🔎 If you see an alert for analytics.usips.org, this is a self-hosted system I am running as a test. It is GDPR compliant and collects no invasive information.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Isn't he the faggot behind the "who's afraid of modern Art" video?
And don't tell me, let me guess. He has a video going against AI art(this videos would contradict each other, but I imagine he's too stupid to see why)
2016 would have been the title ix rules where it is possible that he was accused and suspended without even having the opportunity to hear or confront the accuser or the accusations. If no police report was made, it could be an angry ex retroactively removing consent. However, I'm sure he was #believeallwomen, so fuck him.
The woman releasing this being glib is kinda gross though
Edit: got the wrong date, but 2020 would have been the same ruleset.
While all breadtubers need to go into the blender,
Going to largely corroborate your take.
tl;dr: There is no EOC or education requirement, which means it was likely pretty bullshit.
Source: I have knowledge of how university kangroo courts work.
Here is what happened.
Someone made a complaint. It might be the girl, it might be her roommate. There was an investigation done, where the major factors in the decision process were "how likely is the girl or her family to make a stink" and "how valuable to the university is he?"
Under modernish playbooks, if he was suspended for just a semester with no police involvement what this means is:
1) "Evidence", provided any actually existed, was weak as fucking hell.
2) Despite 1, There was SOME basis to the complaint.
3) Even if readily exonerated, if an investigation is started, for liability reasons the university will still find something to scuff him up on.
4) The university wanted this complaint resolved quickly and quietly. This doesn't mean anything special, that is the default standard of the tribunals.
The usual way shit in these manners is handled is pretty much every university rape allegation involves underage alcohol consumption. If the involved parties weren't drunk and/or underage, then there was almost always a party involved where minors were drinking. So usually instead of trying to make a he said/she said case, the university will violate the guy for some alcohol policy.
Most girls in college are retarded so they just hear "He's getting punished" and no further thinking is done. Most case that don't involve the police... lets just say the "rapes" aren't reported for weeks or months after the fact.
The ones who aren't retarded and/or were actually assaulted, or their fathers are involved, the university will do the "oh gee you know, these cases are really tough to prove and look we're getting him on SOMETHING, you should be happy about. If we have to involve the police, the defense is going to pry into just how much of a drunk whore you are, and if he's aquitted he might sue the university and get a payout and his record cleared. So its not ideal but isn't it better than him maybe getting away with it? So please sign this NDA and release."
For the accused, its the inverse "Ok sure you can try to fight this but then we'd want a police investigation and you'll be completely fucked for admissions to any acedited school. Even if you didn't do anything, is it better to just take this lighter punishment and be done instead of spending a decade+ trying to sue the school for being a dystopian tyranny with the very real possibility you'll lose?"
In this case, if its a girl he was dating there is enough basis to warrant an investigation just on the face. This reads like a "I'm revoking consent because I found out he made out with my best friend" to me,
I'm also going to say:
The "manager" saying they fired him is correct but really elevating their level of decision making, like "as the manager of the radio station, I made a principalled stand against rape". lolno.
once there is an actual investigation, the radio station manager would have been handed down the mandate to suspend him from the University administration, this would be the case with any university extra circulars.
At the radio station that would be about the same as getting fired because unless its the monday through wednesday 1am to 4am slot there are going to be multiple takers to replace him.
If he worked any other campus job that involved interacting with other students (aka all of them) he'd likely be suspended (fired) from those as well until the investigation concluded.
Further autism:
The fact this guy has no EOC/Written apology or 'rape is bad' essay/"education" requirement is pretty telling.
A normal case of drunken hookups with morning regret would look something like
"Paulson, Nicholas Sexual Assault or Sexual Violence (1) Definite suspension for one semester; and (2) Education requirement"
Definite suspension (that is, he doesn't need to file for readmittance, his punishment ends after one semester) and has to attend a "rape is bad, mkay" class. Doesn't even have a restaining
A bit more serious case would be
"Pupo-Lazaro, Roberto Sexual Assault or Sexual Violence (1) Indefinite suspension for one full academic year; (2) Education requirement; and (3) Order of No Contact."
