💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

[ForTheHoard]

You are correct but consider that he isn't being tried because of his speech, he's being tried because he shot someone.

I'm not overlooking that. He shot someone, admitted it, and is being charged with attempted murder. Self defense is an affirmative defense.

State (opening)- Chud shot Nigger without justification.
Chud's Lawyer (opening)- He used force but it was justified by his reasonable belief he was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm.
State- What happened, Nigger?
Nigger- Chud is a racist and/or called me a nigger.
Chud's Lawyer- Does this evidence show/imply you attacked him?
Nigger- I dindu nuffin, but yes.
Chud's Lawyer- What happened, Chud?
Chud- Nigger attacked me and I shot him to stop the threat.
State- Couldn't you have done something else?
Chud- No. I couldn't retreat and I believed I was going to be seriously harmed.
State (closing)- The defendant’s belief was not reasonable and the force was excessive.
Chud's Lawyer (closing)- The state has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that this was not self-defense.
Judge- *explains to the jury how the law works and what factors they need to consider*
Jury- *deliberates and provides verdict*

Chud's job, channel, behavior, etc. doesn't really matter to me. You could remove him entirely and put anyone or anything in his place and it wouldn't change the way I feel about the case. Some variation of the above scenario is going to take place during the trial, and what happens during the parts in red can affect any and all people accused of racism. Id rather this happen to a faggot like Chud because if it goes bad, nothing of value would be lost.

This shit is gay because prosecutors used to see cases where the facts leaned towards self defense and charges were never brought. Now, even if the nigger is raping your wife while sawing your son's head off, you're going to spend some time in prison and have your life ripped apart by the judicial system if you kill them. Too many DA offices have been taken over by social justice foids that would rather get back pats and CNN interviews by trying cases they have a high risk of losing. What would have made you retire in disgrace 30 years ago is now a springboard into political power.

 

[Vlad the Implier]

I'm not overlooking that. He shot someone, admitted it, and is being charged with attempted murder. Self defense is an affirmative defense.

>the threat or use of force against another is not justified:
>if the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force

This is directly from Tennessee state law.

 

[Gatcha Gonna Getcha]

He assaulted Chud in public and ran off like a coward.

& then Chud followed him

Somehow, this doesn't cross into, "He got what he wanted" when Chud finally maces him in self-defense

It's not self defense when you FOLLOW them. He did it to provoke a reaction & retaliated after he got it. You all talk this shit about libtards playing dumb, does that mean you're actually this retarded? You can hear him saying "lets go get that nigger" what part of that sounds like self defense to you?

It should be legal to chase down and empty the can in his eyeballs.

Even if it was it still wouldn't be self defense. You are not DEFENDING YOURSELF when you are CHASING someone. You operate on the backwards logic that YOU want to do Y & Y should be legal so anyway you can twist the law to make it sound legal to you & your hugbox is fine, even if it sounds fucking insane to any rational human. You will force X to be Y when the two aren't even close.

 

[ForTheHoard]

View attachment 9026703
>the threat or use of force against another is not justified:
>if the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force

I'm not ignorant to that either, and that's where the judge's instructions and the jury's deliberation draws that line. Hence why I really tried to highlight the importance of that in my effort post.

Section A of the image you posted includes abandoning the encounter. This will be reliant on facts we don't know yet. Did Chud square up, try to fight, and get the shit kicked out of him before shooting? Probably not self defense. Did he get attacked, try to cover up or defend, or get tackled/restrained before shooting? An unwillingness to participate in the fight is an abandonment of the encounter even if your non-threat words caused a punch to fly. He may or may not have had the opportunity to retreat. There's a bit of circumstantial evidence. There's the audio of Chud screaming about getting nig off of him. He grazed his left bicep with a bullet which is really hard to do if it's just a negligent discharge while you're unholstering. I haven't seen anything implying he was a willing participant in the violence. THIS PART IS CURRENTLY AN UNKNOWN.

The legal definition of provocation is above my education and seems to vary from place to place. It doesn't look like there's anything in Tennessee law that codifies that. Again, that's probably going to come down to how the judge decides to give the jury instructions. It's all going to be judged based on the moment the confrontation started to when the shot was taken. 3-4 minutes max. That's assuming he just gets charged with attempted murder and not a plethora of other things that may be easier to convict on.

We don't know why they were there, how it started, or what exactly happened. All of those things are what makes our arguments wrong or right. I just haven't seen anything yet that exonerates or condemns him. Otherwise we're just blowing smoke up each other's asses and speculating on things we know little to nothing about.

 

[/intl/2]

maybe his lawyer can argue hes mentally deficient and therefore his mind operates differently .only way this inbred is gonna get off lol

 

[Mr. Suction]

Glad to see the resident rightoids disown this guy. Nice improvement over when they were lionizing James Fields (the 2017 Charlottesville, VA rally car attacker). Which, even if one were to cope and believe he was completely innocent, at the end of the day it was still a White trash schizo untermensch getting removed from wider society. You'd think they'd be glad for something like that; it's not like him getting jailed was going to un-plow everyone, and resurrect Heather Heyer.

 

[FPTMIU]

Dalton has been pretty open about his desire to shoot a black person dead on stream.
View attachment 9002448

https://archive.is/cJGvU

View attachment 9002519

https://archive.is/HoyNA

View attachment 9002609

https://archive.is/i9TQN

View attachment 9002450

https://archive.is/mHkhL

View attachment 9002456

https://archive.is/RJYup

Dalton's got priors too, I doubt the judge or jury is going to go easy on him.

This is the most obvious fed imaginable. Mark my words this will lead to some law being passed that gives niggers immunity if they attack someone for calling them a nigger

 

[IliterateNerd77]

Pro-black politispreg youtuber Antonio speaks, gives his retarded take on ChudTheBuilder.

He also supports Karmelo Anthony

 

[Leland Palmer]

Provocative speech is protected.

It really isn't. We can invoke 1A all day long, but there is a line. The situation where you are using potentially lethal force after causing the need for that force is very often where that line is. The Supreme Court knew this with Chaplinsky, but they've also known that not everything qualifies. If anything, what qualifies as "fighting words" anymore has been reduced down to basically just the racial slurs.

We obviously don't know all the facts and won't until the trial

Which makes it fascinating that anyone is creating these wild ass scenarios to defend "ChudtheBuilder" at all. A significant part of this thread is just throwing random bullshit out there to manufacture a defense for what may actually be an attempted murder.

Going forward, is it going to be legal for black people to enact violence on white people that say nigger?

It never has been, and never will be. This and your question after are purely the realm of fantasy.

constantly diminishing right to defend yourself and your property.

If anything you are describing the exact opposite of what is happening nationally. Stand-Your-Ground laws without a duty to retreat are the law of the land in the vast majority of States, most States don't have a duty to retreat in a home and of those some don't even have it in a vehicle. The only way that you can view this as a true sentiment is if you only look at specific areas of the United States. We're past the point of justified self-defense cases like Bernie Goetz being controversial culturally, we are now in the "we must allow self-defense even if they may not pass the smell test according to state rules" era.

the footage their outdoor surveillance cams recorded must be damning.

It's not self defense when you FOLLOW them.

I don't know of a courthouse that allows you to bring your firearms into the facility, either. Most courthouses also don't have a firearms check area. It is entirely possible that he had to leave his gun in his car, had the verbal altercation, went to the car to grab his gun, then went back to continue the altercation. If that is the case, then you are no longer in a self-defense situation.