🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Movies with mark made two new videos. Video
His first one is on saberspark and it's about how he doesn't understand Ralph Bashki. Listen i don't like Sabercuck but i have a good feeling mark was trying to label him as a right wing reactionary for retarded reasons.
Video
The second is on ranting with vengeance. I also don't like vengeance as he's a comic book larper who doesn't understand marvel or DC. However the only thing i agree with, was his rant on video essays being absolute jeet content (which is pretty hypocritical as he calls them larpers while being a larper himself) and this makes Mark angry cause deep down in his heart he knows this is true.
Also why the fuck should people watch a video essay made by some redditor fuck on how capitalism is evil while owning a shelf full of steel copy blu-ray dvd's and boxsets.
Movies with mark made two new videos. View attachment 9628425 Video
His first one is on saberspark and it's about how he doesn't understand Ralph Bashki. Listen i don't like Sabercuck but i have a good feeling mark was trying to label him as a right wing reactionary for retarded reasons.
View attachment 9628447 Video
The second is on ranting with vengeance. I also don't like vengeance as he's a comic book larper who doesn't understand marvel or DC. However the only thing i agree with, was his rant on video essays being absolute jeet content (which is pretty hypocritical as he calls them larpers while being a larper himself) and this makes Mark angry cause deep down in his heart he knows this is true.
View attachment 9628458
Also why the fuck should people watch a video essay made by some redditor fuck on how capitalism is evil while owning a shelf full of steel copy blu-ray dvd's and boxsets.
Ranting for vengeance is a kid,no shit he dosen't know much about comics he was like 16 or something when he started making Content, it was probably just a reaction to how far left everything in comics is.
Also this mark faggot looks like he touches kids.
Super interesting video by some guy I've never heard of about four incel characters, and why they deserve to be seen as complex and layered rather than flat villains. I think that this video is much more interesting than your typical breadtube schlock and that the guy making it does give some cogent and insightful arguments at times. That said, there is an undercurrent throughout that he doesn't really know what he's talking about. He's made this big video about incels, but obviously does not know what an incel is. Of the four characters he chose to analyze - Tetsuo from Akira, Simon from Infinity Train, Eridan from Homestuck, and Azulin from The Unicorn Wars - none are incels. Tetsuo and Eridan are canonically not celibate. Tetsuo is open and shut, he has a girlfriend, he has sex with her, and their relationship is quite real. Eridan is probably closest to an incel because he gets rejected a few times, but he does have a few relationships in the comic. Further, given the bizarre mechanics of his species' romance, it's kind of incoherent to use that label. Further still, he's thirteen for almost the entire run of the comic in which he appears. As for Simon and Azulin, from what I can tell, neither one ever expresses feelings about romance or sex. Azulin just flatly has nothing to do with celibacy, and Simon only makes sense as an "incel" if you project a crush on the other main character Grace onto him, which this guy does but which is purely speculative.
In reality, the common quality that unifies these four characters is that they are all men who lash out in response to trauma. That's what the video is actually about, not incels. But it's useful to call them incels, because otherwise, people might feel bad about demonizing them. The term "incel" is basically just an invective that people can use to justify bullying. You have to say things like "It's okay to abuse this person, because he is an incel!" or you might start to feel uncomfortable inflicting further misery on a population that already suffers enormously.
>is it lulzy?
A little. There's the fact that this guy's intellectual character study focuses on four cartoon characters. He says that "probably nobody else is familiar with all four of these characters," and criticizes incels for having generic taste, when I would consider this the exact kind of media diet I'd expect for a breadtuber. I mean, I'm not a breadtuber, I'm just a slightly nerdy guy who grew up in the 2010's, and I know all of these characters except the teddy bear. He also says that he was inspired to make the video because he felt a sense of similarity with Nikolas Cruz, who apparently looks like him. At the end of the video, he expresses fear that he could've turned out like Cruz if things had been different, "if I hadn't been raised by lesbians, or if I wasn't so sex repulsed."
Super interesting video by some guy I've never heard of about four incel characters, and why they deserve to be seen as complex and layered rather than flat villains. I think that this video is much more interesting than your typical breadtube schlock and that the guy making it does give some cogent and insightful arguments at times. That said, there is an undercurrent throughout that he doesn't really know what he's talking about. He's made this big video about incels, but obviously does not know what an incel is. Of the four characters he chose to analyze - Tetsuo from Akira, Simon from Infinity Train, Eridan from Homestuck, and Azulin from The Unicorn Wars - none are incels. Tetsuo and Eridan are canonically not celibate. Tetsuo is open and shut, he has a girlfriend, he has sex with her, and their relationship is quite real. Eridan is probably closest to an incel because he gets rejected a few times, but he does have a few relationships in the comic. Further, given the bizarre mechanics of his species' romance, it's kind of incoherent to use that label. Further still, he's thirteen for almost the entire run of the comic in which he appears. As for Simon and Azulin, from what I can tell, neither one ever expresses feelings about romance or sex. Azulin just flatly has nothing to do with celibacy, and Simon only makes sense as an "incel" if you project a crush on the other main character Grace onto him, which this guy does but which is purely speculative.