Indefinite suspension means he has to petition the university to end his punishment after a full academic year as passed. has to attend the rape s bad class, and isn't allowed to contact his victim (see: indefinite suspension).
or
"Agirtmis, Eyup Sexual Assault or Sexual Violence
(1) Indefinite suspension for at least two full academic years; (2) Education requirement, including at least one meeting with a member of the EOC Office; and (3) Probation, if the Responding Party successfully petitioned to return to the University after the suspension period, for the duration of the Responding Party's tenure as a University student. The terms of the probation would include reporting regularly to a designated administrator within the EOC Office and being barred from holding any office or participating in any activity in which the Responding Party represented the University."
Jesus christ I can't believe they didn't just expel this dude. This reads to me like a serial offender.
Given the afrinigger name I'm guessing this is woke DEI bullshit "Oh we can't just send the nigger to prison".
if you want to look a nigga who definitely did it:
"Hughes, Michael Sexual Assault or Sexual Violence Expulsion from the UNC System"
That nigga got dead to rights doing some real shit, and they were done with him.
or
"Felton, Jalek Sexual Assault or Sexual Violence 1) Expulsion from the UNC System; (2) Order of No Contact; and (3) Ban from the University's campus for four years."
That nigga got seriously fucked up.
I would expect there are actual criminal charges related to those two.
If you want to look at fairly weak case:
Carter, Dustin Deliberate touching of another's sexual parts without consent One semester definite retroactive suspension.
This would have been some bullshit. They likely suspended this guy for the investigation but then learned the complaint was mostly bullshit. Rather than admit wrongdoing, they sentanced him to "time served".
Movies with mark made two new videos. Video
His first one is on saberspark and it's about how he doesn't understand Ralph Bashki. Listen i don't like Sabercuck but i have a good feeling mark was trying to label him as a right wing reactionary for retarded reasons.
I watched this video, sufficive to say I hate both of these faggots. Saberspark because he's goonmaster supreme and jorks his pork to any woman with a curvy figure. And I hate this guy because he's such a pretentious faggot. I'm surprised he didn't mention that faggot cartoon reviewer: animat/mat brunet considering he did a terrible 3 part retrospective on Ralph Bakshi
Also why the fuck should people watch a video essay made by some redditor fuck on how capitalism is evil while owning a shelf full of steel copy blu-ray dvd's and boxsets.
Fuck Jacob Geller. Hated this guy's guts for a while now because he's a blowhard about video game discussion and has played a role in making everyone else blowhards like him, like NakeyJakey. The Electric Underground supremacy!!!!!! He's not in the files!!!!!!!
the kind of fag that defends "gone home" and who tries to make people feel like a bad person for rightfully criticizing dogshit game design because it has an ideological basis behind it
just call these people jews and dont cut them the slack to explain why they aren't
Will the other crabs in the bucket tear him apart more because he's possibly an evil rapist or because he's a Jew and responsible for Gaza? Or does he have enough of the right opinions that his transgressions should be ignored even if he's a Palestinian genociding rapist?
While his accusation is extremely vague and likely carries little real water, fuck this guy. Jacob Geller had the gall to say those who hated Modern Art, mostly all political shit and/or abstract stuff that's likely used for money laundering, a path for Fascism. Yeah because God forbid someone having different opinions or taste. This whiny faggot is practically a poster boy for Leftist Jewish stereotypes.
I don't know this loser from Adam but it doesn't say he raped her. It says he sexually assaulted her while she was unconscious. Given the puny penalty (suspension for a term -- that's really just a symbolic punishment, not a real one) it could be that he just fondled his girlfriend's tit while they were sleeping together in the same bed.
Then, after they break up, she weaponizes his admission that he fondled her sleeping tit, University imposes symbolic punishment to bend the knee to raging harridans and make the whole stupid business go away.
I don't know this loser from Adam but it doesn't say he raped her. It says he sexually assaulted her while she was unconscious. Given the puny penalty (suspension for a term -- that's really just a symbolic punishment, not a real one) it could be that he just fondled his girlfriend's tit while they were sleeping together in the same bed.
Then, after they break up, she weaponizes his admission that he fondled her sleeping tit, University imposes symbolic punishment to bend the knee to raging harridans and make the whole stupid business go away.
I like gaming critiques but I always found his videos to be pretentious shallow slop. So I'm glad to be given a better reason to hate him.
