UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think the idea that normies aren't as radical as us is wrong. I think they're all just as radical and want them gone but aren't able to express that due to the illegal nature of it.
I think "general public" consists of people who have limited exposure to info, are generally unconcerned with politics, or just look at the system with a vague air of mysticism that seems to decide what it wants when it wants with little external input. They vote for X, and then Y just happens. They're not sure how or why it happens, the process and people involved, it just does. The start and end of their involvement in the political process is with a vote, which is more of a civic duty over anything else. I've bloviated about how ill-informed the public generally is before and why it might've changed because of Covid, but regarding to what extent the general public is willing to see something "radical" done it all rather rooted in balance and morality.

For example I think "Kick 'em all out!" is a sentiment many people probably share, but it's also probably tempered by exceptions, and might just be that: sentiment. I doubt the public will get wholly behind certain radical concepts to the end you're thinking, but I think many of them likely keep their actual opinions to themselves for the sake of etiquette if nothing else. What people also feel comfortable saying is also dictated by their leaders and public figures. There's probably nobody going to say, "Remigration now!" until someone of prominence says it, so until then it's taboo. Any sort of pro-racialist rhetoric is probably not going to become an overt thing. What we perceive as "civnat" platitudes might become more prominent and serve as a cover for some politicians to be implicit about supporting natives over non-natives (imagine Jenrick's tweet but without the tacked-on Sikh bit at the end) but that's the extent I feel it'll probably go.

Some math about the possible number of "Radicals":
Just using general numbers: 48,208,507 = Registered voters.
31% = Voting intention for Reform (Politico)
47% = Reform supporters who think they're not tough enough (Yougov)

If we assume that 47% are people are of your mindset then using this (flawed) calculation, there's at least 7,322,872 people who could be considered "Radical" and would support stronger policies.

Edit: Forgot about this poll.
45% = Percentage of Britons who want all illegals + some legals gone.
38% = Percentage of the public this poll claims to represent.
68 million ("the public") -> 38% = 25,840,000 -> 45% = 11,628,000
What is the deal with councils in the UK, and do they have an equivalent in the US? They seem like an upscaled HOA
Same in concept as in the USA, except far less autonomy, mostly delegated responsibility of handling local services.
Local authorities cover the entirety of England, and are responsible for services such as education, transport, planning applications, and waste collection and disposal. In two-tier areas a non-metropolitan county council and two or more non-metropolitan district councils share responsibility for these services. In single-tier areas a unitary authority, London borough, or metropolitan borough provides all services. The City of London and Isles of Scilly have unique local authorities.
Dilon's rule & No Home Rule is basically the status quo in the UK.
home rule states, the state's constitution grants municipalities and/or counties the ability to pass various types of laws to govern themselves (so long as the laws do not conflict with the state and federal constitutions)
Dillon's Rule states, only limited authority has been granted to local governments by passage of statutes in the state legislature.
 
Last edited:
The Bank of England should be replaced with Freddo so we can measure inflation a lot better.


Complete nonsense. 1.8 million attended Obama's inauguration. There were 150k - 250k there, Tommy's just trying to increase his chances of getting a US speaking gig career.

EDIT: Stand Up To Racism did a video show or podcast of some sort where they admitted they'd failed and that there were in excess of a million on the UTK side.
farleft-counterprotesters.mp4
Strange that this horrendous, racist cunt disagrees with the numbers Stand Up To Racism estimate attended


So she thinkes that 50,000 of them attended, so between a 2:1 to 3:1 ratio

Number plucked out of a bucket.
 
Strange that this horrendous, racist cunt disagrees with the numbers Stand Up To Racism estimate attended


So she thinkes that 50,000 of them attended, so between a 2:1 to 3:1 ratio

Number plucked out of a bucket.
When our fren PewDiePie said that 'Indians have poo poo in their brains', he wasn't wrong.

