Dragon Age: The Veilguard - A woke disaster? Yep!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Are u woke enough for this game?

  • Hell yeah, I want play it with my wife's son

    Votes: 170 9.4%
  • Nope, I need to suck more girlcock first

    Votes: 393 21.8%
  • Yasss, I identify as an autistic dwarf of color

    Votes: 377 20.9%
  • Nah, I rather play Fallout76

    Votes: 862 47.8%

  • Total voters
    1,803
Now name a modern-day video game that even has this.
1730512176219.png
Every soul calibur game for a start, they even give you a selection of options
Every argument you've made has only exposed your ignorance of games and every single one is a retarded tumblr/reddit piece of bullshit that can only be maintained in a place where you ban everyone who can prove you wrong
 
Veilgaurd is such a bad game people would rather argue about fan service than talk about it.
Hard to take the game seriously when even it's biggest defenders like Jason Schrier admits it's a piece of shit and they're only elevating it to "own the chuds"
jason schrier dragon age.jpg
This game will be forgotten by this time next week, and people will only remember it for the absolutely insane modern day politics shoehorned in and the awful marvel writing. Meanwhile, something like Baldur's Gate 3 is still relevant because it's an actually good RPG, same goes for the original Dragon Age that came out 15 years ago now.
 
Small comparative update with what I posted 5 hours ago. The number of reviews have fatten a bit.
1730512949850.png
1730512974417.png
1730512995067.png
2nd day after release. Still consistantly under 3/10 by users. Journo scum get bent.

Edit : Sorry but I forgot to show this too : 6219 steam reviews, 78% mostly positive, 5212 positives and 1426 négatives. A stark contrast.
1730515463400.png

Apologies but I should be assleep(insomnia) and I am too tired to dig for nuggets or trashes. GLHF folks.
 
Last edited:
That's not even remotely close to tit armor and you know it.
A man's torso is not defined by society as "sexual" in the least. Otherwise, men would be required by law to cover up at all times. And way to just handwave away ridiculous male armor as "tastes have changed", yet still get pissy when a woman points out that the boob armor trope is outdated and retarded. So men are allowed to decide when armor designs are stupid, but women aren't, huh? God, you're a faggot.

Doomguy's armor in the original Doom didn't have the abs exposed on purpose: the box art clearly shows a thinner, underlayer was torn away by a demon's claws. At no point was he designed to look sexual, give me a fucking break. Name a game where the men are sluttier-looking than the women.
Imagine if each of your testicles were stretched out, then encased in a sphere of armor. That's what boob armor is. It doesn't make sense from any standpoint, so it should die off.
Look if we want realism in fantasy that ship sailed eons ago.

No woman would be doing anything near physical attacking since the weakest of men can absolutely body even trained female fighters. Ever tried arm wrestling your brother or male cousin after the age of like 13? A single woman attempting to "adventure" would be constantly at risk of being raped and/or otherwise assaulted to death, just go to India to see what that's like. And actual, historical bows need immense physical strength to wield so ignore those ranger fantasies too. There's a reason poisons, assassination and specialist weapons like the naginata were associated with women. They needed every advantage they could get to compensate.

Also I want to see that dick armor in the game, that'd be funny af. Where's my codpiece representation, BioWare???
 
Hard to take the game seriously when even it's biggest defenders like Jason Schrier admits it's a piece of shit and they're only elevating it to "own the chuds"
View attachment 6589295
This game will be forgotten by this time next week, and people will only remember it for the absolutely insane modern day politics shoehorned in and the awful marvel writing. Meanwhile, something like Baldur's Gate 3 is still relevant because it's an actually good RPG, same goes for the original Dragon Age that came out 15 years ago now.
I got to be honest when I saw that he said he didn’t like the game I laughed. Even their number one supporters don’t care about it. If they didn’t shoehorn a bunch of trannies into the game nobody but us would be talking about it right now. Their whole player base seems to be people playing it for political purposes.
 
Ah yes, those chuds all review bombing, as if inappropriately leaving positive reviews isn't the same tactic, especially when you're willing to rate the game 10/10 and then immediately say it isn't perfect and thus should not be 10/10. Wonderful logic.
 
