woowie queen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
you got a dainty and you want to redesign it? god forbid if they're black or fat and you want to make them white or thin, the mods won't allow you.
🦊 Furry Closed Species - Pay $500 to draw a bedazzled fox
- Thread starter Sangria
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
GayDemiBoy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
Since when has being obese been a 'minority' group. In the good old U.S.A isn't that the majority of people now? I think trying to compare someone wanting to lighten the skin of a character they now own to being harmful to some huge audience is already godawful but to then compare what they think is some sort of racial slight to be just as bad as making a fat dainty thinner is just extremely stupid to bordering offensive.
If you're overweight/obese you don't face racism just because you're a fat bastard like actual racial minorities. By even saying that in their rules all Dainites do is make themselves look like either morons on racial issues or at worse diminishing racial issues.
woowie queen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
and she doesn't free myo events for dainties as she thinks that those would hurt the community (???)
so, another anon on the csvent blog said something right.
and i'll quote this.
" If anything then changing a dainties sex should be questions from how many females were changed to males physically like one mod would often do "
it was pretty normal seeing people getting female dainties and make 'em male, be (rarely) normal ones or (usually) of the femboy category.
woowie queen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
back with some dainty-related drama over the editing rules.
almost all the anons on csvent seem to be against this rules, but there are some that seem to approve them.
surprise, the rules might be for virtue signaling.
csvent.tumblr.com
csvent.tumblr.com
almost all the anons on csvent seem to be against this rules, but there are some that seem to approve them.
surprise, the rules might be for virtue signaling.
As an overweight woman, I couldn't care less about people turning their fat dainties into skinny, or buff, whatever other body build...hell, its pixels! Dainties are so sexualized sometimes that's it almost feels fetishy. Also that vaporwave vitiligo dainty made by Pajuxi is gross. Jesus, that's not how vitiligo works. They're not fucking dogs with incoherent blobs. Good job on the forced diversity Pajuxi. Do researches next time. Also black people are not the only ones to have vitiligo ffs.
Anonymous said: As an overweight woman, I couldn't care less about people turning their fat dainties into skinny, or buff, whatever other body build...hell, its pixels! Dainties are so sexualized...
csvent.tumblr.com
@woke anon. Thats a take. But I'm willing to believe it since they just allowed someone to change a dainties stockings, hair, pale tone to black with vitiligo, and had their danty's top surgery scars changed from a natural old scar look to a red pink stand out color without an edit bow or anything. And honestly that last bit made me uncomfortable considering moat dainties only wear lingerie and the change up feels kinda fetishy to me
Anonymous said: @woke anon. Thats a take. But I'm willing to believe it since they just allowed someone to change a dainties stockings, hair, pale tone to black with vitiligo, and had their danty's...
csvent.tumblr.com
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2018
back with some dainty-related drama over the editing rules.
almost all the anons on csvent seem to be against this rules, but there are some that seem to approve them.
surprise, the rules might be for virtue signaling.
As an overweight woman, I couldn't care less about people turning their fat dainties into skinny, or buff, whatever other body build...hell, its pixels! Dainties are so sexualized sometimes that's it almost feels fetishy. Also that vaporwave vitiligo dainty made by Pajuxi is gross. Jesus, that's not how vitiligo works. They're not fucking dogs with incoherent blobs. Good job on the forced diversity Pajuxi. Do researches next time. Also black people are not the only ones to have vitiligo ffs.
Anonymous said: As an overweight woman, I couldn't care less about people turning their fat dainties into skinny, or buff, whatever other body build...hell, its pixels! Dainties are so sexualized...@woke anon. Thats a take. But I'm willing to believe it since they just allowed someone to change a dainties stockings, hair, pale tone to black with vitiligo, and had their danty's top surgery scars changed from a natural old scar look to a red pink stand out color without an edit bow or anything. And honestly that last bit made me uncomfortable considering moat dainties only wear lingerie and the change up feels kinda fetishy to me
Anonymous said: @woke anon. Thats a take. But I'm willing to believe it since they just allowed someone to change a dainties stockings, hair, pale tone to black with vitiligo, and had their danty's...