The Left are trying to cope, but cannot, and as Orange Man flies in tomorrow they'll be close to apoplexy with their mental breakdowns.

Wouldn't be surprised if one of the idiots tries to blow Trump up, to try and achieve fame and attention.

Number plucked out of a bucket alright, her hairy fanny bucket!
 
News time and we're onto a great start. Top Starmer aide has to resign due to crude sexual comments in a WhatsApp group about Diane Abbot

One of Sir Keir Starmer’s top aides has quit after it emerged he had exchanged sexually explicit messages about the veteran left-wing MP Diane Abbott.
In a fresh blow to the beleaguered prime minister, Paul Ovenden announced he was leaving his role as Downing Street’s director of strategy to avoid becoming a “distraction” after the 2017 messages were uncovered.
The former journalist, who has worked for Labour for more than a decade, had reportedly exchanged emails with a colleague at the time that included sexually explicit remarks about Ms Abbott.

Mr Ovenden’s departure comes after the resignation of Angela Rayner this month and last week’s sacking of Peter Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to the US.
It piles pressure on the prime minister, who is facing mounting anger from Labour backbenchers over his leadership, with the party consistently lagging behind Reform UK in the polls.
Speculation is building that he could be forced out after May’s local elections if the results are as bad for Labour as expected.

In a statement to ITV News, Mr Ovenden said: “I am accused of eight years ago as a junior press officer sharing with a female colleague the details of a silly conversation that I was party to with other female staff members.
"Before summer, I had announced to some of my colleagues my intention to leave government.
“Though the messages long pre-date my current employment and relationship with the prime minister, I’ve brought forward my resignation to avoid distracting from the vital work this government is doing to positively change people’s lives.

"As an advisor, my duty is to protect the reputation of the prime minister and his government."
"While it is chilling that a private conversation from nearly a decade ago can do this sort of damage, I am also truly, deeply sorry for it and the hurt it will cause," he added.
A No 10 spokesman said: "These messages are appalling and unacceptable. As the first black woman to be elected to Parliament, Diane Abbott is a trailblazer who has faced horrendous abuse throughout her political career.

"These kinds of comments have no place in our politics."
On Monday, Richard Burgon, MP for Leeds East, said the prime minister must “change course immediately” or he will be gone by May, saying it is “inevitable” the prime minister will be forced to quit if the local elections are as bad as predicted.
It comes after Labour MP Clive Lewis warned on Friday that Sir Keir “doesn’t seem up to the job”, while fellow MP Graham Stringer said Sir Keir is “supping in the last-chance saloon”.
Ms Abbott is currently sitting as an independent after being suspended by Labour for standing by a controversial letter she wrote in 2023 comparing different types of racism based on colour.
She was originally suspended from the parliamentary Labour Party in 2023 after writing a letter to The Observer comparing racism experienced by people of colour with that seen by other groups.
She apologised for any anguish caused by the remarks, which drew criticism from Jewish and Traveller groups, and was readmitted to the party before the 2024 general election.
But in July she said she did not look back on the incident with regret.
She has been a long-standing critic of Sir Keir’s leadership and has joined Labour MPs in warning May’s local elections are a make-or-break moment for the PM.
Labour was asked to comment.
Guardian gives us a chuckle by directing Labour to save themselves by emulating New York's incoming mayor
Progressives in the UK and US are grappling with the same question. Why have rightwing populists become so much more successful at tapping into public concern? And why are so few politicians on the left connecting with ordinary people?
Barely a year after taking power in Britain, Labour’s popularity has collapsed with unprecedented rapidity against surging support for Nigel Farage’s Reform UK.

