BananaSplit
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
You're still batshit insane to sincerely believe young-looking cartoon characters is remotely similar to real-life children, and that ONLY your imaginary 30-yo virgin boogeyman is the sole audience of every manga/anime/game featuring pretty girls ever (such as shounen/shoujo titles but to name more concrete examples, Food Wars or Yuugari both had sexual fanservice literally aimed for the teen audience in Japan).It applies to everything. The brain processes what you put into it no matter what that is. If you engulf yourself in violent games you're going to be less sensitive to violence than if you didn't. Halloween, Psycho and Exorcist were beyond anything people were prepared for in the era. Now they barely touch even the opening crawl of a horror movie. We went from no blood in the shower to the evil dead remake having it rain blood in the finale because people adapted to the media they were consuming and had to be pushed further and further. It's a slippery slope where destructive ideas become normal because what wasn't really harmful in step 1 leads to stop 10 which is CGI lolicon (still legal bigot!) which then leads to actual child abuse images being normalized.
I don't think it's a good idea to encourage people to think of children as sexual no matter the medium. I don't think anime as a medium is a healthy one to consume. While all media is generally a waste of time to varying degrees, anime is especially destructive if you compare it's viewership to that of others. Watching 1000 pound sisters isn't going to lead any one to wanting to become that fat and retarded but watching lots of anime does lead people to acting as retarded as anime characters. That's the difference davido-kun.
Are you also by any chance part of the twitter userbase upset about uzaki-chan and nagatoro?