- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
Provoking fights makes him an obnoxious faggot. Calling out nigger behavior in public makes him based. Neither of those things are crimes, nor are they direct and imminent threats to someone's safety. That, more or less, is the current legal standard to justify violence. Will that change? I hope not. A lot of major legal precedent is set from cases involving gigantic scumbags.I wonder if they will speak at length about the fact he was doing this as a job. Provoking people. He was employed to antagonize and start fights. That will probably be a contributing factor as well when it comes to the jury.
The median age of his jury pool is about 30. 64% is 18-64. 55% white, 22% black, 12% hispanic, then asian/other. College degrees are below the national average at around 30%. Median household income is about $70k with per capita income being $34k. Poverty rate is around 10%. Lots of skilled tradesmen and people that work on the military base. The county went Trump in 2024 to the tune of 58.5%.
It's a little more racially diverse than the rest of Tennessee, but it's also younger and still solid red. It's also the South, so there's a good chance the locals have laughed at a nigger joke once in their life. To be in the jury pool there, you have to be registered to vote, not be a felon, and have an active drivers license/state ID.
If a black guy attacked me and got shot in the process, the progs in my area would give me the chair. Especially if my post history and wanton use of racial slurs were used to besmirch my character. He definitely has a better shot than I would.