In reality, the common quality that unifies these four characters is that they are all men who lash out in response to trauma. That's what the video is actually about, not incels. But it's useful to call them incels, because otherwise, people might feel bad about demonizing them. The term "incel" is basically just an invective that people can use to justify bullying. You have to say things like "It's okay to abuse this person, because he is an incel!" or you might start to feel uncomfortable inflicting furhter misery on a population that already suffers enormously.
>is it lulzy?
A little. There's the fact that this guy's intellectual character study focuses on four cartoon characters. He says that "probably nobody else is familiar with all four of these characters," and criticizes incels for having generic taste, when I would consider this the exact kind of media diet I'd expect for a breadtuber. I mean, I'm not a breadtuber, I'm just a slightly nerdy guy who grew up in the 2010's, and I know all of these characters except the teddy bear. He also says that he was inspired to make the video because he felt a sense of similarity with Nikolas Cruz, who apparently looks like him. At the end of the video, he expresses fear that he could've turned out like Cruz if things had been different, "if I hadn't been raised by lesbians, or if I wasn't so sex repulsed."
An incel is a Nihilist materialist that frames his arguments around sex and science(even if the science is bullshit). The Nihilism stops him from getting laid and the materialism stops him from looking inward.
The video sounds interesting and oddly enough Dave Greene has talked about this before.
I think the use of cartoons from this guy isn't the best way to examine these people. But then you'd have to look that evil in the face and no one wants to do that.
Here's an absolutely ridiculous conversation with trans ideologue, Reddit atheist, and Matt Dillahunty (I can't believe I used to take that guy seriously) acolyte Jovan Bradley. He's talking to a caller named "KJ" debating the topic of transgenderism. He does a great job in convincing me that transgenderism is, in fact, a secular religion with no concrete definition or distinction for anything.
KJ drilled him on his ideology, asking why he can't identify as a 13-year-old black boy because race and gender are supposedly both just socially constructed, and staying completely calm and level headed. Jovan on the other hand, he kept upping the smugness and liberal condescension as his ideology was slowly made to look extremely foolish and dogmatic.
This continued to the point where KJ asked whether if he would be a woman right there on the call if he declared it to be so. Jovan agreed that KJ wouldn't have to do anything other than declaring himself to be a woman to be a woman.
KJ then asked if Donald Trump declared himself a woman tomorrow if we would have our first woman president. Then, because Jovan is so detached from reality, he said yes, and he would
"Affirm him in the same way he affirms Caitlyn Jenner, she's a "piece of shit" but still a woman. If he comes out and legitimately transitions in his old age like Caitlyn Jenner did, I would affirm that he's a woman." and he would "potentially" be our first woman president.
He also proceeded to cite the Jewish Talmud (imagine my shock) for having 8 gender identities. This despite the fact that he calls anyone else who cites a religious text a cultist who believes in made up garbage and "sky-daddies".
These pseudo-intellectual bullshit arguments amuse me to no end. If you can get past how much of a condescending prick pretending to be smart Jovan is, look it up and give it a listen.
"under investigation" AKA not charged or convicted. "I have emails" but doesn't post them. Claims "i’m pretty sure had to leave the university" and then immediately says "he sexually assaulted his ex gf while she was unconscious in 2016 and was subsequently suspended from UNC for only ONE semester." If anyone wants to fact check this, they would need to put in a NC FOIA for police records relating to Jacob Geller and also try to find out if he ever went to UNC.
"under investigation" AKA not charged or convicted. "I have emails" but doesn't post them. Claims "i’m pretty sure had to leave the university" and then immediately says "he sexually assaulted his ex gf while she was unconscious in 2016 and was subsequently suspended from UNC for only ONE semester." If anyone wants to fact check this, they would need to put in a NC FOIA for police records relating to Jacob Geller and also try to find out if he ever went to UNC.
Interestingly, the woman who decided for some reason to mention this just now doesn't seem to have been aware that this was made public 6 years ago. Nor the two people who claim to corroborate the story, nor the Blusky account investigating it. The story here is that someone accused Jacob of some sort of sexual misconduct, and UNC decided based upon whatever evidence they had that he was guilty of "sexual assault or sexual violence" and should be punished by a 1 semester suspension, but also either did not contact the police at all (which is more likely) or the police considered the case to be inadequate. Other students heard "he's under investigation of sexual assault or sexual violence" and assumed that meant rape. Could be anything ranging from total bullshit to UNC deciding to coverup for mega-rape. Most likely Jacob and his ex-gf were drunk at a party and had a regrettable sexual encounter.
Hi, thread tourist here, just popping in to say that I thought this Jacob Geller faggot was DarkViperAU at first glance.
Personally I believe this to be a far more damning accusation than any rape allegation.
2016 would have been the title ix rules where it is possible that he was accused and suspended without even having the opportunity to hear or confront the accuser or the accusations. If no police report was made, it could be an angry ex retroactively removing consent. However, I'm sure he was #believeallwomen, so fuck him.
The woman releasing this being glib is kinda gross though
Edit: got the wrong date, but 2020 would have been the same ruleset.
Fuck Jacob Geller. Hated this guy's guts for a while now because he's a blowhard about video game discussion and has played a role in making everyone else blowhards like him, like NakeyJakey. The Electric Underground supremacy!!!!!! He's not in the files!!!!!!!
Why do all the internet lefties have to be horny retards? I just want entertaining video essays damnit!