In the US, a year after Joe Biden’s defeat, the Democrats are still derided by swathes of voters and remain at a loss for how to take on Donald Trump’s unique brand of politics.
But while Labour and the Democrats languish in nationwide polls, there are exceptions. In New York over the summer, Zohran Mamdani rose from little-known assembly member to social media sensation and heavily favoured Democratic nominee in November’s mayoral contest.
His success in the Democratic primary comes on the back of a highly impactful people-powered campaign that looks likely to propel him to victory. A poll for the New York Times this week concluded that Mamdani held a commanding lead over his three rivals for the mayoralty, including the scandal-hit incumbent, Eric Adams, and the multimillionaire former governor Andrew Cuomo.
What if anything, can Labour learn from his success?

It’s the economy, stupid

Political observers in the UK believe Labour has a communications problem. But for good comms, you need substance. For Mamdani, that has come in the form of a laser-sharp focus on the economy and affordability.
According to the NYT/Siena poll this week, 49% of likely voters thought Mamdani would perform best on affordability issues, compared with 23% who said the same of Cuomo and 10% for Adams.

“Elections are almost always about very, very fundamental things,” said Matthew McGregor, the chief executive of 38 Degrees who is a former digital adviser to Ed Miliband and worked as a digital campaign strategist in Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign.
“Mamdani has got an agenda that clicks with people’s real lived experience of a city that has become just farcically expensive, doesn’t work for working-class people, and where there is very stark inequality between people in the boroughs and the rich parts of Manhattan,” he said.
Claire Ainsley, a former Labour policy chief who now runs the centre-left renewal project at the Progressive Policy Institute, a US thinktank, said: “He’s highlighted the cost of living and affordability, and that’s right – that is the major issue that’s bothering Americans. Even if inflation is under control, cost of living is a big problem.”
By comparison, Labour’s first year in power has been characterised by constantly changing policy priorities. Before and after being elected, Starmer has variously talked about his six first steps, six “milestones”, five “missions” and three “foundations”.
Most recently, the prime minister has sought to reset his government by announcing a “phase two” focused on delivery, including the economy – but for many Labour MPs these constantly shifting priorities betray a frustrating lack of vision that makes it difficult to connect with the public.

Champion compelling, costed policies

With his focus on affordability, Mamdani has identified the key problem for many New Yorkers. Crucially, he is also presenting clear and compelling solutions.
His policies include free bus transport, a rent freeze on the city’s 2.3m regulated apartments, a crackdown on bad landlords and commercial rent control, free childcare for parents starting at six months, and a $30 minimum wage by 2030.
“His answers aren’t ‘Have you read through my 12-page white paper on breaking down planning so we can get New York building again?’. It’s not ‘We’re going to make work pay by encouraging businesses to invest’. It’s ‘We’re going to make buses free, we’re going to fill in the grocery deserts’,” McGregor said. “Practical, meaningful things that people can grasp and understand.”
Mamdani is seeing off criticism about the feasibility of his promises by setting out clearly how they will be paid for – imposing a 2% tax on the top 1% of residents earning more than $1m annually, and raising New York City’s top corporate tax rate from 7.25% to match neighbouring New Jersey’s at 11.5%.
For its part, Labour is implementing a whole slate of progressive policies that are very popular with voters – strengthening renters’ and workers’ rights, including a ban on fire-and-rehire practices, increasing the minimum wage, cutting down hospital waiting lists and making it easier to see a GP.
The trouble is, these are not being properly championed. Ministers seem reluctant to bang the drum for some of their most popular moves, sometimes for fear of angering business. Last year, Downing Street disowned a press statement that called P&O Ferries a “rogue operator” for past fire-and-rehire practices after the firm threatened to pull out of an investment summit.

Craft an overarching story – and pick a side

David Axelrod, a former strategist to Obama who then advised Ed Miliband in 2015, memorably said Labour’s campaign that year failed because it could be summed up with: “Vote Labour, win a microwave.”

