💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

View attachment 9025260

So this account is claiming that chud is calling adin ross to post bail because he cant access his gosendgo account with out the phone the cops took and he will fight for free in brand risk if adin helps

The account also has other messages from chud and a link to a new givesendgo

Either someone is scamming retards to send money or chud is crying to adin ross.
IMG_7104.jpeg

ADIN ROSS? Hahahahhahahahaha.
 
i'm not talking about yelling nigger, think walking up to a family and telling a dad you hope his kids get raped and killed or something. eventually you'll find someone whose gonna snap.

They act like there aren’t entire fucking communties/channels/etc….

Dedicated to white tweakers and Methheads beating the fuck out of each other in the backwoods of Arkansas

Just like that dude earlier in the thread was saying.

YOU ANIT NEVER LIVED AROUND WIGGERS
 
Why do you hold Chud to a different standard than the feral blacks assaulting him?

He isn't. If you'd paid attention to the clip he lays out pretty clearly what standard he's holding Chud to with Chaplinsky. Chud is deliberately using probably the only thing that is guaranteed to provoke a fight. When you start engaging in provocation, your ability to justify self-defense as a legal argument becomes far more difficult. When you couple this with his many tweets that can be construed as him actively seeking to shoot and kill a black person in a pre-meditated self-defense scenario, it sounds like he was looking to kill someone.

It'd likely be 4th degree assault, giving Chud the legal right to pull out his mace in preparation for another assault, if not mace him immediately.

Which is a reasonable escalation of force.

In how many jurisdictions is it considered brandishing when someone assaults you and you prepare yourself to defend against a second attack?

In a lot of them if the escalation of force isn't viewed as proportionate or you don't meet other criterion surrounding handling a firearm in a self-defense situation. It's one thing if you brandish a firearm in self-defense if someone is trying to come at you with a knife or other weapon, or if you have a reasonable fear. For example, if someone were to pull a realistic enough imitation firearm on you, you may be within your rights to pull a firearm. It totally depends on the situation, and the item being brandished in defense of a second attack. Firearms are viewed as an immediate escalation to lethal force and for very good reason. If you are viewed as escalating to lethal force, you are going to have a difficult time claiming self-defense.

Why is the onus on Chud to essentially remove himself from society so low-impulse retards can't wantonly assault him and attempt to disarm his lawful tools for self-defense?

Chud doesn't have to remove himself from society. He can do what everyone else does in polite society and contain himself and go on about his day like a normal person. It is not hard to not act like a degenerate, and it's even less difficult to not constantly record yourself being a degenerate. Nobody made ChudtheBuilder walk around screaming nigger at Black people, nobody made him record himself doing it over and over again, and nobody made him make tweet after tweet painting every angle to claim self-defense look less and less like self-defense, and more like attempted 2nd Degree Murder. I cannot fathom how you come to this conclusion.
 
They act like there aren’t entire fucking communties/channels/etc….

Dedicated to white tweakers and Methheads beating the fuck out of each other in the backwoods of Arkansas

Just like that dude earlier in the thread was saying.

YOU ANIT NEVER LIVED AROUND WIGGERS
Billy Bobs are just as retarded as any nigger. Chud fits the bill. Violent, crude, has his baby mommas, and shouldn't be in polite society.
 
Chud doesn't have to remove himself from society. He can do what everyone else does in polite society and contain himself and go on about his day like a normal person

long, logical reasonable post literally hand holding them on your reasoning and why it’s a bad idea to support nuisance streamers causing problems and how the court will likely deal with this

His easy marks that he begs donos from:

SOMETHING SOMETHING U WERE BORN WHITE THATS YOUR TEAM COLORRRRRRR

The absolute state of chud defenders at the moment.
 
"Fighting words" are misunderstood. It has never been a greenlight for niggers to assault racists. It isn't a relevant doctrine in self-defense cases. There isn't any precedent of a violent nigger gets acquitted on the basis of being called a nigger (some killers have been convicted of manslaughter, but the circumstances were pretty muddy to begin with). Much to the chagrin of BLM & associates they go to prison all the time for battering or killing Crakkka ass racists. Kiwis have this idea that niggers never go to jail for all the crime they commit which is so laughably retarded

It actually is a relevant doctrine in self defense, it's actually written into the code of Tennessee that you can't provoke a confrontation and then claim "self defense", specifically to prevent what Chud was trying to accomplish which is endlessly bait people into phsyical confrontations and then ultimately shoot them as a form of legalized murder.
 
So much reddit ITT because how can you not find someone angering a nigger to the point where it activates it's socioeconomic factors funny? This is a problem how?
:thinking:
 
God damn, you fucking faggots are so annoyingly dumb. What Chud wants is white people to not be justifiably attacked for exercising the rights white men setup for them to enjoy. When losers like you just go, "Well, what do you expect? The terrible state of things is indeed the state of things!" No shit. That's the entire issue that Chud wants addressed.

