Aug 29 2021 - Barb returned to 14BC

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly, state-funded nursing home or other program until she dies. Which won't be long due to the dementia.

I do actually feel bad for her.
We don’t know what her mental state is.

“It’s on camera!” She could be faking.

“Chris says-“ Chris cannot be trusted.

I have pity for her because her situation sucks and no one deserves to be raped. But she brought some of this upon herself.

Edit: She groomed Chris to be way too affectionate with her to the point where other people noticed and it made them uncomfortable. She was also nasty and abusive throughout his life. Her own family wants nothing to do with her. That’s what I meant. Again, she didn’t deserve to be raped.
 
Last edited:
This is a really bad sign for Chris - with two adults, normally both would be charged with incest. Unless the state believes that it was not consensual. woo boy.
Or maybe Barb decided to throw him under a bus. Just like she did to his father.

I still find her greeting some stranger who was taking pictures at her lawn as a sign of her not being all there.
 
Or maybe Barb decided to throw him under a bus. Just like she did to his father.

I still find her greeting some stranger who was taking pictures at her lawn as a sign of her not being all there.
She’s used to weenery and lookyloos by now. What is she gonna do, wave a shotgun and yell?
 
People don't usually die from traumatic events (not including suicide). It can cause all kinds of problems but death isn't one of them 99.9% of the time, so I don't get why this thread was made. If she dies soon, it'll be her succumbing to her old age, not her being PTSD'd to death.
 
I'm seriously hoping Barb goes to a government/state-sponsored facility. It's got to be loads better than 14 BC. I know she has dementia, with small moments of lucidity, but I'm pretty sure she would be happier away from it in case she does remember what Chris did. She is/was a manipulative person, but I don't think she deserves this.

Plus, she can get some form of actual care. I hear the state takes nursing home abuses more seriously and will fuck a facility's shit up.
 
We don’t know what her mental state is.

“It’s on camera!” She could be faking.

“Chris says-“ Chris cannot be trusted.

I have pity for her because her situation sucks and no one deserves to be raped. But she brought some of this upon herself.
You're a scumbag bro.

Edit; really, Kiwis? Grow a spine.
 
Last edited:
I'd be feeling swell, if I were laminated by Chris-chan.

Maybe Metokur is right: Barb, powered by residual Chris cum, will pull a Biden and testify that their sensual dollops of kisses were consensual.
 
Powerlevel, but I do have direct knowledge about that. You are not allowed to record during a court session unless you have permission of the court. Permission is only given to accredited media where I work; it is unlikely that other jurisdictions allow observers in the gallery to record. If any of the courtroom staff see you recording (and we will) the judge will have the attending deputy remove you. At minimum. So Don't Do That.

For a more accurate view of the legal aspects of this situation see https://kiwifarms.net/threads/chris-the-legal-issues. Sorry for the powerlevel.
Correct. You need permission from the court, and in most cases accredited media are still limited by what sort of recording or live reporting they can do (and it varies district to district, state to state). You often cannot bring your phone into the gallery, or at least you can’t use it to do stuff like live tweeting or blogging or forum posting, without express permission of the court.

There are limited seats for observers, and although I hope lots of weens don’t show up to a procedural hearing, keep that in mind if this does go to trial.

I imagine there will he at least one local reporter present, assuming there isn’t a continuance, because it was the local paper that had the details from the arraignment. Insider might send their reporter to cover this if it goes to trial, but I can’t see them wanting to put someone in NYC on the Acela to DC, only to have to drive another two and a half hours, for a procedural hearing.
 
He described how he took pleasure mimicking bondage videos from HeavyR on her. Why the fuck do you ask. Barb is a walking dead.
Whenever we get new information about this the impression I get is that it was way, way, more violent then even a lot of chris's detractors are pretending. This wasn't consensual, chris did some fucked up shit against Barb's will here. I'm sure chris thinks it was "consensual" but I seriously think Barb was just way too confused and terrified to really "argue".