I got to be honest when I saw that he said he didn’t like the game I laughed. Even their number one supporters don’t care about it. If they didn’t shoehorn a bunch of trannies into the game nobody but us would be talking about it right now. Their whole player base seems to be people playing it for political purposes.
The people who made the game are also the same kind of political spergs who don't care about making a good game, so it checks out.
I'm glad that less and less people are taking that kike seriously, he's as big of a lolcow as Mark Mann, my personal pet cow and yet there are still people who hold him as a "lone gaming journalist with standards". Pathetic. Adam Sessler was a better gaming journalist than him and he's a TDS afflicted drug addict.
Ah yes, those chuds all review bombing, as if inappropriately leaving positive reviews isn't the same tactic, especially when you're willing to rate the game 10/10 and then immediately say it isn't perfect and thus should not be 10/10. Wonderful logic.
Speaking of which, how is the Steam situation? I know they have been pruning negative reviews, but are they keeping the positive ones that don't say anything productive or just straight up say they are "evening out the review bombing"?
 
No, they wouldn't. (Here's a hint as to how I know: I'm a woman.) If you're wearing a cuirass that's made of steel and weighs 20 lbs., why the FUCK would you decide to add on even more steel to it, make it heavier, weigh you down, and thus make you a slow-moving target? Think with your head for once, and not your dick. Retard.
This is really naive. You could say the same about a giant, entirely aesthetic steel penis called "codpiece" men wore. And I PERSONALLY wouldn't wear it, so should I say "oh, I'm a man, so trust me, no man would wear that", despite proof some did?
I DO agree with shit like women dressed as strippers in battle looking stupid, but adjusting dimensions to give an accent towards the bust is quite doable, with minimal added weight, and you don't talk for all women at all.
Women don't like being sexualized, it's not that hard to understand.
You mean DYKES don't like being sexualized (by men). Some women want to be sexy, this isn't a crime. Stop acting like any woman who dresses sexy or even slutty does so because a big oppressive MAN made them do it, OR that being sexualized is something NO WOMAN EVER WANTS, sex is literally a woman being SEXUALIZED in the most literal way, and last I checked not all sex was rape. It only is to militant lesbians.
I said slutty.
I would argue no straight man acts """slutty""" by your standards, only women and faggots. So this kinda feels like you have stick up your ass about straight men.
Women like ogling men's asses, too.
weren't you just telling people to not sexualize people? or just WOMEN can't be sexualized, or is a woman who stares at another womans ass ALSO awful for sexualizing a woman?
 
Last edited:
Hard to take the game seriously when even it's biggest defenders like Jason Schrier admits it's a piece of shit and they're only elevating it to "own the chuds"
View attachment 6589295
This game will be forgotten by this time next week, and people will only remember it for the absolutely insane modern day politics shoehorned in and the awful marvel writing. Meanwhile, something like Baldur's Gate 3 is still relevant because it's an actually good RPG, same goes for the original Dragon Age that came out 15 years ago now.

This is a good example of a really strange aspect of the cope of Schreier and his ilk. The game fails resulting in the development studio at best losing staff (and reputation) and at worst being shut down. The owning publisher not only fails to generate the desired revenue but almost certainly suffers a significant loss. In so far as they still have any credibility and/or relevance the reviewers running cover take another hit to that further reducing their future prospects. On the other side of things gamers don't get the game they wanted but also don't pay for it - they actually lose nothing and the chud cheerleaders with their youtube channels make hay generating views, subs and revenue. And we get to laugh at it.

The only losers here are those involved in the production and defence of this game. The "chuds" lose nothing. The level of self delusion on the part of Schreier and the rest of his fantasist cult is off the scale. It's almost as ridiculous as believing that a man can be a woman.
 
Further criticism. You can clip right through your companions. They have no solid mass. It's ridiculous.

You can't interact with any of the fauna. I saw two nugs below me and I thought "Great, sliced nug!", I drop down, they go *poof* and disintegrate into dust that gets carried away by the wind.

There are physical barriers that prevent you from going to certain areas on a map. They have an icon of a red lock that says "Currently Inaccessible" No explanation given. It is so incredibly lazy. Rather than create a physical obstacle that can't be currently surmounted, they just block it off with a white opaque wall with a lock icon. In addition to this, it feels like an action game on rails. There is no free exploration of the spaces, you have to follow very specific paths that are extremely obvious on the map. You are absolutely incapable of freely exploring most of the areas you can see on the map.

You can't leave arbitrary markings on your map. You can mark certain objects the game thinks are important, like a higher level chest when you get within a certain proximity to it, but that's it.

You can gain access to skills with skill points, but you have absolutely no control over your attributes.

You are unable to specify tactics for your companions and the AI seems a little stupid. Your companions seem to use mostly basic attacks unless you tell them to use their abilities through a pause and activate menu. You can spend skill points you gain from increasing your "bond level" with your companions on automating certain skills, which seems really stupid. As we already know, companions have no health and cannot die. You can upgrade their weapons to increase their damage.

Most of these things are serious regressions from previous entries in the Dragon's Age series, and even from just the last entry, Inquisition. Most of the things I list here as being retarded were things that were properly implemented in Inquisition 10 years ago!

This alone with what else I have mentioned would be more than enough to refund this game as utter shit. Include the woke stuff, and this game is something I wouldn't force my worst enemy to play against their will.

That's it for now, I am sure this is just the tip of the iceberg.

It's skinsuit Dragon Age.

It makes sense why the trannies love it, since there is nothing they love more than skinwalking (and doing so quite poorly).
 
This is a good example of a really strange aspect of the cope of Schreier and his ilk. The game fails resulting in the development studio at best losing staff (and reputation) and at worst being shut down. The owning publisher not only fails to generate the desired revenue but almost certainly suffers a significant loss. In so far as they still have any credibility and/or relevance the reviewers running cover take another hit to that further reducing their future prospects. On the other side of things gamers don't get the game they wanted but also don't pay for it - they actually lose nothing and the chud cheerleaders with their youtube channels make hay generating views, subs and revenue. And we get to laugh at it.

The only losers here are those involved in the production and defence of this game. The "chuds" lose nothing. The level of self delusion on the part of Schreier and the rest of his fantasist cult is off the scale. It's almost as ridiculous as believing that a man can be a woman.
There is nothing more important than owning the libs chuds. Making a good game? Who cares about this stupid nerd shit? What about making sure the customer gets a good deal for what they're paying? Fuck em, they should be happy to get anything at all. Be grateful for what you have and think of the poor devs!
These retards live in a fantasy. Many of them don't even care about videogames and are only here securing a foothold in the culture wars, projecting all the way. Every single studio that shuts down and every single game that bombs is a good thing with no downsides, the sooner these talentless parasites leave the industry the better.
 
This is a good example of a really strange aspect of the cope of Schreier and his ilk. The game fails resulting in the development studio at best losing staff (and reputation) and at worst being shut down. The owning publisher not only fails to generate the desired revenue but almost certainly suffers a significant loss. In so far as they still have any credibility and/or relevance the reviewers running cover take another hit to that further reducing their future prospects. On the other side of things gamers don't get the game they wanted but also don't pay for it - they actually lose nothing and the chud cheerleaders with their youtube channels make hay generating views, subs and revenue. And we get to laugh at it.

The only losers here are those involved in the production and defence of this game. The "chuds" lose nothing. The level of self delusion on the part of Schreier and the rest of his fantasist cult is off the scale. It's almost as ridiculous as believing that a man can be a woman.

Well, Schrier is no different than a 9th grade troll essentially. His whole mindset here is just that anti-woke people want the game to fail and if it doesn't they'll be sad. He hates them, so the thought of them being sad makes him happy. It's like the feminists drinking out of 'men's tears' mugs (or Shapiro with the 'liberals' tears' for the opposite side).

But a difference with Schrier and the 9th graders is that he has a lot more experience with the inner working of the gaming industry. I think he knows that Veilguard is not actually breaking any records or showing itself to be an undeniable success. Most likely, it's actually a weak start for such an expensive and game from a premier studio and interest will fizzle quickly.

In the long run, the game will be revealed to be an underperformer. It might not destroy Bioware, but there probably won't be any more Dragon Age games. But that fact will be revealed down the road, maybe in an earnings statement or some investor call many months from now. Therefore, the only real gain to be had from this game is short term bluffing to upset the chuds.

In other words, Schrier is focused on shit posting to piss off people he despises because there's literally nothing else he can do to feel satisfaction in this situation. The downside is that eventually people will quote tweet his gloating with the facts, but that's nothing new for him. They'll be blocked or ignored and he'll make excuses like 'crunch' or something is the real culprit.
 
Back
Top Bottom