His point was that Labour in 2015 offered voters a set of loosely connected transactional promises but lacked any overarching narrative. Many believe this is a problem plaguing the current Labour government and a key to explaining the success of Trump in the US and Farage in the UK.
Both Trump and Farage have clear narrative stories to tell about the problems of the country and their proposed solutions. So does Mamdani. McGregor said: “He wants to be a politician that says this whole system isn’t working, and we’re going to change things in a bigger way. Politics is a vibes-based business in the modern media environment, and everything you do is a demonstration of whose side are you on.”
He added: “I think you can learn from Mamdani without saying we have to be more leftwing. Those policies need to connect to that bigger story that you’re telling. Farage is telling a story, and Trump is telling a story, and Mamdani is telling a story about the country, its challenges and problems and who’s to blame for them.”
That final point – picking a side and identifying your adversaries – is key. Ed Owen, a former UK government special adviser during the New Labour years who is now a visiting fellow at the centre-left US thinktank Third Way, said: “We on the centre left are great at being rather po-faced, rational, logical, and establishing ourselves inadvertently as the defenders of the status quo that most people hate.
“We are in a period of history where people’s faith in politics and politicians is at an all-time low. Insurgent political figures like Mamdani, and also on the right, are good at positioning themselves as agents of change.”

Get social media

Even when you tick all those boxes – a focus on people’s biggest concerns, popular policies and a compelling overarching narrative – you need a way to cut through to the public, including to voters who don’t follow politics closely.
Mamdani is a hugely talented communicator who has built a huge presence on social media. His masterful campaign videos and direct, easy style are shared with 1.4 million followers on TikTok and 4 million on Instagram. Unlike most politicians, at 33 he is a social media native.
“These TikTok videos, I think, are a really compelling and interesting manifestation of something,” McGregor said. “Understanding the modern media environment and the fact that huge swathes of people consume information in completely different ways to how they did five, 10, let alone 20 years ago.”
The decline of traditional media means many voters consume news only through snippets on their social media feeds. The only UK politician with a major TikTok presence is Farage – he rivals Mamdani’s reach with 1.3 million followers.
Despite the efforts of successive No 10 comms chiefs, the UK government has been slow at adapting to new forms of communication – though Starmer and other ministers are increasingly popping up on alternative platforms such as digital-only outlets and parenting podcasts.
Owen said: “We’ve got to be able to communicate where people are – and that’s increasingly on social media channels – in the form they want. And we’ve been really bad at it.”

Be an authentic local voice

Mamdani is a very New York success story – and one that observers say can’t be simply copy-pasted to the UK or other parts of the US. “It isn’t as if this is some sort of template you can just transpose to any political environment,” Owen said.
Ainsley said: “If there is a lesson to be drawn, it’s about the importance of authentic candidates that speak to the voters that you need. Clearly, his victory has energised parts of the left, but they are not representative of the mainstream of America, that is where the midterms and the next presidential election will be fought.
“He’s played to the base that he needed, which is a narrow selectorate in New York City. He’s got conviction, and one of the things that the swing voters who’ve moved away from the Democrats over time have said to us is that they want politicians with conviction – but they also want candidates that have got the competence and credible policies that they think are going to meet their everyday needs.”
Bob Vylan loses another gig after gloating over Kirk getting murdered
The punk duo Bob Vylan have had a gig cancelled after their frontman Bobby Vylan called the far right commentator Charlie Kirk, who was fatally shot last week in Utah, “an absolute piece of shit of a human being” while performing in Amsterdam.
The Tilburg venue 013 has cancelled the Ipswich band’s 16 September show as a result, saying that the band went “too far” at the Paradiso venue in the Dutch capital.

