salt just doesn't hand it out like candy. Hormones can, if left unchecked by doctors, can have negative effects on the body. Hell, a lot of people have to go through medical and psychological evaluations just to make sure they can even psychologically/physically handle the changes hormones bring.
Also, if you're on hormones long enough, some aspects of your body will permanently change.
With hormones you are doing something that has a drastic effect on your body and the fact that the author of the article seems to think it's okay to just lump them in with trying out a new shirt or a new hat is just fuckin' stupid!

"Read, lots: blogs, forums, books, magazines, journals.
The more you think about it the clearer things will get (eventually), and the more information you have to think with the better armed you are to construct your own conclusions.
Another wonderful option is to attend local support groups. Finding gaggles of non-binary folk is hard enough online, although you may be surprised how many other gender questioning people there are in your near vicinity.
Although nobody’s journey will be exactly the same, finding like-minded folk you can share experiences with is invaluable."

Okay, so absolutely no mention of going to see a professional psychologist or gender therapist? Are people who are professionally trained to advise others in these specific areas too hetero-cisnormative for you people?

I'm sorry- this frustrates me. This is shitty, touchy-feely "advice" directed to people who are in a vulnerable position. I hope that anyone who is having issues with their gender identity can see through this bullshit and go seek the advice of a real mental health professional.


 
*Looks at links* I knew this person would be a genderqueer or something like that. I all had to do was just take one look at her. BTW, does anyone else think those glasses make him/her look like an SJW Steve Urkel?

Not just that, but the suspenders, too. Great jerb.

It's like hating white people while wearing the whitest clothes you can find.
 
Holy shit, there's fucking no excuse for that low dose hormones comment. These people deserve a giant lawsuit.
 
Back
Top Bottom