Euro migrant crisis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
This article goes over why ISIS's targeting of Christians should be considered genocide and why it's stupid how the United States refuses to acknowledge it and give Christian refugees higher priority.

And as horrible as all of that is, their treatment of Yazidis is even worse. It's blatantly fucking obvious that ISIS has embarked on a genocidal campaign against Yazidis, Christians, and other non-Muslim groups... and yet President Obango has the nerve to talk down to us about how it's "religious profiling" and "not what America stands for" to demand that non-Muslim refugees fleeing ISIS be given higher priority because they are in much more danger.

If we were living back in WWII, would it be "religious or racial profiling" to suggest that Jewish refugees be given asylum quicker than regular Germans? Now, I may just be a simple Kiwi, but I don't think it's wrong to advocate the immediate protection of groups who are under threat of genocide over groups who are not faced with genocide.
 
If we were living back in WWII, would it be "religious or racial profiling" to suggest that Jewish refugees be given asylum quicker than regular Germans? Now, I may just be a simple Kiwi, but I don't think it's wrong to advocate the immediate protection of groups who are under threat of genocide over groups who are not faced with genocide.

It wasn't (and technically still isn't) an unpopular sentiment that Jews were below other people. FDR actually refused to allow a boat full of Jewish refugees from docking in NYC during WWII because of this sentiment, forcing them to return to Europe and arrive to Nazi soldiers arresting them on the spot.

Speaking of the Jews, they're actually some of the refugees that may be coming to America because of the Arab migrants. Their utter hatred of Jews rivals that of the Nazi regime. They've been vandalizing and robbing their homes and businesses, assaulting, raping and even killing them in disproportionate numbers. It's the greatest irony of an area that swore to protect them due to previous atrocities.
 
It wasn't (and technically still isn't) an unpopular sentiment that Jews were below other people. FDR actually refused to allow a boat full of Jewish refugees from docking in NYC during WWII because of this sentiment, forcing them to return to Europe and arrive to Nazi soldiers arresting them on the spot.

Speaking of the Jews, they're actually some of the refugees that may be coming to America because of the Arab migrants. Their utter hatred of Jews rivals that of the Nazi regime. They've been vandalizing and robbing their homes and businesses, assaulting, raping and even killing them in disproportionate numbers. It's the greatest irony of an area that swore to protect them due to previous atrocities.

They are as homophobic and antisemitic as nazis. But they are way more rapey and misogynistic than Hitler's ilk.

This means they are literally, worse than nazis.
 
And as horrible as all of that is, their treatment of Yazidis is even worse. It's blatantly fucking obvious that ISIS has embarked on a genocidal campaign against Yazidis, Christians, and other non-Muslim groups... and yet President Obango has the nerve to talk down to us about how it's "religious profiling" and "not what America stands for" to demand that non-Muslim refugees fleeing ISIS be given higher priority because they are in much more danger.

The whole basis of an asylum claim is reasonable fear of persecution or worse. Without actual danger, people have no greater claim to their legal request to immigrate into a country, which can simply refuse their applications like they would anyone else. Yazidis and Christians are, undeniably, in vastly greater danger.

It's also rich coming from Obama. I seem to recall he's President of a country that has currently mostly blocked Syrian immigration of any sort, not even counting the bungled campaigns by various states to set federal immigration policy, which is obviously unconstitutional.
 
This thread is depressing and enraging as fuck (not because of the posters but because of the content), so I thought it would be a good idea to lighten the mood.

/pol/ has once again latched onto a seemingly innocuous thing as a symbol of something much bigger (and not very PC). And in typical /pol/ fashion, it actually makes a creepy amount of sense.

yqp02cB.png

cuuOZIe.jpg

5ZE9w1S.jpg

I haven't seen anything like this since the whole Bella and the Bulldogs thing.

EDIT: If it wasn't clear, I don't actually believe that the Angry Birds movie is an allegory for the Euro migrant crisis, I just think that this shit is hilarious.
 
Last edited:
A mayor of a small German town told families to keep their children away from migrants to avoid "provoking them" when they wear fewer clothes in the summer (tw: Daily Mail article, but the other articles I found on the subject are all in German). A grandfather speaks up about how his 10-year-old granddaughter and her friends have been harassed by boys from the migrant center, and wants to know what the mayor is planning to do about it by summertime. After all, if the girls are being harassed in fucking winter while they're wearing coats, what will happen during the summer when they start wearing t-shirts and shorts? The mayor had this to say:

30D0B11C00000578-0-image-a-143_1454430300614.jpg


In other words, the mayor is totally okay with prepubescent girls getting sexually harassed by migrants. After all, they shouldn't provoke them, the little sluts.

The ensuing outrage is glorious. People immediately begin shouting things like "Who the hell elected you?" and "Boy oh boy, you've got some nerve. What kind of mayor is this? He should step down!" One of my favorite lines is:

Mayor: "Well, it's not technically necessary for the girls to walk there. There are alternative routes for going to school."
Audience member: "It doesn't fucking matter if there are other routes!"

He's literally the male version of the mayor of Cologne, telling women (or in this case, little girls who haven't even entered puberty yet) how they should dress and behave in their own fucking hometown. The German people are getting more and more fed up, and who can blame them?
 