'might'? like there's any doubt that's what its for. you gotta keep your digital deer sock people oppressed!
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
All this fuss over a group of expansive drawings. People are really getting their money's worth at this point.back with some dainty-related drama over the editing rules.
almost all the anons on csvent seem to be against this rules, but there are some that seem to approve them.
surprise, the rules might be for virtue signaling.
As an overweight woman, I couldn't care less about people turning their fat dainties into skinny, or buff, whatever other body build...hell, its pixels! Dainties are so sexualized sometimes that's it almost feels fetishy. Also that vaporwave vitiligo dainty made by Pajuxi is gross. Jesus, that's not how vitiligo works. They're not fucking dogs with incoherent blobs. Good job on the forced diversity Pajuxi. Do researches next time. Also black people are not the only ones to have vitiligo ffs.
Anonymous said: As an overweight woman, I couldn't care less about people turning their fat dainties into skinny, or buff, whatever other body build...hell, its pixels! Dainties are so sexualized...@woke anon. Thats a take. But I'm willing to believe it since they just allowed someone to change a dainties stockings, hair, pale tone to black with vitiligo, and had their danty's top surgery scars changed from a natural old scar look to a red pink stand out color without an edit bow or anything. And honestly that last bit made me uncomfortable considering moat dainties only wear lingerie and the change up feels kinda fetishy to me
Anonymous said: @woke anon. Thats a take. But I'm willing to believe it since they just allowed someone to change a dainties stockings, hair, pale tone to black with vitiligo, and had their danty's...
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
Needs to be more talk of people taking existing intellectual property, slapping funny markings on it, and being a jealous dingbat about other people doing the same thing.
These are "Cyberchus", TL;DR they're Pikachus with electronic-themed markings and aesthetics. From the looks of it, it's a completely dead concept now, and has been for almost a decade, but I remember seeing them around a lot, and I remember there being a lot of obnoxious drama surrounding them, the creator, and similar/affiliated groups that all amounted to "I swear to god if you slap paint on a Pikachu in a way I deem too similar to how I did, I'm gonna shit and fart"
Slapping funny markings on a wolf and calling it an original, closed species is unoriginal as-is, but the idea of taking someone else's original species, putting squiggles on its body, and then frothing at the mouth possessively over your original, closed, super-exclusive concept is almost parodying itself. I don't think designs necessarily need to be "original" to be good, given that almost all art and designs/concepts are derivative in some way or another, and I think Cyberchus are a cute little gimmick- but I really think it all boils down to how you go about handling it all. If they just admitted "yeah, it's Pikachu with funny markings, anyone could do it- let's not take it too seriously and act like we're in court about it", I really wouldn't even bother mentioning them.
But nah, some poor kid who was obviously very young decided to make their own Cyberchu, clearly out of appreciation, and instead of the creators/collaborators recognizing that, here's a bunch of high schoolers ganging up on a kid who's probably like, eleven. Over a drawing of Pikachu.
www.deviantart.com
"Or I'll report you" yeah, I can see the admins of Deviantart of all places taking this as a grave situation to be dealt with immediately. The only decent thing about this all is that the creator didn't decide they wanted money for recolors.
These are "Cyberchus", TL;DR they're Pikachus with electronic-themed markings and aesthetics. From the looks of it, it's a completely dead concept now, and has been for almost a decade, but I remember seeing them around a lot, and I remember there being a lot of obnoxious drama surrounding them, the creator, and similar/affiliated groups that all amounted to "I swear to god if you slap paint on a Pikachu in a way I deem too similar to how I did, I'm gonna shit and fart"
Slapping funny markings on a wolf and calling it an original, closed species is unoriginal as-is, but the idea of taking someone else's original species, putting squiggles on its body, and then frothing at the mouth possessively over your original, closed, super-exclusive concept is almost parodying itself. I don't think designs necessarily need to be "original" to be good, given that almost all art and designs/concepts are derivative in some way or another, and I think Cyberchus are a cute little gimmick- but I really think it all boils down to how you go about handling it all. If they just admitted "yeah, it's Pikachu with funny markings, anyone could do it- let's not take it too seriously and act like we're in court about it", I really wouldn't even bother mentioning them.