No that's actually not what your hero wants. He posted that the day he shoots and monkey and then gets off is the day whites take their country back. He posted that on X for the whole world to see numb nuts and then he tried to make it happen.

If you were "provoked" into violently victimizing others for being offensive, you deserve to be put in jail. And if you're white, you would be. Nobody wants Chud to be able to shoot people for nothing, faggot. He didn't get his ass beat after starting a fight. He justifiably put holes in an animal trying to kill him and the wrong person is being punished, ffs.

Actually Chud was itching to shoot people for nothing dipshit. He made many statements about his intentions. You trying to pretend that he was a hairs breath away from death at the hands of the wild nigger is laughable. If you're going to confront people and get in fights you should probably learn self defense or use non-lethal means to protect yourself. You know kinda like what he did previously. But for some reason he decided he had to protect himself this time by mag dumping when the cops were mere yards away and could have arrested his attacker. All according to the predictions he made on X but I'm that's just a coincidence and not indicative of his mindset.
 
Opinion discounted as you're arguing the exact same retarded stance as everyone else with the ass-backwards logic.
In a lot of them if the escalation of force isn't viewed as proportionate or you don't meet other criterion surrounding handling a firearm in a self-defense situation. It's one thing if you brandish a firearm in self-defense if someone is trying to come at you with a knife or other weapon, or if you have a reasonable fear. For example, if someone were to pull a realistic enough imitation firearm on you, you may be within your rights to pull a firearm. It totally depends on the situation, and the item being brandished in defense of a second attack. Firearms are viewed as an immediate escalation to lethal force and for very good reason. If you are viewed as escalating to lethal force, you are going to have a difficult time claiming self-defense.
I am asking for a specific jurisdiction where this scenario is illegal. You are completely wrong on everything you're saying, especially this leftoid concept of proportionality.
Chud doesn't have to remove himself from society. He can do what everyone else does in polite society and contain himself and go on about his day like a normal person. It is not hard to not act like a degenerate, and it's even less difficult to not constantly record yourself being a degenerate. Nobody made ChudtheBuilder walk around screaming nigger at Black people, nobody made him record himself doing it over and over again, and nobody made him make tweet after tweet painting every angle to claim self-defense look less and less like self-defense, and more like attempted 2nd Degree Murder. I cannot fathom how you come to this conclusion.
I sincerely wish we could instantly teleport people like you to Africa where you belong. If you do not like free countries to remain free, get the fuck out of them.
No that's actually not what your hero wants. He posted that the day he shoots and monkey and then gets off is the day whites take their country back. He posted that on X for the whole world to see numb nuts and then he tried to make it happen.
"Hi, I'm a standard faggot who doesn't understand what self-defense is. BTW, Kyle Rittenhouse is a MURDERER. If he didn't want to go there and MURDER people, why'd he have a gun and shoot people to death?"!
 
So I looked into this provocation clause in Tennessee law @Dafuqisdis? mentioned to but neglected to directly reference. If this is what you are referring to, it seems like the relevance of this will come down to if Chud tried to walk away or not.
TN Code § 39-11-611 (2024) (Archive)
2024 Tennessee Code
Title 39 - CRIMINAL OFFENSES (§§ 39-1-101 — 39-17-1812)
Chapter 11 - GENERAL PROVISIONS (§§ 39-11-101 — 39-11-717)
Part 6 - JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (§§ 39-11-601 — 39-11-622)
Section 39-11-611 - Self-defense

  • (e)The threat or use of force against another is not justified:
    • (1) If the person using force consented to the exact force used or attempted by the other individual;
    • (2)If the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force, unless:
      • (A) The person using force abandons the encounter or clearly communicates to the other the intent to do so; and
      • (B) The other person nevertheless continues or attempts to use unlawful force against the person; or
    • (3)To resist a halt at a roadblock, arrest, search, or stop and frisk that the person using force knows is being made by a law enforcement officer, unless:
      • (A) The law enforcement officer uses or attempts to use greater force than necessary to make the arrest, search, stop and frisk, or halt; and
      • (B) The person using force reasonably believes that the force is immediately necessary to protect against the law enforcement officer's use or attempted use of greater force than necessary.
Under (e)(2) it is stated that if the person who provoked the other individuals use of unlawful force abandons the encounter or communicates an intent to do so, but the one "provoked" continues in using unlawful force, then the right to use force against the other is not voided by that code. If Chud walked away before the Joshua Fox punched him, it seems like this would not be relevant. I'm not very knowledgeable on legal jargon, so I'm not sure the exact definition of "provoked" being used here, but it would also be very helpful if anyone knows what it is.