Bobby Vylan, who does not use his real name, added on stage: “The pronouns was/were. Cause if you chat shit you will get banged. Rest in peace Charlie Kirk, you piece of shit.”
In a statement, organisers said: “While we understand that these statements were made in the context of punk and activism, and that the reporting on them is sometimes less nuanced than what actually happened, we still believe these new statements go too far. They no longer fall within the scope of what we can offer a platform.”
The 013 venue said it had initially decided to let the duo perform “despite the controversy that arose after their Glastonbury performance”. At this year’s festival, the frontman led chants of “death to the IDF”, prompting an ongoing criminal investigation by Avon and Somerset police. The band also had their US visas revoked, scuppering an autumn tour.
After the band clarified that the chant was “not an antisemitic slogan, but rather criticism of the Israeli army”, 013 decided to go ahead with the show.
The UK branch of Turning Point, the right-wing youth group that Kirk founded, claimed that in footage of the Paradiso show, Bobby Vylan “mocks and glorifies the brutal murder” of Kirk.
In response to the show’s cancellation and allegations that the band celebrated Kirk’s death, Bobby Vylan said in a video: “At no point during yesterday’s show was Charlie Kirk’s death celebrated. At no point whatsoever did we celebrate Charlie Kirk’s death. I did call him a piece of shit. That much is true. But at no point was his death celebrated. If it was, go find me a quote, go find me something that proves that we were celebrating his death. You’re not gonna find it, because it didn’t happen.
“What did happen is one reporter that bought their ticket online came with the sole purpose of finding something to report and after I called [Kirk] a piece of shit and we played a song, they have written that up as a celebration. It’s not a celebration … Calm down.”
The band subsequently tweeted: “They want us down so bad but we just played a sold-out Paradiso. It’s always love in Amsterdam.”
Prior to the Amsterdam show, the band called BBC director general Tim Davie “a spineless puppet” on X in relation to the controversy around why the live feed of the band’s Glastonbury performance was not cut after he made his comments. “There was nothing antisemitic or criminal about anything I said at Glastonbury. Why do you think @metpoliceuk @ASPolice are taking so long?”
The Newquay festival Boardmasters potentially stands to lose its licence this week after it allowed the band play the festival in August, in the wake of the Glastonbury controversy.
In July, a Reform community organiser applied to Cornwall Council to review the event’s licence, saying that the band’s appearance “undermines the licensing objectives”. A Boardmasters spokesperson said the festival did not “tolerate hate speech” or “incitement to violence”. Devon and Cornwall police said they were happy with the measures put in place at the festival.
Legal timeframes meant the hearing could not happen until after the festival. The council also heard from locals who supported Bob Vylan’s appearance at the festival.
There was ultimately no unrest or disorder during the band’s performance. Singer Bobby Vylan told the crowd: “It was a little bit of a battle to get here.”
Lord Alli evicting tenants so he can jack up the rent. Got to get money to bribe Labour from somewhere
The Labour donor Lord Alli evicted a family of five from one of his rental properties before increasing the rent by nearly £1,000 a month.
The family, who have school-age children, had lived in the five-bedroom north London townhouse for four years, paying £4,800 a month.

Days after they were handed a section 21 “no fault” eviction notice in June, the property was re-listed for £6,000 a month, amounting to a 25% increase.
It is understood that the existing tenants offered to pay this increase in full, but this offer was refused. The home was then re-let to new tenants for £5,700 per month, a 19% increase.
The government is planning to abolish no-fault evictions under the renters’ rights bill and, in many situations, ban landlords from relisting their properties at higher rents for at least six months after evicting a tenant.

Waheed Alli, who is worth an estimated £200m, has donated over £500,000 to Labour since 2020 and is one of the party’s largest donors. He spent weeks in the spotlight last year due to the tens of thousands of pounds’ worth of gifts he gave to Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner, including spectacles and clothes donations to Starmer’s wife, Victoria. Starmer has also made temporary use of a £18m penthouse that belonged to Alli.
No-fault evictions are one of the leading causes of homelessness, according to the charity Shelter, because they give landlords the power to evict tenants with just two months’ notice, without giving any reason for the eviction.
The father of the family who was evicted from Alli’s house told the i newspaper they pleaded with the property’s management agent to allow them to meet the increased asking price and stay in the property: “We have children who were settled in local schools … so we wanted to avoid the disruption if we could.
“We asked if there was any chance that we could even just stay an extra month so the kids wouldn’t be disrupted in September, and we could get through exams, but it was a no.”