But nah, some poor kid who was obviously very young decided to make their own Cyberchu, clearly out of appreciation, and instead of the creators/collaborators recognizing that, here's a bunch of high schoolers ganging up on a kid who's probably like, eleven. Over a drawing of Pikachu.
mah cyberchu diesl by DibbyInvader on DeviantArt
www.deviantart.com
"Or I'll report you" yeah, I can see the admins of Deviantart of all places taking this as a grave situation to be dealt with immediately. The only decent thing about this all is that the creator didn't decide they wanted money for recolors.
Vapewizard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2019
The 'best' part is the person putting in those o3o emojis while policing some child's fanart on a fanart website.
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2020
I never understand how someone can be possessive about something nebulous like a generic designed creature. I never really got the concept of adoptables back then either, tbh.
I remember creating a cat blob character when I was 13. Literally a blob with ears, tail and a face. Me and my friends made scribbles of them for fun. But I guess I missed out on making it a closed species, and getting butthurt about people using the same basic design and having my friends bully random kids on deviantart over it. Darn. Maybe next time.
I remember creating a cat blob character when I was 13. Literally a blob with ears, tail and a face. Me and my friends made scribbles of them for fun. But I guess I missed out on making it a closed species, and getting butthurt about people using the same basic design and having my friends bully random kids on deviantart over it. Darn. Maybe next time.
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2016
I think adoptables are a decent enough concept for making a quick buck. You sell someone a character design, however competent it may be- money is money at the end of the day. It's absolutely lazy- I've sold designs, and it's wonderfully easy to get done, and that's probably why so many people opt to do it at least once (assuming people want your designs). Getting paid for actual commissions requires working under a deadline, you need to specifically follow the commissioner's instructions, etc. But with this, it's a matter of slapping together a design and tossing it out in the void.
What I don't get is the culture surrounding adoptables. Once you sell the design, the buyer should honestly be allowed to do whatever they want with the design; it's their property, they paid for it. But you'll have adoptable sellers who hover around their buyers post-transaction like drones, policing what they do, getting mad when they don't use the design enough (or at all), not allowing people to resell them (even if it's for the price they bought it for; I understand getting mad about it being sold for more), not allowing them to change anything, etc. I figure if you're going to be that controlling and possessive over something you've decided to sell, you shouldn't have been selling it in the first place. I take that back, getting to control and police people is the fucking point for them.
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
Huh, for a second I thought these were those Radiant Pikachus from the Radiant-Spirits/Radiant-Hearts DeviantArt group (sadly these groups no longer exist).Needs to be more talk of people taking existing intellectual property, slapping funny markings on it, and being a jealous dingbat about other people doing the same thing.
These are "Cyberchus", TL;DR they're Pikachus with electronic-themed markings and aesthetics. From the looks of it, it's a completely dead concept now, and has been for almost a decade, but I remember seeing them around a lot, and I remember there being a lot of obnoxious drama surrounding them, the creator, and similar/affiliated groups that all amounted to "I swear to god if you slap paint on a Pikachu in a way I deem too similar to how I did, I'm gonna shit and fart"
View attachment 1526279
Slapping funny markings on a wolf and calling it an original, closed species is unoriginal as-is, but the idea of taking someone else's original species, putting squiggles on its body, and then frothing at the mouth possessively over your original, closed, super-exclusive concept is almost parodying itself. I don't think designs necessarily need to be "original" to be good, given that almost all art and designs/concepts are derivative in some way or another, and I think Cyberchus are a cute little gimmick- but I really think it all boils down to how you go about handling it all. If they just admitted "yeah, it's Pikachu with funny markings, anyone could do it- let's not take it too seriously and act like we're in court about it", I really wouldn't even bother mentioning them.
