I don't get angry critics/reviewers. For one, they're reviewing things that either aren't meant for them or they should have outgrown years ago (though, there are some kids' cartoons out there that can be enjoyed by adults due to the more adult jokes being more readily understood, like
Animaniacs and
Rocko's Modern Life). For all their talk about studios ruining childhoods, they seem to do it quicker by nitpicking stuff that would go over kids' heads anyway and most parents would dismiss as harmless entertainment. For another, it's never intellectual or even interesting, just squawking about why this TV show/movie/book/comic is bad and shouldn't be watched (and that's another thing: are these angry critics/reviewers so narcissistic that they think everyone has their mindset?). No look at as to "Why?" or even a brief history behind the scenes of its creation, buried by stupid jokes and catchphrases or, in the case of MysteriousMrEnter, a dour attitude and a lot of severe mental/emotional issues. It's all so tedious.
I prefer to read a review like
this than watch something like
this. Then again, that's probably all just me and I'm considered "too old" to "enjoy" something like this. To that I'd say, "Good."
Oh, and here's another angry reviewer/critic you should be picking apart: Troy Steele from
http://www.bloggerbeware.com/. He's the MysteriousMrEnter of Goosebumps books (Goosebumps being those 1990s kids' horror books written by R.L. Stine) and his trigger book (the book that makes him go into a frothing rage) is
Chicken, Chicken, number #52 of the original Goosebumps series about two farm kids who turn into chickens after being cursed by a witch.
Nerds are very poor at the whole "vote with your wallet" concept.
That's why it's so easy to make money off them.