Speaking on Alli’s position as a Labour peer and major donor, the father added: “The hypocrisy just feels like too much … I voted Labour and I’m just incredibly disappointed.”
Before Labour came to power, the government promised to “immediately abolish no fault eviction”, but has yet to name an implementation date for the renters’ rights bill. Recent Ministry of Justice data revealed that 11,400 households in England were forcibly removed from their homes by bailiffs as a result of these evictions between July 2024 and June 2025.
A spokesperson for Alli refused to explain the reasons the family were evicted. She said: “Lord Alli is not a commercial landlord and he doesn’t manage – and has never managed – this property. This is his former home where he no longer lives and where one tenant was replaced with another for less money than the former tenant offered and at an amount lower than the market price. Clearly, this was not about money.”
The news comes a month after Rushanara Ali resigned as the government’s homelessness minister after it emerged she had evicted four tenants from a property she owns, then re-let it weeks later for £700 more a month.
Some articles I post just for the picture.
Reform UK-led Warwickshire County Council has stripped its chief executive of the power to decide which flags are flown outside the council's headquarters.
The move follows a row over the decision to fly a Progress Pride Flag outside of Shire Hall, in Warwick, during Pride Month in June.
Councillor George Finch had asked for the flag to be removed when he was elected as leader of the council, but chief executive Monica Fogarty refused.
The council's cabinet has now voted to hand the decision-making power to the council chairman, Reform councillor Edward Harris.
The Pride Progress flag is a redesigned rainbow flag, with additional colours to represent a wider range of marginalised communities.
Previously, Fogarty held responsibility for deciding which flags could be flown.
Explaining the new flag policy during the cabinet meeting on 4 September, Finch said: "It takes it out of the hands of the elected leader, it takes it out of the hands of non-elected members, it puts it in the hands of the chairman of the council."

Warwickshire County Council chairman and Reform councillor Edward Harris will now have sole responsibility for which flags can and cannot be flown outside of the council's Shire Hall headquarters in Warwick
But leader of the Liberal Democrat opposition, councillor Jerry Roodhouse, dismissed suggestions decisions would be non-political.
He said: "I've never seen a chairman yet go against their political party in a council meeting, in a chamber, anywhere. So don't give me that rubbish."
Jonathan Chilvers, leader of the Green group, asked if the leader would reassure "people that come into this building or seek work in this building" they would not be judged on their sexuality, but rather "their work and their character".
Finch said: "This is the point of common sense. It's not about the colour of your skin, your sexuality, who you love, it's not about any of that. It's about whether you can do the job."

He insisted the move was about unity and said that was why he thought only the Union Flag, the St George's Cross or the County Flag of Warwickshire should fly outside Shire Hall.
Finch added: "This county, everyone that's in it, is identified by three things. The United Kingdom, England and our county."
But he did not rule out other flags flying in the future, suggesting such decisions would be "at the discretion of the chair".

The new flag policy does not require the council chairman to publicly explain decisions on which flags he will not allow to be flown.
Green councillor Sam Jones raised wider concerns about flags and said it had "become plausible deniability to say, 'I'm a patriot', when actually what you're trying to do is intimidate people".
Finch responded by labelling those who used flags to "cause violence" or "in an extremist way" as "wrong".
1757957821238.webp
 
If you're intimidated by the country's flag then you shouldn't be here.

Wooo Darkies. I'm FUCKEN ENGLISH. Aren't I terrifying? Like Freddy Frueger fucked a Xenomorph and gave birth to a hobbit looking mother fucker. Watch out for my long bow and Yorkshire puddings!
 
Interesting if this footage actually drops and shows what lying faggot Streeting is for pretending he supported the Supreme Court ruling. He got really attacked after by lunatic trannies after and that’s probably why he’s clawing back begging for attention in these Pride groups. The Puberty blocker part is indefensible.

