- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
"I want to make a statement. Part of being a business woman names do you talk to a lot of Republicans and libertarians."
Wat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"I want to make a statement. Part of being a business woman names do you talk to a lot of Republicans and libertarians."
It's a typo. "names" -> "means""I want to make a statement. Part of being a business woman names do you talk to a lot of Republicans and libertarians."
Wat.
No, I know. I'm just amazed that "The most oppressed woman evar and the face of GG" is such a lazy fuck with half of her posts.It's a typo. "names" -> "means"
"I want to make a statement. Part of being a business woman names do you talk to a lot of Republicans and libertarians."
Wat.
Did we start the fire?
Unfortunately, I'd say your hyperbolic language here in this title is far more like GamerGate than those expressing criticism of something they see as hurtful.
No one, not Brianna or anyone else, should be held above criticism, and the fact is, many felt hurt by her actions and words today. Even her comments tonight do not seem to really grasp the problem people see.
I was never under the misguided impression that Brianna was perfect, and she certainly didn't choose to be thrust into this position. I believe her stumbling at times is to be expected, and calling her on that is important. I hope that people will be constructive with her and help her understand what has many so concerned.
No one should be held above criticism
if ghazi manages to do a 180, pigs will fly and the four horsemen will ride.
This is going to massively fracture that cult at the very least. They can't nearly as easily relocate as, say, /gamergate/ did after /gg/ was kill.Because Wu is a moderator of the subreddit I expect a mass banning to occur first before /r/GamerGhazi has the opportunity to pull a 180.
Have my babies.So, can we call it...
A Wupocalypse?