A mayor of a small German town told families to keep their children away from migrants to avoid "provoking them" when they wear fewer clothes in the summer (tw: Daily Mail article, but the other articles I found on the subject are all in German). A grandfather speaks up about how his 10-year-old granddaughter and her friends have been harassed by boys from the migrant center, and wants to know what the mayor is planning to do about it by summertime. After all, if the girls are being harassed in fucking winter while they're wearing coats, what will happen during the summer when they start wearing t-shirts and shorts? The mayor had this to say:

30D0B11C00000578-0-image-a-143_1454430300614.jpg


In other words, the mayor is totally okay with prepubescent girls getting sexually harassed by migrants. After all, they shouldn't provoke them, the little sluts.

The ensuing outrage is glorious. People immediately begin shouting things like "Who the hell elected you?" and "Boy oh boy, you've got some nerve. What kind of mayor is this? He should step down!" One of my favorite lines is:



He's literally the male version of the mayor of Cologne, telling women (or in this case, little girls who haven't even entered puberty yet) how they should dress and behave in their own fucking hometown. The German people are getting more and more fed up, and who can blame them?
I can't believe that such blatant rape apologetics are coming from actual politicians. That sounds like something that RooshV or Julien Blanc would say
 
I can't believe that such blatant rape apologetics are coming from actual politicians. That sounds like something that RooshV or Julien Blanc would say

Do they want Nazis? Because this is how you get Nazis.
 
I can't believe that such blatant rape apologetics are coming from actual politicians. That sounds like something that RooshV or Julien Blanc would say

I mean, if those 10-year-old girls get assaulted, it's because they were totally asking for it. Little girls should know better than to walk around in their own hometowns wearing t-shirts and shorts as if that's what they've always done, the little whores.

I'm honestly in shock that politicians are telling women to change their behavior and attire instead of, you know, telling the migrants to keep their fucking hands and comments to themselves when they're guests in another country. If a woman is raped or assaulted for having her hair uncovered and wearing a short-sleeved shirt while walking past some migrants, whose fault is it? And is it really a ~misunderstanding~? The woman is absolutely not to blame, she's exercising the rights she's entitled to in a free, egalitarian society. If men from these shithole countries have such little self control that they immediately sexually harass any woman (or girl, for that matter) who isn't swaddled up like a mummy, they need to go.

We don't tolerate sexual abuse and harassment from our own men, why should they be any different? The rape apologetics and double standards are absolutely infuriating to me.
 
Liberalism and feminism today:

If a white man pets the woman on the rear or calls her offensive names, it is rape and he should be killed on the spot for daring to be a sleazy jerk.
If a non-white man rapes or beats up the woman, it is "cultural enrichment" and the poor migrants are to be coddled for being provoked and the worst of what can happen to them is sitting through a "no rape" class. Bonus points if it is in swedish and german and they don't speak a word of it.

Am I thinking their priorities are seriously ***ed up and it would be more logical to switch the reactions around?

Consider this insane barbarian scenario that I came up with:

If a white man pets the woman on the rear or calls her offensive names, he is told not to do it again because he is a jerk and worst that happens he is sent to seminar.
If a non-white man rapes or beats up the woman, he is deported to whatever ***hole he came from. After getting a few well meaning kicks from the cops.

But apparently being non-white gives rape privilages. Raprivilages. Bravo tumbler, bravo.
 
Some posts here have been removed or are walking a thin line. While you are entitled to your own opinions, try not to be blatantly hate-filled.

Just remember, I will believe any of your shit opinions to be genuine thoughts.
 
Hating these literal child-raping scumbags isn't wrong, just try not to drag things like the Nazis into the discussion when it's not relevant to the topic and have a little filter on the output.

but calling all immigrants from Muslim countries "child-raping scumbags"
Did I specify that to apply to all immigrants? I don't think I did, I was mainly referring to the incidents that have been highlighted in the thread in the last few pages. It's way too common for these incidents to occur to not build a theme in people's minds, but don't take it as me literally saying that all immigrants are child rapists. Sorry for the confusion.

Nazis are directly relevant. There is going to be a spike in membership of Nazi groups and sympathizers in the immediate future. How do you think these groups recruit?
I was referring to a now-deleted post about Hitler's Nazis.
 
Last edited:
Hating these literal child-raping scumbags isn't wrong, just try not to drag things like the Nazis into the discussion when it's not relevant to the topic and have a little filter on the output.

I'm against mass, uncontrolled immigration and all for exercising full severity of law against people who break it, no matter who they are or where they came from, but calling all immigrants from Muslim countries "child-raping scumbags" is fucktardery which does absolutely nothing to help solve the immigration problem and is reminiscent of wizardchand and MRA delusions of "beta uprising".
 
Hating these literal child-raping scumbags isn't wrong, just try not to drag things like the Nazis into the discussion when it's not relevant to the topic and have a little filter on the output.

Nazis are directly relevant. There is going to be a spike in membership of Nazi groups and sympathizers in the immediate future. How do you think these groups recruit?
 
Back
Top Bottom