But nah, some poor kid who was obviously very young decided to make their own Cyberchu, clearly out of appreciation, and instead of the creators/collaborators recognizing that, here's a bunch of high schoolers ganging up on a kid who's probably like, eleven. Over a drawing of Pikachu.
mah cyberchu diesl by DibbyInvader on DeviantArt
View attachment 1526294
View attachment 1526295
"Or I'll report you" yeah, I can see the admins of Deviantart of all places taking this as a grave situation to be dealt with immediately. The only decent thing about this all is that the creator didn't decide they wanted money for recolors.
- https://www.deviantart.com/pikachim-michi/art/RS-Icarus-Electric-415088222 - https://archive.vn/U9QH5
- https://www.deviantart.com/ambunny/art/RS-Oracle-415015831 - https://archive.vn/fg8ZC
- https://www.deviantart.com/dekkii/art/RH-Kindle-Reference-386440857 - https://archive.vn/5AsO1
- https://www.deviantart.com/pikachim-michi/art/RH-Alure-app-704241395 - https://archive.vn/7FMQp
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
Speaking of combination Pikachus, I remember seeing this group back in the day called Rainbow-chus (archive). It seems to have expanded since I last looked at it in 2012 by adding monochromatic blenders and iridescent. I remember the designs being cute and bright but they try to look cooler than they really are. At a surface glance, nothing too notable and I've never heard of any drama coming from the place. Maybe something happened but I haven't thought about this group in forever.
An artist I used to follow owns a Rainbowchu and now she's inactive. No one has took her character or place which is actually surprising since Closed Species groups revoke ownership for the slightest thing.
One thing I find weird is that none of the characters are drawn to look like normal Pokemon, it's the furry stylised version of them and looks really weird to me.
An artist I used to follow owns a Rainbowchu and now she's inactive. No one has took her character or place which is actually surprising since Closed Species groups revoke ownership for the slightest thing.
One thing I find weird is that none of the characters are drawn to look like normal Pokemon, it's the furry stylised version of them and looks really weird to me.
![[Redacted]-san](http://uploads.embed.kiwifarms.st/data/avatars/l/25/25303.jpg?1623991751){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
Here's another closed species I've been looking at for a long while, before the anime fish people.
They're called 03pyuko, they're basically computer viruses in a form or catgirls or some other hybrid thing. (They also appeared in Japan in 2003.)
Here's some examples.
The prices for the MYO slots are:
Intact: 23€\2600 DA points
Defect: 28€\3100 DA points
And here's one that has way too much going on with their design.
Other than than, most of the art for this closed species is pretty good.
What do you guys think of these?
They're called 03pyuko, they're basically computer viruses in a form or catgirls or some other hybrid thing. (They also appeared in Japan in 2003.)
Here's some examples.
The prices for the MYO slots are:
Intact: 23€\2600 DA points
Defect: 28€\3100 DA points
And here's one that has way too much going on with their design.
What do you guys think of these?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2015
I think that they're a fucking Chobits ripoff, that what I fucking think.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2018
why is there so much closed species that is just "anime girl with totally unique traits"?
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
I honestly don't know tbh. Probably laziness or something.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
Because some people think cat girls are still all the rage like in the 2000s?
Adoptables are quick and easy cash grabs. Some artists only have the creative capacity to combine popular things like animals, objects and foods rather than make fleshed out, original ideas.
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2019
At this point they’re just ripping off KanColle/Kemono Friends. Take something random and make it into an anime girl persona.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2018
someone said it in this thread way earlier i think, but this is definitely proof that these are meant to be collected, not replicated. who the everloving fuck is going to remember all those details when drawing this bitch? less is more, fucksake.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018