IMG_3890.webp
IMG_3891.webp
 
Wales might soon have a fourth National Park, though some are apparently 'worried' about naming it after Wales' maddest lad ever - Owain Glyndwr.



As a Welshman and Reform UK member and voter, I can think of no better man to name it after.

He stood up for what he believed in, just as nowadays I and others stand up for what we believe in.

I respect Owain, what he did and why he did it. I understand his struggle and plight - I would never hate him nor his memory.
 
Interesting if this footage actually drops and shows what lying faggot Streeting is for pretending he supported the Supreme Court ruling. He got really attacked after by lunatic trannies after and that’s probably why he’s clawing back begging for attention in these Pride groups. The Puberty blocker part is indefensible.

View attachment 7920326
View attachment 7920328
I just want to mutilate children's genitals and fuck up their body development. Why can't you bigots just let me do it!?
 

Apologies if this is already posted but I did scan back several pages and didn't see it. I've been off the news stuff for a bit this weekend. It's nothing that will astonish people but it's interesting to see the Daily Mail trying to run counter-information to some of the misrepresentation.

They ran the numbers and compared disorder between the Unite the Kingdom and the Nottinghill Carnival. The "violence" at the rally really sounds very different when you point out that "one in every six-thousand attendees were arrested."
 

Apologies if this is already posted but I did scan back several pages and didn't see it. I've been off the news stuff for a bit this weekend. It's nothing that will astonish people but it's interesting to see the Daily Mail trying to run counter-information to some of the misrepresentation.

They ran the numbers and compared disorder between the Unite the Kingdom and the Nottinghill Carnival. The "violence" at the rally really sounds very different when you point out that "one in every six-thousand attendees were arrested."
The entire side bar is ball washing Charlie Kirk's killer. All the stuff he's said and how he's innocent and shit. It's weird.

In b4 daily mail claim it's racism causing the arrests.
 
And here’s the footage of Streeting sucking tranny girldick. Honestly if he really was one of the ones trying to take Starmers jobs let’s see who is going to take him seriously now… hes definitely under estimated how far the mumsnet terfy reach goes anyway. One thing many of these politicians will be late to grasp is how much this far left ideology is dying. But keep pandering only to these people. After how much I’ve seen Brits talking about Charlie Kirk coverting the last remaining support they had. I’m sure it will work out well for you!


 
And here’s the footage of Streeting sucking tranny girldick. Honestly if he really was one of the ones trying to take Starmers jobs let’s see who is going to take him seriously now… hes definitely under estimated how far the mumsnet terfy reach goes anyway. One thing many of these politicians will be late to grasp is how much this far left ideology is dying. But keep pandering only to these people. After how much I’ve seen Brits talking about Charlie Kirk coverting the last remaining support they had. I’m sure it will work out well for you!


tweeload_9h66il2d.mp4
It's either him or Ed 'Beaker' Miliband now.

MEEEEP!

 
Streeting knows that if Starmer is out, he won't survive because he does not play the game well at all. I swear it was him who leaked about Rayner because she is still in line to take over.

Can the faggot minister be less Kaniving for once? Mandleson used to do the same shit. After what he said about the trans stuff, I would not be surprised if he were a pedo, honestly.

Wow, just fucking wow. What a deceitful cunt, Mumsnet faction will annihilate him. He will play victim and say he is gay, but no, it's because you are a lying cunt, who happens to be a faggot.

So for the double post, no, you deceitful prick, they're mostly men intimidating women. As for detransitioning, the detrans Reddit is huge, it is a harrowing read and for you to take away those people's pain after being gaslit by the media and pedos for years shows how gutless you are. You are a scheming, embryo weasel of a man who wants to damage young people. I would have 1000 Anges over this fucker any day of the week.

Apologies, just in, Trump just announced he is planning to make Antifa a domestic terror group
1757974735755.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom