BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🏰 Deploying update to the Tatarus security page. If you encounter issues, post here.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I can come up with an argument for "we was" without trying - grammatically, a collective noun is treated as a singular. So you'd say "the board of directors is furious", not "are furious".

And I don't even need to pretend nigger grunting is human.
 

Something something neuroscience something something social conditioning something something more diversity. For some reason, hard science nerds with cartoon animals for channel mascots are all smarmy leftists. One point that's funny is he advocates for more women in military leadership roles, as if diversity matters for any of the objectives a military needs to fufill. The military is one of the only places where physical strength and endurance is still important (ignoring chairforce types), anyways, which totally contradicts his point that leadership based on physical ability is irrelevant. A good leader leads by example, right?

Also, the line about more female leaders so that women are more represented is retarded. Why would that matter if sex differences are miniscule? Is it because women face different problems? Everyone has different problems. No one is calling for children to be elected to represent the child population, or construction workers elected for construction workers, or every difference or combination of differences in people to be elected proportionally in their governments to represent everyone. That's the only way to solve the problem of unproportionable representation taken to its natural conclusion. Of course, he probably means more women in leadership because abortion.

I can't wait for the world to explode because this shit is mind-bendingly retarded.

EDIT: Any semi-recent political video about topics I've never cared about recommended to me seems to be some flavor of leftist essay and I don't know why. It's always one amongst a sea of non-political content aligned with my interests
 
Last edited:
It’s like the third video I’ve seen about Ground News being bad. I was ready to write it off as another YouTube ad-read bad but maybe I judged too quickly.

I was going to write like two whole paragraphs about female leadership in the military but why bother? It isn’t that deep.
 
ignoring chairforce types
Men have vastly faster reflexes than women, and quite a significant number of American air platforms outside air-to-air combat roles still do not have fly-by-wire, meaning that flying the B-52, the C-130, and other heavy aircraft requires upper body strength and stamina. Even for "Chairforce" pilots, men are still significantly advantaged over women.
 
Men have vastly faster reflexes than women, and quite a significant number of American air platforms outside air-to-air combat roles still do not have fly-by-wire, meaning that flying the B-52, the C-130, and other heavy aircraft requires upper body strength and stamina. Even for "Chairforce" pilots, men are still significantly advantaged over women.
I meant desk jockey and but that's also true, despite all the wishcasting about women potentially being better pilots because they're more compact.
 
I meant desk jockey and but that's also true, despite all the wishcasting about women potentially being better pilots because they're more compact.
BUT IN DA MARVEL MOVIES.....
Screenshot_20260812-184048_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
"Of course the Scandinavian countries have social democracy, the SOVIETS WERE RIGHT NEXT DOOR!" like that means anything.
Yeah Norway joined NATO in 1949 as a founding member, but built a wellfare state because the Soviet Union was literally next door and Stalin cared so much about equality in neighbouring countries. It had nothing to do with them being ethnically homogenous high trust societies. JFC this guy is dumb.
Sweden had a nuclear arms program until the 70s because "the Soviet Union was right there!"

(Sorry for necroreplying, but this was just so dumb and I just can't with the Soviet glazing, I am old enough to have visited the Soviet Union as a child, and my strongest memories are children begging in the streets and my grandmother crying over the state of the city where she was born.)
 
Yeah Norway joined NATO in 1949 as a founding member, but built a wellfare state because the Soviet Union was literally next door and Stalin cared so much about equality in neighbouring countries. It had nothing to do with them being ethnically homogenous high trust societies. JFC this guy is dumb.
Sweden had a nuclear arms program until the 70s because "the Soviet Union was right there!"

(Sorry for necroreplying, but this was just so dumb and I just can't with the Soviet glazing, I am old enough to have visited the Soviet Union as a child, and my strongest memories are children begging in the streets and my grandmother crying over the state of the city where she was born.)

Soviet Glazers are spiritual niggers, just remember that.
 
BUT IN DA MARVEL MOVIES.....
Screenshot_20260812-184048_DuckDuckGo.jpg
You joke, but a significant portion of the population has been filtered by the trope of the "girl who's actually the best but has her achievements taken or is overshadowed by an inferior male pig." Can't wait to die in 2034 when my female CO starts giving us the silent treatment after we request the order to retreat a bit too rudely.
 
I don't hate myself enough to watch all of Jammies's videos, so I have to ask, is he always this much of an annoying faggot?
A while ago I started getting this guy's content in my feed constantly, and given how much people post about him in this thread, I think a lot of other people did too. It seems like most people just post the thumbnails without watching the videos. I find this perfectly understandable, as the videos are pretty intolerable to sit through. However, I have watched a few Jammies videos all the way through, and am therefore more authoritative on the topic than most posters in this thread. If there's interest or I feel motivated, I might post an analysis of his response to Exquofante's excellent video on race realism. For now, there are really two things that I think are important to understand about Jammies:

1) Jammies does not see himself as a Breadtuber. He plainly toes the Breadtube party line, as proven by the number of critical responses he's made to chuddy video essays and his rabid support for fellow lolcow Oliver Thorn, but he doesn't limit himself to just this topic. Since the start of the channel he's replied to nonpolitical video essays. He's responded to an essay on music, an essay on "sigma males," and a LOT of apology videos (which in my opinion don't count as video essays, but they are on his channel for some reason.) Following his Exquofante video, he said that he wants to distance himself from politics. His channel description reads that he likes "making on videos on weird people," which presumably includes but is not limited to chuds.
2) I earnestly believe that Jammies has a developmental disorder. I am not saying this to be mean, or to be funny, or to discredit a person with whom I disagree politically. This might be controversial to say in this thread, but in my opinion, Breadtube videos usually have high production value that demonstrates a degree of intelligence. I would even go so far as to say that most Breadtubers are smart, and only say stupid things because they've been indoctrinated into holding high allegiance to a particular political position. Jammies, on the other hand, shows no such signs of intelligence, and in fact shows many signs of mental deficiency. His signature style is to record his screen while he plays the video on the left half of the browser and takes notes in MS Paint on the right half. This is already pretty autistic, but it's especially stupid when he does it because handwriting his notes in real time reveals the fact that he can hardly spell. He draws a lot of attention to this as well, saying things like "sorry I'm a bad speller." This is accentuated by his terrible handwriting, which isn't really his fault because it's basically impossible not to have bad handwriting when writing in MS Paint with a mouse, but then he didn't have to choose that particular style anyway. He will also occasionally do math in real time, demonstrating that he struggles to do relatively simple problems without a calculator. At one point in the Exquofante video, he gets very excited when Exquofante shows a graph on crime statistics, declaring crime his specialty because he studies forensic science. He fails to realize that forensic science knowledge is immaterial to one's capacity to interpret graphs, and that this was only tangentially related to Exquofante's point, so discrediting the graph does not disprove the argument. More importantly, though, he plainly misunderstands the graph, which is disturbing because he reports interpreting data to be among his strengths. He gets confused easily, struggling to follow arguments, and in many places his counterarguments are "that doesn't make sense," "I don't understand," or "you are stupid." I'm not exaggerating; he will often respond to a claim with no counter beyond calling it and/or the person making it "stupid." Most of the problems with his videos could be avoided if he wrote a script ahead of time, but for some reason he always improvises, despite making comments in his responses which suggest he's seen the original video already. Finally, I'll point out that his leftism is evidence of a lack of critical thinking, but I understand not everyone will agree with me there, so take it with a grain of salt. In all, he has difficulty reading, writing, doing math, and reading graphs, which means he would certainly do very poorly on standardized tests like the SAT or ACT and is probably at least one standard deviation below the average IQ.

Jammies is 100% a lolcow, and he is 100% in agreement with Breadtube, but he is a different category of lolcow than someone like Contrapoints or Philosophy Tube. He's not really deviant or malicious in the way they are, nor is he especially committed to politics. I would consider him a lolcow primarily on the grounds that he produces bad content and is abnormally stupid.
 
His channel description reads that he likes "making on videos on weird people," which presumably includes but is not limited to chuds.
You forgot to mention the second half of his description. It's "making on videos on weird people to help prevent misinformation and educate." The combination of misinformation and educate reads distinctly political, especially among liberal circles which he evidently slants himself towards. What misinformation is there to debunk in shitty apology videos? Either he was just writing words that sounded right together or his intent is similar to the "deradicalization" Breadtube channels and "independent" fact-checking sites of the late 10's-early 20's. Roughly half of his grading videos are nonpolitical, however, yet I don't think he's made enough content to mark out a definitive trend.

This might be controversial to say in this thread, but in my opinion, Breadtube videos usually have high production value that demonstrates a degree of intelligence. I would even go so far as to say that most Breadtubers are smart, and only say stupid things because they've been indoctrinated into holding high allegiance to a particular political position
Yes, that's why the term "midwit" is used frequently by its critics. They're able to both understand complex concepts like Marxism and Critical Theory and simplify them in order explain them to a wider audience but they lack either the intellectual confidence or humility to realize that their high-minded ideas have no practical place in a functional society, essentially. This is evidenced by the constant redefinitions, infighting, and political collapse on their side of the camp.

Finally, I'll point out that his leftism is evidence of a lack of critical thinking, but I understand not everyone will agree with me there, so take it with a grain of salt. In all, he has difficulty reading, writing, doing math, and reading graphs, which means he would certainly do very poorly on standardized tests like the SAT or ACT and is probably at least one standard deviation below the average IQ.
I agree. To add to this, his 100 point grading scale and pedantic criteria that focuses on shit like the bibliography not being up to instead makes me believe that Jammies probably takes many of his ideas about what makes a good essay from his years at high school/college. Oftentimes, a paper isn't graded on how cogent its argument is, but rather how accurate the citations are, how correct the grammar is, how many reasons with supporting evidence there are, and whether the formatting is done correctly. These quirks of written essays for school don't translate well to use in grading Youtube videos made for casual consumption. Just look at his criticism of any of the chud videos vs. the kind of praise given to PhilosophyTube's troon ramblings and you'll see what he values most in any argument.

To play armchair psychologist, Jammies is autistic and potentially ADHD; Retard autism, not savant autism. While he sucked at STEM, he did well in literature and composition subjects, likely by hitting those boxes teachers write in their grading standards. Like a dog doing tricks, these feelings of satisfaction from the high grades from hitting the boxes fueled his love for pedantic argumentation.

As for his leftism, academia is controlled by leftists who understand and use all the argumentative tricks that trickle down to academic grading standards everywhere. This is unlike right-wingers who, for better or for worse, shirk these seemingly arbitrary standards pushed by the leftist academics (who conveniently control what can be published and therefore cited). Left-wingers reward their adherence. He doesn't think critically about things either (see all the "I don't know"'s and "This is stupid"'s), so naturally he's going to also lap up the Marxist-Socialist drivel and critical theory in the mainstream education that presents itself as an objective reflection of reality.

As an addendum, remember that he posted a video admitting to this really gay story:
Spoiler: Archive
poster.avif
5:45
 
Last edited:
Should have probably crossposted this earlier, but I managed to get a hold onto Hbomberguy's 4 and a half hour long Adobe video essay that he's spent the last 2 and a half years on that's currently locked up on Patreon and he still hasn't released onto YouTube yet.

It's exactly what you expect one of Harry's essays to be, except he's not targeting any other YouTubers this time besides some literal who animator channel that he used to watch until he got bought out by Adobe.
 
Back
Top Bottom