Hopefully his next job is putting fries in a bag.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=elLfziXnuBoSuper interesting video by some guy I've never heard of about four incel characters, and why they deserve to be seen as complex and layered rather than flat villains. I think that this video is much more interesting than your typical breadtube schlock and that the guy making it does give some cogent and insightful arguments at times. That said, there is an undercurrent throughout that he doesn't really know what he's talking about. He's made this big video about incels, but obviously does not know what an incel is. Of the four characters he chose to analyze - Tetsuo from Akira, Simon from Infinity Train, Eridan from Homestuck, and Azulin from The Unicorn Wars - none are incels. Tetsuo and Eridan are canonically not celibate. Tetsuo is open and shut, he has a girlfriend, he has sex with her, and their relationship is quite real. Eridan is probably closest to an incel because he gets rejected a few times, but he does have a few relationships in the comic. Further, given the bizarre mechanics of his species' romance, it's kind of incoherent to use that label. Further still, he's thirteen for almost the entire run of the comic in which he appears. As for Simon and Azulin, from what I can tell, neither one ever expresses feelings about romance or sex. Azulin just flatly has nothing to do with celibacy, and Simon only makes sense as an "incel" if you project a crush on the other main character Grace onto him, which this guy does but which is purely speculative.
I want to say only because I think it's funny. This guy has a separate video about how he is literally Scott Pilgrim for 48 minutes and how pathetic that is. I guess those lesbians didn't do such a great job raising him.
While his accusation is extremely vague and likely carries little real water, fuck this guy. Jacob Geller had the gall to say those who hated Modern Art, mostly all political shit and/or abstract stuff that's likely used for money laundering, a path for Fascism. Yeah because God forbid someone having different opinions or taste. This whiny faggot is practically a poster boy for Leftist Jewish stereotypes.
A bit off topic, but I went to the Vatican Museum a while ago, and they had a "Modern Art" section in there.
The museum was full, like you could barely move in some places, yet literally no one gave a fuck about the modern art, like not one soul. I went with a guide, and they also didn't give a fuck, the tour ended before we even got there. And the "Modern Art" section is literally part of the path you have to take to leave the museum, yet everybody just walked right past it, barely giving it any thought.
I looked at it for a couple of minutes to see if there was any value in them (there wasn't), and the funny thing I noticed is that it seemed like even the Vatican didn't give a fuck, because there were fewer cameras (a lot more blind spots) and like only one guard for the hole section. They know it's all worthless.
A bit off topic, but I went to the Vatican Museum a while ago, and they had a "Modern Art" section in there.
The museum was full, like you could barely move in some places, yet literally no one gave a fuck about the modern art, like not one soul. I went with a guide, and they also didn't give a fuck, the tour ended before we even got there. And the "Modern Art" section is literally part of the path you have to take to leave the museum, yet everybody just walked right past it, barely giving it any thought.
I looked at it for a couple of minutes to see if there was any value in them (there wasn't), and the funny thing I noticed is that it seemed like even the Vatican didn't give a fuck, because there were fewer cameras (a lot more blind spots) and like only one guard for the hole section. They know it's all worthless.
A bit off topic, but I went to the Vatican Museum a while ago, and they had a "Modern Art" section in there.
The museum was full, like you could barely move in some places, yet literally no one gave a fuck about the modern art, like not one soul. I went with a guide, and they also didn't give a fuck, the tour ended before we even got there. And the "Modern Art" section is literally part of the path you have to take to leave the museum, yet everybody just walked right past it, barely giving it any thought.
I looked at it for a couple of minutes to see if there was any value in them (there wasn't), and the funny thing I noticed is that it seemed like even the Vatican didn't give a fuck, because there were fewer cameras (a lot more blind spots) and like only one guard for the hole section. They know it's all worthless.
Same experience with the MoMA in NYC. Although to be fair there were a couple of large scale intricate models that were modern that I liked, but that could just be me liking large dioramas anyway, but no one else cared and everyone was just there to see The Scream.
Although to be fair there were a couple of large scale intricate models that were modern that I liked, but that could just be me liking large dioramas anyway,
#BelieveAllWomen
I hate this smug up his own ass kike faggot. Women lie about being sexually abused so it could all be bullshit. Kikes have no humanity so I wouldnt be surprised if he did rape her. And then colleges don't want more rape convictions originating from their dorm rooms so it makes sense to give a nothing suspension to shut it all down ... so its either or in my eyes, for all we know he could have raped a tranny.