Britain 'has NO plan to defend itself from armed attack' concludes devastating review - The former head of the British Army has warned that the country is already in the 'last chance saloon'

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link: https://www.gbnews.com/news/war-warning-report-britain-defend-itself
Credit: Dan McDonald, GB News
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/RfVqV

Britain is not prepared to defend itself from an attack, a major new report has warned.

The Commons Defence Committee has concluded that the Government is moving at a "glacial" speed in response to the threats of Russia and China.

The 11-month-long inquiry said that Britain was struggling to meet its defence obligations under Nato Article 3, which requires member states to “maintain and develop individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack”.

The major report noted the UK had "next to nothing" with its integrated air and missile defence systems and “lacks a plan for defending the homeland and overseas territories”.

british-soldiers-with-labour-ministers.webp

Defence Committee chairman Tan Dhesi warned politicians not to bury "their heads in the sand" over the issue.

The Labour backbencher said: “We have repeatedly heard concerns about the UK’s ability to defend itself from attack.

"The Government must be willing to grasp the nettle and prioritise homeland defence and resilience.”

As part of the inquiry, MPs heard evidence from senior military figures and defence experts and conducted visits at Nato sites across Europe.

tan-dhesi.webp

Tan Dhesi warned politicians not to bury 'their heads in the sand' | PA

Defence Minister Luke Pollard told the Defence Committee: “I think we have been very clear that we are not satisfied with Article 3 in the UK.

"But, equally, I think that is a position that every European Nato member state is clear on as well.”

The report comes just months after Sir Keir Starmer vowed to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and the announcement of the Strategic Defence Review, which the Prime Minister says will transform Britain's Armed Forces.

And now, the former head of the British Army, General Lord Dannatt, has said he hoped the inquiry's findings served as a "wake up call" to politicians.

u200bgeneral-lord-dannatt.webp

General Lord Dannatt said he hoped the inquiry's findings serve as a 'wake up call' | PA
He said: “We have piled risk on risk over the years, taken too many peace dividends since the end of the Cold War and we now stand in grave danger from Putin’s Russia.

“The time to act is now. We are in the last chance saloon.”

Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge said: “The defence select committee has exposed the hollowness of Labour’s defence rhetoric.

“Instead of prioritising defence readiness, the only pace Labour have shown is when it comes to surrendering the Chagos Islands and putting the British Army back in the dock.

“Labour’s policy documents have all been published far later than promised and their Strategic Defence Review won’t deliver until the 2030s.

“Meanwhile their own Defence Readiness Bill hasn’t even got a timetable and could be years away.

“Warfare is changing rapidly but Labour are moving far too slowly.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said: “Later today the Defence Secretary will outline his plans to bolster the UK’s warfighting readiness, keeping Britain secure at home and strong abroad.

“This includes identifying multiple sites across the UK for new factories to make munitions and military explosives as we move to the next phase of building factories of the future.

“Choices taken by the Chancellor at the upcoming Budget will ensure no return to the hollowed out and underfunded Armed Forces of the past, as we continue the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, allowing us to invest in the modern capabilities to keep the country safe.”
 
What are the chances William dissolves parliament and forcefully reattaches the UK's balls
Two words - IF and ONLY

He'd need to become King first, though that's not too difficult as King Charles III is still seriously ill after Covid and still has 'the sausage fingers'.

He'd also need to renounce any and all involvement of the WEF and state that he will put all Britons first and tell Anal Schwab and co. to fuck off back whence they came.
 
every time a eurocuck beats their chest, remind them of this and how muslims are raping them while their people aplogize for them being so rapable
 
“The English are a race of merchants. In order to secure for themselves the commerce of the world, they will set the continent in flames.”– Austrian Emperor Francis II, 1805.
 
This is not true. Any army that attempts to invade us has to:

  • Get across the channel without being sunk by hitting small boats
  • Traverse up roads that look like bombing ranges
  • Eat food prepared by third worlders
  • Prepare their troops for the most depressing, demoralising place on Earth
  • Avoid getting shanked by the browns
  • dodge getting baby-trapped by the fat rotters we call women
  • Have their ear-drums burst by scouse, cockney and brummy accents.
If they navigate all of that, then they have to repair this shit hole which would bankrupt them.

Impenetrable Britain.
In case anyone was curious as to what an entirely hypothetical invasion of the UK would look like.
 
Nothing to be gained from invading Britain, I'm afraid. We should do the world a favor and nuke it, though.
They need to remake this scene and replace all of the frightened, pissing cockneys with Muslims busily raping and stabbing each other and one lone old white guy staring at the mushroom cloud and going "Oh Thank God" like that guy in the oil tanker from Waterworld.

 
The UK is a deeply unserious country, completely lacking in any international influence or power, it's ruling body of genuinely spiteful inbred pedophiles amuse themselves by lazily torturing their own people.
Not the Muslims of course, they are rather aggressive. And spiteful faggots they may be, they're also massive fucking cowards, so you don't even have the benefit of a safe public space to go along with your constant, rigorous and unnecessary oppression, because the Native Briton is one of the most cooperative creatures on this planet, much to their own discomfort.

Drag these faggots into the streets, they won't even fight back.
 
Last edited:
Who would want to invade britain? You'd bankrupt yourself trying to turn the place profitable. No use conquering land that'll just cost you.
 
>UK has the least amount of cops per capita
>UK has the shittest cops known to man
>UK cops don't even carry guns
>The British Army, RAF and RN are so understaffed and underfunded that they couldn't defend the country if they wanted to


And yet under these conditions the British accept and let's be honest enjoy the destruction of their nation instead of offering an ounce of resistance. The problem is not the boot on their necks, the problem is them grabbing the boot with both arms and driving it down even harder.
 
Back
Top Bottom