Thread kinda quiet after I posted that Joshua Fox who's a child offender is actually white. Where the per capita people now?
What about the Joshua Fox that tried to set his house on fire with his wife inside because he got in an argument with her? The "13% do 50%" statistic is about violent crime, which seems to hold up here. Also, if you think pointing to a single white pedophile disproves that you do not understand how statistics work at all. You can name plenty of trannies who don't try to commit suicide but 42% still do try.
What does it mean to “side with Dalton” other than post on social media and donate to a gofundme? Do you not see he was a grifter and that your precious wignat movement isn’t real?
You don't have to even do that, just not publicly fantasizing about interracial prison rape is a good start, several of the Chud haters in this thread can't make it that far though. If you can do that, a good next step would just be to not sadistically enjoy his suffering at the hands a corrupt two-tiered court system.
I find it interesting that when I check the thread in the morning there’s a majority of pro-Chud posts, but when I check the thread in the afternoon it’s all nigger love. Do the nigger lovers not have jobs, or are they posting on Tel Aviv time?
I noticed that too, plus looking at when certain reactions come in there seems to be lots of Chud-haters in the daytime for the US, and more pro-Chuds in the evening and nighttime.
 
Last edited:
I am asking for a specific jurisdiction where this scenario is illegal. You are completely wrong on everything you're saying, especially this leftoid concept of proportionality.

This specific scenario is illegal in every jurisdiction. In any jury, not one person would vote for acquittal. The grandpa who hates rap music and wants blacks to pull their pants up would lock Chud away without thinking about it. He's a piece of shit menace that's streaming antisocial confrontations and trying to find some gay loophole whereby he can murder people.

"Hi, I'm a standard faggot who doesn't understand what self-defense is. BTW, Kyle Rittenhouse is a MURDERER. If he didn't want to go there and MURDER people, why'd he have a gun and shoot people to death?"!

You should look up the concept of mens rea faggot. You see if someone takes a gun as a necessary precaution to a dangerous area that's a total different scenario from a guilty mind concocting scenarios about how he's going to shoot monkeys and niggers and get away with it. Not in a regretable tone no, but in a really kinda rubbing their hands tone. Why don't you think on the difference between those scenarios you muppet?

I sincerely wish we could instantly teleport people like you to Africa where you belong. If you do not like free countries to remain free, get the fuck out of them.

How about if Chud loses his "self defense case" (LOL) you inbreds get to drive the suicide cars in the upcoming race war. We'll give you crash helmets to make it safer.
 
Last edited:
ass-backwards logic
You are completely wrong on everything you're saying, especially this leftoid concept of proportionality.

It isn't ass-backwards logic, you're just retarded. For your reading pleasure.

1779159947394.png

There is not a quality firearms instructor on Earth that will not tell you that pulling your gun in any situation involving physical force may put you in prison. If you are not meeting a threat with the proportionate level of response, you are going to face prison time in almost any jurisdiction. Some states, including the state of Tennessee where Chud lives, have a standard called "provoking the difficulty". If you actively provoke someone into attacking you, a legal defense invoking self-defense becomes much more difficult if not impossible to stage. Given the evidence that we have seen - to my knowledge a clear video of the incident has not yet been released - a prosecutor would not have a difficult time claiming that Chud was being deliberately provocative and intended for violence to be done upon him as an outcome.

Why the fuck is anyone defending a dude who went to court over refusing to pay a restaurant bill and ended up shooting someone else and himself in front of the courthouse? Isn't this the exact behavior you're claiming he's pointing out as an issue?
 
Why the fuck is anyone defending a dude who went to court over refusing to pay a restaurant bill and ended up shooting someone else and himself in front of the courthouse? Isn't this the exact behavior you're claiming he's pointing out as an issue?

You see he said NIGGER to black people and therefore: civil rights!
 
For someone who wants to criticize Nigger behavior- which is completely valid, he sure acts like a fucking nigger. I’m a very big free speech advocate but when you’re just provoking for a reaction, you’re asking to get fucked with. FAFO
 
house on fire with his wife inside because he got in an argument with her? The "13% do 50%" statistic is about violent crime, which seems to hold up here. Also, if you think pointing to a single white pedophile disproves that you do not understand how statistics work at all. You can name plenty of trannies who don't try to commit suicide but 42% still do try.
I mean 70% of sexual Assault, pedophilia, consumers of CSAM are predominately white, and you can't even use per capita out if it outside of Native Americans regarding rape. I never said Joshua didn't have a domestic. I said tge Joshua fox who's in a sex offender registry was white and born 14 years prior to him.
 
Back
Top Bottom