Britain 'has NO plan to defend itself from armed attack' concludes devastating review - The former head of the British Army has warned that the country is already in the 'last chance saloon'

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link: https://www.gbnews.com/news/war-warning-report-britain-defend-itself
Credit: Dan McDonald, GB News
Archive: https://archive.ph/wip/RfVqV

Britain is not prepared to defend itself from an attack, a major new report has warned.

The Commons Defence Committee has concluded that the Government is moving at a "glacial" speed in response to the threats of Russia and China.

The 11-month-long inquiry said that Britain was struggling to meet its defence obligations under Nato Article 3, which requires member states to “maintain and develop individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack”.

The major report noted the UK had "next to nothing" with its integrated air and missile defence systems and “lacks a plan for defending the homeland and overseas territories”.

british-soldiers-with-labour-ministers.webp

Defence Committee chairman Tan Dhesi warned politicians not to bury "their heads in the sand" over the issue.

The Labour backbencher said: “We have repeatedly heard concerns about the UK’s ability to defend itself from attack.

"The Government must be willing to grasp the nettle and prioritise homeland defence and resilience.”

As part of the inquiry, MPs heard evidence from senior military figures and defence experts and conducted visits at Nato sites across Europe.

tan-dhesi.webp

Tan Dhesi warned politicians not to bury 'their heads in the sand' | PA

Defence Minister Luke Pollard told the Defence Committee: “I think we have been very clear that we are not satisfied with Article 3 in the UK.

"But, equally, I think that is a position that every European Nato member state is clear on as well.”

The report comes just months after Sir Keir Starmer vowed to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP and the announcement of the Strategic Defence Review, which the Prime Minister says will transform Britain's Armed Forces.

And now, the former head of the British Army, General Lord Dannatt, has said he hoped the inquiry's findings served as a "wake up call" to politicians.

u200bgeneral-lord-dannatt.webp

General Lord Dannatt said he hoped the inquiry's findings serve as a 'wake up call' | PA
He said: “We have piled risk on risk over the years, taken too many peace dividends since the end of the Cold War and we now stand in grave danger from Putin’s Russia.

“The time to act is now. We are in the last chance saloon.”

Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge said: “The defence select committee has exposed the hollowness of Labour’s defence rhetoric.

“Instead of prioritising defence readiness, the only pace Labour have shown is when it comes to surrendering the Chagos Islands and putting the British Army back in the dock.

“Labour’s policy documents have all been published far later than promised and their Strategic Defence Review won’t deliver until the 2030s.

“Meanwhile their own Defence Readiness Bill hasn’t even got a timetable and could be years away.

“Warfare is changing rapidly but Labour are moving far too slowly.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said: “Later today the Defence Secretary will outline his plans to bolster the UK’s warfighting readiness, keeping Britain secure at home and strong abroad.

“This includes identifying multiple sites across the UK for new factories to make munitions and military explosives as we move to the next phase of building factories of the future.

“Choices taken by the Chancellor at the upcoming Budget will ensure no return to the hollowed out and underfunded Armed Forces of the past, as we continue the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, allowing us to invest in the modern capabilities to keep the country safe.”
 
Fun facts about the current British "millitary":

- The Navy, which once ruled the waves, now has more Admirals than ships
- The Army has more Horses than operational Tanks, which isn't that much of a issue since they are a island but oops! No ships!
- The currently have a similar number of soldiers as they did in 1817 following the demobilization and mass retirement of men after the Napoleonic Wars
 
Just seems like they want more bodies for the meat grinder.

- The Navy, which once ruled the waves, now has more Admirals than ships
Just to add to this, we used to operate under the power of 2 rule, which was our navy had to be bigger than the next two biggest navies combined, since we're an island nation.
 
This UK military won't even be able to handle the population once the scales have dropped from enough people's eyes, and the people take direct action.
 
we should attack them.
What would be the point?

This information is shocking to absolutely no one.

Yet you'll see eurofags argue that "The British burnt down the white house MAGat! Don't mess with us" or "NATO would beat the United States if they touch Canada!"
Just seems like they want more bodies for the meat grinder.


Just to add to this, we used to operate under the power of 2 rule, which was our navy had to be bigger than the next two biggest navies combined, since we're an island nation.
Meh, the English are stubborn, i imagine they will be back at some point. Might take 30 years though.
 
This UK military won't even be able to handle the population once the scales have dropped from enough people's eyes, and the people take direct action.
Like in France, there's a solid core of retired general officers in Britain who'd be willing to serve their country again when the sludge in Westminster provokes that direct action. Serve it by helping direct the military in cleaning that sludge out. Much longer and most of them will be in the graveyard though
 
Thankfully I'm not in Bri'ain where NPoCC or whatever you Anglos call your Stasi check your mean tweets, so I can say this:

The Bri'ish military is so screwed that if anyone, in earnest, were to engage in armed revolt, there is a strong possibility that the Army would lose.
 
sure they do!

They will cry to Papa Trump to send in the troops to save them. It's a plan, not a good one, but it is a plan.
 
Back
Top Bottom