Whatever Barb did in her life, she sure as shit didn't deserve this.
 
Yea, I'm not saying he's some sort of high profile celebrity, tards. But consider it this way. Beforehand, very little was done against Chris and Barb (except small charges for small crimes, minus the backing over of the GP owner with a car) and it hit a niche audience.


But now there's a lot more eyes on the case because of two things. 1) the confusing and sick nature of the crime, and 2) Chris' self-proclaimed trans-ness

The reason I bring these up is that this especially struck a cord with Twitter, (iirc) the most used social media network out there, and also the most self-righteous. It hit most people who were too young or old to know CWC because it's a sick crime, and otherwise it hit the SJW community because Chris says he's trans and a lot of people still refer to him by he (which meant they could show off their moral superiority). It creates a lot of in-fighting, and riles people up for much longer than this case would normally be in the spotlight. Now, of course the government wouldn't normally care about this shit, but remember there's also extremely tense political tensions in the US. If Virginia law enforcement let this one go, especially as a red state, they'd probably be seeing a lot of instability because a lot of young people (aka SJW Twitter users aka people willing to send death threats and perform terrorist actions in the name of "progress") are at the head of this shit. They're more than happy to take the lack of action on this case as general catch-all government incompetence and start another wave of BLMesque riots about cops and the justice system, but this time in the vein of trans-ness. The American government is held together by shoe strings and bubblegum, one sign of incompetence and that house of cards is gonna slowly come crashing down, state by state.


Of course, remember this is an autismofag talking here, it could be very more occams-razor than I make it out to be. But this is just my two-cents as to why it's going the way it is.

You're right and you're wrong. From personal experiences (I live outside of USA), the people I know who know about the Chris-Chan thing are people who spend a good amount of time on the internet and are under 45. They saw it in passing and thought it bizarre. The Boomers I know had no idea and because I don't live in the U.S. maybe that's why but it's not something even the under 45's have interest in other than passing news. I'm sure in some circles, people are interested in following along (Metokur said as much) and it probably is more high profile than certain other crime stories (Like the Batman shooter or even the Watts trial which people know about but aren't actively following).

However, Chris-Chan raping his mom isn't going to be something that is going to get rioters in the streets if Chris gets a slap on the wrist. Not to get too political, but most of the political riots of the last 10 or so years are plastic as fuck with powerful groups and system money putting boots on the streets and controlling who got arrested, for how long and who got off. What political angle is here? The TERFs? Christian groups? What sort of political angle can be used for the benefit of Chris raping his mom? No interest group with actual power cares.

And who would provide cover for the rioters? It was a common meme last year that the rioters were using your average liberal who participated as a sort of crowd to blend into after they threw bricks through storefront windows. Who is going to mobilize on the streets? Internet people? To see justice in 2021? Is some chubby White girl in Michigan going to get pretty princess points for protesting against a Tranny raping his mom? There's no PPP in that.

Look the other guy was being optimistic when he was saying stuff like "I'd be mad as a tax payer if they state cracked down on Barb", the law applies whether we like it or not and whether it is fiscally worth it or not. However the state is going to just follow routine procedure on a moral law like this, no greater but no less.
 
People who are not retarded do not believe Barb getting charge is some kind of done deal if it was consensual and she is found competent.. There is nothing in it for the state to charge Barb. Why would they? To get her off the streets she stalks for victims? To punish her so she doesn't do it again? To provide a measure of closure to her victim? To silence public outrage? As a feather in the cap of the prosecutor's office? To grandstand in the media?
well, to not get sued for missing their officials responsibilities for one, though that never happens. but really mainly because they're supposed to not judge such stuff by "why bother" or "who does it help" kind of logic - they might just as well let chris go with that logic - there isn't supposed to be "anything in it" for the state to charge barb, that's why justice is supposed to be blind the local motivations aren't supposed to matter. the punish her part isn't supposed to be for so she doesn't do it again but for others not to do it even passively participating - the plea deal increase in few last decades has thrown all of that out of the window anyhow though, maybe they gave barb some fine for farting during sex and that's that for her part of the whole issue - equivalent to chris's spraying on purpose on a person being changed to release of gas(which is really the whole problem with the plea deal system in operation that it straight up changes what was done to something there isn't even evidence for from something more serious there's evidence for, messing with statistics and the messing with the feedback of the law system).

they could just use "we believe she was R'd but we cant' prove it" though I suppose - but it could be also used as defense that it never happened.

I do understand that chris has used successfully the non-blind justice before though - or maybe barb used it for chris in chris's previous court cases. basically the prosecution there might do what fucking ever they want based on what kind of a day they are having.

and realistically what would they put as punishment for barb anyway? some fine? and if barb doesn't want the R charges it's really hard to ask barb to be a witness then, while trying to keep up the appearance of being choosy about who they're prosecuting.
 
Whenever we get new information about this the impression I get is that it was way, way, more violent then even a lot of chris's detractors are pretending. This wasn't consensual, chris did some fucked up shit against Barb's will here. I'm sure chris thinks it was "consensual" but I seriously think Barb was just way too confused and terrified to really "argue".

Whatever Barb did in her life, she sure as shit didn't deserve this.
I don't have perfect memory of everything Chris said in conversation with ILJ, but didn't bondage stuff came from screenshots of his conversation and then was proven to be fake?
 
Powerlevel, but I do have direct knowledge about that. You are not allowed to record during a court session unless you have permission of the court. Permission is only given to accredited media where I work; it is unlikely that other jurisdictions allow observers in the gallery to record. If any of the courtroom staff see you recording (and we will) the judge will have the attending deputy remove you. At minimum. So Don't Do That.
It's not a powerlevel to report what is a basic fact. You will not just be removed from a court for doing this without permission, you can immediately be held in contempt of court and literally jailed with no process whatsoever for up to six months. While that worst case scenario is not terribly likely, contempt of court, in the actual presence of the judge, is not something to fuck around with.

There are judges who will just instantly hit you with a $100 fine if your phone even rings during their hearings, because you're not supposed to have them. Do not do that. Or if you feel you must, make sure you don't get caught.
I don't have perfect memory of everything Chris said in conversation with ILJ, but didn't bondage stuff came from screenshots of his conversation and then was proven to be fake?
Yes, the BDSM chats were fake.
 
I could actually imagine Chris thinking about that scenario, about one of the most accessible ways of making his dream of having his very special kin a very very slim chance of being a possibility is by fucking his weak dementia ridden mother...

If Barb did give birth and the child was captured by the templars, would all the inbreeding break the abstergo machine?
 
Whenever we get new information about this the impression I get is that it was way, way, more violent then even a lot of chris's detractors are pretending. This wasn't consensual, chris did some fucked up shit against Barb's will here. I'm sure chris thinks it was "consensual" but I seriously think Barb was just way too confused and terrified to really "argue".

Whatever Barb did in her life, she sure as shit didn't deserve this.
The BDSM texts were fake as shit, so don’t worry about it.
 
Chris said he'd been using condoms so he wasn't trying to sire Crystal then. He can't even use that as a defence, not that it'd be a good defence, "my daughter Crystal was foretold by GodJesus so I had to nut in a lady to save this universe and Barb was the only one around". Also shows premeditation along with that book he bought.
 
Chris said he'd been using condoms so he wasn't trying to sire Crystal then. He can't even use that as a defence, not that it'd be a good defence, "my daughter Crystal was foretold by GodJesus so I had to nut in a lady to save this universe and Barb was the only one around". Also shows premeditation along with that book he bought.
But Crystal bullshit would be just a motive in his case - "raped his elderly mother to create offspring". No one will care how retarded or deluded it was.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom