Battlefield General - Discuss the series here

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
DtWeNWYWsAcbR0W.jpg
 
Judge Holden said:
So...the game launch party is happening in Sweden and pics are leaking out already
DtaH4AUU4AQuryk.jpg

DtZ37tkWkAExDLn.jpg:large


Notice the "WHITE MEN WHITE MEN WHITE MEN" quote that is spun as more of the ebil mushogynurd bigotry the stunning and brave team faced in their quest to put the first wammen in a game in history....but was actually a reference to the fact that "white man" was a censored term in battlefield V chat
Click to expand...

Just a heads up, Dice didn't display those tweets to mock BF5 detractors, that's actually a live feed of people posting tweets under the hashtag #everyonesbattlefield and since it's been used for a few months, a lot of people who were using the hashtag (along with #notmybattlefield) to complain about BF5 resurfaced, which is what we see here.
 
Ruin said:
Battlefield. While FO76 sucked ass at least they didn't shriek about all their fans being sexist Nazis for months up until release.
Click to expand...

If nothing else, the drama surrounding Fallout 76 has been entertaining. Battlefield V is boring and EA's snide, antagonistic PR didn't get a hundredth of the attention that Fallout 76 has. I didn't even know Battlefield V released because almost nobody anywhere remarked upon it.

You know your shitty game sucks when even the drama flops.
 
horsemeat69 said:
Theres something about the way Battlefield 2 and 2142 felt that I really miss.
Click to expand...
Maybe it's the slow pace gameplay that's what missing after Bad Company 1 made it's debut. I always felt that Battlefield Bad Company 1 had that nice balance between old school Battlefield and new school (BC2, 3 and 4, etc.) the game play was very slow paced, had a lot of classes, kept the emphasis of combined arms by making most of the vehicles very reliable for the players to use outside of getting to point A to point B and the gunplay wasn't being based solely on quick reflexes and better aim.
 
Zaragoza said:
Maybe it's the slow pace gameplay that's what missing after Bad Company 1 made it's debut. I always felt that Battlefield Bad Company 1 had that nice balance between old school Battlefield and new school (BC2, 3 and 4, etc.) the game play was very slow paced, had a lot of classes, kept the emphasis of combined arms by making most of the vehicles very reliable for the players to use outside of getting to point A to point B and the gunplay wasn't being based solely on quick reflexes and better aim.
Click to expand...


Bad Company was so nice because of the destruction and map design working together to make maps that really did change from game to game due to player interaction.
 
Quijibo69 said:
I wonder what game is worse Fallout 76 or Battlefield 5.

:thinking:
Click to expand...

Insulting your customers with such little disguise as it is now exhibitionism, puts them on the same discourse as Blizzard. Problem is we can also expect Bethesda to use more diversion as they did with banning shit talking, next anyone who doesn't approve of Fallout 5 are just entitled haters. It's objectively worse just because EA are involved.
 
Last edited:
Think they'll fire that idiot dev who literally went on Twitter and told gamers not to buy the game?

Boy did they listen.
 
Battlefield was my favourite fps series and I looked forward to and bought every new instalment and dlc for it since Bad Company 2.
Battlefield 1 was when things started to piss me off, while I should have seen the warnings of what was to come but still I enjoyed BF1 anyway as it was a unique shooter. But BF5 was the straw that broke the camels back and I refused to buy it or any other Battlefield again until they ditch this SJW shit and respect their fans again.
 
Secret Asshole said:
Well, what do you expect?

"DON'T LIKE IT, DON'T BUY IT FAGGOT. ITS THE CURRENT YEAR AND US WRITING OUT AN ENTIRE TEAM OF NORWEGIAN COMMANDOS FOR TWO POWERFUL WOMEN IS PROGRESSIVE. FUCK YOU MISOGYNISTS"

*Nobody buys shit game*

"Oh God, please buy it. Please. EA's contract has them stripping out my left kidney if we don't make $500 million by end of year. PLEASE GOD, BUY IT"

Fucking pathetic desperation. Nobody likes desperation. Not women. Not people who interview for jobs, nobody. Eat shit and rot EA. The last and final game I've ever bought from you was Mass Effect 3 and its going to fucking stay that way. Because at the end of the day, all you're going to put out is pozzed Battlefield Games and Sports.
Click to expand...

Maybe people just bored of mindlessly ganking and buying DLC.

I know a few people that buy these games and they only play them for like 5 hours despite throwing down a 100 dollars. I don't know who plays these.
 
Apoth42 said:
Maybe people just bored of mindlessly ganking and buying DLC.

I know a few people that buy these games and they only play them for like 5 hours despite throwing down a 100 dollars. I don't know who plays these.
Click to expand...
That's the thing, from looking at IMFDB the game pretty much has fuck all weapons in it which mean that most of the popular weapons of world war 2 such as the M1 Garand and PPSH 41 are effectively behind a paywall (dlc) which is fucking bull shit.
 
ulsterscotsman said:
God I miss Call of Duty World at War, that was how you did a WW2 game not this shit!
Click to expand...
World at War was alright not as great as United Offensive. The only thing World at War had it going for was the inclusion of the Pacific Campaign and the whole grittiness of the Eastern Front but even then the guys at Treyarch really only added that only for bells and whistles.

ulsterscotsman said:
That's the thing, from looking at IMFDB the game pretty much has fuck all weapons in it which mean that most of the popular weapons of world war 2 such as the M1 Garand and PPSH 41 are effectively behind a paywall (dlc) which is fucking bull shit.
Click to expand...
... You do know that DICE isn't adding Season Passes for Battlefield 5 right?
 
Zaragoza said:
World at War was alright not as great as United Offensive. The only thing World at War had it going for was the inclusion of the Pacific Campaign and the whole grittiness of the Eastern Front but even then the guys at Treyarch really only added that only for bells and whistles.


... You do know that DICE isn't adding Season Passes for Battlefield 5 right?
Click to expand...
I adored the WAW single player campaign and atmosphere and blowing peoples legs off with bouncing betty's in multiplayer.
 
Last edited:
Zaragoza said:
World at War was alright not as great as United Offensive. The only thing World at War had it going for was the inclusion of the Pacific Campaign and the whole grittiness of the Eastern Front but even then the guys at Treyarch really only added that only for bells and whistles.
Click to expand...

What's funny is that those old CoD games did an insanely good job at being diverse while actually being good historically accurate games.

In Finest Hour you played as an African-American and had a female Soviet sniper as a teammate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom