anon101x
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2024
If I can add to this, one of the big intellectual hurdles to clear regarding this is that morals have no real place in legislation/judicial precedent.
The law does not dictate morality, it however does use moral rhetoric as part of the argumentative game to get to a regulated state. The purpose of law is to regulate activity and keep the system functioning in a desired manner by providing do's and don'ts to the regulators and regulated. This distinction is important because legal discussion (especially here) is utterly lousy with moralfaggotry polluting what can otherwise be a valid prediction of the outcome.
Frankly, both parties should be beaten with hammers for different reasons, both related to being retards, but that's a moral statement. The practical response is, as quoted, "both of you are retarded, whoever has the most appropriately underhanded attorney wins."
I’m just so fucking thankful I can read something interesting besides the quartering seething and PPP clanking a triangle at his poop stories - lol